omg i finally understand born haber cycle!! thankyou so much!!
@ChemistryGuru6 жыл бұрын
Hi Janelle! Glad you found the video useful! :)
@asiathompson25594 жыл бұрын
Couldn’t wrap this around my head until just now, thankyou so much!
@avaverreault1793 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! I finally understand the Born Haber cycle after searching endlessly on youtube haha
@hilaryjayakody24044 жыл бұрын
These videos help a lot specially in this period of quarantine ...thank you so much ...big thumbs up all the way from Sri lanka..
@ChemistryGuru4 жыл бұрын
Hi Hilary thank you so much! Stay safe and healthy during this quarantine! :)
@douglasfurtek76374 жыл бұрын
You deserve a lot more viewers and subscribers. Your explanations are so clear and concise. Thanks
@ChemistryGuru4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your kind compliments! Really appreciate it :)
@douglasfurtek76374 жыл бұрын
@@ChemistryGuru You are welcome. You deserve high praise.
@hannahocan3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much!! This video made so much more sense than the teacher and the textbook did!
@innocentabae11184 жыл бұрын
It's a very clear explanation and illustration as well. Good work.
@alphamenson37846 жыл бұрын
keep doin this good work man, shout out to yo bro...all the way up from East Africa in Tanzanian
@ChemistryGuru6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Kendrick for the encouragement! Yup will keep working on this! 😁
@ssemakulagrace49002 жыл бұрын
You're good sir, precise yet elaborate Thank you so much 🤝
@Jjirfa Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this. You're a great teacher.
@zongbinhong4552 жыл бұрын
splendid, concise great demonstration. Thank you!
@PossibilityGanyiwa4 ай бұрын
U are the guru 🙏
@frankkazem53593 жыл бұрын
This awesome muri chiba chibe chibabest when it comes to chemistry
@violetkapasa-qp6kz6 ай бұрын
Thank this was very helpful ❤😊😊😊
@Lanadelreyloverr7 ай бұрын
You life saviour thank you so much
@rakibspathshala21642 жыл бұрын
Thank you At last clear the topics
@asadavsten1481 Жыл бұрын
hello sir. i want to ask. what about Ca3N2? it is the draw was same? so Ca3 was solid and there is 3 Ca. are we going to separate the Ca? so Ca3 going to 3Ca (atomic)? if like that, i think we need to build one more line. what i mean is like you did Cl2, you make it to 2Cl (two atoms). and my case here is Ca3, i want to make them three atoms Ca. what you say sir? thank you very much before for you're attention
@haseebfareed99212 жыл бұрын
Hats off for this Sir
@sravanichappalle70894 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video! Helped me a lot ^^
@marissarivera45022 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, this was so helpful!
@roriefriz90682 жыл бұрын
Could we also say that the Ca(s) is being dissociated into Ca (g), like so its not atomisation energy being used but dissociation energy?
@ChemistryGuru2 жыл бұрын
dissociation energy is involving breaking of 1 mole of covalent bonds, so for metals there is no dissociation energy since the attractions holding calcium atoms together are metallic bonds and not covalent bonds. atomisation is to convert elements to 1 mole of gaseous atoms, so the bonds broken depends on the attraction in the elements, eg for metals will be metallic bonds, simple and giant molecules will be covalent bonds.
@roriefriz90682 жыл бұрын
@@ChemistryGuru Thank you so much!
@roriefriz90682 жыл бұрын
@@ChemistryGuru Hello, I have one other question. Could we consider sublimation energy and atomisation energy to be the same thing?
@ChemistryGuru2 жыл бұрын
@@roriefriz9068 sublimation is a physical process from solid to gas so it's different from atomisation. In general if the names of the processes are different then they must mean different things, if not there is no need to have 2 processes with different names but are the exact same process.
@RomarioBryan-y1i Жыл бұрын
i thought that the 2nd electron affinity would be above the first AE at the extreme top du do it being endothermic.
@madchaddd2 жыл бұрын
Thank you Cher!!🥲
@hadiap65072 жыл бұрын
Why do we put 2 in front of the Chlorine?
@tadiwanashemandaza80213 жыл бұрын
Thank u so much sir...was so lost b4
@duckman82612 жыл бұрын
true lifesaver!
@hehez83383 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for this.
@roriefriz90682 жыл бұрын
Whats the difference between dissociation energy and atomisation energy?
@ChemistryGuru2 жыл бұрын
bond dissociation energy is energy required to break 1 mole of covalent bond. atomisation energy is energy required to convert elements to 1 mole of gaseous atoms. They are different processes.
@roriefriz90682 жыл бұрын
@@ChemistryGuru Could we say that Cl2(g) is using dissociation energy to be broken up into isolated atoms, instead of atomisation energy? In the above you said it was (ΔH at of Cl*2), wondering if we could say its the same as (ΔHs)? Thanks again:)) I really love your channel, its helping me so much!!!
@ChemistryGuru2 жыл бұрын
@@roriefriz9068 yes in the case of Cl2(g) = 2Cl(g), we can describe this as either 2 x atomisation of Cl(g) or Bond dissociation energy of Cl-Cl. Both describe the same process.
@derelict30153 жыл бұрын
Can we use an energy cycle diagram to represent the born haber cycle?
@ChemistryGuru3 жыл бұрын
by right both energy cycle and energy level diagram can represent Born Haber cycle (or any question involving Hess' Law), but for A Level syllabus almost all schools are using energy level diagram in their marking scheme. So it is recommended to stick with energy level diagram for Born Haber Cycle.
@daiyankhan80823 жыл бұрын
That was amazing
@beanbean90192 жыл бұрын
very helpful! :D
@sheshanihemanthika10354 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, Sir!
@rachellau83456 жыл бұрын
Hello! May I ask if the sequence to draw any born-haber cycle is fixed?
@ChemistryGuru6 жыл бұрын
Hi Rachel actually the sequence need not be fixed. But since Born Haber cycle is a fixed cycle with basically the same processes so it's easier to draw it in a standardised way. Much easier to remember in this way
@suhshbekma5 жыл бұрын
great ,nice video
@ChemistryGuru5 жыл бұрын
thanks for the compliment!
@manashpratimxi-a23942 жыл бұрын
Why didn't you use the enthalpy of sublimation to change the state of calcium from solid to gaseous?
@ChemistryGuru2 жыл бұрын
the process of Ca(s) to Ca(g) is considered at atomisation instead of sublimation
@rajpurameerut86765 жыл бұрын
Thanks It helps a lot.
@ChemistryGuru5 жыл бұрын
Hi Rajpura thanks! Glad the video was useful 😄
@archismansaha90895 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir
@drayeni94362 жыл бұрын
Why is it always exothermic? (Ionic reaction)
@vijayjoshi54922 жыл бұрын
Because the bond made are greater than the bonds broken within the chemical reaction, therefore, due to energy being released when bonds are formed, it is a negative ( exothermic) enthalpy change. It is a much stronger bond in ionic NaCl than it is in gaseous Na^+ + Cl^-. Hope this helps!!
@rajpurameerut86765 жыл бұрын
thank you
@EdwinKiptoo-uq8et Жыл бұрын
Wow. But I need a tution
@raphaelkinyabwiru250011 ай бұрын
Thanka
@faithelias27982 жыл бұрын
God loves you all
@adityameena8654 жыл бұрын
What is endodermic and exodermic😂😂
@ChemistryGuru4 жыл бұрын
endothermic process absorbs heat from the surrounding so the temperature of surrounding will decrease. exothermic process releases heat to the surrounding so temperature of the surrounding will increase.