Nice video. But I thought the MOD16 data includes the actual ET. Why are you then using the potential ET instead of using the actual ET from MOD16?
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Hi Moses, The MOD16 ET algorithm is based on the Penman-Monteith equation (Monteith, 1965) & the algorithm includes the leaf area index (LAI) and the Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FPAR). What this means is that MOD16 cannot calculate any ET over water bodies or barren land/rocks/desert areas. You need to have some vegetation for it to work. That is why I made a rectangle around the reservoir that includes surrounding land areas which have some vegetation. If you want to know more about it, please check out my Evapotranspiration video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/aaPCZ5yiZaqJn9k and have a look at the user guide: lpdaac.usgs.gov/documents/494/MOD16_User_Guide_V6.pdf All the best, Andreas
@moseschisola96902 жыл бұрын
@@GeosearchInternational Thank you very much for the clarification. I now understand.
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Hi Moses, you are welcome! All the best, Andreas
@cusco4x2952 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video. Thanks a lot.
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
You are welcome Cusco! All the best, Andreas
@ms.saseekawijesekara-unive41552 жыл бұрын
Very useful video.
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful! All the best, Andreas
@AliAli-xb3oi Жыл бұрын
thanks for your efforts
@GeosearchInternational Жыл бұрын
Most welcome Ali! All the best, Andreas
@triumphorowale2877 Жыл бұрын
Please can you help me out on how to calculate evaporation index using water level and evaporation on a dam and its uses. Also, what is the difference between index of evaporation and evaporation? I am working on dam operations and the impact of rainfall extremes.
@GeosearchInternational Жыл бұрын
Hi Triumph, sorry I have not heard of an evaporation index. There is a Precipitation Evaporation Index (PEl) which is calculated from a class A pan evaporation and precipitation data. I don't think it is calculated from dams. Let me know if you find out any further details on this subject. All the best, Andreas PEI: A measure in vertical inches of the average annual abundance of rainfall for a given location. The mean annual class A pan evaporation in inches is subtracted from the normal annual total precipitation in inches to give the precipitation evaporation index. Source: petrowiki.spe.org/Glossary:Precipitation_evaporation_index_(PEl)
@rathnakumarv39562 жыл бұрын
in case of off-stream closed loop pumped storage schemes, how the water in the lower reservoir will be filled/replenished if the evaporation is more than precipitation at a given location?
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Hi Rathna, most reservoirs in arid regions will have high net evaporation losses - i.e., evaporation from the water surface exceeds the precipitation falling on that surface. If there was no inflow into the reservoirs they would just dry up like a swimming pool which is not topped up at regular intervals. The reason why the reservoirs exist in the first place is that they usually have large catchment areas (aka watersheds). During precipitation events a large proportion of the incoming water from rainfall events becomes surface runoff which finds its way to the reservoir. If the precipitation falls as snow, it will build up in the mountains until it melts in the spring. In both cases, although evapotranspiration may exceed precipitation rates in a catchment, the surface runoff is sufficiently fast so that the a large proportion of the water can reach the reservoir before it is lost to evapotranspiration. If we slow down this process - for example by constructing hundreds of small dams upstream of the reservoir - we may end up with the situation where the reservoir no longer gets filled by surface runoff. All the best, Andreas
@rathnakumarv39562 жыл бұрын
@@GeosearchInternational i understand this fundamentals sir. I mean to what is the solution possible??
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Hi Rathna, there are large evaporation losses from all reservoirs. You need to balance the need for these reservoirs and the benefits they provide with the loss of water. When these kind of schemes are designed, evaporation losses must be part of the cost-benefit analysis. If the evaporation losses are too high, there are ways to reduce it - for example floating solar panels - but also this should be part of the design stage of the project. Other options like shade balls are usually not economical over the large reservoir areas. Basically, what is needed is better planning at the design stage, rather than trying to find retroactive solutions. All the best, Andreas
@rathnakumarv39562 жыл бұрын
@@GeosearchInternational thanks
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Welcome! All the best, Andreas
@getachewbayable8 ай бұрын
Nice video. But Is it possible to use MODIS PET for reservoirs and lakes, because MODIS PET is designed for terrestrial surfaces?
@GeosearchInternational8 ай бұрын
Hi @getachewbayable. That is a good question, and I spent quite some time looking into it before I developed the methodology of the video. PET is usually measured using open pan evaporation - so evaporation from a water surface, not a land surface. It is really difficult to calculate evaporation from a lake or reservoir as the thickness and temperature of the water column play an important part in controlling ET. Also the air above the water becomes humid, which reduced PET. That is the reason for using 80% of PET. However, there is only one PET which is the maximum possible evapotranspiration rate from any vegetated or open water surface. There are many ways to estimate PET. MODIS uses a modified Penman-Monteith equation (Monteith, 1965) which requires vegetated surfaces. You cannot get any PET/ET values from bare ground. In the video I showed that MODIS gave quite a good correlation with the work done by the USGS at the Kajaki reservoir who used meteorological station data. Hope that answers your question. All the best, Andreas
@getachewbayable8 ай бұрын
Dear Andreas, Thank you so much for your response. I appreciate the approach you've suggested. Could you please provide references that have utilized MODIS data, such as MODIS PET, for estimating evaporation on water surfaces? I have tried searching for them, but I couldn't find any relevant literature. I would be grateful for any recommendations you can offer
@GeosearchInternational8 ай бұрын
Hi @getachewbayable, you have my permission to use this KZbin video as a reference. Also have a look at the description below the video where there is a link to the USGS paper which I use as a comparison to show that it is a reasonable approach to use in areas of the world where meteorological station data is lacking. All the best, Andreas
@getachewbayable8 ай бұрын
Dear Andreas, Thank you for your prompt response and for granting permission to reference your KZbin video. Your approach and explanation style have been enlightening, and I'm eager to delve deeper into this topic. In our pursuit of scientific rigor and credibility, it's imperative to support our methodology with published literature. Your mention of utilizing MOD16 for estimating open-water evaporation has sparked my interest, and I believe referencing a published paper or article would greatly enhance the robustness of our work. Considering your expertise in this field, I kindly request your assistance in locating a published paper or article that demonstrates the application of MOD16 for estimating open water evaporation. Leveraging your knowledge and experience would be invaluable in ensuring that our research is well-supported and respected within the scientific community. Your guidance in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Thank you once again for your generosity in sharing your insights and expertise.
@GeosearchInternational8 ай бұрын
Hi Getachew, the purpose of science is to question everything and find new and innovative approaches to solve problems such as evaporation losses from water bodies. It means that sometimes you end up developing a methodology that nobody else has thought of yet... or maybe they have, but google does not think it is important so we cannot find that special paper. My methodology is inspired by the 2007 USGS report on the Kajaki reservoir, and the only difference is that I used MODIS instead of conventional weather station data. I have a high regard for the USGS, and as my approach gave data comparable to theirs, I think that it is a viable way to estimate evaporation losses. If you do find any other researchers who are using MODIS or other satellite evaporation data for estimating evaporation from water bodies, I would appreciate if you share it with me. Since I made this video I have not come across any myself. I wish you good luck with your research & all the best, Andreas
@moseschisola96902 жыл бұрын
How does the ET data from MOD 16 from appEARS differ with the ET data (MODIS - SSEBop) from the climate engine app?
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Good question Moses. I think that MOD16 and the operational simplified surface energy balance (SSEBop) use two different algorithms, so they should give the same trends but obviously not the same outputs. Which one is better will depend on the climatic zone & landuse, but to decide that you will need some real field evaporation data. All the best, Andreas
@youssefelkhattabi74882 жыл бұрын
Hi Andreas, can you make a video about how your career started in the water sector? I'm very curious.
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Hi Youssef, I started looking for groundwater in the Middle East about 30 years ago, and then got into GIS and river basin management about 20 years ago. Nowadays I'm doing a lot of capacity building, & am interested in how to monitor water resources using free data and tools. The key for me has always been to go for new opportunities that present themselves, and to never stop learning new skills. Maybe I'll make a video someday, but am too busy at the moment. All the best, Andreas
@nelsondisalvatore9812 Жыл бұрын
Can I ask a science project question? If I have a huge container let's say circular kids pool, full of sea water and I want to destilate it using the sun, how much freshwater can you expect?
@GeosearchInternational Жыл бұрын
Hi Nelson, Sea water contains about 35g/L of salts (3.5%), which would be left behind if you managed to fully evaporate all the sea water. The volume of fresh water produced should be the same as the initial volume, as the salts dissolved in the sea water don't take up any extra space. In fact adding salts to water can reduce its volume slightly due to a process called electrostriction. So you should end up with a very slightly larger volume of distilled water than the initial volume of sea water. All the best, Andreas See: www.ocean.washington.edu/courses/oc400/Lecture_Notes/CHPT3.pdf
@nelsondisalvatore9812 Жыл бұрын
@GeosearchInternational I can't thank you enough for your valuable videos, I have recently become interested in freshwater conservation and desalination because of all the news about draughts in my country. Your videos have been very informative, I hope you don't mind I come back with some more questions.
@GeosearchInternational Жыл бұрын
Hi Nelson, I am happy to try to answer any question related to the videos. All the best, Andreas
@Malnaddairy2 жыл бұрын
Hi sir I'm interested in calculating evaporation of particular river basin. Can you suggest a software for evaporation calculation. (Software & method)
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Hi Manudeep, please see my video on how to get the actual evaporation from a catchment: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mYakpYyvfK5so6s All the best, Andreas
@madhurjyaparasar32492 жыл бұрын
Sir can we calculate the percolation loss of water from the reservoir
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Hi Madhurjya, for percolation loss estimates you will need to make a full water balance: Inflows-Outflows-Evaporation. You can estimate the evaporation losses using the approach I propose in the video, but you will need accurate measured inflow & outflow data. Could also be supplemented by piezometer data. Good luck & all the best, Andreas
@madhurjyaparasar32492 жыл бұрын
@@GeosearchInternational ok i understand. Thank you so much sir your videos are really helpful.
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
You are welcome Madhurjya! All the best, Andreas
@leonidasalejandroariasbalt46392 жыл бұрын
Parabens, video otimo
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Muito obrigado Leonidas! All the best, Andreas
@abdulahmadzazay3552 Жыл бұрын
How to download the excel file? Thanks
@GeosearchInternational Жыл бұрын
Hi Eng. Zazay, You will find the links to all files in the description below the video. To download in Google Drive, you need to click on the down arrow - on the top right of the screen. All the best, Andreas ******************************************************************* Link to EXCEL data & calculations: bit.ly/3Nbn8rt Link to PPT presentation: bit.ly/3wggQ2O Link to CHIRPS precipitation video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ioG2f2pngNqCi68 Link to: MODIS Evapotranspiration video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/mYakpYyvfK5so6s Link to Reservoir Storage Monitoring video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYOso2iamdKKhbs *******************************************************************
@abdulahmadzazay3552 Жыл бұрын
@@GeosearchInternational Thanks a lot
@GeosearchInternational Жыл бұрын
Most welcome! All the best, Andreas
@rathnakumarv39562 жыл бұрын
why evaporation & transpiration, that too potential is also being calculated when reservoir is capable of only evaporation alone?
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Hi Rathna, it would be great to calculate the evaporation rate directly for the reservoir, but the required data is not available and also I have not found any remote sensing product which gives an estimate of transpiration from water bodies. That is the reason why I'm using the potential evapotranspiration (PET) calculated by the MODIS MOD16 algorithm which is a measure of the amount of water that would be lost from the land surface to the atmosphere through evaporation and transpiration, if sufficient water were available. The studies made by the USGS in the wetland Everglades of south Florida in 2006 showed that open water evaporation is about 80% of PET. That is the reason for applying this correction to the PET values. All the best, Andreas
@rathnakumarv3956 Жыл бұрын
@@GeosearchInternational can we use the results that we obtained from this website only for research?
@GeosearchInternational Жыл бұрын
@@rathnakumarv3956 As far as I know, it is necessary to acknowledge the data source in any report. All the best, Andreas
@youssefpeace60892 жыл бұрын
Hi dear..how I can contact with you?
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
Hi Youssef, If you have any questions about the video I will try to answer them in this comments section. Sorry I don't have time for emails etc as am very busy at the moment. All the best, Andreas
@youssefpeace60892 жыл бұрын
I want ask about ves survey..is ip2win good software to use .is same result as ix1d ?? thanks so much
@GeosearchInternational2 жыл бұрын
I use GeoVES see: kzbin.info/www/bejne/e3-TXnmeltNmnNU
@amosgayflorzaizayjr1201 Жыл бұрын
Can you use climate engine or other meteorological datasets to determine the storage capacity of a reservoir, water surface area, and water level?
@GeosearchInternational Жыл бұрын
Hi @@amosgayflorzaizayjr1201 There is no easy way to get this data, as there is always processing involved. I have seen some websites offering radar altimetry data but only for the big reservoirs, and there are some Google Earth Engine tools for processing reservoir areas. To get the storage capacity you need the elevation-area-storage curves which you can only get via digital elevation model or from the reservoir design reports. See: kzbin.info/www/bejne/iYaWlKagl9ZooqM and kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYOso2iamdKKhbs All the best, Andreas