How To Get UNLIMITED FPS Slow Motion on ANY Camera

[@cameraconspiracies]

If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, you can slow down your video until it becomes a photo. Then you'll be no better than a loser photographer. I have a video coming on Topaz Enhance Video AI, it's actually pretty amazing, it just takes time to render. They are having a sale until November 4th. Topaz Video Enhance AI www.topazlabs.com/topaz-video-ai/ref/1640/ enter code GETVIDEOAI for an additional 15% off. Davinci Resolve amzn.to/3gOxRgn Panasonic GH6 amzn.to/3DdvjAb or USED amzn.to/3DfQwcr or bhpho.to/3LI6cc7 or USED bhpho.to/3U2ZrG7 Olympus 12mm f2 amzn.to/3aiz1NS or USED amzn.to/3MaMDrO or bhpho.to/3utrUKK Laowa 7.5mm f2 amzn.to/3U2GzGo or bhpho.to/3f19uYX Instagram instagram.com/vegetablepolice/ All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice

[@einstankan]

Tip: Topaz should sponsor your pc build for faster render. It really is time consuming..

[@classicdice21]

He’s slowly turning into a photographer. Videos so slow that it’s now a picture.

[@finnman89]

He will kill you for this accurate insult.

[@AllThingsFilm1]

LOL. Right?

[@sinduda]

What a loser😈

[@bdssoaz]

🤣🤣🤣

[@dublbude]

Best comment!

[@przybylskipawel]

With slow motion the challenge is not making something that is moderately fast appear glacially slow. The challenge is to make something that is lightning fast appear reasonably slow. The bottom line is that with slowing down jumping grasshooper this process will not neccessarily work.

[@spacelord1913]

Wait until he learns what a photo is.

[@NoName-rg3np]

Gonna start calling slow motion the "Caseh," because you need an intervention the same way Northrup did with the bokeh.

[@MattJacobs]

True

[@joestrahl6980]

Excellent idea "this is rendered at Caseh 3600 without any degrading"

[@NoName-rg3np]

@@joestrahl6980 😂 right!

[@arboreal-coincidence]

Hey Kasey, for your viewers working with slower framerates to start with, a good trick is increasing shutter speed on the shoot to reduce the amount of motion blur… gives better results with speedwarp, and if only doing 50% slower, then going to 90 degree shutter angle is great for a 30 fps shoot to get 60 fps in post.

[@PhilTonic]

And just three years later Kasey has finally crossed that road.

[@karmmark888]

Of all the thumbnails that look like they’re obviously click bait I was not expecting this to be legit infinity ♾ 👍🏻

[@imagenatura]

This method works well as long as the movements aren't that fast... For example, if you try this on a car with the wheels turning at 90kph as it drives by you filming, you'll have weirdness happen on those wheels. For that, you'll need to start with more frames per second, maybe 1000 fps.

[@chinitopinoy1726]

Yeah, it won't work well on really fast and erratic movement especially unpredictable type motion.

[@pshelnh]

Bro is inventing photography

[@77dris]

LOL, that 4800p was pretty epic. If you put that through Resolve one more time, time would reverse and I suspect you would be dodging dinosaurs instead of cars.

[@JamesChamberlainGamingNVlogs]

This is an excellent idea, and one I have also had myself. The optical flow in DaVinci Resolve combined with the process of speed warp is quite amazing. I do believe that in order to utlilize speed warp however, you need DaVinci Resolve studio. Nonetheless, definitely a great concept and one I can certainly see myself using more.

[@jjpeppers12]

honestly the greatest intro on youtube

[@recordingonthego9651]

Holy cow, this is actually a good hack! Thanks!!

[@Qupppa]

The 'p' suffix in '1080p' means 'progressive scan', not 'frames per second'.

[@EddieStudios]

Dude! This is awesome. You crack me up, man. Always amazing.

[@aviationrambler]

I've been doing this for years but not to the same extent. The idea is basically comparing two frames, finding the differences, and using that to construct a new frame. In certain use cases it absolutely can be used to fake so motion and rather convincingly so. Basically if things are moving in predictable ways. There are other situations where it doesn't work so well, basically with erratic behavior. With erratic behavior you'll get a lot of ghosting. The higher the starting frame rate, the better this works.

[@matt_pang]

Rumor has it that if you keep slowing down your footage, export, rinse and repeat, you'll end up having a single picture. Then in reality, you could've claimed to yourself you shot something 10,000 fps and it was merely a photo.

[@-grey]

The rerender slowly degrades the dynamic range and gives a green tint everytime, but it's still barely noticeable by 4800p since the GH6 looks good. Surprised by Panasonic, they really came in clutch this time. If the dynamic range doesn't suck worse than Canon, they might have something here - PDAF or not.

[@DaveKatague]

Now we can see the depth of defocus hunting in all It’s glory 😂

[@-grey]

@@DaveKatague It's an artistic choice to make more immersive wildlife videos. Kasey obviously wants to represent the intensity of being hunted by a bird of prey by having the autofocus hunt also. 😂

[@ghostapi874]

I think this will work well aslong as the thing you are filming is moving slow enough that it does not make big movements between the frames of the framerate you are filming at. In other words the faster the object the higher your framerate needs to be for this to work.

[@chinitopinoy1726]

Yeah, I agree! I’ve tested before on very fast erratic movement and doesn’t do too well. Way to overcome this is shoot as high an FPS you can from the start. Even then, really fast action like exploding particles doesn’t do as well for motion interpolation.

[@ghostapi874]

@@chinitopinoy1726 ye also the higher your frame rate the less blurred the frames will be and the easier it is to interpolate.

[@MarcosElMalo2]

@@ghostapi874 If you don’t care about blurring or artifacts, shoot with an intervalometer and use each frame as a keyframe. This is completely illegitimate and I haven’t tested it. I’ll leave that for photographers, but you should be able to get infinite FPS at infinite resolution.

[@harrison00xXx]

totally agree! I got some 120 fps very fast moving bird footage and it was basically impossible to make a nice movement over 240 fps effectively. With Topaz i got usable 240 fps out of the 120 (IPB!), but 300%+ (so 360fps+) was just not bearable to watch. Tried the same now with DaVinci... pretty much same result, "usable" 2x, unsable 4x and more. I think you can do it with nearly any footage and framerate to increase fps by factor 2, but anything really fast moving in the frame just demands high fps, so beyond 240 fps from the beginning. I really like the DaVinci Resolve process, much better than the Topaz software when it comes to slowmo processing! Topaz Video Enhance AI does a very good job at bad material, at higher bitrate but lower res stuff, at anything which is just "unwatchable" in 2022. It does also a great job at upscaling BluRay source material to 4K, but for more compressed 1080p material the 4K upscale looks too often wrong especially at eyes, hair and other stuff. So for lesser quality 1080p i stick to 2K/2560x1440 upscale which give just a very good looking "better 1080p".

[@Donbros]

What about making shutter speed higher like 5k maybe it would deal with it better. Because you get more details

[@cowboy6591]

Sounds like topaz is using image 'MORPH' between frames to smooth things out, clever. God I love DaVinci!! Glad I bought the pro version.

[@Finite-Tuning]

Yeah I've done this. So you ain't first to think of it! I use Vegas cause I just can't wrap my head around anything else (Premier, Resolve). But in Vegas you can do this right on the timeline, just hold Ctrl and drag the end of a clip longer or shorter to speed it up or slow it down. Easy peesy! That's why I use Vegas, it just makes sense. But it can only speed or slow a clip to a certain point. To go further, simply render out the clip in prores HQ then import to the timeline and repeat the initial steps again. Or use a 3rd party plugin like Boris Effects. Oh and regarding Topaz, didn't anyone ever tell you that good things take time? Topaz Video AI is a very good thing. But yeah, it is a bit painfully slow sometimes. Cheers 🍻

[@briandipierro8865]

I still use Vegas since about 2013 when my friend taught me how to edit with it. It's the only software that doesn't mind the 10 bit files from my S5 since I gotta pay if I want to use them in Resolve. I technically did pay for Vegas and I'm still using only Vegas 17. Vegas in general is the first editing software I paid for when I got a big tax return in 2013.

[@Finite-Tuning]

@@briandipierro8865: It's all painful to learn, but Vegas has always made the most sense to me. I stick with them because they continue to advance and remain logical while doing so. Cheers 🍻

[@chinitopinoy1726]

DAIN is also a good interpolation program but only works for Windows if I recall correctly.

[@supercurioTube]

Is that any different from slowing down to the same ratio in one pass?

[@JohnDrummondPhoto]

Very interesting! I plan to shoot the NYC Marathon this Sunday. I'll definitely give this technique a go!

[@maximumblackness]

This guy is an evil genius!!!

[@ledheavy26]

After seeing Philip Bloom talking about using Topaz to upscale a lot of his footage I thought for sure you would try it to make the 300p or picture to picture modes better looking.

[@NOTLeavingLV]

I successfully used Topaz Video Enhance on a video I shot on the insta360, it brought it to 4k60... However that was the old and no longer available version of Topaz video. The new version is terrible and garbage to be sure.

[@harrison00xXx]

@@NOTLeavingLV Whats that wrong with the newer version? I am also still on an older version, but it works well for my needs (upscaling or deblurring/deblocking/denoising....) Just tried recently the slowmo features (artemis V3), they work but im not close to as impressed as Kasey is.

[@rjkral]

It's been a while...but you got almost slow enough to be a photo and cry "STACEY! Is that you?!"

[@dublbude]

Not sure if you ever plan on trying the better Lumix 100-300 or not. Especially having the GH6, you'd get the dual stabilizer you do on the other 3 lenses, and the Olympus can be sold for at least 75% the cost of the 100-300. If you do, the version 2 is much better, and pretty much a no brainer to spend the extra. I am sure you'd find your own Canadian friendly deal on one. Why I am sending this message, is there's actually a hidden semi-known tripod collar for the Lumix 100-300mm. It is from a German company and you can still get a hold of them through email and order one . They are 87.50 Euros shipped (at least that's what they told me in MN, USA). I ended up emailing back and fourth with them delaying the process, trying to see if they still made a collar for the 35-100 2.8, which they don't. I ended up ordering a used one off ebay, from Britain, as they were a bit slow getting back, half my fault for the extra emails though. Anyhow, link below of the Roesch 100-300mm tripod collar. I am sure it would take a couple weeks shipping from the company, but they don't come around often used. You can search "Roesch tripod" in ebay, and if they ever pop up used, ill send you the link. I haven't got mine yet, but it has gotten praise on the forums. www.roesch-feinmechanik.de/29701.html

[@stumacquarrie477]

Topaz is great, bud. Slow as hell, yes, but amazing detail recovery and output.

[@yangbestari]

this video is so useful that ive actually bookmarked it on my davinci tutorials bookmark folder. thanks

[@DutchinBrazil]

Me too haha

[@summers9218]

You have style man. I will sub you.

[@CarlBergsdorf]

I wonder if this would work as good with more difficult movement and textures like grass and faster moving objects. Still a very cool trick but I think the example showed mightve been a best case scenario. Would be nice to see different scenarios with moving water and stuff

[@JoshMilesVFX]

Hilarous. Love your videos. I often binge a bunch, not sure what that says about me and how much time I have on my hands.

[@fromagefrais]

You have hacked the matrix.

[@SudarshanAshiya]

optical flow and warp stabilize is also there in premiere.

[@dublbude]

Very nice work. Are we going to see a motage 24,000fps, with a new song?

[@LizStClair]

Great video!

[@OversikerSTUDIO]

Great content, thank you!

[@cunjoz]

destroying the camera industry one video at a time

[@StanShimkus]

Fantastic idea 👍

[@khalidbinhelaly]

Man you got humor I must say, loved it thanks

[@RaiderKnight13]

Grandpa Turtle approves this video! 😁

[@davefink2326]

This is why I subscribe

[@wellnesspathforme6236]

Nice find!!!

[@EasyLifeES]

I never seen a video from YOU before (till NOW)... but... hmm... great humor (YES I know that you know by now)! Congrats! :)

[@realMDizzy]

Wow that looks shockingly good!!!

[@gruntaxeman3740]

Have you ever thought to get deep dive in post processing? Topaz is known to be easy to use but state of the art stuff makes better results and usually doesn't cost anything. It is satisfying to make everything in cheap camera by increasing resolution, stabilizing, removing noise, changing framerate, increasing background blur, adding VFX that is unable to distinguish from real footage. It is possible make better stuff than in modern movies while the effects in movies are for saving costs. That also make possible to make that perfect camera by using camera as capturing device, and move the work on the computer. It takes time for sure.

[@richaneesh]

Better to get Davinci coz it comes with all other video editing options

[@JeuneCyclisteDynamique]

At first, I really thought you were going to elaborately troll us all and explain to us that shooting still pictures was the way to get unlimited (as in infinite) FPS, since the image no longer moves, you know.

[@MarcosElMalo2]

Well, if you shoot 2 stills, one at your starting position and one at your end position, you could just use them as keyframes and interpolate in your editing program. This would also allow you to get resolutions above 8K-only limited by the megapixels of your camera.

[@chinitopinoy1726]

Finally you follow my advice using Topaz VEAI. 😂 Been using it to upscale my 240 fps and 480 fps from the Sony RX10 IV and 960 fps shots from my Huawei P40 Pro for two years now with really good results. In addition, I use Caprock Anti-Moire filters to reduce aliasing/moire during shooting in the high frame rate modes for even better results. 👍 I would max only upscale to 4K for the slowmo shots. I found if I go higher to 8K I get more artifacts, but I think it depends on the shot.

[@lilp2573]

Nice examples on your page using VEAI.

[@DenysLukoshkin]

CRAZY idea, GREAT video! Off I go to try it =)

[@ValiRossi]

I use Topaz for image enlargement. If you start with a good sharp image, it works great.

[@philosynth]

you are the victim of a conspiracy of photographers to turn vloggers into one of them

[@chinitopinoy1726]

Do it on birds flapping their wings and you’ll quickly see the limitation of interpolation and how it doesn’t do as well. With predicable and not so spontaneous movement it works okay. Interpolation is getting better tho and excited to see how it will evolve within the next couple of years.

[@Max-mh5yo]

you are so funny and helping in the same time :D

[@the_last_rangefinder_society]

You do realize you’re evolving towards stills photography?

[@AnnexF]

Great tip!

[@domehouse79]

Brilliant video

[@olsonspeed]

Very cool, I have wanted to be able to do this for many years.

[@downsouthoutnabout]

Ive noticed when using optical flow it can struggle if the image has alot of lines. Like stair railings . It gets very glitchy and strobe like. In this instance use the frame blend option. And it will work much better.

[@aengusmacnaughton1375]

"Budget Hobo-Ass" -- wow! How did you know? That's what we named our first born!!!

[@stanuc2utube]

Thanks for this.

[@DogeGFSolo]

Topaz schmopaz Now i dont need it. Thanks for this video lil buddy♥ u pulled my chestnuts out of the fire with this one 😁👍

[@dirtnap7697]

Yes, More Salmon!

[@swagonman]

4K at 1Mfps = still photography!!!! Nothing moves. It’s ur worst nightmare! 😂

[@mickyr171]

Had this idea a few years ago and tried it and while it does work for certain footage, if something happens in 1/200s of a second and you're filming the original footage at 120fps, you'll still miss the event, so its good for speed ramping a bike jump or something but not good for things that happen in the blink of an eye

[@Bangus56]

Im thinking of adopting this process to my electricity meter to save costs. Perhaps I can also apply this to the hot Australian sun, avoiding sunburn.

[@nickybateleur]

Inception. Nice.

[@Vahmrick60]

Will it work on the free version? Right now, I don't have 4K, best I can do is 60fps at 1080i on my Nikon D 5200.

[@TheRealStructurer]

Cool. A good excuse to get a beefier computer 😉

[@JakeyWakey]

Anyone have extra resolve pro license?

[@bogyojozsef]

Can do a video tutorial for this?

[@TheOriginalMigz]

I wonder if there is a Premiere Pro way to do this ?!?

[@mydadspulloutgametrash]

Damn have you tried filming gunfire or something? That'd be wild.

[@therealbenallington]

The Topaz link isn’t working on my iPad with Safari “Too many redirects” or something…

[@cameraconspiracies]

Fixed it.

[@Sciencedemos]

It is a pity you hadn't done it with water drops or glass breaking, etc..instead of yourself jumping. 😂

[@youranonymous931]

Sometimes he does it with swinging his head and a fake wig.

[@gnanavelpradeep4584]

thank u camera guy

[@NOTLeavingLV]

Hey Casey, I have been sort of a dick in the comments in the past. I do love your stuff. I am curious what you think about the OM-5... As a micro four loser that uses the Lumix G9, I found it laughable that OM basically made an inferior camera to a 2019 Panasonic camera in nearly 2023. Thoughts?

[@MajmunskaPosla]

Great freebie tip

[@p_p]

NICE! you did it

[@brokeforever]

What if you take the topaz logo watermark and bring the exposure down and add some contrast to match the rest of the image? Boom problem solved.

[@pinoybtcanalysis6576]

how about updcaling in topaz?

[@MG-hg8cu]

I keep watching to see when the arrow will smash the canon cripple hammer in the intro

[@VoxeeMedia]

There is some artefacting on your hand and arm, has like halo efect

[@sandeepmates]

thanks ..yeah helpful

[@wedopowersports]

That's Rad

[@nativesugarshack9328]

What color was that shirt supposed to be 🤣🤣👍

[@DaveKatague]

This is hilariously genius 😅

[@Jambo1999]

Its an idea, but your example, no offense, but you are kind of slow moving anyway. Try it with a hummingbird or such, the movement may be too blurry.

[@Kamikaze3557]

I just had to come here and post LOL, On the title……Topaz may suck for what you’re using it for. I own the paid version and it’s very good for what I use it for…upscaling SD footage. I also have DaVinci R. Studio. I use both on the same videos, they work great together.

[@NeilFarrimond]

Wonder if you can do this in FCPX? Mmmmmmmmm...........

[@fotoshootproductions8607]

There are no artefacts because the background is neutral and uncluttered. If the background was foliage or busy, it wouldn't be that smooth and artefact free.

[@ilya6355]

I take a photo and tell everyone its 1 mil fps

[@SuperZardo]

Hint: just pause the video and you get an *infinite* number of frames/sec right there! For free!

[@harrison00xXx]

Topaz AI still say: "process with watermark", but i dont get any watermark at all. I use Topaz AI just for older movies to upscale, and even then im mainly denoising/deblocking really old movies from (my own, legit...) DVD rips. If i still have the original source DVD working, i sometimes try to upscale it, but more often than not - if i download the movie in the professional upscaled 4K version with higher res source material, im just better off with the pirated 4K file...

[@jtravelz8197]

at that speed, car will never reach him

[@stever1514]

yeah but what does it look like with an exploding water balloon or something more complex than your arm? nice idea gho

[@whereisamerica7384]

That is a really good idea and it looked good. I stopped the video and switched from my phone to the tv. I have several things I want to try this with now. This is Markus Pix level thinking btw.

[@FerencBirosam]

fckin brilliant, annoying you made me wait this long to tell us but ok, thank you!