Thank you for explaining image size and file size to this 79-year-old novice Photoshop user in Brooklyn New York. I also wish to thank you for not playing background music and your impeccable presentation. All my best wishes, DavId
@ChristianDThompson11 ай бұрын
This explanation is extremely clear and well-structured. Thank you.
@Photography.by.thuso.ramatu4 жыл бұрын
Beautiful teaching as always, rock solid presentation Karl. Thank you and I am looking forward to next week's video. Stay safe!
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, you too!
@TheNexXxusFiles3 ай бұрын
Thank you for pronouncing it as GIF :D
@ba553y4 жыл бұрын
Wow! I just watched your video of several years ago about sizing for print and you upload this today! I needed it. Thanks Karl!
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
You are so welcome Bassey!
@lizzyshengshengzhou2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the clear and comprehensive explanations!
@VisualEducationStudio2 жыл бұрын
You're very welcome!
@amandameth24083 жыл бұрын
Such a valuable and concise video! Thank you, Karl!
@AdrianBacon4 жыл бұрын
This is good basic information. Nice to see covering LR, as many people use LR to manage their assets and don’t want to have to leave it just to get a web version.
@johnl44694 жыл бұрын
Thanks Karl. Good to see you're keeping well mate.
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Cheers
@macmac19344 жыл бұрын
Karl, Thanks for sharing, That more than great info, Your scientific terms have a value.
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Glad to help
@lornanjanja68374 жыл бұрын
Yaaaasssss💃🏿💃🏿 notification gang here. First comment 🎊🎊💪🏿 Ooo. You know I've always wondered why some images appear pixelated after printing yet the images were clear. I just assumed it was the printer settings/quality. This is a great lesson sir. Thank you for taking the time.
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Glad to help Lorna :-)
@davidmilisock52004 жыл бұрын
Traditional print can be a challenge, I did some work for a haberdashery some years ago who had issues with some prints they had done of linen menswear. Like Karl said DPI/PPI are certainly directly print related the texture in linens when close up shots are printed can cause moire like issues with Amplitude Screening processes. The same can be said for over sharpened images.
@DalsPhotography-Daniela4 жыл бұрын
you are just amazing!!! Best wishes from Uruguay !
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@jlwilliams4 жыл бұрын
I go back to when Mosaic was a thing, but there's no way I could explain this info as clearly and authoritatively as Karl does. I'm going to save the link to send to all the people who tell me, “We can't use this image for our website because it needs to be 300 dpi.”
@davidmilisock52004 жыл бұрын
I remember Mosaic. 😀
@fraserlock-macardy963310 ай бұрын
Fantastic Video Lesson, Thanks.
@jmitchphotography4 жыл бұрын
This is awesome!! I actually use Gimp as well!!! Thank you for your insight brother!! GOD bless!!
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@jmitchphotography4 жыл бұрын
Karl Taylor Absolutely and I’m bench watching the education videos!! Cheers sir!!
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@carlosdias19404 жыл бұрын
The content is of such level, that I have to raise mine just for start commenting!!! ;-) Note:its the only ad that I watch on YT!
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@JohnAmaro_Official Жыл бұрын
thanks for the advices and tips but at 8:35 thats not the new lightroom.Thats the lightroom cc which is a bit different...Lightroom classic still in 2023 has the same export settings:)
@MariusVolden2 жыл бұрын
9:10 how do one get this export window? I press export, but I get the "old way" every time :( Is it a mac vs windows thing? Weird
@pedroalves87394 жыл бұрын
Very nice ;) another video with excellent content.
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoy it!
@JayKay-jh9ek4 жыл бұрын
Can't wait to apply what I learn
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
That's great Jay!
@Govannonart4 жыл бұрын
Very useful. Thanks a lot for sharing. Best regards from Mother Russia
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful Mother Russia.
@smartwork84772 жыл бұрын
Thnx for the video.
@adrianvanleeuwen4 жыл бұрын
Good to know that you recommend 2500 px wide x 2000 px high for web display. By coincidence, Amazon recommends 2560px size for images (square format on its listings of products). Note that Amazon allows users to use the magnifier tool available to zoom into the image to see details of a product on screen. While lots of people are using phones these days there still lots of statistics that show people shop and view websites on laptops and tablettes, as well as desktop monitors for finding businesses. Resolutions of monitors on "laptop" are generally default at HD 1920x1080px these days, cheaper ones below $600 are 1300 pixel wide, and some pro laptops are 4K resolution, but 4K is less common among general consumers, and desktop monitors can also be very high pixel from HD to 4K size depending on price.
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@GrandEpicPhotos4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir for this valuable information. This video came at the right time. I’m currently working on resizing my images for my website and my question is what’s the recommended file size for an online portfolio?
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Hi Mohapi, this section covers what I aim for with my online portfolio: kzbin.info/www/bejne/d2i2fHiDrctmi8U :-)
@GrandEpicPhotos4 жыл бұрын
Karl Taylor Thank you very much for the videos, they are highly appreciated and very informative. Will watch the video.
@anilaboutme2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Karl. You do not sharpen your image after resizing??? I see some people do this.
@MrWeddingPhotography2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video. You state that dpi/ppi is not relevant to the web but you have to enter a number on step 1 ‘resizing in PS’. Years ago we would use 72 PPI but with advances in monitor quality would you now leave at 300 taking into consideration that a lower number would result in a smaller file size. Also, as sharpening should be the last step taking after resizing the image, do you normally apply any sharpening to your web images? Thanks
@VisualEducationStudio2 жыл бұрын
An image that is 2000 pixels wide will get displayed at the designate of the website regardless of the PPI we set. If we set 300PPI or 72PPI the image is still only 2000pixels wide. Many screens these days display at various resolutions, back in the day 72PPI was a standard screen resolution but now they are often 150PPI. Yes I apply sharpening to my images and the exact process to get the best out of my images is covered on the Karl Taylor Education website.
@kreygscott4 жыл бұрын
First*** Another valuable piece of content Karl. Thanks for sharing mate.
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
My pleasure!
@barbrarudd33284 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. I was have this problem. What software do you recommend, to use for retouch up. I'm still new to retouch up.
@josesavant3 жыл бұрын
Noticed no one answered this. My personal recommendation for retouching is Photoshop and/or Affinity Photo.
@Wayne-hz2bz2 жыл бұрын
NOVICE INQUIRY! I'm not a pro and I'm not planning to be one in photography. I used my phone to capture photos and I really like the simplicity and quality of it every time I take a snap of something. The thing is every time I upload it on Facebook, the quality gets downgraded. I have noticed that pros use a "web-sized" photo every time they upload their stuff and the megapixels, image size, and file size has been reduced but the photo quality on Facebook is not compromised. QUESTIONS: 1. How do I use Photoshop (or any other apps) to reduce the megapixels, image size, and file size of my photo without compromising the image quality on Facebook? 2. What would be the recommended megapixels, image size, and file size of a vertical and horizontal photo before uploading it on Facebook? I am willing to transfer my photos from my mobile to a pc/laptop and go from there. I would really appreciate it if you could help me with this and thank you so much in advance! :)
@fixitrod49694 жыл бұрын
I don't think Gimp has any steeper learning curve than most "granular" raster photo editing type software. I use GimpPhoto. It's very similar to Photoshop. If you've used photoshop you can Google how to make Gimp look like Photoshop. I pay for photoshop but use Gimp for a noise reduction plug in called Dcam noise reduction... it's amazing.
@Am_ro12 Жыл бұрын
Brilliant video, however, I am still left scratching my head on how to get images down to a few hundred kb as you recommend for the web. Even the one you did was 800. Sometimes i find images on sites that are amazing quality and really sharp and are only 30-60kb. I have no idea how to achieve that.
@careylee59514 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I've been looking! I'm an event photographer so when I get home I have to edit anywhere from 2000-3000 images and I just started learning how to batch edit. I post a lot to FB and keep the long end at 2000 pixels and when someone want that image I resize and then email to them. I need to shorten my processing time because I'm usually a week or two behind. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful! Batch processing using 'scripts' - 'image processor' and/or creating your own actions. We teach all this on KTE.
@careylee59514 жыл бұрын
@@VisualEducationStudio I'll be sure to check that out ! I have an account there.
@sunwang30764 жыл бұрын
So useful
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that
@lukasreich34914 жыл бұрын
thanks a lot man
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
You're welcome!
@gewglesux4 жыл бұрын
I've itching to try Luminar. Do you have a bit.ly? This was so very helpful! Thanks!
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Thanks but sorry I don't
@gewglesux4 жыл бұрын
@@VisualEducationStudio Hey Karl, I wanted to ask -just to help you out.. But Either way i ordered up Luminar. Cant wait to use it. Thanks for all you do.
@movieman20094 жыл бұрын
I think you can do all this way faster with a program called Jpeg Mini Pro for sake of changing file size.
@DalsPhotography-Daniela4 жыл бұрын
you can use jpg mini with Capture One as pluging ;)
@anilmali94384 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SIR
@popcornparam4 жыл бұрын
Ok I have a question. I have a 45 mp camera I know it's good enough for large prints. I shoot raw now what should I do to get a massive print without pixelation. I mean when u save the edited raw to jpg it gives u some increase megapixel option. Throw some light on tif conversion for huge prints. I mean like real huge ( building size or bigger )
@MelissaNicole0054 ай бұрын
Thank u
@davidmilisock52004 жыл бұрын
A great primer for image posters, you're dead on about social media resampling your images, I go farther and claim that many forums really screw things up. The support for color and quality is very poor. I use 3 image editors, AfterShot Pro, PaintShop Pro and Photo-PAINT, the first 2 are buy and own, Photo-PAINTships with CorelDRAW and provides Device N color, CMYK, LAB and live transparency support. I use all those for my hobby photography, PSP and PP to replace Photoshop for all my high end architectural image corrections for print, generally for traditional or digital. For RAW conversion and taking my corrected images to the web I use AfterShot Pro (it's the old Bibble Labs) it allows my corrected TIF files to be opened and then color profile converted and resized for web in a few clicks. Seems fine up to 2,500 images so far. Thanks for the post.
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Thanks David.
@gamingwithpratham77214 жыл бұрын
Sir you missed the acdsee 🙄.
@fixitrod49694 жыл бұрын
IrfanView is free and offers a bulk resize tool that works excellent as well.
@AnujithRajasekharan4 жыл бұрын
Thankyou
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
You’re welcome Anujith
@eazyjosh4 жыл бұрын
Tap like if you've been angry with Instagram once regarding posting of your pictures
@atahassanzadeh48784 жыл бұрын
😍🙏
@messylaura4 жыл бұрын
oh, thats why its wasn't working, i was changing monitor from 13 inch to 7inch then posting.....................:P. i know, second word is 'off'
@Razor20484 жыл бұрын
Great video, but there doesn't seem to be as much of a need to resize for web in terms of reducing output resolution, as no camera on the market currently offers an output resolution that would be considered too high. Even the best Hasselblad camera, lacks resolution needed or users to be truly satisfied. For example, there no camera that offers a high enough resolution to accurately show just how overwhelmingly cute river otters are. Resizing in terms of resolution and not compression, may become necessary when cameras reach the multi-gigapixel range.
@mounishvijay38404 жыл бұрын
successfully wasted 13 minutes
@VisualEducationStudio4 жыл бұрын
Sorry it wasn't to your taste Mounish - thanks for watching all 13 mins!
@mounishvijay38404 жыл бұрын
@@VisualEducationStudio that's fine! I liked some of ur other videos!!