How To Structure Your Literature Review For Success: Full Tutorial (+Examples)

[@babaganaabba8050]

Emma, thanks so much to you (and your team) for this brilliant and, yet succinct explanation of literature review; I am sure you people invest tons of hours in the production of such a high-quality lesson. Please be rest assured that some of us, viewers, are highly appreciative of your hard work. 👏

[@GradCoach]

Thank you for the kind words. It really means a lot to us :)

[@yohannesseifu8559]

i need your email@@GradCoach

[@GradCoach]

FREE LITERATURE REVIEW WEBINAR - gradcoach.com/webinar-literature-review/ FREE LITERATURE REVIEW TEMPLATES: gradcoach.com/templates/ FREE DISSERTATION COURSE: gradcoach.com/course PRIVATE COACHING: gradcoach.com/dissertation-coaching/

[@deinmatamunokuro1157]

I sincerely appreciate your effort towards impacting knowledge,but I will recommend that you give examples that are in form of research writing e.g for this topic"literature review" you can just illustrate by writing a typically brief literature review to enable better understanding and help those who can't grasp to better appreciate your work.

[@adunn9498]

Thank you this video made it more clear for me than other videos.....I am working on my research paper and lit review for clinical mental health counseling.

[@djibrildiarra17]

Thank you so much for this great job with clear and soft explanation. It is brief and clear. Anyway a have a question : "Is it possible to combine different ways of discussing a litterature review in the body part ? I mean combine thematic and historical, or thematic and methodological for examples ?" Thank you.

[@SahondraHarinivoAndriamalala]

I really appreciate your hard work. Thank you so much. It is really a big help for me

[@GradCoach]

It's my pleasure

[@EenGamer.]

I wrote up my results, discussion and conclusion. Should or can I add new sections to the literature review?

[@GradCoach]

If your data analysis has brought new discussions to the surface that require additional theoretical grounding (i.e., you haven't covered them in your LR yet), then it would typically make sense to revisit your LR and flesh it out a little.

[@lovemorekatsande6591]

Thank you so much am keenly following you and am so hopeful that i am going to make the best out of this lesson.

[@GradCoach]

Wonderful!

[@MehariKibret]

Thank you so much Emma

[@blackamericanlesbianprofes4357]

Wow, this is right on time. I am literally working on my MSc in Forensic Accounting Dissertation, I am at the Literature Review section. Thank you for posting. Date Stamp: 03sept22

[@GradCoach]

Glad it was helpful! Good luck with your dissertation.

[@wasafisafi612]

Thank you for the video. It really helps me a lot

[@alexummaalikumssa6813]

Awesomeness is unmentionable!😅

[@ekennahutchinson1636]

Thank you 😊

[@ukelady]

Brilliant ! Thank you !

[@carlosbarros6972]

Thanks much, it’s a good information ❤

[@herujunaidi]

Thank you

[@paulustheking9842]

This was very informative

[@puspath1643]

Really helpful 👍👍👍.... please make a video of how to structure methodology

[@GradCoach]

Glad it helped :) We have a few videos covering methodology on the channel and a few more on the blog - see gradcoach.com/category/methodology-analysis/

[@epomarkpanguaimah9950]

Great presentation. Really informative

[@GradCoach]

Glad you liked it!

[@maureenmoraa9919]

Thanks I like the tutorial, is the one on one review free or we have to pay and if free how to go about it.

[@TheKarthhh]

Thanks for sharing🙂

[@xasan4492]

Thank you for sharing 💗

[@GradCoach]

You are so welcome

[@kiprotichh]

Awesome, I like how you do it

[@GradCoach]

Thanks!

[@solomonyemidi3203]

Research may result from gaps in practices of a certain field (e.g. conduct of monetary policy by central banks) that may not have anything to do with literature. How do we handle such an issue? This is because not all research topics are based on gaps in the literature.

[@sarahglanville1352]

Generally, and without knowing what exactly your research aim is, my thought is this: If research on a topic is missing (central bank policies and their policies) then the ’gap in practice’ is also a gap in the research literature. If you are embarking on an under investigated area of research, you are making the case for conducting research. It is trickier because your literature will point to the value of contributing research to your area of study, so you will be pulling from literature that supports that. I don’t know your thesis, but maybe things like ‘trust in banking’ ‘banking and ethics’ economic theories and banking, and civic and political theory…. In this case your thematic review makes the case for your thesis/original research.

[@imaladywith3]

Great information

[@GradCoach]

Glad it was helpful!

[@imaladywith3]

Thanks❤

[@GradCoach]

You're welcome 😊

[@bubelerasmeni1846]

very informative, I tNice tutorialnk you raised a lot of softians

[@GradCoach]

Glad it was helpful!

[@evansjohnarek2271]

Great,! Madam Emma

[@GradCoach]

Thanks :)

[@sftbukhari8408]

thanks so much

[@GradCoach]

You're welcome!

[@IndianAkbarKhan]

Thanks! ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

[@jigishasrivastava]

Gold

[@IloriSamson]

Great

[@mohamedkhalfan823]

This is good stuff

[@GradCoach]

Thank you :)

[@Atikamaqsood99]

Like ur video from Pakistan

[@ikimiso1027]

brilliant explanations thank you but please need help

[@bubelerasmeni1846]

That would be 99 percent of us

[@xasan4492]

Thank you for sharing 💗

[@GradCoach]

Thanks for watching!

[@md.zahidhassan3208]

Thank you

[@GradCoach]

You're welcome