I love this guy! I literally heard his voice in my head while taking my Civ Pro final
@cascam19 жыл бұрын
Check this out 1L don't let the language confuse you. Joinder is just that - we are joining claims and/or parties not just claims (OR) parties as the professor said. If done wrongly then you'll deal with misjoinder analysis.
@daviddrelinger87303 жыл бұрын
FRCP 13 14 19 and 20 are all classified as Either Compulsory or Permissible Joinders of Claims and Parties. 13a= compulsory claim 13b= permissible claim 14= impleader 19= compulsory party 20= permissible party
@melar984 жыл бұрын
You provide the best explanation.
@TheJansport19 жыл бұрын
Thank you Steve Carell!!
@hertzclaude20799 жыл бұрын
Thank you for having this up!
@donizekor22153 жыл бұрын
This is totally unrelated to this video yet immeasurably coincidental and cool, but I see you served on an LDS mission. Where did you serve? (I did, too).
@searchforjusticeandchange95153 жыл бұрын
Is the joinder filed with the summons and complaint or as a separate motion?
@SirGregg3 жыл бұрын
Joinder between the living and the dead. An adhesion contract between the living man and his strawman full legal name. Moving the living into the venue of the dead. Administrator is the trustee of the intestate accounts of the deceased at law. 'You' is the customer. 'Person' is a corporate paper fiction of law. 2 b(e)rth certificates, 2 dates of birth, 2 names.
@renemcintyre36534 жыл бұрын
GREAT CLASS.
@KaplanBarReview4 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed the video. Send us a DM on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram if you have any questions or need help preparing for the Bar! We've got your back. -Kendra from Kaplan
@inspector4545Ай бұрын
ahhh they dont provide scrap paper in the FL bar
@Will-rr1uz3 жыл бұрын
no scrap paper on online bar, I guess we're out of luck
@drakejones2098 Жыл бұрын
Watched this on 2x and got more in :07 than I got in 1:10 in CivPro. Phenomenal.
@nichv8575 жыл бұрын
What about intervention?
@PANTYEATR16 жыл бұрын
so, I cannot bring an federal action against 2 defendants whom injured me in the same way and are part of the same corporation, but committed the injury in different states at different times??
@volcomstone31569 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this!
@shaungorham54792 жыл бұрын
It's cool, Greece.
@ashlybrown10635 жыл бұрын
This is good, but what about when the claim may be bound up in a state created right or obligation, then the state law would be used. Also, if the state law interferes with the federal court being its own independent judicial body, the federal law would be used. I feel those are two more points that are essential to an Erie analysis.
@KaplanBarReview5 жыл бұрын
Perhaps we'll share this in a future video! It's worth noting that this lecture pertains directly to personal jurisdiction. Feel free to reach out with any additional questions!
@darkness88ew5 жыл бұрын
You teach more in 15 minutes than weeks of class. Well, at least you put things into the "30,000 feet" perspective much better.
@KaplanBarReview5 жыл бұрын
That's definitely one of our specialties ;) ... so glad you found this video useful!
@wesmatron7 жыл бұрын
A policeman asking for your name, address and date of birth is creating joinder between the parties of 'you' and your legal person
@siegfriedshrink65806 жыл бұрын
Nonsense. You clearly did not understand the eplanation. There is no such thing as 'legal person'
@kimanismith40852 жыл бұрын
@@siegfriedshrink6580 everything is legal (contractual).
@JohnBrown-pq9tj Жыл бұрын
Oh you wacky sovereign citizens, thinking you know things.