When you learn that your walking habits are similar to the late “mad” philosopher.
@Daniel-j6l2 ай бұрын
This is one of the best videos I’ve watched on KZbin.
@TheNeuralist20 күн бұрын
Yes.
@James-ll3jb5 ай бұрын
I'VE BEEN THINKING LIKE Nietzsche since reading Will to Power in 1979. First gobbled BG&E in 1976. I lived and breathed Nietzsche thru 37 states and 13 countries 25 years. WHAT A GAS!😊
@la80765 ай бұрын
You forgot about Kierkegaard, he endorsed walking too for solving problems
@Everywhere45 ай бұрын
In my few, popular philosophers like Plato and Nietzsche do not really invent new ideas, rather they act like a seed Cristal in a chaotic solution of ideas around which those ideas try to crystallize in a coherent structure. Philosophers don’t invent ideas, they put them together. Sometimes multiple distinct Cristal structures can emerge from the same seed Cristal, allowing for different phases and interpretations of the same philosopher.
@liltick1025 ай бұрын
Best thoughts are revealed to us while walking-it’s actually like a book writing itself non stop in your idle mind - always while walking, Herzog talks about this a lot, as did many
@amanofnoreputation21645 ай бұрын
It's not about distance or time. I've "lost the village" at the local recreation ground just ten minutes away. One of the most spiritually and intellectually fertile places I've been in my entire life is my own small and unremarkable back garden where I used to have a trampoline. What it takes is an absence of cares and distractions. Both of which people are all too determined to thoughtlessly heap upon me.
@matgonzalez62725 ай бұрын
this just connected for me a bit differently. I used to live in NYC, and would easily fill notebook after notebook; both pocket sized and A5s, filled cover to cover. the reason was how much stimulus the city provided; riding the subway, meeting/seeing new people daily, it was disorienting for dreams but one of the most powerful things for thinking. Sitting on a train and watching people come and go on my hourly commute was strangely like the thinking process described here. Someone new would board, and someone familiar exit; events and lives intertwined in such a way that I hardly ever had the same experience twice, just sitting and watching. I’ve long tried to capture that, but living in a much smaller city of only ~80k now, working from home, and hardly ever having time to watch has not been conducive. I’m going to make more time to simply wander, and i thank you for bringing this into my focus.
@scotthjackson56515 ай бұрын
When you talk about Nietzsche's aphorism writing style it sounded exactly like Madlib's style as a hip-hop producer and Beat Conductor.... he doesn't just put out full length tracks, there is this organic flow as he lays out the beats. Some of them are long enough for a full track, but often he throws out little chunks of beats that are 100% good enough to expand into a full track, and other time just a few seconds of other beats that are also amazing but you only get one or two bars and it's gone. He might be under the constraints of sampling rules (i.e. the economic costs thereof) but still, there is the varied texture where you get full value as a listener across a tapestry of meaningful components - from macro to mini beat concepts.
@Themissinglink655 ай бұрын
What a revealing video, my thoughts actually work like that of the fox, I jump between different literary styles in my artistic practice, doing them in short but powerful and bountiful bursts, even the walking muse, the methodology of cooking your thoughts, letting them simmer, taking a life of their own and stealing your mind; that's how I'm writing my current fiction books, songs and poems (I'm 15) and to think, my train of thought works like Nietzsche's is a really nice thought. Although my mind can seem at times to be it's own self, leading me to different thoughts, ideas and artistic paths, regardless of what I want. It's still very fun, to put it plainly. I think that's why Nietzsche's writings talk to me. They are reflections of how my mind works, not saying I'm as much of a genius as he is, but they simply mirror my brain on a broader level, their outlining structure, to put it into words. Glad I was Thinking like Nietzsche❤ I'll continue to do so, love you man
@ryanrohn45615 ай бұрын
Well done. Very insightful and useful.
@guzgrant5 ай бұрын
One of my children gave me the book The walking philosophy by Frederic Gros which posits the same sentiment ...but in coffee table book format . Our calf muscles are the second heart is what they say . All the returning blood to the brain gets the thoughts flowing . I am an ultra runner I have written a thousand treaties on long bucolic runs . Unfortunately I dont carry a note pad .
@TheLivingPhilosophy5 ай бұрын
Haha yeah harder to do with a run for sure
@XanderDDS5 ай бұрын
that pilgrimage looks incredible, i've gotta add it to my bucket list!
@ginru41265 ай бұрын
"I would fain bestow and distribute, until the wise have once more become joyous in their folly, and the poor happy in their riches."
@travisbplank5 ай бұрын
1. See the meaninglessness of existence. 2. Insist on some BS like "we can make our own meaning" or some other nonsensical platitude. 3. Declare victory over nihilism.
@MrThebloodsucker4 ай бұрын
Yep it's better to not take idiots like Nietzsche seriously. They offer nothing more than infantile nonsense given how they're not suited for any serious discussion.
@alecmisra49645 ай бұрын
The problem with thinking like nietzsche, besides the stupendous knowledge he commands is his rich figural language which few can match, even if naturally inclined to the aphoristic style. Its what makes the rest of us also rans.
@brreezy4215 ай бұрын
Ya the man was no doubt an intellectual genius. You don't get a professorship at 24 at the time if you're not
@Aphorismenoi5 ай бұрын
I think the Eternal recurrence exist because Nietzsche's back in the Form of you and nobody's paying attention with it
@ciroalberto3975 ай бұрын
Comment left 4 the algorithm
@decline.enjoyer5 ай бұрын
Good video
@liltick1025 ай бұрын
This sort of writing you find in Henry Miller, Elie Faure, Schopenhauer, Montaigne. . Stream of consciousness basically- the best, is going up in the air, J A Baker, Maya Deren, Tarkovsky, Nijinski, all good examples- Dostoyevski- Cervantes technically.
@vito35105 ай бұрын
You dont wanna think like him ...his sufferings...i cannot imagine ...he in my opinion has uncovered so many truth that goes under the radar so much because he yaps too much but still he basically overloaded because of his isolation plus his mind mostly his mind.
@robertabrahamsen90765 ай бұрын
In April I hiked at least 40 miles of mostly empty beach on the Washington State coast alone and read The Gay Science cover to cover. It was a profound experience.
@brreezy4215 ай бұрын
My favorite of his
@kingdm83155 ай бұрын
nice
@michaelmcclure33835 ай бұрын
Its interesting that you mention how Nietzsche tends to abandon old ideas in order to focus on the new and how his aphoristic style suited that. There was a very interesting video on Nietzsche by an Australian professor called Dr Adrian Heathcote and he claims that Nietzsche completely abandoned the idea of the will to power (and in fact argues that individual will is a fiction) in his late work. He made a really convincing case. Its possible that its wrong to try and read Nietzsche Iike he's formulating some consistent thread that runs right through his philosophy, it's possible that each chapter is new.
@Vooodooolicious5 ай бұрын
It's clear to see in Thus Spoke Zarathustra that he goes from will to power to something like a will to being human. It is a misunderstanding general that the superman is all about the will to power. The superman is a transcendence of values. No other philosopher is as misunderstood as Nietzsche. Now that I think about it, I think that he wanted it that way. I think that he didn't want to teach people. He wanted them to read, think and understand.
@michaelmcclure33835 ай бұрын
@@Vooodooolicious Yes, very misunderstood. This Professor said the misunderstanding about the will to power came mostly from the dubious posthumous publication of "The Will to Power" and from the notion that we don't need to consider the late work like Twilight of the Idols, Ecce Homo, Beyond Good and Evil... because it's the product of a Syphilitic brain (another false narrative). I guess thats how it was easy to lazily draw the conclusion that there is a continuity in his thought on will, but the Prof looked at the late work in isolation, as a kind of final conclusion of Nietzsche's metaphysical views on the matter and there really is a dramatic departure. Anyway. I found it really illuminating, although this might have been obvious to others who have gone deeply into the late work.
@michaelmcclure33835 ай бұрын
@@Vooodooolicious from Twilight of the Idols "At the beginning stands the great fateful error that the will is something which produces an effect --- that will is a facility... Today we know it is merely a word" "The 'inner world' is full of phantoms and false lights: the will is one of them. The Will no longer moves anything --- consequently no longer explains anything --- it merely accompanies events, it can also be absent. The so called motive is another error. Merely a surface phenomenon of consciousness, an accompaniment to an act, which conceals rather than exposes the antecedentia of the act. And as for the I? It has became a fable, a fiction, a play on words: it has totally ceased to think, to feel and to will" Here he's basically saying personal will is a chimera, a fiction, an afterthought.. This is because Nietzsche negates the concept of the individual I.. so if there is no I, then how can there be an individual doer?. This is due to his final embrace of Heraclitan wholeism, where there is apparently no room for any I to stand apart from the whole.
@Vooodooolicious5 ай бұрын
@@michaelmcclure3383 Carl Jung wrote about how professors were glad when he died because they could finally breathe easy.
@michaelmcclure33835 ай бұрын
@@Vooodooolicious As many have pointed out Kaufman (the atheist) did his best to shape Nietzsche's death of God into a declaration of atheism, when his actual views were more agnostic than anything, just opposed to the Christian version of God because he thought it fell short of divinity. And ever since we've seen different theorists and ideologues on the left and the right use Nietzsche to their various ends. But it seems his aphoristic style and the various discontinuous stages his work took lent itself to different interpretations. Would you say?
@christophersnedeker5 ай бұрын
Why would I want to go insane?
@TheExistenceClass05 ай бұрын
If You Want To Think Like Anyone you Like You Have To Become Like Him To Think Like Him !
@gurrenmed53195 ай бұрын
Trust me a person must think for himself rather than think as another person, What is even to live if you live by another person's ideology Even this goes against Nietzsche
@Fazmatical5 ай бұрын
My question is: why the hell would you want to?
@liltick1025 ай бұрын
Being from Newfoundland hearing an Irishman must be similar to being an Englishman in Australia or Kenya
@TheNeuralist20 күн бұрын
I love you.
@BlueDusk955 ай бұрын
That's a very ableist video to which I oppose the examples of Pascal and Leopardi who lived practically as recluse and yet where allegedly as creative and original thinkers as Nietzsche.
@brreezy4215 ай бұрын
Maybe I'm just being generous but if you asked him he'd probably agree there's various ways to keep an active stimulated and creative mind (however u wanna describe it), but this is what Nietzche used and is effective
@DamienWalter5 ай бұрын
The big N would have been a demon at Twitter
@TheLivingPhilosophy5 ай бұрын
It’s a cruel fate that has kept us from seeing that reality 😆
@ejenkins47115 ай бұрын
And then jung seen how he seen it.
@amanofnoreputation21645 ай бұрын
I don't think walking gave Nietzsche thoughts. That's not how it works in my case. It's rather than, when you have a tremendous thought, it is physically impossible to repress it's energy and sit down.
@thebigmanwithwalkingtree74715 ай бұрын
I definetely agree with you
@Themissinglink655 ай бұрын
It'd be cool if you make a video on the hedgehog next
@CJusticeHappen215 ай бұрын
Positive Thinking Isn't Thinking, It's Exercise. Use Your Brain For It's Original Purpose. Live First, Find A Reason For Living Later
@grimjhaixus5 ай бұрын
Dude writes like how I talk.
@amanofnoreputation21645 ай бұрын
"No . . . let him walk."
@davidegioletta62385 ай бұрын
First step : Stop speaking English, it's too simple a language to have complex thoughts, and yes the complexity of the languages spoken influences the depth of thought
@michaelcalixte3553 ай бұрын
Are you left handed?
@TheLivingPhilosophy3 ай бұрын
Yessir
@michaelcalixte3553 ай бұрын
@@TheLivingPhilosophy I am as well. Sometimes I think that was a key point to why I always look to think outside the box and look for new perspectives on old topics!
@TheLivingPhilosophy3 ай бұрын
@@michaelcalixte355 I've often wondered the same. There's definitely some weird wiring with it but I haven't been able to triangulate what the difference is. I'm sure there are books. I do always get excited when I realise someone is left handed though. 10% of the population is rare enough! 👈
@kevinbeck88365 ай бұрын
Hello sir 👋 I like your videos but I have a problem with this one. You draw attention to his aphoristic style but you never bring up how his sickness influenced it. His migraines sometimes only allowed him a few moments to write, so he’d jot down what he was thinking and go back to vomiting and rest. He even credits some of his deeper insights as arising spontaneously after particularly terrible bouts of sickness. It should be brought up as much as the hiking if you are going to talk about his thinking
@amanofnoreputation21645 ай бұрын
I don't think there is a way to think like Nietzsche. Ways and methods are for other philsophers. If you think like Nietzsche at all, it isn't a way of thinking you've learned but _the way you think._ Period. The idea that his philosopy is an innate aspect of his psychological temprament, rather than a skill, would certainly appeal to Nietzsche pretensions fo elitism, but were that not the case far more people would be able to do. The would be incapable of not doing it.
@kingdompreparation69435 ай бұрын
Why in the world would I want to think like him?!?! Nietzsche lost his mind, mostly due to his insane ideas and lack of faith. No thank you.
@brreezy4215 ай бұрын
He went crazy from a brain tumor or syphilis. Although it's funny and mysterious or something to think his ideas drove him insane, it's kind of silly and childish to actually believe it
@traildoggy5 ай бұрын
"I wish God were alive to see this." -- Homer J Simpson
@Yonkipog5 ай бұрын
To think like nietzsche, all you have to be is an ENTP.
@James-ll3jb5 ай бұрын
What is an ENTP?
@Yonkipog5 ай бұрын
@@James-ll3jb its an mbti personality type , its psuedo science but it kinda has a element of truth in it . We ENTPs think of an thought and than play devil's advocate to criticize the thought to keep the thought fair and logical from all perspectives , so that the thought doesn't remain constant but rather it continuously evolves , pretty similar to what nietzche does , as described by @michaelmcclure3383 's comment on this video .
@James-ll3jb5 ай бұрын
@@Yonkipog Ah! Being socratic....or a libra lol! Thanks...
@Yonkipog5 ай бұрын
@@James-ll3jb i already admitted it was psuedo science, you didn't have to cause such a burn by comparing it to zodiac sings . LOL
@stevesmith49015 ай бұрын
What a self-indulgent video. Did not expect this from this channel.
@Archimedeeez5 ай бұрын
insightful
@GregMilner5 ай бұрын
Step 1: Get syphilus.
@kevinbeck88365 ай бұрын
Step 1: Learn to read
@ejenkins47115 ай бұрын
So did he tap into this core tesla used and that why they are short and sweet because there is no point 🍀💚🦍
@outofoblivionproductions40152 ай бұрын
No thanks.
@jam10875 ай бұрын
Because he's not a normal person. And "Thank God" he isn't!!!. Did you hear that? Walking, not video games ,even though he is "The"Boss incel with pasty skin and dishpan hands he would not be suffering any video games
@siyaindagulag.5 ай бұрын
He,of the distinctively European forehead.
@asaiira5 ай бұрын
I used to love this channel 1 or so years ago when it was so welcoming to people despite their gender. This disease of male-centric vanity is a corruption of soul that seeps into the language you use to address your audiences. Using 'he', 'man' and 'himself' doesn't make your ideas immediately "deep"
@marycontrary62165 ай бұрын
I'm a woman and I enjoy this channel regardless of the use of the descriptors.
@asaiira5 ай бұрын
@@marycontrary6216 Yes your being ''woman'' should make everything alright i guess. There are a lot of women everywhere contributing to filth that degrades the general image of women in eyes of children and mass populations. The first critique of language made 300 years ago was made by a woman who was surrounded by women who felt like you. Congratulations
@asaiira5 ай бұрын
@@marycontrary6216 I suppose your being a woman should justify this and every other atrocities against your gender anywhere else in history or now in the world based on your personal indifference to it? I dont care if you are a woman It only makes it worse when women act as enablers in these cases. The first critique of for example sexist language was made by a woman who was surrounded by women like you who told her i imagine ''it never did bother me''.