Quite impressive that if you really stick with you dont even need the opening theory
@thebottman1Ай бұрын
I like how this ended up transposing to one of the lines of your new Chessable course, at least until your opponent refused the early Queen trade. Very instructive seeing how you finished the game!
@jonjones820Ай бұрын
As always, G to the G, Coach.
@althompson3085Ай бұрын
Appreciate center pawn discussion.
@caesarspqr5561Ай бұрын
How to win with the pawn in the endgame? Read dvoretsky's endgame manual and either become mentally unstable or a endgame god 😂
@girator2010Ай бұрын
Very well played. Rd6!
@ElderScrollsVINewsАй бұрын
Really appreciate your coaching. Thanks for the information it's very helpful.
@ChessCoachAndrasАй бұрын
@@ElderScrollsVINews cheers mate!
@robinesperozaАй бұрын
Great video, I personally don't really care about computer review. If I have an IM explaining their moves I have more then enough. Thanks for video, like how you still think about best moves, even when anything wins.
@ChessCoachAndrasАй бұрын
@@robinesperoza good take! Thanks 🙏
@TheBigGuppyАй бұрын
Yay! I knew it. Pawns really matter. I’ve been seeing c5 against 3.Nc3 lately. I wonder if some whacked bad chess KZbinr did a video on it. Just take the pawn. Posted for the algorithm.
@myhatmygandhi6217Ай бұрын
I think it's just a case of players at this level not learning openings. Most people will say learn opening principles and work on tactics. A lot of 1000's wouldn't know how to punish 3. c5 also.
@fabioarturospada4178Ай бұрын
Such a lucid game. Rd6 ended up being one hell of a move!
@DadOnHisOwnАй бұрын
Very, very good
@shujaatullah3617Ай бұрын
Exactly, Caesar. I was reading Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual on Pawn Endings last night and felt that I was going mad...huhuhu...