How Ukrainian Sea Drones Destroyed a Russian Ship Caesar Kunikov

[@Aitelly]

New Video US DESTROYER SHIP kzbin.info/www/bejne/enzGiXduhcakr6M

[@MrM4Goo]

As a builder of large RC low center of gravity boats/drones/hellos iv Run/seen these at speed and without a heavy ballast/payload these are thrown around in any open water even with the advantage of operating these by eyesight its a bumpy ride & being controlled by GPS or only the 3 onboard cameras in anything more than a swell will be no walk in the park so the only option "bigger is indeed better" as with any RC

[@gregjones3660]

et tu jetski?

[@ryansav1527]

Welcome to the future: David vs Goliath is effective in modern warfare..

[@Tony-ti7wk]

russian bot detected: ​ @user-bd5sp6pu8k

[@FullMetalContent]

@@user-bd5sp6pu8k как Херсон поживает?

[@lannael.]

@@user-bd5sp6pu8k да, случайные и редкие 😂🤡

[@FullMetalContent]

@@user-bd5sp6pu8k го в Херсон, если не зaccaл?

[@xinniethep00h]

@@user-bd5sp6pu8k lmao you're really bragging about taking Avdeevka which is mere kilometers from land Russia has held for over a decade. Let's not even talk about the 10s of thousands of men killed to take it. You need to start worrying why Russian jets are getting shot out of the sky almost daily now. Better pray f16s haven't arrived 🙏🏼

[@Platypus_Warrior]

When you see an RC boat turning on water, I wonder how a missile or a torpedo could hit such a small thing. The best option would be a proximity detonation hopping the shock wave will do the trick. Yet, it's so small and quick that the heat signature must be almost invisible and radars would see them too late anyway. Seems like you can still win wars with 1/10 of the budget of your adversary but with brains like history showed us

[@Nauda999]

Yes, surface ships are so obsolete now. Once AI technology develops, underwater drones will hunt down the submarines too, and in general time to start making terminators, and make humans obsolete too.

[@Nauda999]

@@mozillafirefox892 Time to call them Ukrainian Starlink satellites, like everything is Ukrainian now. Ukrainian Storm Shadows, Ukrainian Scalps, Ukrainian Bradley's, Ukrainian Leopards, Ukrainian HIMARS. Only Ukrainian about these water drones is that they have been put together in Ukraine and launched from Ukraine, the parts are not built in Ukraine, nor any part of Starlink or the MQ-9 reaper drones or spy satellites.

[@Platypus_Warrior]

So you did? Please tell me more, I'm curious@@mozillafirefox892

[@sirave6017]

I would think fragmentation rounds (airburst proximity fused, like you said), that's the only sure way, but at a high enough cyclic rate, and I wouldn't waste rounds at range. Wait till it gets within a 750m...but that's probably against protocols/procedures or something.

[@Platypus_Warrior]

you must first see it thow. Skimming the water surface, if the water cooling system goes straight back down, how would your radar see it if it comes "slowly at first" ? There's a lauching time, still nowadays@@sirave6017

[@dirtydish6642]

I imagine China may be completely rethinking any sea invasion of Taiwan.

[@jawarakf]

China is number 1 in manufacturing drones now. If US allowed China to supply weapons & necessities to Russia like how US & NATO allowed to supply weapons to Ukraine, Ukraine would have fallen today. What makes you think China is interested to waste resources invade Taiwan in the first place? China would rather invade Guam and several islands in Pacific held by US that have natural resources and cut off US from entering the east.

[@gilean6179]

@@jawarakf bro, China is surrounded. What makes you think they will ever win any war? History shows they are losers.

[@olexb]

china can not think, they can just copy

[@fredtouche9367]

About a month ago Xi Jingping told Joe Biden straight to his face that China would invade Taiwan so I would not rule out this possibility. You can imagine the resulting mayhem of a few thousand naval drones attacking the invasion fleet.

[@hohepatewhiu1818]

Yeah China will copy it and watch out USA

[@evFPV]

What the Ukranian army are doing to the Black Sea Fleet is amazing. They are genious! The only thing that surprised me is that they are relying on Starlink. I thought that maybe they had a relay drone in the sea serving as communication hub to the rest of the kamikaze drones. Relying on Musk´s is quite risky, but I suppose they had no other option. Again, thank you for sharing

[@zwireobecne]

The famous Russian Navy is being destroyed in a war with a country that doesn't even have a navy :D

[@TheRealBillBob]

First of all it's not Ukrainian ingenuity. Ukraine never had any such thing. These were donated by the West. That's number one. Number two, it sounds like the Houthis have been giving these sea drones now. So now they get to sink a few US ships and you can call the Houthis "amazing" and "genius" if you want to. 😂😂

[@Nicolas-v1z4i]

@@TheRealBillBob well if they invented there own drones like OP thought then yes it would be genius terrorist or not. You clearly lack an enromous amount of neurons and its sad

[@andrewbrock4636]

​​@@TheRealBillBobso these drones were donated to Ukraine but also the houthis so then they can be used to attack the people that donated to them? Are you an alcoholic?

[@themagetone4184]

@@TheRealBillBob yepyep, "we re not losing our fleet to weak Ukraine, we are losing it to West and/or Houthis", what a big pile of nonsense. First of all, "sea drones" Houthis use are not even remotely as advanced as those mentioned in this video. It's not even comparable. Their sea drones are literal motor boats with remote detonation and no streaming technology or even ability to control the direction of movement. It's not even a drone, it is just a catchy word to use by mass media. I mean it's not hard to google their "sea drones" up. I mean, there never was a single succesful use of those "sea drones" recorded, even against commercial ships. Second: if those are donated by the west, i'd like to learn what sea drones u're talking about. I've never heard or seen any sea drone even remotely similar to this one. Also i've never heard of western military relying on starlink and soviet explosives for their weapons. So pls, educate us. You guys are addicted to copium

[@LordMondegrene]

Nice grafix and explanation. SUBSCRIBED!

[@fsmprophet8319]

Graphic

[@jpsholland]

so you like to be fooled?

[@bilboriches7216]

@@jpsholland Ivan, you have a russian ip

[@Aitelly]

You are Awesome 👍🏻 Have a nice day 🙏🏻

[@DanteFrancis-ze8fb]

​@@jpshollandFooled? What in this video are you trying to pretend is false?

[@g40471]

Good stuff ,very clever design Ukraine 👍

[@g40471]

@user-zr4uw5ng3r ok then, very clever Britain and i'm sure the armed forces of Ukraine will skilfully operate them.

[@FulseFlag]

​@@g40471разведка целей и наведение на цель USAF Global Hawk RQ-4B. Это уже прямая операция НАТО против России под ложным флагом Украины. Ты уже готов идти в военкомат, друг?

[@g40471]

@@FulseFlag Sorry but I cannot read your reply perhaps it best you use english as this station is an english talking forum ,nothing wrong with your language just cant read it.

[@andreus_777]

@user-zr4uw5ng3r oh I see, there’s ruzzian here

[@andreus_777]

@@g40471 russians think that everybody in the world can understand their language and even speak 😅

[@user-221i]

This one used Oneweb satellites. Musky disabled Starlink for Ukrainians.

[@Aitelly]

Yes he did. Love Elon Musk

[@user-221i]

What?@@Aitelly

[@ampeg187]

No this is false, there is no official news of spacex disabling starlink for UA but Musk does not support using starlink for war purpouses

[@TheRealBillBob]

He said he loves Elon Musk. Can't you read? @@user-221i

[@bewareofthedg]

@@ampeg187 official Ukrainian authorities confirmed this

[@РостиславКіндратюк]

сьогодні цими дронами потоплено ще один каcanський корабель - корвет "сергкй котов".

[@antonextaler184]

Записался на фронт уже? Или сдернул от тцк?

[@beaumontgile5886]

This thing has same motor as my yahama banshee

[@cristo6007]

Don't get any ideas 😂

[@juhajuntunen7866]

But I can not unthink it!

[@Aitelly]

🤔

[@benpurcell4935]

Many American WW2 PT boats had aircraft engines to power them.

[@ZiGGi03]

Drones were used to throw off the radars and the boat was parked floating off shore the drones sneaked up it didn’t have to go full speed so was rather quiet so can sneak up if needed . 7 drones were used and had different jobs to do

[@Bling_The_Visual_Creator]

Iran watching

[@Aitelly]

🤔

[@green_red34955]

yeman also watching ❤

[@rick1611]

Iran should start building their own due to usa harassment

[@chevyjay399]

US ships are much more capable to deal with surface threats.

[@bluedragontoybash2463]

US carrier fleet have left the chat

[@ic2e230]

It seems you made it in 1 day or you are a secret agent of SBU and knew about the atack in advance. Both senarios are cool af.

[@Aitelly]

Yes we made it in 1 day you are one of the few who understood 3D animation and working through the night to get this done

[@Aitelly]

Please Sub and Hit the Notification Bell to help us grow

[@VALMOX]

I love the video❤

[@lahabitaciondelatrapado4621]

The video is great from an engineering perspective. From a military perspective, let me add a few things off the top of my head: 1- The attack was carried out in coordination and there is footage of the event. 2- The ports have nets to counter the naval drones, so a plan had to be mustered. 3- A explosion happened in a location close to the russian naval base just before sunset, so they sent this ship, which has radar and AA gun to scout the area outside of the port, the idea was to have early warning if another weapon or aircraft was on their way. The Ukranians probably studied the movements of the russian fleet and expected this reaction. 4- The first drone to hit the ship has a thermal camera where you could see dusk happening. It tailgated the ship and hit it in the rudder. 5- With the mobility impaired, a second drone hit it again in the rudder, completely inmobilising the ship and turning it into a sitting duck 6- Another drone/explosion happened in the middle of the ship, I couldn't find footage of this explosion. 7- Another drone hit the ship in the same spot as the previous one, the damage can be seen before impact. At this point, the crew had probably started evacuation. 8- Further thermal footage can be seen of the ship sinking straight down, this means there were even more naval drones lurking and filming, a minimum of 5 naval drones carried out this attack plus whatever caused the initial explosion inland. Hope it helps, maybe a video idea for a part 2 😉 ****Edit: the escenario I described is the sinking of the ship Ivanovets***

[@kevint1910]

it should be fairly simple based on the video provided to time the bob rate of the "drone" and calculate from that the displacement mass yielding an approximation of the size for the potential warhead....with out even bothering to do so it is obvious that the motorized surfboard in question can not mass much over 300 lbs 100 or so of which will be the drone battery pack motor and controls leaving 200 lbs of payload for a warhead...and you claim that this is what sank a warship? two of them now in as many weeks? yeah sure they did.

[@Aitelly]

@@lahabitaciondelatrapado4621 Awesome Feedback

[@4oh8cal]

​@@Aitelly I'm pretty new to the channel, do you do detailed videos on Russian attacks on Ukraine??

[@Jonathan.D]

I these videos are great, and this is one that gives lots of details. However, I did see one detail that was missed. On the original drone, there are three angled fins that run across the top of the vessel. These fins serve a specific purpose. They are needed because of the high speed of the vessel and the large payload located forward of the center. If rough seas are encountered, they prevent the vessel from being forced under the water and becoming a submarine. If the vessel encounters a large wave, the water pushes against the angled fins. This force causes the bow of the vessel to rise out of the water rapidly. Keep up the great work.

[@antoine9765]

Always wondered about this, thanks 👍

[@steveyountz9184]

Would it help if they used foils to help with speed and/or being less conspicuous in the water?

[@celticbedou]

Good point, speed, range and stealth.

[@charlesunderwood6334]

The latest film suggests the sea was too rough for that, but come Summer, that will change

[@steveyountz9184]

@@charlesunderwood6334 I thought anything using foils could handle somewhat tougher sea-states. Am I wrong?

[@mannygon]

I would think that detonation at, or below, the water line would be more desirable than a elevated detonation. Just saying.

[@DanteFrancis-ze8fb]

Foils would lift it out of the water making it much more visible, and would rob the explosion of Munroe effect caused by the water when it detonates submerged. (Meaning a lot less powerful)

[@matthewbittenbender9191]

Certainly a game changer in closed and coastal water combat. I'm surprised this wasn't developed years earlier. Guess the need wasn't there until now.

[@VALMOX]

I gonna publish this model made of LEGO soon👍🇺🇸

[@Aitelly]

Awesome will be happy to see it.

[@VALMOX]

@@Aitelly ❤️

[@Apache-t9o]

@@VALMOX very interesting 👍

[@spotlight9864]

Hello, great job! What render engine do you use in blender? Is it EVEE?

[@Aitelly]

Yes it's EVEE

[@spotlight9864]

@@Aitelly Thank you

[@elonmax404]

7:07 Crimean bridge is definitely not 227 meters in length

[@Palma59-t4f]

Это главный пролёт моста, судоходная часть. Неужели не понятно?

[@АГЭМААли]

Россия заслуживает все что с ней происходит потому что она позволяет всяким так с ней обращаться.

[@igorvel7724]

Не согласен с Вами. РФ заслуживает суда и позора, потому что позволяет СЕБЕ подлые, нечеловеческие поступки.

[@gregwarner3753]

The Kunikov was running not only with standard running lights but actually had deck lights on. Did they not realize they were in enemy water and subject to attack. They should have been completely blacked out. How stupid can the Russians get?

[@Aitelly]

They were in Crimea Annexed. So they thought they don't need defenses

[@xOpenAir]

The drones have a thermal imager and the ship will be visible even with the illumination completely turned off.

[@gregwarner3753]

@@xOpenAir That makes sense.

[@maikmohamed-bq2mu]

Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦❤️💪

[@BotPHb]

В составе России!

[@ino-1048]

@@BotPHb нравиться не нравиться но параша скоро розвалиться, подрочи пока на фюрера пока живой

[@camdarley8659]

Great video, very informative and well designed. Amazing CGI

[@mummelmann-hd2xu]

Durch die Grafik versteht man den Vorgang.. Sehr gut erklärt und skizziert.. Danke 🇩🇪🇺🇦 Ist es nicht gefährlich, diese gute Wasserdrohne so detailliert zu zeigen? Die Russen liegen ca.2 Monate hinter den ukrainischen Erfindungen zurück, aber sie bauen nach und gucken bestimmt auch dieses Video !!

[@yura8469]

Є дрони які не досягнули своєї цілі у росіян. Тому вони знають принцип дії. Але вони їм не так потрібні як Україні. Окупанти можуть тільки топити цивільні судна, але у них для цього є і ракети

[@theempireofthepeople]

Russians are not stupid if we know exactly how this things look they know exactly how it's made...the only reason they can't counter Ukraine made weapons is either corruption or money😅

[@Bergelmir_Þrúðgelmirson]

90% дронов сбивается, поэтому у нас много подбитых и целых таких водных беспилотников. Войну они не выиграют. Украина станет опять русской.

[@СтепанСтепанов-о7ш]

@@yura8469как только гражданские могут топить, если они потопили в портах Украины даже военные катера? Последних несколько катеров были потоплены в Одессе и Николаеве.

[@СтепанСтепанов-о7ш]

И это не Украина делает данные дроны. На Украине их только собирают. Комплектующие поставляет Британия.

[@sundragon7703]

In comparison, US defense corporations cannot wrap their heads around a weapon that costs substantially less than $1 million/unit. Thanks Ukraine for showing the way.

[@bluedragontoybash2463]

The US don't like to develop cheap weapon that can be used against their own very expensive weapon

[@harleyquinn8202]

Because CEOs of those corporations need to show multi-billion profits to their shareholders. Not much profit with those cheap drones.

[@joepatriot363]

Allow me to share a thought and experience with many of you younger people. I remember the Vietnam War and the way it was reported on a daily basis. We were winning all along, UNTIL we lost it.

[@zwireobecne]

The famous Russian Navy is being destroyed in a war with a country that doesn't even have a navy :D

[@nikolabulog4659]

Boats are not navy?

[@themagetone4184]

@@nikolabulog4659 bro, everyone knows what the guy means, there's no need to act like that. yeah, boats are hardly navy compared to, lets say, russian fleet

[@JeZZGro]

US F117 is destroyed by country that even has no real AA, it is 2nd WW AA.

[@alexeyshatilov1496]

В эту игру можно играть и вдвоем/троем. Хуситы крайне не уважительно относятся к любой американской/английской посуде, плывущей по красному морю ))

[@watching-you-]

А США проиграло воздушную войну в знаменитом налете 11 сентября тем, кто не имел своих самолетов. 😂

This little boat made warships obsolete

[@bombheadgames9565]

Does FSB actually mean Fast Sinking Boats?

[@sergiyrospysdiyenko6224]

😂😂😂🎉

[@JeZZGro]

You westerns are really on level of a todler.

[@ivan1kot]

Нет, это Федеральная служба безопасности

[@Dmitro_13748]

In russian language, FSB means Federal Security Service (like FBI)

[@Chervick]

1. Magura does not use Starlink 2. The road bridge was destroyed by a truck with explosives, not by sea drones

[@OggyXXXL]

2. It was damaged twice

[@alexsaveljev3290]

@@OggyXXXL только в украинских новостях, а по факту дрон не доплыл

[@impaugjuldivmax]

скоро доплывет

[@beshketx]

​@@alexsaveljev3290 да да да, дрон не доплыл, удары по опорам второй раз были с помощью черной магии конечно же)

[@gfhhxxhg4731]

Неверная информация эти дроны умеют маневрировать что бы уйти из выстрела корабля. По поводу манёвра на видео ничего не показано

[@653dakota]

Мультик.

[@Narek2805]

@@653dakota цей мультик потопив вже не один реальний корабель

[@GamePlayShare]

Too bad maskim ilonovitch have switched sides and now tries to block starlink operations on drones.

[@speedhump231]

Musk must hate star link being used to attack his Boss's ships. Great video.

[@Aitelly]

Aggreed

[@vsochi234]

man just likes freedom of speech and people already calling him a russian puppet 💀

[@mynameisschezuan]

​@@vsochi234 He sure like freedom of speech which is great, but Musk have said some pretty stupid things for no good reason.

[@soulxtr]

@@mynameisschezuan And what is he stupid he said? ​

[@miriamweller812]

@@vsochi234 That's how fascism works. You either are with the fascists or you are their enemy. Nothing new.

[@KamilsView]

I just learnt from Wikipedia that the Polish word Ropucha is used because the ship was built in Poland. Ropucha (pronounced roh-puh-hah) means toad in Polish (you know, similar to a frog ;-) ). Cheers!

[@yourfabuloushappymann5154]

Suppose what would happen if they opened the bow and stern hatches simultaneously?

[@mykhajlo9225]

Same meaning in russian and Ukrainian

[@KamilsView]

Oh, cool. Thanks for that. Is it also pronounced the same way in Ru and Uk? @@mykhajlo9225

[@KamilsView]

Well, that depends where the ship is and how much would they open those hatches. @@yourfabuloushappymann5154

[@themagetone4184]

@@KamilsView yeah

[@СергейМарченков-ц4х]

Каждая война дает что то новое. Новое оружие, новая тактика

[@BMW_MAN]

Новая капитуляция и суд над военными преступниками пошедшими против своего народа купленные за миллиарды долларов США . После чего будет негласный суд над теми кто отдавал приказы об атаках на Российские корабли и выделял на это деньги. Просто будут убиты у себя дома в постели.

[@jurgenkaulfu181]

Und viele tode Menschen Leid und Zerstoerung!

[@manueltran1964]

They should mount the HD video camera on some sort of gimbal or stabilizer to compensate for rough waters for better transmissions and steering.

[@Onlynxes]

фейспалм... ты ведешь себя как ребенок

[@christopherkims]

Slava Ukrania 🇺🇦

[@AdmiringOceanSunset-sy7ys]

Congradulation's Ukraine, for making it into the drone's club. Roa Aotearoa nui.

[@roberthammer8635]

Can you do a Video on Russian UMPK ?

[@BMW_MAN]

No no no no. You don't understand this other thing. It is necessary to understand.

[@marcuskruger5324]

Und jetzt bitte den Rest der Schwarzmeer-Flotte des Iwans durch See-Drohnen auch noch versenken.👍👏💪

[@jurgenkaulfu181]

Und dann?

[@aryehyehudahajzenberg9503]

ABSOBLOODLUTELY AMAZINGFANTASTIC VIDEO ! DONT YOU GUYS NEVER GET TIRED OF BEING EXCELLENTS !?!?! Thank you very much for this cool video (as usual), keep up the excellent superexcellent work and may God bless you always !

[@Aitelly]

God Bless you too. New Video Next Week!

[@THEROBINKEVIN]

But where is the fuel ⛽ tank in this boat

[@Aitelly]

It's similar to Sea doo Jet Ski

[@ataxpayer723]

The fuel tank of this ship is located on the seabed.

[@brianpeck4035]

It runs on water.

[@Patt12]

@@brianpeck4035 no fuel need all electronic

[@Patt12]

@@ataxpayer723 he was referring to the drone fuel

[@BeatClub35]

Slava Ukraini! ✊✊✊✊

[@gherkamum]

🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦💪

[@JeZZGro]

Battlefied is waiting for you.

[@fikayfilms]

I love this video, i also want to use blender but it seems to be very complex to me. Pls do you have a way for me to learn it easily?

[@WatchThisA]

Based on some of the video I've seen of these in high seas, the only improvement I see should be some gyro stabilized camera mounts. From the videos the cameras seem to be hard mounted now which makes me seasick just watching.

[@Aitelly]

I was also having the same thought. I mean the pilot driving these Drones might be having Sea Sick 🤢 after a Couple of minutes

[@Softhedge]

Ну вы все секреты раскрыли. Надо подводные дроны делать,как торпеды.

[@you_are_soul]

"the operator pushed the throttle to the max", Full Send!

[@JeZZGro]

Todlers...

[@rulue8610]

Russia has lost two vital warships. First was Moskva in 2022, now Cesar Kunikov.

[@xOpenAir]

lost significantly more, not 2 ships. 4 landing ships alone were sunk, and in general Russia lost 20% of the ships of the Black Sea Fleet or 50% of the ships of the total displacement of the fleet

[@michiel1362]

Nice graphic video work

[@Dirk80241]

One drone attack, 25 APCs or tanks gone! Bullseye!

[@tonyp2865]

It's a 40 year old ship built in Poland.

[@Aitelly]

Yes

[@TrusePkay]

Do a video on how the Iskander and ATACMs work

[@7_years_and_]

Could have explained more about what are ships defence .

[@Patt12]

None by the look

[@zoe-ml8cx]

We're never satisfied with someone else's work...

[@thomasjacques5286]

Amazing. And the US and NATO are gleaning all sorts of Intel and Lessons Learned in real time.

[@oneminutes1034]

Молодцы украинцы

[@suspiciousminds1750]

Fantastic video, highly informative. I learned a lot. The vessels that are being sunk are not what we think of from WW2. They are thin skinned with little or no compartmentalization. Once the hull is breached it is difficult to control flooding. That is why the cruiser "Moskva" took much more damage before going down, she was armored and designed to control flooding.

[@charlesunderwood6334]

That's maybe why landing ships are being targeted especially- to function they have to possess a single, giant, internal space and no compartments.

[@Aitelly]

It's because they hit the ammunition storage I guess

[@v1adimiros]

"Moskva" was destroyed by two Ukrainian anti-ship missiles "Neptune"

[@suspiciousminds1750]

@@v1adimiros Yes, and suffered secondary explosions. My point is that as a front line warship she absorbed a lot more damage before going down.

[@Козак-т6с]

How do you know all this? You have one of these drones or their exact design was described in Popular mechanics or what?

[@Aitelly]

🤔

[@nikosatsaves3141]

Magura in greek is the elderly's cane with the curved edge which they use to help them stand or batter someone! .

[@thesuncollective1475]

How did you make this vid so fast!

[@Aitelly]

After 15 years in the Animation Industry we managed to get it done in very less time.

[@chad872]

ChatGPT

[@CashMacGregor]

i watched the an board video from a drone as it sped toward a russian ship. you could see bullets hitting all around the front of it then when it was 60-70 feet away the shooting stopped. you just knew the "snipers" were running to the other end of the ship.

[@BiGDuke6Actual]

With today's news - GREATLY looking forward to reading Putin's OBITUARY ASAP

[@yourfabuloushappymann5154]

The face of war certainly has changed indeed. EMP surface charges in a porcupine array helo deployed

[@charonstyxferryman]

With inertial navigation aid, and its dead reckoning capability, A Sea Baby doesn't miss the target.

[@Andy-gg9yo]

This is not a Russian ship, but a Soviet one. 14 republics of the Soviet Union created Russia - ships, subways, schools, airplanes, power plants, hospitals, factories. Russia itself did nothing - it just lost medicine, the army, space, Vladivostok became an internal port of China

[@MrColins710]

exactly!

[@kadu.g.g]

Large warships, well armed and equipped, but defenseless? Who is the pioneer of this maritime drone project?

[@garcon_damour]

Bros on fbi wanted list💀

[@Aitelly]

Thank You we Made it !

[@garcon_damour]

Ur lucky bro😂

[@triadwarfare]

Maybe they're on the FSB hit list too?

[@user-vj9qz3br6l]

These sea drones should carry air drones on their decks for further versatility

[@Art_Int_40]

So you made 150 sec of new video and then just added the older one. :/

[@Aitelly]

New Video coming on 17th February 2024

[@kingping3933]

All videos are like this!!! it end abruptly 🤔😒

[@joseph87328]

Shocking how the radar on the ships cannot identify these small crafts moving. Russia needs to work on this

[@TheRealBillBob]

Well maybe the US can show everyone how it's done, now that reports are saying the Houthis are getting sea drones. If they manage to hit a ship, it would minimize Ukraine's accomplishments.

[@daddyrabbit835]

If only we put this much effeort into helping each other.

[@valkry007]

This could not have been possible without U.S. targeting information.

[@Aitelly]

You might be right

[@ЯрославК-х2с]

Сумніваюсь , про все що діється в Чорному морі Україна знає сама , так як майже все Чорне море це територіальні води України .

[@happychayka]

​@@ЯрославК-х2сах да. Самый сильный флот во всём мире - украинский 🤡

[@ЯрославК-х2с]

@@happychayka сильний чи не сильний це питання до політики . Факт залишається фактом Україна це єдина країна в світі хто самотужки потопила стільки кораблів ворога з часів 2 світової .

[@andrewbrock4636]

Cope

[@charonstyxferryman]

Ukraine has a new Sea Baby. It can carry 1 ton of explosives - and can carry air-defence missiles too. ... and even better, it can go under the water, so it's basically a torpedo - or - an air defence system with 1,000 Km range. Source: "Arthur Rehi's video (07. March 2024)

[@piotrsyczak]

btw 'ropucha' mean a toad

[@nino88881]

Great video👍. Just a suggestion. Please just use one type of unit or mention both each time. It just doesnt sounds right when you mentioned 700lb drone then it can carries 300kg war head. Just use one or the other or mention the conversions each time. Thanks

[@bombheadgames9565]

If this was crossed with a jumping mine, they could maybe hit the underside of the kerch bridge with a shaped charge.

[@РоманПушкарев-ч2и]

Смотри гад. Ещё будут попытки на Крымский мост. Я рядом . Задумайся прежде чем писать

[@ihsanulhaq8851]

So these ships can't stop bombs moving at 50 mph it's very interesting

[@bluedragontoybash2463]

Interesting ? not to the mighty and expensive US navy

[@strangeke7750]

@@bluedragontoybash2463 us navy can stop these with laser weapons

[@BotPHb]

@@strangeke7750 pew pew pew

[@dogeboje3929]

Most incredible drone

[@berndhofmann752]

The Russians should learn That they are no marine power. Remember Tsushima.

[@protectoroflight5895]

Интересно, сработают ли такие же дроны против американских авианосцев?)

[@BotPHb]

Нужно хуситам отправить пару десятков единиц для испытаний.

[@OhhCats]

Я уверен, американцы уже разработали средства противодействия против таких дронов - что-то похожее на электронную систему защиты для танков, когда из танка навстречу к летящей ПТР вылетает мини-ракетка, которая эту ПТР сбивает на подлёте. Америка это продвинутая свободная страна, а путинская Россия это отсталая вонючая диктатура. Свобода победит

[@ino-1048]

Пока уничтожают корыта окупантов

[@xOpenAir]

Пока мы точно знаем, что эта технология отлично работает по бдк и ракетным катерам рашки

[@РоманПушкарев-ч2и]

Легко и с радостью

[@fifi23o5]

Whoever knows something about the boats would know they can't have such a range. They are designed as planing boats, that's why they can reach high speeds. But at high speeds they would have very short range. Their cruise speed is probably more in about 20 knot range. From Ukrainian shore to the location of the strike is more than 400 nautical miles. At cruise speed that is 20hours. Propuslsion is based on a SeaDoo technology. It is well known, easy to obtain and also there is a lot of data available. I don't know exactly what model they used, for my calculation I used a mid range model, although it's much lighter than this drone. It has fuel consumption of 35-40 litres per hour. That would equate to 700-800 litres of fuel. And this is at a distance shorter than the claimed range of 800 kms. No way it can carry that much fuel. There is a possibility that it could travel at long distances in displacement mode, but there are several other factors to be taken into account. Planing boats are not very fficient in displacement mode, wated jet is not very efficient at low speeds, it's displacement top speed would be some 4.5 to 5 knots max, that means it would take it 80 hours, more than three days to reach it's target, they would be exposed to detection for three full days. My bet is they were not launched from the coast in the first place. Most likely from some NATO ship, maybe even from some civilian cargo ship. Then there is a ''small'' thing about guidance. Starlink does not work in or around Crimea. I'm 99.5% they are using US/NATO assets to relay the signal at minimum. BTW, on the day of the strike there was extremely big activity of recconaissance assets in the area. There was the usual RQ-4, P-8, RC-135, E-3. All at the same time! I've seen them all there before, but not at the same time. Maybe, actually, probably, there were even more. That indicates direct NATO involvement.

[@nathanryweck3137]

Nope, this video is confusing the older smaller model with the newer, larger long range model which doesn't use seadoo systems.

[@fifi23o5]

@@nathanryweck3137 Nope. And even if it were, the same problem exists. The SeaDoo system is the most readily available and very efficient system, there is absolutely no reason not to use it. And the laws of physics still apply, there is no magic wand...

[@nathanryweck3137]

Incorrect. There are many different designs and different sizes of these sea drones with different fuel capacities and ranges. Look it up. @@fifi23o5

[@andyvegas]

Lol the drones are definitely not Nato. Ukraine was the production mind and brains of the cold Ivanoid Slave Empire.

[@fifi23o5]

@@andyvegas Yeah, right...

[@mrvgranfield]

How is the counter offensive going

[@michaelcullen6923]

Crimea is "annexed"? More like occupied

[@ivan1kot]

Это тебе так по телевизору сказали?

[@JeZZGro]

Then Kosovo is occupied too? Right?

[@aday6339]

It sounds like a Hollywood movie 🍿🍿 😂😂😂

[@Aitelly]

😉

[@aday6339]

@@Aitelly I didn't know where you got your news from, but it's sounds like a story from a Hollywood movies.🍿🍿🍿🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@ahmedalsharman]

It is *not* a Ukrainian made drone ,, It is a *British made Drones* .

[@13flr]

Does the UK have similar weapons?

[@ahmedalsharman]

@@13flr they are UK made weapons which was transfered to Ukraine last year ... there is also a good chance that the operators are also from UK 🇬🇧 .

[@13flr]

@@ahmedalsharman Do I understand correctly that you don't have any facts and are just repeating Kremlin propaganda right now?

[@ketelin4285]

@@13flr Get this into your head - any kind of long range drone needs sattelites and recon drones like global hawks that cannot be shotdown . These are what counts not a jetsky with a bomb strapped on , mkay ?

[@ahmedalsharman]

@@13flr just google *Uk transfer underwater drones ukraine*

[@HeKuTK0]

7:50 this is shown incorrectly. Only one side of the bridge was damaged. Other side was still standing. The whole bridge was fixed up and is still standing nowadays

[@isadanjan4762]

Caesar Kunikov did not have any means of defense, including the ship's AK630 minigun. So I don’t see the point in comparing what was destroyed by a kamikaze boat, especially since even a subsonic cruise missile can also damage it for that reason. It is very risky for an unarmed ship to enter a conflict zone.

[@Aitelly]

Noted

[@NePokirni]

Не смеши . Артиллерия2 × 2 × 57-мм АК-725Ракетное вооружение2 × 20 × 122-мм РСЗО «Град-М» ПЗРК «Стрела-2"

[@vanhelsing5469]

@@NePokirni Footage of maritime drone attack published Ukraine, to the Russian large landing ship "Caesar Kunikov", project 775, which we previously talked about. The attack at 6.15 am almost abeam Yalta was carried out by a Ukrainian unit called Group 13 equipped with maritime drones MAGURA V5, we previously reported about it and drones. It is unknown what purpose the landing ship Caesar Kunikov had, but at the moment, not a single ship in the world can repel a massive attack by sea drones. Putting this ship out to sea was quite a risky endeavor; unlike other ships of Project 775, it does not have AK-630 artillery mounts and has nothing to repel an attack with. Judging by the video, the ship tilted and capsized on one of its sides. According to Ukrainian media, the ship "Caesar Kunikov" sank, Russian media do not confirm this. Ты видимо сам это придумал, так как на этом классе даже ак725 не было- стрела может быть, но она надводные цели не может сбивать.

[@isadanjan4762]

⁠@@NePokirniу проекта 775 не было ак725 если ты не в курсе + стрела предназначена для поражения воздушных целей, а не надводных. Тем более что я сам всю информацию знаю и тролли с другой стороны которые пытаются оправдаться мне не нужны. Если уж ты хочешь троллить тогда спроси почему за 2 года ни один горшков и другие классы которые пускают крылатые ракеты, кроме патрульных кораблей не были задеты? Или боятся катера что уже корабли с с миниганом от 630 сразу же будут не по зубам

[@vanhelsing5469]

@@NePokirniу этого корабля не было АК725- то что тебе сказал Гур не значит что это прям должно быть правдой, или военную цензуру у себя кушаешь тоже?

[@jdcole333]

First, it's an older drone then it says it's cutting edge. There's also four different ranges and three different speeds, did anyone proofread this before they sent this out to the masses?

[@StuartRobinson123]

putting your logo on the military equipment you're trying to teach about is really annoying

[@jc-tu6pg]

damn that is some lightning fast production time! this just happened a couple days ago! but why wasn't the russian ship able to detect its approach?

[@GRosa250]

The crew of the Russian ship was drunk.

[@DanteFrancis-ze8fb]

The drones are small and partially submerged. Only very advanced radars with good computers to filter out the clutter would spot those. And ruSSian tech is far from modern or advanced.

[@miklemikle-1982]

@@GRosa250 это десантный корабль. На борту нет оборудования для обнаружения маленьких надводных целей, если только визуально. И ещё, наши ребята не пьют на службе.

[@alexeyshatilov1496]

Не смог. Бывает. За то сегодня в Одессе накрыли базу с этими катерами. Ни один клоун-генитальный музыкант не пострадал.

[@michiganmarv1860]

Crashing a drone into a civilian bridge is called terrorism… have we forgot

[@bc-guy852]

No - it's NOT. A bridge built over occupied lands and water, which has a RAIL facility that transports tanks - - is Most-Definitely a military target. And the Kerch Bridge won't be standing for much longer. Watch.

[@xOpenAir]

if the bridge carries out military cargo logistics and is generally built illegally, then it is a military purpose.

[@robertdavis5753]

At night that thing must be deadly. US Navy Vet. Freaking scary.

[@MonsieurGone]

*How NATO Sea Drones Destroyed a Russian Ship Caesar Kunikov

[@myedoxx]

Today's comments: "Ukraine has no fleet." Comments in two years later: "Russia has no fleet."

[@Aitelly]

hmm good Comment

[@alexander_nunezf]

Imagine when there are submarine drones available.Ones able to emerge and submerge under a few meters of water to hide themselves.

[@trevorcorker929]

oh the irony, Russian weapons used against the Russian navy.

[@fatmanoverlanding]

Noticed the two different designs. So is Ukraine using two different design sea drones? Or did you just use creative estimation on what they actually looked like?

[@xOpenAir]

Ukraine has several naval drones and with different warhead weights (from 350 kg to 830) on the Internet you can find references to at least 3 drones, but there are more of them «Маричка», Sea Baby, MAGURA V5

[@richbrown9690]

Crazy how Russia now has it's own analogues of these sea drones now

[@rickbase833]

Warfare is getting nastier by the decade. What is scary is this tech could be fitted with a munition which starts with the N. Imagine launching this from a sub 500 miles from a large naval base and having it ride in and boom. Said naval base is destroyed.