Howard Gardner: Truth, Beauty, and Goodness Reframed

[@mariaxroman]

The world is going to be saved by beauty

[@勇二下森]

不易と流行の中で 変えるべきもの 変えてはいけないものを真善美という 集約された価値を 自分の軸で対峙すべきだと感じます。 ガードナー先生の 謙虚な探求心には 深い尊敬の念を持っています。

[@luissidneymariano1041]

40:48

[@elevatetogenerate]

it was nearly impossible to understand the censored Beauty of the presentation. I am lamenting deeply, and regrettably

[@jerryrhee7748]

Again, Peirce is neglected. If what is true of the “commons” (56:11) is true of the “commens”, Then the rank ordering (1:17:45) can be known as: Beauty/Goodness/Truth (alphabetical) and NOT T/B/G BECAUSE Firstness, Secondness, Thirdness; Esthetics, Ethics, Logic; Sayer, Doer, Knower; AND "Logic is rooted in the social principle (and vice versa)" (Peirce, from Richmond and Udell) and "All that we call sacred history attests that the birth of a poet is the principal event in chronology" (Emerson).

[@xDMrGarrison]

I find the lady who introduced Howard quite attractive, which is strange since she's almost 60 years old and I'm 21 :P

[@nancymohass4891]

What a nonsense “copyrighted” disruption !

[@chrismca]

Listening to Gardner lecture about truth is like listening to a sumo wrestler lecture about bulimia. Consider all the money he's taken from schools; and has his hypothesis of Multiple intelligences helped schools? Clearly not. He admitted he called his idea Multiple "Intelligences" just to sell books. A former colleague once asked him how much he believed in his own idea of MI, and he replied "So what, I'm rich and you're not." What does that tell you about his commitment to the truth?

[@acadder1]

It is ironic that a person who has been suckered into believing the liberal model of the world purports to tell us about truth and beauty. This guy is vacant at the root level. Trust nothing said or written by shallow "philosphers" - all surface and worse than useless. If you want to know about truth and beauty, read Swedenborg.

[@robertpirsig5011]

+acadder1 The truth can be attributed to other points of view too. Not everyone see's the same version of philosophical truth. An argument from authority is an an argument from ego, from those who think that their perceptions are somehow more acute, instead of it just looking at the thing differently.

[@pixieelpis8716]

There is more started by Swedenborg. I read 11 Swedenborg volumes. then I found the Urantia Book which seems to take it further.