HS 2025 ABTA English Solution | Page-29 | HS 2025 English ABTA Test Paper Solved | Let's Improve

[@MR_SUMIT_BRO]

4:32 mam We should use hobe toh. we ar pore to should / shall bose

[@Sragdhara_Speaks]

"Shall" traditionally "we" er shathe use hoy future events express korte, but modern English-e "will" more common. Indirect speech-e jodi direct sentence-e "shall" thake, tokhon backshift hoy "should" (obligation) or "would" (future event). Ekhane: Direct: "We'll (we shall) soon be at your station." Indirect: I said we would soon be at their station. "Shall" → "would" hoy future action report korte, tai ekhane "would" perfect fit. 😊

[@AnanyaGhosh-jv7zj]

Mam writing er ekta video hole valo hoy

[@AnanyaGhosh-jv7zj]

Preci chara baki j gulo syllabus a ache writing sugulo lekhar j format ta ektu bole dile valo hoy

[@swagatammanna8923]

V এর টা তো Complex করতে বলেছে but দিয়ে join .. ,

[@Hormoncardiosingh]

Mam,, পুরো টা solve করাচ্ছেন না কেনো,,শুধু grammer Solve করাচ্ছেন।।

[@jaynalabedin9108]

Mam iii/ grammar er sentence 2 bar beverb osbe kii.....😔 No other man was as important as I

[@letsimprove98]

Yes, it is correct and grammatically acceptable to use the verb "was" (or any verb) twice in a sentence when needed for proper meaning and grammatical structure. Here's why it's necessary in this case: 1. Prothom "was" diye bujhaano hochhe onno lok-ra eto ta important chhilo na. 2. Ditio "was" diye bujhaano hochhe je ami important chhilam. "No other man was as important as I was" e sentence-e prothom "was" ta comparison-er part ("as important as") bujhaano jonne use hoyeche. Ditio "was" ta sentence complete korte, amar state ke highlight korte use kora hoyeche. 😊

[@jaynalabedin9108]

@letsimprove98 Thank you mam