Huns and Hungary

[@GergoMarosvari]

Greetings to our Kazakh cousins! :)

[@bociszem4719]

@Aleks Kevyn because you are hungarian, doesn't mean you are right. Im hungarian as well and COMPLETELY (cant exaggerate it more) disagree with you.

[@zaga7890]

Aleks Kevyn I’m also Hungarian, and disagree with you

[@user-gy5er6wh2j]

@Aleks Kevyn The Honfoglalo Hungarians are not Swiderian nor Kunda civilization. According to the genetic studies of Dr. Neparáczki Endre the Honfoglalo Hungarians were genetically R1a and R1b (Indo-European) DNA which is from an Iranian variation that originates from northern Afghanistan and the Tarim basin. They also found Haplogroups N1c1,Q, and C1 N1c1 is the (Finno-Ugric) marker, but they found the East Siberian veriation which is related to the modern day Buryats, Evenki, Yakuts ect.. but no Finno-Ugric variation. While Q is also Siberian it is the genetic remains of the proto Native Americans(Native American Dna) C1 is Altaic (Mongol-Turkic) These were the primary Male Haplogroups of DNA found in the Honfoglalo Magyars. Our closest relatives(genetically) are the Bashkirs, and Volga-Tatars(Bulgars) even the Magyar Tudományos Akadémia is now saying the Magyars are a Iranian-Siberian admixed Eurasian people, who happened to speak an Uralic Language without any Relationship. Besides the Bashkirs Kazakhs have a genetic relationship with the Honfoglalo Magyars by some Magyar tribes who did not come into the Carpathian basin. So yeah they are infact our "Cousins" As well update yourself on your History otherwise you're the one bringing falsification and miss representing the origin of Hungarians. According to Martin Shultz and Fischer-Seller 31.4% of Hungarians are West-Turanid Phenotype Making them Eurasian. While only 25.7% of the Hungarian population is Caucasian European.

[@user-gy5er6wh2j]

@Aleks Kevyn You claim pseudoscience, but genetics is not a Pseudoscience. But yes I do agree that there are many falsifications done with the raw data of any research. obviously there not a homogenous group, no Steppe nomadic confederation is. What I believe the main Magyar Group was of Indo-European Siberian mixed dissent who spoke a Siberian language(Yeniseian specifically), not a Homogenous Uralic group that assimilated Turkic and Iranian people groups, I believe this because of the Arpad's Dynasty's Genetics threw Bela III, if the Elites were of Indo-European dissent most likely the main tribe was the same Ethnic Group. Of Course Modern Hungarians and the Conquering group will be different genetically no people group stay Homogenous. But to say there 86% European is not accurate, There is a high frequency in E1b1 which is not Indo-European but paleo European/North African. and if you break down the specific strands of the R1a and R1b groups you will see it splits from the Slavic and Iranian which there is the Highest frequency of the Iranian strand in Eastern Europe, which was brought by the Magyars, and has a common link with the Bashkirs. Regardless the frequency of DNA varies from location to location and also by sub people group. If you look at the Székely and the Csango they have a surprisingly high frequency of Q , if you look at the southern central Alföld region you will find higher Eurasian Frequencies same in Bihar. Most of the Genetic samples are not diverse which leads to falsified information. What makes it clear that Hungarian is Finno-Ugric? is it because the Academy said so? Besides the consensus now is that "Finno-Ugric" is a linguistic distinction not an ethnic one regardless same thing is said about most language families. and no there not Psudo-Science, its referred to as Political Falsification(That's when you misappropriate Science for a political cause) I personally don't have any political motivation in this. I do believe Hungarian language originated out of Siberia but further East rather than the Urals, which I would say even has some commonality if not the same original parent language as the Finno-Ugric groups, but split of into it's own distinct group.

[@onehope6448]

@Aleks Kevyn You are such a moron...

[@attilaistenostora]

Greetings from Hungary to our all Turkic brothers🐴🏹🐺

[@WeAreOnipipa]

Bro steal our name 🇲🇳

[@ZombiesFan-yn3pu]

I am crimean karaite tatar, they are mix of huns, mongols, cumans, khazars, tatars and crimean goths, im also krymchak tatar, hello to all my turan brothers

[@animasyonYT]

Crimean karaite tatars are Turks too im sad about you only 2.5K Crimean Karaite Tatars left :( Crimean Karaite Tatars are Turks too And Tatars are Turks Too. Hi Türk Brother ♥️♥️♥️

[@greyfells2829]

the horse masters of the world will forever be united in brotherhood under the great sky

[@hungarienness]

Amen

[@denkapeneva2018]

Love from Bulgaria 🇧🇬❤️

[@غاليةعيدوعجم]

Bulgarian slavs no Mongolia and turkey

[@iandgabon5231]

Ternyata Hun atau Hungaria adalah penakluk hebat pada zaman dahulu.. Saya pencinta sejarah klasik dari Indonesia. Sebuah Video yang bagus.

[@zoltanparajdi245]

Magyarisztán... a törökök mai napig így hívják Magyarországot... Kalapács írt egy jó nótát erről, amiben ez szól : Ősi nepből mik lettünk...

[@forestfoxurbansprawl75]

This is fascinating. I had my genetic data matched on mytrueancestry and it reports that I'm related to Hungarian conquerors dating to Arpad Dynasty along with other peoples from the steppes all the way to Mongolia. I'm Eurasian American with English/Scots-Irish/German/Visayan ancestry. I'm also R1a, surname "Driver". I have no known/recorded ancestry from Hungary or further east, I've always thought my family were more northwest Europeans. Maybe you all are my long lost cousins from across the pond 😉

[@petmop1309]

But Scottish are related to scythian if im right

[@forestfoxurbansprawl75]

@@petmop1309 I've heard something like that but wasn't sure if it was true. It appears there's a large missing piece in my family roots. Then again genetics don't lie, so it is possible.

[@AKumar528]

@@forestfoxurbansprawl75 history is largely missing in records. For eg, Mongols conquered Russia, Poland and Hungary. It's unbelievable if they didn't leave any trace. Specially during the three centuries of Tatar yoke or Ottoman rules later. But it goes back further. Migration of Indo Europeans from central Asia to West Europe. Or Huns around the time of Christ

[@ferenccsoka9933]

Same here I descend from the arpad dynasty but I am r1b

[@animasyonYT]

Fact: Huns Are Oghuz Turks That Means You're Oghuz Turk like me. Oghuz Turks are Turkmens, Turkey Turks Azeris aka Azerbaijan Turks ( They Call themselves Azerbaijan Turks), Huns and alot of more if you want you can search Oghuz Turks.

[@eminmammadov4163]

I am a Turk from Azerbaijan. One thing I never could understand: why the Ottomans fought Hungarians and Bulgarians. They are our cousins.... Otherwise, we need to unite to revive the original culture.

[@xanshen9011]

For religious purposes. The Magyars and Bulgars converted to Christianity, (Catholicism & Orthodoxy respectively) meanwhile the ancestors of the Ottoman Turks, the Seljuks, converted to Sunni Islam. And under their new religious leaders, (Pope, Caliph, Patriarch etc.) they engaged in warfare to try to convert each other to their new religions. But even IF we ignore religious purposes for warfare the peoples of the steppe never really got along with each other. The Magyars even when they were still Tengrist frequently invaded and raided the territory of the 1st Bulgarian Empire. And it was the Pechenegs, another Turkic group, that caused the Oghuz Turks to migrate into Iran and eventually Anatolia.

[@mohsenghaedi4778]

dear friend, there is no pure ethnicity. the huns mixed with the people form present hungry. the iranians, scychtians in present Baku mixed with people from middle asia. You can test your genetics to see there is NO ethnicity, maybe culturally different! the genetics always tells the truth not the media!!

[@xerxen100]

"why the Ottomans fought Hungarians and Bulgarians" because they(ottomans) hate working, and like looting and robbing. Ottomans was under semitic control. Hungarians even allow the ottomans to pass through Hungary to invade austria, but when ottomans come back, they plundered all the way on hungary, and enslaved the locals....

[@davefekete7187]

@@xanshen9011 Very true but back then they didn't have the knowledge that we do now, i always say "its never too late!" now its the perfect opportunity to unite all Turkic brothers into one big alliance! Turkey,Kazakhstan etc we all came from the same roots but from different tribes with everyone of us having divers unique distinction,cultures,languages etc we are all cousin from a far distance but it still makes us brothers.

[@niki327]

​@@davefekete7187 Am bestem alle nach Mongolei, denn dann hört auf eure herrschen Gedanken ! Undankbare Sippe ❤😊

[@VicaCica72]

From the publication: The genetic origin of Huns, Avars, and conquering Hungarians Huns, Avars, and conquering Hungarians were migration-period nomadic tribal confederations that arrived in three successive waves in the Carpathian Basin between the 5th and 9th centuries. Based on the historical data, each of these groups are thought to have arrived from Asia, although their exact origin and relation to other ancient and modern populations have been debated. Recently, hundreds of ancient genomes were analyzed from Central Asia, Mongolia, and China, from which we aimed to identify putative source populations for the above-mentioned groups. In this study, we have sequenced 9 Hun, 143 Avar, and 113 Hungarian conquest period samples and identified three core populations, representing immigrants from each period with no recent European ancestry. Our results reveal that this "immigrant core" of both Huns and Avars likely originated in present day Mongolia, and their origin can be traced back to Xiongnus (Asian Huns), as suggested by several historians. On the other hand, the "immigrant core" of the conquering Hungarians derived from an earlier admixture of Mansis, early Sarmatians, and descendants of late Xiongnus. We have also shown that a common "proto-Ugric" gene pool appeared in the Bronze Age from the admixture of Mezhovskaya and Nganasan people, supporting genetic and linguistic data. In addition, we detected shared Hun-related ancestry in numerous Avar and Hungarian conquest period genetic outliers, indicating a genetic link between these successive nomadic groups. Aside from the immigrant core groups, we identified that the majority of the individuals from each period were local residents harboring "native European" ancestry.

[@tamasbudai6122]

Attila=Hunnia=Hungary

[@batuhanerdogan7519]

Magyarzstan

[@bayramlbey5582]

🇦🇿❤️🇭🇺

[@romania1918]

Gypsy =gypsya=hungary

[@romania1918]

Transylvania is romania. You can be proud to be slav, cause thats what hungarians are

[@gibsonlavery6978]

@@romania1918 Ro(wo)mania is a stolen country, with a fictive history, without any culture. vlach= oláh=roma (not roman)

[@aliengalaxy6096]

Nowadays many Hungarians are making personal genetic tests and the majority of Hungarians have similar results. According to these genetic tests, the Hungarians have a vast amount of shared genomes with local ancient Stone Age and Bronze age samples from the Carpathian Basin which was the western part of the Scythian civilization and where later the Hungarian state was established around 900. Hungarians also have a big Scythian impact on their genetics from the Scythians and from Scythian folks (Sakas, Sarmatians, Huns, Avars, Hungarian tribes of Árpád). And of course, Hungarians have Germanic and Slavic genetic impacts. My Hungarian family has many Scythian, Asian Scythian, Asian Hun, Carpathian Basin Hun, Saka, Sarmatians, Avar, Hungarian conqueror sample matches.

[@najibullahnazari2213]

Huns belongs to the cuman kipchak. I'm Kipchak from Afghanistan 🇦🇫 and I love all my Kipchaks peoples around the world 🤘🤘🤘

[@MrNoobidoobidoo]

Old Turkic tribes in Afghanistan united in the past as Hazaras. Later came other Turkic tribes such as the Uzbeks and Turkmens. Now Tajiks claim some Sunni Hazara tribes such as Dai Mirak, Tatar, Dai Quzi, Dai Kalan, Kohgadai and Qarluqs to boost their population. These tribes are Turkic and subtribes of the Hazaras.

[@najibullahnazari2213]

@@MrNoobidoobidoo I'm Dai Mirak kipchak Hazara

[@madameagnes7548]

Great video!

[@NubiansNapata]

Jordanes provided the physical appearance of Attila. “Short of stature, with a broad chest and a large head; his eyes were small, his beard thin and sprinkled with grey; and he had a flat nose and swarthy skin, showing evidence of his origin.” This is not a typical feature of the Turkic people but rather the Mongolic features of East Asia. The Russian anthropologist (1960s) provided the ethnological details of the skulls and the skeletal remains when visited the Hunnish and Avar cemetary sites in Hungary and Romania. Most of Hunnish elite leaders had a striking resemblance to modern Manchurians and the elite Avar skeletal remains with central Mongolians. He has also noted that the most of calvary remains were either intermixed or homogenous. Overall, it had a higher Turkic related remains. What’s interesting about his report is that all the elite/leader skulls were purely Mongoloid/East Asian. In order to shed light on the genetic affinity of above groups we have determined Y chromosomal haplogroups and autosomal loci, suitable to predict biogeographic ancestry, from 49 individuals, supposed to represent the power/military elit. Haplogroups from the Hun-age are consistent with Xiongnu ancestry of European Huns. Most of the Avar-age individuals carry east Eurasian Y haplogroups typical for modern north-eastern Siberian and Buryat Mongol populations and their autosomal loci indicate mostly un-admixed Asian characteristics.

[@davefekete7187]

Not Mongolian my friend, Attila came from one big Hunnic tribe called the Xiongnu documented by old Chinese scholars, the oldest documented Hunnic tribe in the area of ancient China where that's where Attila came from and where his dark hue colored skin probably comes from plus it explains his complexion and they talked about how the Xiongnu also had multiple hunnic tribes The north Huns , The west Huns and of them where called the White Huns and there was a fourth one but i forgot, You should look up the Xiongnu its very fascinating.

[@husamabed6527]

The Huns are Mongolian Turkic tribes. Huns & Magyars are Mongolian Turkic with German/Slavic admixture. Be pride for who you are.

[@magyarahun8982]

Thx brother! 👍

[@rayvarrayka4053]

My brothers greeting from Hun Rabari of India.

[@indianbaba7093]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@letsspeakhungarian6626]

If yoù want to learn more about the Huns and how they are related to present day Hungarians, I recommend for example the researcher Obrusànszky Borbàla's work. She is Hungarian and spending a great deal of her life in Mongolia, she does a lot of research.

[@ravenalbj]

The word HUNGARIAN does not exist in Hungarian language. They are Magyars period. They have nothing to do with the Huns. The territory was called HUNGARIA before the Magyars came there. The name of the main Lake in Hungary named BALATON. is derived from the Romanian word BALTA meaning "lake".

[@letsspeakhungarian6626]

@@ravenalbj acording to you? Historically speaking we have hun period, magyar period, avar pwriod etc. Huns has something to do with the magyar period since genetically they are connected. Some of them were huns as well. Newsflash: magyarok magyarul beszèlnek magyarorszàgon. Hungarians speak Hungarian in Hungary. Not romanian, not slovak etc. Balaton got its name from the natural phenomenon , music like sound above the lake. From 'Bàl a tón' which means Ball on the lake. Plus , real Hungarians don't give a shit about the tonns of lies fabricated about our history, language. We know who we are

[@AK-fe1lu]

@@ravenalbj Hungarian ancient peoplel,Bal is an ancient God's name,Balaton just means Bal (a tón) on the lake.Balta (axe)is a Hungarian word. As for Romania let me not say anything!

[@ravenalbj]

@@AK-fe1lu Hungarian BALTA is from Romanian BALTAG fighting axe. The word came about, because when cut with a BALTAG, a BALTA "lake" of blood came out. The name BUDA-PESTA is from Romanian words. BUDA from BUDINI a Dacian Tribe which lived in Pannonia, and PESTA from PESTE meaning "over" (the Danube).

[@AK-fe1lu]

@@ravenalbj Is logical thinking the way to go?How could a country created in 1859 give even a single word, people,to a people of thousands of years?It was called the Byzantine Empire,For Romania after Rome.This is the name of the country!On its territory lived Kunoks, who spoke Hungarian.Their country was called Cumania.Buda (Buddha), because it is called that in every country in the East!Scythian prince who founded a religion.Ask the Chinese for help,they built a museum in honor of the Hungarians.China is not a colony, it is strong and can face reality.

[@WeAreOnipipa]

Our attilian brothers 🇲🇳 i wish hun countries reunite

[@xerxen100]

Then we all became Russia XD Althought it is a defected state, but still Hunnic.

[@ertaloveday5373]

I was born in Hungary, have been learning Turkish language for nearly two decades, nevertheless I struggle to put a simple sentence together, In the contrary, In Estonian language I’m able to conduct a conversation, and take delight in the finnougric cultura, and love singing Estonian pop songs.... and learning Estonian language didn’t cause much of a headache, I’ve enjoyed it profoundly, and never felt alien as the Turkish Lang did...if you’ speak Hungarian at a conversational level that you can master the Estonian language within a couple months and and you don’t even have to change your Hungarian accent.... EESTI JA UNGARI KEEL ON SAMA PÄRITULOGA. KAKS ILUSAT KEELT, KAKS EUROOPAI KULTUURI RIIKI.SOOVIN TEILE HEAD PÄEVAT.... Estonya ve Macarca dilleri ayni kökene sahiptir. İki güzel dil, iki Avrupa kültür ülkesi.. İyi günler diliyorum.

[@10word83]

Turks love Hungary. We are son's of Atilla 🖤

[@drdre5030]

@@10word83 no u r mongol

[@AKumar528]

That doesn't prove much. Even two languages in China or India are mutually incomprehensible. Doesn't mean they aren't same ethnicity.

[@kila200]

@@AKumar528 LOL WTF. Of course they are not the same race

[@intertvonline1917]

The Chinese called 2000 years ago the Hungarian Majia people the branch of the Hun tribes. They stated they were EUROPID looking, not Asian. Welcome to China and read ancient scripts!

[@petmop1309]

Thanks for telling friend

[@hungarienness]

Thank

[@Dominic-mm6yf]

Fascinating,I have watched The Khanate a brilliant movie.Would like to see a Kazakh production xnout Attila one day.The origins the Huna are complex.There were many Huna Khaganates sharing a common culture but although the ruling elites were Turks others were Magyar,Iranian,Germanic and other central Asian origins.

[@kudaibergenbaiamanov8628]

👍👏🤝👏

[@erospista3134]

I am Hungarian, have blond hair, green eyes, but my DNA result shows dna all the way to Mongolia.

[@pejakenovic805]

Huns and Turks were blended and living in same steppes for hundreds of year...thats why some East Europeans are very mixed in their origins...

[@daveporter4667]

Hungarians have Balkan ADN/DNA. Check you ADN/DNA and you will see that you share less than 5% with your uralic vein. You will be super lucky to have more than 5%. I did not believe first and I took the test again. We kept the language but the ADN/DNA is European, Balkan. This is a neutral fact/evidence, no political BS.

[@IranAzadLoading]

Same with the Ossetians(alans/scythians), they have not too high scythian blood left, but kept language, culture and identity, but genetically they are mainly caucasian.

[@schytoyamnaya9015]

The majority of Hungarians always had european dna. Even in the age of when the hungarian tribes came to the Carpathian Basin the common people already had european features with 5-10% inner asian heritage or siberian heritage. The Hungarian Conqueror elite had higher inner asian and siberian features with 20-30%, but the 60-70% of their features were eastern european, western european, caucasian. Its because we have an uralic language, doesn't necessary mean that the people were with siberian origin. The dna and the language are not the same thing. The genetical origin, the language, the cultural heritage is not necesary connected. Its not even impossible, that the ancient uralic languages once existed far south in the forest-steppe zone, and later some of the speakers migrated north and mixed with Siberian genetical features, but some uralic speaking populations stayed in south and not necesarry had any siberian or had mininal siberian heritage. But of course this is just a theory, like anything else around the uralic speaking people.

[@daveporter4667]

@@schytoyamnaya9015 Uralic - Ural Mountains, the mountains that marks the border of Europe and Asia. Uralic = from Urals mountain.

[@schytoyamnaya9015]

@@daveporter4667 The term 'uralic' means that most of these languages exist near to the Ural mountains in nowadays. But the fact that most of these languages are existing now near to the Ural Siberia, doesn't mean that this was the case in ancient historycal times.

[@daveporter4667]

@@schytoyamnaya9015 These languages were replaced by Russian language in Ural mountains, gone, vanished, crumbs. Not a main language anymore. We can see how English replace languages today, if is spoken by the powerful ones and the language is easy to speak, it will replace the old ones.

[@hungarianhistoryiii.1359]

ancestors of 9-10 century hungarians: tien shan huns, western xiongnu, central saka, tien shan saka, pazyrik, kazakhstani scythians. present days folks : bashkort, kazan tatar, turkmen, siberian tatar. present days hungarians maximum 10% 9-10 century magyars others are carpathian populations since mesolitic and german, slavic immigrants mix. im 25,6% scythian, 19,9% sarmatian, 9,08% proto-hungarian, 1,71 % avar (asian dna) 0,38% asian hun. my slav is 9,2% but the european avars (grffin styled onogurs from volga) as slavs in my true ancestry. my dna more than 50% steppic, my identity is 100. my paternal dna has yamnaya, R1b - Y5587 my maternal dna has finnic - like U5b1b1a origin.

[@notorious9278]

Scythians have nothing to do with hunnic Hungarians of today stop making stories

[@hungarianhistoryiii.1359]

and dont write fakes about my heroic past!

[@braincrashtv8377]

Kazakhs still tries to find their legacy;from mongols to magyars)

[@kilicmo]

🐺🤘🇰🇭🇭🇺🇹🇷🇦🇿🇰🇬🇺🇿🇹🇲🇰🇿🐺🤘 we are the son of Atilla

[@weifan9533]

Why do you put up the flag of Cambodia there? Cambodians are descended from Austroasiatic Khmer tribes and they have nothing to do with Altaic whatsoever.

[@kilicmo]

Mongolië 🇲🇳🇲🇳🇲🇳🇲🇳 put this one

[@weifan9533]

@Ra Chau More like Baiyue + Hoabinhian + some South Asian (not necessarily Indo-Aryan)

[@laszlototh1232]

walahogyan midig elmarad a masodik bejovetel , mink it eltunk a vizozon elott , a vizozon miatt huzodtunk fel a hegyekbe es EUfrates be ..visszajottunk nem elfoglalnijottunk haza jottunk ,,

[@mmpchinggis]

Szerintem olvasson tobbet.Sok mindent tartogat nekunk a tortenelem.sokkal tobbet mint gondolnank.(Mongol testvertol)

[@xerxen100]

Azért a vizözön előtti időkből igazán kevés emlék maradt. Viszont ha már hegyek, Nepál alapitói, és legrégibb népe a Magyar. Szerintem és szerintük is van kapcsolat a népnév miatt, de se nyelvi, se genetikai, se kulturális egyezés nincs velük. DE a himalája teteje az azért optimális volt a vizőzőn ellen :D

[@madguy881]

So some Mongolians, Kazakhs and hungarians are all descendants of huns...?

[@bloodyshark2126]

Yeah huns gave birth to many nations and just shut up about it. People fighting over these for their shitty ego is just annoying

[@xerxen100]

Much more nation than this :D. But Huns just Huns. They are originally the Schythians.

[@baconsans431]

Kurultai and khagan are Mongolian words.

[@teopayam2335]

And Turkish words.

[@noname-ml7lm]

More like Turkic. Turks used that title centuriez before Mongols.

[@nuperaa6617]

@@noname-ml7lm how do you know that? Old Mongolian it's not a well recorded language...

[@noname-ml7lm]

@@nuperaa6617 Gokturks used that back in the day cuz they were nomadic Khaganate its a word from Old Turkic.

[@nuperaa6617]

@@noname-ml7lm man, they lived really close to Mongolians, they were part of a tribal confederation. It's hard to say the exact origin of the word's. All I'm trying to say is that Mongolic and Turkic people are closely related culturally, and I don't like it when Hungarians project these people history as they're own.

[@aliokansarca1773]

China archive 'HanShu94a' Xiong-nu / Hiung-nu / Hun-nu 'hu' means 'barbar' in China 'wu - hu' means 'Five Barbars Hun' in China.. - Tu'jue (Turks) - Ti'ele - To'uba (Turks - Tungus) - Ashi-na (Turks) later on (gökturks) - Xianbei (mongols) - Yue-tschi (tohars)

[@epsilonxvi5675]

but some turkish people said that turkey is the real decendant of mongol and huns.

[@xerxen100]

Almost all Hun descendant state is claimed that he/she was the only one true descendant XD But that certainly wasnt Turkey.

[@МусаСайдахметов]

Жарайсың Бауырым ✊

[@phoohpo8225]

I Hungarian

[@stefanptube]

I made my full mtDNA test for Ashkhenazi ancestry. Second genetic distance step from 50 matches 30 family names Jewish. Third genetic distance step from 150 matches 130 family names Finnish and Hungarians. Looks like my maternal line derives from converted on Judaism white Huns from Khasar Khanate unless Magyars and Finns are mythical lost tribes of Israel :) .

[@indrajitpun1346]

Damn, East Asians were so powerful and wide spread in the past. Japan to Hungary and Finland, Siberia to India[Mughals], Pacific Oceans to Americas and Indonesia to Madagascar.

[@AKumar528]

Read about the Mitanni and Hittite kingdoms as well. And the Tarim Basin kingdoms whose kings were from North India. And the kings of southeast Asia who all descendents from Indian kings ruling over an Asian population. Indians did it before anyone else!!

[@kila200]

@@AKumar528 indians never ruled oytside of india tho

[@xexes3975]

@@kila200 they had one native empire that reached to some parts of Iran..

[@kila200]

@@xexes3975 which

[@xexes3975]

@@kila200 Mauryan empire

[@holyskozsuzsanna8766]

Alma is alma in kazakh and magyar language

[@МуратИбрагимов-р5у]

Какие иБашкирский

[@hulagu.gokboru]

Magyars are not Turkic. Period

[@CarlosSanchez-my7zg]

There is no "pure" races. Every human is mixed. There is mongolian blood in Vikings, Turkic blood in the Finno-Ugric origins(which is a language base, not a genetic base), Continental European in the Ainu bloodline, etc...

[@kyonknight5260]

Ainu are not caucasian they are asian... You been watching to much anime

[@user-gy5er6wh2j]

Ironically Hungarians are not even related to Finno-Ugric people genetcally. Our closest Genetic relatives are the Bashkir people in Russia who speak a Turkic language.

[@kyonknight5260]

@737PilotDocSportelloLovesShastaFay did the facts hurt your feelings antifa trash. Gtfo

[@mangotango2646]

@@user-gy5er6wh2j a person with a brain, it's good to see 😂 I swear some people are coming up with the weirdest theories about Magyar dna origins. They confuse dna with language family a lot.

[@__Man__]

@@mangotango2646 yes, DNA and language not always correlate

[@lovemagic469]

Hungaristhan lol

[@sforza1903]

Attila was turkish.and hungary people has turkic blood.but modern turkey and modern hungary mixed with too many bloods types ,since last 2000 years

[@stolzerpfalzer768]

Turkey must have mixed with Mordor orcs when they once looked like Hungarians

[@sforza1903]

@@stolzerpfalzer768 turkey is complicated. Mixed with 72 different ethnics since came to anatolia from hun .selchuk and ottoman empire times.. so i am not sure i am pure turk. And also turkey republic turks in turkey kinda assimilated. Pure turk can be %10 maximum of 80 million .except kurds all ethnics accept themself az turk.some kurds also see themself as turk too.At least turkey turks dont have asian eyes as other turkic people in center asia.. kavkaz nations. Balkans. Bosnian albanian..kurds arabs.greeks armanians. And sub ethnics.in this country see themself as turkish..shortly from ottoman times 700 years modern turkey population is a mix combine of balkan .kavkaz. anatolia and middleast people.. in scandinavia you people see as copy of them england germany middle europe same looking pysically people...turkey u cant. Physical look changes when you go near syria iran iraq border. Dark skin dark hair eyes. In black sea. Blue eyes blond.mainly. .in agean part white skin . In meditterano part dark skin like greeks and hispanic. This is all called turkish people.. Dont watch so many films dude! Read history and research science to get devolop your mind

[@laszlototh1232]

not really ,, but same time yes ,,, Turkish people are the same blood ,second nearest to us,,Jesusita's used the Turkish people to attack us , as they new ,they cannot hurt us ,only our own blood can hurt us ,, they just had to wait and mislead all nations who are Turkish , they start the Islam in turkey to separate and forget they Blood ,they are very good ,on waiting ,, and use our self to agent our self ,Yes Turkes and HUNS same blood

[@idiebeforeiquit]

Attila was hun, and hungarians are from the huns. No turkish BULLSHIT. Deal with it!

[@yumani_]

Turkish = Türkiye Türkü. Turkic genel olarak Tüm dünya'daki Türkleri kapsıyor Macarların Hunlarla veya Avarlarla alakası yok bu efsanedir Hunlar ve Avarlar Türktü hiç onlara benziyorlar mı?

[@dherrera9767]

Magyars weren't Turkic people, they were Ugric people

[@TheFoxisintheHouse]

En Magyar vagyok, nem Torok. The Magyars were invaded by Turkish forces and they tried ruling the country, but eventually we kicked them out! So no, we are not Turk. We are not huns. We are the Magyars.

[@dherrera9767]

@attila.theconqueror You are the shithead here, nobody was insulting you. It's a linguistic classification, the language you speak is most closely related to the Khanty and Mansi people, right there in the middle of Siberia, not Turkic people, go tell them they are Turkic and they will laugh in your face after they kicked your srry ass. Now if you like to fantasize about being 0.01% hun, it's your problem, you need a reality check and to get a life, you seem delusional

[@zaga7890]

D Herrera You’re still wrong LOL

[@B3NY0001]

D Herrera our ancestry had 46% hun genes and only 40 fin-ugor so go the fck away with yo bullshit. This theory was made up by Hasburg during 1848-1849 and it was a good thing for the supporters of Trianon

[@enginkanal428]

We learned from the Hungarians that we are Turkish and establish Turkology... Köszönöm

[@protectorategeneral]

Serval mistakes

[@ravenalbj]

Hungarians of today have nothing to do with the Huns. They are Magyars and the word Hun or Hungarian does not exist in their language. The land was called Hungaria before the Magyars came to Pannonia, hence the present name. Huns were mentioned as Henochi by Arrian who made the circumnavigation of the Black Sea during Emperor Trajan's time. That was right around the year 100 AD. The Huns didn't come from anywhere, they were the Skits and North of Black Sea was their land of origin. Priscus who was at Attila's court never used the term Huns, he called them Skits. These Skits also called Huns, and later a part of them called Mongols, controlled all the land from the Black Sea to Asia. The name Siberia came from the name of one of their tribes named Sibiri. While is true that the original CAZACS were the same nation as the Huns the Asian looking Kazaks are not the original people of Kazakhstan. The word CAZAC is from Romanian word CASA meaning "house". CAZARE-CAZARMA means "housing". Your history is totally false as who the Huns were. If you people would read a little of the original writings of antique history, you will come to your senses in a hurry. Procopius wrote much About the Huns and made clear that they were Cimeri and related to the Goths. And the Goths were not Germanic people they were Gete Romanian ancestors. The reason the Huns "disappeared" is because they are Romanian ancestors and still live in Romania. They didn't disappeared they only changed their names. From Huns the name changed to AVARS. In Romanian AVERE means "wealth" (and the Huns were wealthy), and from Avars to BANAT. The name changed but not the meaning. BANET means "lots of money". Therefore do you see the meaning? AVERE is "wealth" and BANAT "lots of money". That is why the Huns were called AVARI (wealthy) and later BANAT (lots of money). The people in Romanian BANAT are famous as being the most prosperous. The name ATTILA is not strange at all to Romanians. There was a Roman Senatorial family named ATTILIUS, and there was a line of Thracian Kings named ATTALUS. The name Attila was not used by Romanians (Huns) again after his death, because of the immense fame of Attila. Very much the same reason Europeans do not use the name Jesus. There is a city in Romania called HUNEDOARA which means "city of the Huns". Also a city named Simeria/Cimeria and that is from Cimeri who were one nation of the Huns. The city of SIBIU in Romania is from the tribe of SIBIRI, the same Sibiri who named Siberia. The few words that have been written from the Huns and Mongol Language fit perfectly with Romanian language. The very word MONGOLIA is composed out of two Romanian words. MON from MONT (mountain) and GOLI meaning "barren". It means in a perfect Romanian grammar "Barren mountains". Have you seen the mountains of MONT-GOLIA??? They are "barren". Everything I wrote above can be checked by anyone.

[@chrisstanley2538]

😃🌈🦻✌ smart thx

[@kisslolo96]

Hun, Hungarian and Scythian all exist in the Hungarian language. Just as all the Hungarian origin legends are also related to the Huns, Scythians. Just as the cultural heritage, symbolism and belief. The population of Hungary is made up by 3 nations Huns, Avars, Magyars, which are all related to each other as well. But later on Hungary also got a huge Slavic influence by the neighbouring slavic nations as well as Kuman, Alan and Germanic influence too.

[@VicaCica72]

From the publication: The genetic origin of Huns, Avars, and conquering Hungarians Huns, Avars, and conquering Hungarians were migration-period nomadic tribal confederations that arrived in three successive waves in the Carpathian Basin between the 5th and 9th centuries. Based on the historical data, each of these groups are thought to have arrived from Asia, although their exact origin and relation to other ancient and modern populations have been debated. Recently, hundreds of ancient genomes were analyzed from Central Asia, Mongolia, and China, from which we aimed to identify putative source populations for the above-mentioned groups. In this study, we have sequenced 9 Hun, 143 Avar, and 113 Hungarian conquest period samples and identified three core populations, representing immigrants from each period with no recent European ancestry. Our results reveal that this "immigrant core" of both Huns and Avars likely originated in present day Mongolia, and their origin can be traced back to Xiongnus (Asian Huns), as suggested by several historians. On the other hand, the "immigrant core" of the conquering Hungarians derived from an earlier admixture of Mansis, early Sarmatians, and descendants of late Xiongnus. We have also shown that a common "proto-Ugric" gene pool appeared in the Bronze Age from the admixture of Mezhovskaya and Nganasan people, supporting genetic and linguistic data. In addition, we detected shared Hun-related ancestry in numerous Avar and Hungarian conquest period genetic outliers, indicating a genetic link between these successive nomadic groups. Aside from the immigrant core groups, we identified that the majority of the individuals from each period were local residents harboring "native European" ancestry.

[@ravenalbj]

@@VicaCica72 The problem is that your scientists don't know where to get the genetic samples from. If the "scientists" would get genetic samples from the people in Banat Mountains in Romania, they will find that the Huns-Avars were their ancestors. Yes Mongols of the past were related to Huns. All the explorers of the times said that. MONT-GOLIA means "barren mountains" in e perfect grammatical Romanian. MONT, from Mountains, and GOLI "barren" (plural). That is not a coincidence. Just take a look at Mongolian mountains on Google and you will see what I mean. I studied "The True History of the Mongols" written in the 13 century which was written in Chinese characters, and all the words which are not known the meaning in that book, are Romanian words. The today Mongols are not the Mongols of Genghis Khan. Those Mongols conquered all Asia and they moved there to run those countries. That is why they and their language disappeared.

[@VicaCica72]

@@ravenalbj what are you talking about? They get samples from hun graves, then compare it to the samples of our kings and other people burried in Hungary in different ages

[@yumani_]

Hungarians aren't Hun because they're not Turks

[@mangotango2646]

Magyar closest dna relative is the Bashkir, a tribe in Russia that speaks a turkic language. Our language may be Finno-Ugric but dna is something totally different. Even scholars, archaeology even tied Hungarians to the Huns.

[@mangotango2646]

@efs ne they are connected to them but they aren't Huns. They're closely related to Bashkir turkic tribe

[@yumani_]

@@mangotango2646 Nope Huns are Turkic dude.. they're from Central Asia and literally many Old Chinese Sources describing Huns and Gokturks as same race.

[@yumani_]

@efs ne Hungarians are slavs

[@mangotango2646]

@@yumani_ yes i know Huns are turkic. There are many different Turkic tribes. I'm saying they're closely related through dna to the Bashkir. Hungarians aren't 100% slav, germanic, etc. Like for example, one of my haplogroups is from Central asia / southern russia. While a majority of modern hungarians are related to slavs, the debate is for the origin of who the Magyars are related to in central asia. :)

[@creatifetudes8553]

Modern Hungary has little to do with central Asia even in genetic level nor religion. Atila was not a humanist in any way, he even ated 2 of his sons. This is so biased history. 😒

[@martonjuhasz1544]

what are you talking about? who wrote he ate his sons? :DD thats the stupidest thing ive read today

[@janosgyozohegyvari1003]

Sorry, but this is pure bullshit.

[@muratover6225]

Maybe You mean about Cannibal 😂😂😂

[@akiraasmr3002]

He had a Germanic wife

[@marksvaner5169]

Never ated

[@lp2059]

this is literally missinformation at its best

[@kentugs9942]

Kazakhs still try to emphasis their non existing legacy. Looking from Mongols/Tatars/Huns. Dig deep brothers. Greeting from Mongol.

[@user-gy5er6wh2j]

@@itisprofile I disagree the Proto-Turks were related to the Tuvan People, from the Altai. Who created the Gok Turk empire and spread the Turkic language to non Turkic people i.e. they turkified Eurasia. Altho I belive the Ashina clan were Blue Huns(Eastern Huns) in origin, with most of the prominent Tribes.

[@user-gy5er6wh2j]

@@itisprofile Yes, but its more complicated than that. Usually it was a couple of small ruling clans that were Turkic while the majority of the population where the assimilated natives. This is confirmed threw gentics, as the male lineage of the proto-turks drastically gets diluted the further you go from the Altai region.

[@markeleasternwesternian7064]

modern mongols are manzhurs have nothing to do with Huns, Attila and genghis khan lol

[@nuperaa6617]

Huns were a confederation of nomadic tribes (Mongolic and Turkic most likely)... Do you Hungarians need that much other people history? Why do you guys do that?

[@luanlopes9415]

Very cuman-kipchaks moved to Hungary, fearing the Mongol Expansion, giving even names like the city of Cumaneşti, the St. Stephen was a Born tengriist...

[@kisslolo96]

Huns were confedaration of several tribes not just Mongolic and Turkic but Indo-Europeans as well. The forefather of the Huns were the Scythians who were Indo-European as well. So it was ethnically pretty mix. And This is how it is possible that both Hungarians and other nations can see Huns as their ancestors.