Application of Integration - Free Formula Sheet: bit.ly/3ZdKSnK Final Exams and Video Playlists: www.video-tutor.net/ Next Video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/h3ykZXuEetxml7s
@evanmai6195 Жыл бұрын
Whoa
@georgesadler7830 Жыл бұрын
Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, thank you for a solid explanation of Hydrostatic Force problems in Calculus Two. Drawing a picture is a great way to solved Hydrostatic Force Problems in Calculus. There is an error in this video at about the 7:26 minute mark therefore, I will rewatch this video from start to finish.
@nebilnebastro55210 ай бұрын
yeah his way of finding slope is not right
@mksjnd5 ай бұрын
@@nebilnebastro552 FOR THOSE WHO GOT TRIPPED UP LIKE ME: Actually Organic Chemistry Tutor is completely correct. Keep in mind that we have to find slope in terms of y, not x, since we are integrating by dy. I also got tripped up at the value for b because I originally solved for b by adding 3 to both sides. However, the correct way to find b is how Organic Chemistry Tutor described it. You can test this by inputting y=-3/2x-3, the slope in terms of x in Desmos, Geogebra, or another algebra program. If you also input x=-2/3y+3, the incorrect way to find slope in terms of y, you will see that slope is equivalent, but that the y-intercepts do not match. If you input x=-2/3-2, you will find that the y-intercepts AND slopes between the aforementioned equation and y=-3/2x-3 do indeed match. Hope this helps someone else who became stuck on this concept like me. Add a little mental note that b cannot always be solved for by adding its value to both sides when in terms of y.
@emilyberry3602 ай бұрын
I know why the slope is -2/3 and not -3/2. The equation of the slope in terms of x is y=-3/2x - 3. However, you want to rearrange the equation so that x is by itself. Therefore, using algebra, y=-3/2x - 3 y+3 = -3/2x -2/3y - 2 = x Writing this as L(y) L(y) = -2/3y - 2
@Smile-et3fe7 күн бұрын
F = yhA y = unit weight (9.8kN/m³ or 62.4lbs/ft³) h = distance from water surface to centroid of the shape A = area of the shape
@saberspeed772 жыл бұрын
why is this in calc 2. this is gonna take me at least 6 hours to master.
@faisalmohamed459511 ай бұрын
This is in calculus 1
@randomreplays9 ай бұрын
@@faisalmohamed4595calc 2
@katkrasher9 ай бұрын
This is easy
@katkrasher9 ай бұрын
Alright after working a couple of problems this is not easy i retract my statement
@mrbanana64648 ай бұрын
Applied calculus requires a deep understanding of calculus and the problem. If you didn't understand the definition of the integral you will not understand how to do this but will instead be doomed to copy formulas.
@winsurely70832 ай бұрын
Seems to be confusion in the comments section, slope is not "rise over run." In this case, it is better to think of slope as change in (function) over change in (variable), just like how rise over run is delta f(x) over delta x. Hope this helps!
@dylanarmstrong35693 жыл бұрын
For the example with the trapezoid, wouldn't your slope calculation be wrong because you don't actually know the length of the top half on your grid, you only know it's 12 ft + some amount on the x axis?
@RameshKumar-li2rp3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much I understood it Lots of love from Nepal
@jp95233 жыл бұрын
Great explanation but for me it would be better to locate the origin at the base of the figure so that the limits will be more easier to calculate (if you don't want to use calcu)
@ExoulosАй бұрын
At 8:33, the function for length of the strip should be: L(y) = -(2/3) * (y+3) ; because y = -(3/2)x - 3 Hope this helps someone out
@vinceojeda91202 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Sir for this Video it really saves me in understanding the concept, rather than just reading it in the textbook . more power.
@mdavis50113 жыл бұрын
Confused on how you got slope. Looks like this is change in x divided by change in y instead of change in y divided by change in x.
@navaerick863 жыл бұрын
I also think I see a mistake here, not sure tho
@Anonymous517013 жыл бұрын
Cuz you need to change from y=mx+b to x=my+b. Solve for x and you’ll see its the slope he gets
@graceful5223 жыл бұрын
I love you, sir. When I have money one day, I will be sure to support you.
@georgebartman38249 ай бұрын
youtube > Univercity bro you saved me so many times
@kensielwell Жыл бұрын
Thank you thank you thank you this made no sense until I watched this vid
@kyanisekaildelmonte9285 жыл бұрын
I don't understand the second example. As far as I rememberit's rise over run so isn't it supposed to be -3/2?
@avalon_I Жыл бұрын
I think because we're finding l(y), you have to find it in terms of y. Just as when you find f(x), you find it in terms of x.
@TchallaKilmonger Жыл бұрын
@@avalon_Iyep, I had that issue
@Kyle-pj2vc6 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much, bringing these videos for my final in a few hours.
@noelforde2375 жыл бұрын
how'd it go?
@Kyle-pj2vc5 жыл бұрын
@@noelforde237 Got a perfect score on my Calc 2 final last semester.
@IdleHawk7 Жыл бұрын
@@Kyle-pj2vcWOOOOH!
@teersa4 жыл бұрын
Why did you not integrate for the trapezoid?
@User-ci3su2 жыл бұрын
Isn't the slope at 7:40 -3/2? since it's y2-y1 / x2 - x1 ?
@jhononillgalvez9502 жыл бұрын
I also got -3/2
@christiancarter255 Жыл бұрын
@@jhononillgalvez950 same
@sleepsy152210 ай бұрын
The thing is we are replacing X with y and L with Y so instead of y=mx+b and y2-y1/x2-x1 it is L=my+b because we substituted this values we must substitute them into the slop formula as well so it would be L2-L1/y2-y1
@makenzie23536 жыл бұрын
Shouldn't the slope be -3/2 at 7:26? 6 and 0 are x-values and should be in the denominator since the slope formula is (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
@riley.the.engineer6 жыл бұрын
That is what I calculated as well. I do not understand.
@edisunyoto62566 жыл бұрын
the slope are -2/3 because it's the function of y
@comic4relief5 жыл бұрын
Yes, i thought so also. -9/6 is the slope. What's up?
@hberry695 жыл бұрын
@@edisunyoto6256 no it should still be -3/2 slope is rise over run, y/x, no matter what.
@milesmathews75795 жыл бұрын
Not exactly, I believe he calculated the change between the length of the triangle and y. Slope calculates the average change in a function, and our function is L(y).@@hberry69
@DzahierulAliemy2 жыл бұрын
How about finding hydrostatic pressure, P and then multiply it with the area of the shape, A, we will still obtain the hydrostatic force, F right?
@HeadlessHoursemanMC6 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video like a qna for us to get to know you better I like attachments to people that teach me????!!!
@yungzed Жыл бұрын
lol
@scottsanoria13865 жыл бұрын
Why other h(y) is not just "-y". Others have "number -y". Example is "10-y", "6-y" etc. why?
@SuperStruct6 жыл бұрын
Semicircular Dam Force Question: How come the h(y) doesn't have to be a (10-y)? Is it the h(y)=-y solely on axis placement? (0-y) I think I luckily got this right on the exam by just assuming the total distance dy(opposite gravity--parallel to y-axis) had to be multiplied by y because I thought h(y) was just y, just because it seems like y is the height at every point dy.
@JensenPlaysMC5 жыл бұрын
depends on where you place 0,0 it will change the limits of integration and distances but should be the same result
@laurenbrandt71642 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much this video saved me
@Theadventurelane2 жыл бұрын
why are you using the -y and negative values for the {c,d} when you can use the positive values for c and d and positive y?
@MrApplepieforlife3 жыл бұрын
I read these comments and I thought I was going insane when I was working it out, it barely came out correctly on some of them and the others he flips things over. Just center the at 0,0 from the middle at the bottom and integrate.
@btwags5 жыл бұрын
Why don’t you have to multiply the 62.4lb/ft by gravity?
@CauseAndEfex5 жыл бұрын
Pounds is already a weight, it has the F(g) built in.
@muniradanish85103 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@beep40502 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@galligula47422 жыл бұрын
thanks! For some reason the trapezoid was just giving me trouble lol
@YiqianLiang-y3k Жыл бұрын
sorry why is h(y) negative y?
@user-vv1do1wg1j6 ай бұрын
because it is in the negative axis below the axis line, positive X (to the right) and negative Y (below)
@dr1lltrckz1473 жыл бұрын
why are you unnecessarily using negative values, the height could simply be y and you can integrate from 2-4 not -2 to -4. Also you could set the height to (2-y) and integrate from 0 to 2.
@sleepsy152210 ай бұрын
@16:53 wouldn’t the X be equal to -square root 100-y^2 because it is below the x axis
@ev93566 жыл бұрын
Hey, so how come when y = 0, L = 12, 11:30 ? If the top is 12 ft long and the bottom is 20 ft long, wouldn't you need to account for 4 extra ft at the top (to the right and the left of the top space) in addition to the 12 ft if you are counting from the origin? so at y = 0, L would be 16 ? Anyway not sure, could be wrong, only noticed it because I tried working out the problem before watching you do it. Thanks btw, awsome vid!
@yungzed Жыл бұрын
idk
@hyperstorm866211 ай бұрын
I think you have to think about it as just the length not as a coordinate
@hocnguyen51154 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. Always come back to the same place for the help i need
@graoliveira66883 жыл бұрын
You are amazing!!! Many thanks!!
@JoelBalasaJr.6 ай бұрын
isn't slope equals to change of y/change of x?
@eltariquaye69283 жыл бұрын
How would you do this if you do this if you had to calculate for a rectangle would it be the same?
@hkatbamna1Ай бұрын
Abolish calculus II
@friedhegg8874Ай бұрын
skill issue
@Lalit_Sharma_204 жыл бұрын
Sir , why force on vertical plate (question 1 ) is not uniformly distributing ?
@hunterpresby10902 жыл бұрын
Different levels of depth produce different hydrostatic force bc of gravity, i.e. hydrostatic force at the top will probably be less than on the bottom...i think.
@vashon10011 ай бұрын
Isn't the hydrostatic force on the other side of the plate equal (ie the same), thus net zero? It's not like a dam where there is water on one side.
@achillesarce6397 Жыл бұрын
Can you solve for a parabola?
@carlkpsplucky55544 жыл бұрын
Great and all, but how to you find the sides of a triangle when you only have 1 leg and 1 angle?
@meji49664 жыл бұрын
inverse trig
@isaacrogers64205 жыл бұрын
its -3 not -2
@sepehrramshini64116 жыл бұрын
Why h = - y? Doesn't pressure depend on the height?
@sepehrramshini64116 жыл бұрын
@Ye Htet Aung but that's wrong... Doesn't work for all questions
@Kyle-pj2vc6 жыл бұрын
@@sepehrramshini6411 I think it's h = (height-y)
@NightcoreXenovia5 жыл бұрын
Because the origin is above the object or in -y axis
@edwardzheng50505 жыл бұрын
Height changes as you integrate from -12 to -3
@sleepsy152210 ай бұрын
You are thinking of hydrostatic pressure this is hydrostatic force though they are similar they are not the same
@kurtneylove4 жыл бұрын
Where did he get the -2 and -4 on the first problem?
@wilfredoperez92604 жыл бұрын
He made them up, just to give it a value (Range).
@meji49664 жыл бұрын
I finally understand!!!
@rin-me9wt4 жыл бұрын
I dont understand why it's okay to use L(y) =my + b if it's a trapezoid and not a straight line.
@kennycao93344 жыл бұрын
Erin West because the width is going to be whatever the x value of the equation is based on the slope that you found from the triangle given
@DzahierulAliemy2 жыл бұрын
Why h(y) equal to -y? Why not 3m or something?
@saberspeed772 жыл бұрын
Because the pressure increases the further you go down in depth and isn't a constant 3m.
@vaderanomaly15734 жыл бұрын
why arent we doing this in calc 2? is this honors?
@usctrojanfreak3 жыл бұрын
depends on the professor I guess. Currently doing it right now lol :(
@kevsh49972 жыл бұрын
10:04 I don't understand how it got 2,381,400N .
@fritzschwartz32955 жыл бұрын
hey buddy, not sure what im doing wrong, but i keep getting 9096.5 lbs.
@fritzschwartz32955 жыл бұрын
On 14:12
@fritzschwartz32955 жыл бұрын
So sorry! For W. I kept putting 16.4, instead of 64.4. My bad! U da MAn
@fritzschwartz32955 жыл бұрын
*62.4
@piper-brawlstars68994 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video but shouldn’t c and d be positive?
@JamesBond-nk1zj3 жыл бұрын
You put the coordinate system at the center of a circle or semi circle
@alim-15585 жыл бұрын
h should not be -y here it's y
@jonathanjeffrymulyana43904 жыл бұрын
Same thing
@billg12364 жыл бұрын
best of the best
@bryllethe135 жыл бұрын
2,381,400 ??
@lucasbuddeke71014 жыл бұрын
Anyone else getting 28,454 for the third one?
@salaxsalaxan92184 жыл бұрын
I want to hug you my lovely sir
@medoutube15 жыл бұрын
Shouldn't the slope be RISE over RUN, you flipped it by finding -2/3 when it should be -3/2. Kinda confused, beside that great video, much thanks!
@haruharudude3 жыл бұрын
It's flipped because it's in terms of y
@vinceojeda91202 жыл бұрын
@@haruharudude is it getting the x value in the slope intercept formula because if that's the case it has to be minus B,just asking.
@JamesBond-nk1zj3 жыл бұрын
17:37 I think you should multiply by pi cos the area of the cross section is pi times r squared and isn’t that why you’re using L(y) times d(y) (A=Lw)
@fookiebear16 жыл бұрын
i love you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@SYEDSHORABALI3 жыл бұрын
this is confusing
@kylereed24455 жыл бұрын
Side lemf
@SYEDSHORABALI3 жыл бұрын
brother with all respect you should have represented function in terms of x and y rather than L(y) and H(y)
@stephennellas74415 жыл бұрын
thaaankkkk yoouuuuuuu
@talharizwan12262 жыл бұрын
ily
@janethompson32083 жыл бұрын
I love you
@josewui4144 жыл бұрын
I love your accent lol
@marvalousmarvette5 жыл бұрын
At 1418 mins I did the problem copied it and did not get your answer
@marvalousmarvette5 жыл бұрын
Oh wait I think i forgot -(-8)^3 and that messed me up