Hyperbolic space in Poincaré ball model {4,3,5} cut in half.

  Рет қаралды 3,763

ZenoRogue

ZenoRogue

Күн бұрын

Hyperbolic space in Poincaré ball model {4,3,5} cut in half.

Пікірлер: 12
@lolzsicka9454
@lolzsicka9454 3 жыл бұрын
Brain: this shit too complicated so goodbye im gonna die
@erikkollar66
@erikkollar66 4 жыл бұрын
Looks like Kaleidoscope.
@debblez
@debblez 2 жыл бұрын
this makes me want to see a hyperbolic penrose tiling
@marytepes8437
@marytepes8437 2 жыл бұрын
Wonderful...!
@FraktalyFraktsal2024
@FraktalyFraktsal2024 4 ай бұрын
cool, i understand what's happening.
@erawanpencil
@erawanpencil Жыл бұрын
What would you see if you were in the center of the ball looking out towards the boundary?
@ZenoRogue
@ZenoRogue Жыл бұрын
Not sure whether I understand your question... you mean hyperbolic space (Poincaré ball), filled like in this video (cubes of the {4,3,5} honeycomb), you are standing in the center of a cube? You would see only the walls of the cube you are in, and since the hyperbolic perspective works generally like the Beltrami-Klein model, it would look just like a cube.
@erawanpencil
@erawanpencil Жыл бұрын
@@ZenoRogue Oh, no I meant if you were in the center of a Poincare Ball generally, nothing to do with cubes. In other words, is our universe a Poincare Ball, and we're all in the center (at zero?) looking out at ourselves? I saw Penrose say that 'celestial spheres are Reimann Spheres' and I'm trying to picture that, or understand how extensive this math goes into reality. I'm still new to the subject.
@ZenoRogue
@ZenoRogue Жыл бұрын
@@erawanpencil If you were in the center of a Poincare Ball, you would see nothing, because you would be in an empty universe. You would not even see the boundary of this Poincare ball, because it represents "ideal points" which are infinitely far away from you, it is not a real thing to you, so to say. If you assume that the boundary of Poincare Ball is a painted, real thing, and you can see it somehow (despite it being infinitely far away from you), see the "cohomology fractals" on Henry Segerman's channel -- it is a good representation of how the painting changes how it looks as you move.
@77GOD77
@77GOD77 5 ай бұрын
​@@ZenoRogueBasically like the sky then? We can see the blue sky but it is literally unapproachable! But we are living in a simulation we are a simulation of the Universe itself.
@Zi7ar21
@Zi7ar21 4 жыл бұрын
Mafs
@tristenarctician6910
@tristenarctician6910 3 жыл бұрын
THIS IS SO SAD
Non-Euclidean Third Dimension in Games
10:51
ZenoRogue
Рет қаралды 32 М.
The Double Pendulum Fractal
3:37
Nicogs Playground
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Крутой фокус + секрет! #shorts
00:10
Роман Magic
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Brawl Stars Edit😈📕
00:15
Kan Andrey
Рет қаралды 54 МЛН
Nil geometry explained!
7:16
ZenoRogue
Рет қаралды 69 М.
The Biggest Boss Monster Ever!
11:31
ZenoRogue
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Geometry with a Strange Name
17:18
ZenoRogue
Рет қаралды 7 М.
[HD|60FPS] Bad Apple!! [Shadow Art PV]
3:40
YoshiFan (avrilloosing)
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Non-Euclidean brains
17:51
ZenoRogue
Рет қаралды 8 М.
A Sierpinski Tetrahedron: Iterations 0 - 7 & Flyby
2:54
Catherine Leah Palmer
Рет қаралды 4,6 М.
3D Fraktal - Video (108)
2:59
Amazing Digital Stuff by A.C.
Рет қаралды 83 М.
The beauty of chaos
1:33
Candido Fractales
Рет қаралды 420
Non-Euclidean Retro Platformer
1:55
ZenoRogue
Рет қаралды 11 М.