Like many other photographers, I've downloaded hyperfocal distance charts to my phone. Have I ever used them in the field...? Nope. I've also used the 'focus a third into the image' method, but your explanation here is so simple and effective that I'm surprised I've not come across it before. Thanks for another great video. Your delivery technique and straightforward explanations are a breath of fresh air. Thanks for all the effort you put in to help us.
@mekeyloser4 жыл бұрын
I calculated a hyperfocal distance that delivered a result outside the narrow depth of field of a telephoto lense. Is this calculated distance real or just an artifact?
@eehoo15 жыл бұрын
Watched three videos explaining the same thing and this was BY FAR the best. Thank you!
@AmareshNayak16694 жыл бұрын
Yeah.. even I felt the same
@thomastuorto99294 ай бұрын
Nice work on the vid. Wide angle lenses like you used here are a little easier to work with for a larger distance. Does your technique work either longer focal lengths also? Or do you do any focus stacking? Either way, great vid & I’ll give it a go. Checked out your gear page. You’re definitely an outdoor, nature photographer! Does that M2 13” MacBook Pro handle LRC & PS layers & local brush work without bogging down. I really like the price on it & need something when on the road & would probably bump it up to 512gb & of course, use externals for storage. I’m a pc user when it comes to computers but thinking of trying a Mac. Happy shooting.
@carmencarmensita54224 жыл бұрын
Smart,short and concise with a soothing voice without the need to pose hip and super fun and fast talk. Thank you,I loved it.
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Carmen! I’m not so hip in real life, so why pretend for a video 😜
@harry_wardd4 жыл бұрын
I’ve read and read and watched and watched, haven’t found a single tutorial that’s as clear as this - thank you! 🙏
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Much appreciated!
@Henry300653 жыл бұрын
There is so much conflicting advice available on how to achieve sharp photos from just in front of the camera to infinity, your straight forward and simple advice was like a breath of fresh air! Thank you so much Spencer, extremely helpful, useful and practical advice. Alun
@PhotographyLifeChannel3 жыл бұрын
Very glad to hear it! I think a lot of videos overcomplicate it with hyperfocal charts and calculations. Double the distance is easy and actually more accurate than the other methods.
@lenslifeimages2 жыл бұрын
One of the best video about hyper focal distance to understand. Very well explained. Hats off
@GillesQuennevilleGQ Жыл бұрын
Your explanation for hyper focal is the best I have ever seen on youtube. Bravo. This is exactly how I do my focus in landscape.
@francequirion95474 жыл бұрын
You make hyperfocal very simple and easy to work in the field. I always focus a third into the image when I need to be on hyperfocal, but I will change for this method. Your explanations are very clear. Thank you, you are an excellent teacher and photographer!
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, France, happy you found it useful!
@ill4573 Жыл бұрын
Great, instructive video. No math or in-the-field calculations required. More effective than all the other videos I viewed, with reference to this subject. Thank you 😊.
@bunnymad50493 жыл бұрын
You have just explained it to this newbie better than anyone has. NOW I don't feel so dumb. I'm doing a diploma and this has not been explained at all like this. Bless you. x I have subbed.
@PhotographyLifeChannel3 жыл бұрын
So happy to hear it! Welcome to the channel, and that’s awesome, good luck on your degree!
@stevep85535 жыл бұрын
You sound like a bright young man. Well done and keep at it.
@2229east7thstreet2 жыл бұрын
OUTSTANDING. Thanks for taking this complicated subject and making it easy to understand and apply. I have watched dozens of videos on this topic and yours was way superior to them. Thank you
@hanahana68463 жыл бұрын
Well done young man, you're smart and a great teacher
@olekallovvild72956 ай бұрын
Sensible and practical: you win! 👍
@michaelvail24465 жыл бұрын
I am so happy you made this video. I loved the article you wrote a while back and this video is icing on the cake.
@PhotographyLifeChannel5 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Michael! Glad to hear you liked it. Hyperfocal distance is so valuable for landscape photographers, and the DTD method means it’s not as difficult as some tutorials make it appear.
@5teve5hilling2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your easy explanation, I've been trying to figure out hyperfocal distance, I've come from macro photography to now attempting landscapes, but for some reason couldn't get it right. After watching this I went in to my back garden, put an object on the edge of a paving slab, stepped 2 paving slabs back and focused on the edge of a paving slab 2 past the object, nailed the shot 1st go, I now need to go out and try in the field. Once again thank you.
@vijaykarve7362 ай бұрын
Very practical explanation of a very important concept,Absolutely wonderful.All the best.
@nevvanclarke9225 Жыл бұрын
I teach photography in my local community, and this is definitely the way to do most landscape photography with a wide angle lens. Definitely you can even use it with zoom lenses as well. It will work I see so many people who would focus on the mountain thinking that everything in the foreground would then be sharp as well, but it doesn't work like that. In fact, you get the opposite with a very soft image.
@andrewdg902 жыл бұрын
Definitely the easiest explanation I've come across. Now I need to learn what apertures etc to use for specific photography subjects. It does seem to be a trend for people saying that around F11 is the best for landscape? Why? Landscape is mostly my subject. Thanks again!
@PhotographyLifeChannel2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Andrew! This video might answer your questions: kzbin.info/www/bejne/kImvnmpjetCMias
@andrewdg902 жыл бұрын
@@PhotographyLifeChannel thanks! Very informative! Just getting into DSLR (Canon APS-C) and trying to learn as much as I can. Always got decent pictures on our road trips with my Canon SX using manual settings and auto focus, along with my GoPro and my phone but hoping to step it up a notch! Thanks again!
@hansernst59985 жыл бұрын
Such a good straight forward explanation, totally in line with yr the articles on PL. I also like yr explanation regarding the lens quality influence, it really made the video complete. btw I often wonder why so few landscape photographers use prime lenses to reduce this edge unsharpness. Very well done.
@SteveMillerhuntingforfood5 жыл бұрын
Maybe because landscape shooters are hiking to nice locations and they don't want to carry 3 or 4 (or more) lenses vs 2? I personally find myself wanting every lens I own when I'm out shooting, just incase I need it. And my bag is really heavy.
@PhotographyLifeChannel5 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it, Hans, thanks! I’m definitely among those who have gravitated away from primes recently (used to shoot an all-prime kit) so I’ll try to answer your question. For me, there is a point at which image quality is not what holds a photo back. The 14-24mm f/2.8 does not have perfect image quality, but even at its worst it is not going to be distracting (even to a photographer’s critical eye). The 200% view in the video is quite exaggerated. (Wide angle lenses are also just super hard to design; I’ve only seen one 14mm prime with better image quality than this zoom, having tested 7 by my count from various manufacturers.) Don’t get me wrong - primes ARE better than similarly priced zooms in image quality, at least in the vast majority of cases. But zooms also weigh less because they replace several primes, and if their image quality doesn’t take away from the photo even in a large print (my personal threshold), they win out overall.
@francequirion95474 жыл бұрын
@@PhotographyLifeChannel ...And image which moves us are not necessarily related to the perfect technique...in the contrary, sometimes a bit of imperfection makes the work more human...altough I really know pretty well my craft and that I always want to learn more and more, I do not want to become a technique freak...I want to be touched when I take my photo and to offer that...
@derearl-reisenspeisen15112 жыл бұрын
I have already tried many things but I did not know that it is so easy and works. Thank you for that and greetings from Germany
@seangray45122 жыл бұрын
That's all I needed to understand, Focus at double the distance of yr closest subject, Stop down & shoot! cheers mate!
@ryannemec77654 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the great explanation! I've been trying to wrap my head around this all day in preparation for Chile next week!
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Happy to hear it, Ryan. Have fun in Chile, and keep the Double the Distance method in mind when you need to maximize depth of field!
@chickenitsa3 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation and great tips. Bravo.
@PhotographyLifeChannel3 жыл бұрын
Very glad you liked it, thanks, Christopher!
@lovesong2522 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I've just experimented outside my home and it worked pretty well. I'm going to try it on a street photography session
@odarrien4 жыл бұрын
Great explanation. I’m certainly impressed by your delivery.
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Much appreciated, Darrien!
@macmcmillen62825 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation of this concept and how to put it into practice.
@PhotographyLifeChannel5 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Mac, glad you liked it!
@ericgeorge54835 жыл бұрын
This was an absolutely brilliant informative video; thanks for a fabulous upload. I learned loads and really enjoyed it.
@saeed9045 жыл бұрын
This is fantastic explanation on focusing. I like the double the distance focus method. Thanks
@louspeed15 жыл бұрын
I'm impressed that you can walk on uneven ground while talking and holding a selfie stick! Thanks for the great info.
@pamrobinson80342 жыл бұрын
this was really so helpful. I have given up on hyperlocal distance before, but now i feel like i get it!
@donridgway72694 жыл бұрын
I too am new to this amazingly simple concept, and I'm most grateful. Anything that makes life easier is really welcome.
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
It’s remarkable to me that such a useful, simple, and mathematically accurate technique hasn’t caught on very much yet! Hopefully it will soon. Glad we could introduce you to it.
@littlemermaid19383 жыл бұрын
Cheers Spencer for taking time to create this video and upload it, I found it very useful indeed.
@Ronbo7654 жыл бұрын
If people have trouble estimating the distance to the focus point, they can use a laser distance measurer. They are easy to use.
@Ihab.A3 жыл бұрын
Love the simple explanation! Crystal clear! Thanks
@lhargil2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this. You explained well and it was easy to follow. I am going to use this method.
@Danny1media2 жыл бұрын
Well explained......... I will apply this to my passion
@krappiekiller5 жыл бұрын
This video is so useful. Thanks for investing the time and effort.
@PhotographyLifeChannel5 жыл бұрын
Sure thing, Brian! Thanks for the feedback :)
@robbymacdonald82124 жыл бұрын
Nailed it dude, ever since I started learning photography. Portraits - 1.4 Landscape - F11 Complete BS. Nailed a landscape today, 1.4 @ 24mm
@buttonpusher48044 жыл бұрын
Can I see that photo somewhere?
@falconxvid2 ай бұрын
This is a great tutorial which is practical and doable compare to the DOF calculator and figuring the length on the field which is way to complicated
@marinaafanasiev2 жыл бұрын
Clear and simple. Thank you! Love the Dodge and burn t-shirt :)
@PhotographyLifeChannel2 жыл бұрын
Thanks! It’s my favorite shirt 😄
@greglum81754 жыл бұрын
Great video and you made it so simple. My head was spinning when I was reading about hyperfocal distance and the calculators and the circle of confusion. Going to try out what you said
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Awesome! Glad to hear it. It’s amazing to me how much this subject has been overcomplicated. Admittedly, picking the perfect aperture can take some practice, but the actual focusing component is so simple.
@corinagul612 Жыл бұрын
Thank you, that’s very straight forward. I shall try your method 🤗
@grephusingati78073 жыл бұрын
Simple explanation to understand,thank you.
@PhotographyLifeChannel3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@rasenganpimp5 жыл бұрын
Great job explaining, I learned a lot
@HobbyWelt2 жыл бұрын
How does this method take the aperture in account?
@johnkasza40243 жыл бұрын
Thanks a bunch!! Excellent video and simple, easy to use methodology. I will definitely be trying this out.
@PhotographyLifeChannel3 жыл бұрын
Sure thing! Yeah, it’s strange how this method is easy to use and mathematically optimal, but so rarely talked about.
@DerVagabundli4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for letting me understand this in less than 10 minutes! Great explanation!
@Notaphily4 жыл бұрын
Jamie This is false. It doesn’t work that way. Hyper focal distance depends on the size of aperture also. You can’t focus on the same point (per your doubling distance rule) on different aperture to get the crisp picture.
@DerVagabundli4 жыл бұрын
@@Notaphily I get that you'll need a certain aperture, as wide open would only give you a rather shallow dOf in any case. The way I understood it is that it's comparable to zone focus as in you have a certain depth of field in which subjects remain acceptably sharp and you try to move this zone to a point where it includes both your nearest and your furthest subject. Am I mistaken?
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Jamie, you’re correct - the other commenter is misunderstanding the video. I never said that aperture is irrelevant. Certainly shooting at f/1.4 for a landscape will give you a blurry result in both the foreground and background! What the double the distance method does, which is critical, is EQUALIZE foreground and background sharpness. If your goal is maximum depth of field, that’s exactly what you’d want most of the time. DTD equalizes foreground and background sharpness *even at* super wide apertures, for what it’s worth - though at those apertures, “equalizing” doesn’t mean much because they’re both extremely blurry. So, you still need to pick a good aperture for your shot (probably f/8-11 on average, when shooting full frame) if you want maximum depth of field without extreme levels of diffraction. But as far as focus point, DTD is the way to go if you want your foreground and background equal in sharpness.
@kevinsanders4262 Жыл бұрын
Well presented as always. I am wondering what focus mode you are using for your landscape. I am shooting with a Nikon Z7. Thank you.
@bala1000mina3 жыл бұрын
Hello There, Very clear explanation! Thanks a lot! God bless you all!
@leonelpadron56265 жыл бұрын
Normally, what I do is.... Set to manual focus, turn the lens focus ring to infinity (∞), zoom in live view to make sure both foreground and backgrounds are in focus then release the shutter. This is in aperture priority mode since I already know my preferred lens is perfectly sharp at f/8 with a wide enough DoF. However, your method should work perfectly fine, especially if you have the PhotoPills app to calculate the hyperfocal distance (for visual confirmation). I'll definitely try this method during the weekend. Thanks for the video :)
@jackthair83113 жыл бұрын
Thank you for explaining that. I have asked other vloggers and never got an answer.
@PhotographyLifeChannel3 жыл бұрын
Awesome, glad to hear it was useful!
@HR-wd6cw4 жыл бұрын
To be honest, I've tried the calculators and such and have had the best luck (if I need most or all of the the scene in focus) doing focus stacking instead. Yes, it's a bit more work in post, but in general, I've had fewer issues, and part of this is because I can keep the lens at something like f/8 or f/11, which many lenses are most sharp at those apertures anyway. Now I'm not into the roundtable debates about never shooting beyond f/16 or at f/22 but I do like to shoot at the sharpest apertures possible, and I think that focus stacking, while a bit more work, gives you this benefit while still getting sharp photos.
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Focus stacking is absolutely the best option if it works for your scene! Not always possible, especially if your subject is moving, of course. But when it works, it’s a great technique.
@ruiningsong96914 жыл бұрын
f/16 and f/22 does look not great tho.
@welshchap3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant, simple explanation - thank you
@TheXone7 Жыл бұрын
This was more than useful, thank you!
@nikokane53 жыл бұрын
Another great video. What focus area setting did you use?
@PhotographyLifeChannel3 жыл бұрын
I usually stick to single-point and AF-S for landscapes. I don’t like the imprecision of the larger area modes, and don’t need tracking or anything like that for 99% of landscapes.
@SanPedro222 жыл бұрын
I like this guy. Very simple method I can understand. Thank you.
@chrisjames19243 жыл бұрын
The Photopills app is pretty much the industry standard for dof calculations. It does a lot more besides. Great value for what it does.
@catherinetremerryn3 жыл бұрын
Beautifully described, thank you.
@martinmcglone84565 жыл бұрын
best explanation I have seen to date
@MA-hd4or4 жыл бұрын
wonderful and simple explanation
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Much appreciated!!
@ericgeorge54835 жыл бұрын
Bloody brilliant. Thanks from North Yorkshire England. Fabulous well explained tutorial.
@b1azingmike5 жыл бұрын
Informative and well-spoken. Nice job.
@willyd48504 жыл бұрын
Great video! Thanks for explaining this so simply...
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Sure thing! Glad it could be of use.
@Needacreate5 жыл бұрын
A very helpful video that does not seem to get all the credit it deserves. Should perhaps be followed up with a video about field curvature, which can also impact image sharpness depending on where you focus quite a bit.
@christophharman53253 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation! Thanks.
@PhotographyLifeChannel3 жыл бұрын
Sure thing!
@SweetSourTravel5 жыл бұрын
Very useful info as always. Thanks
@PhotographyLifeChannel5 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it, thanks!
@orangebetsyАй бұрын
good stuff, well appreciated.
@robertlightbourne22173 жыл бұрын
Great presentation !!! Very clear.
@PhotographyLifeChannel3 жыл бұрын
Much appreciated!
@EyeloguesbyDoctorEyeInstitute3 жыл бұрын
brilliant well said and demonstrated
@DerExperiminator5 жыл бұрын
You do make very good tutorials, thanks!
@empotta46243 жыл бұрын
Very helpful, very practical! Thank you!
@PhotographyLifeChannel3 жыл бұрын
Sure thing! Glad it was useful.
@mkbuhain5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the simple yet great explanation.
@jeffallinson80895 жыл бұрын
So much to learn and this video was great!!
@carmelD51098 ай бұрын
Super explanation
@frednorman1 Жыл бұрын
Useful video, thanks
@christettamanti94132 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video. How do you determine the aperture?
@photosprouts5 жыл бұрын
Great video, thanks for your sharing!!
@cii10725 жыл бұрын
Thanks for a very educative video.
@dhumau58193 жыл бұрын
Well explained sir.👉👍
@MultiJayendra4 жыл бұрын
Very beautifuly explained. I loved it. Can i have the image u shown in the video. Or if possible can u show the focus point in the image. ?
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, glad you liked it! I don’t have the RAW image available for download right now, but I’ll let you know - I think we will add it to the main Photography Life website before too long. The focus point is at the very front of the island, the closest part of it to me (far left side of the island).
@ebqren4 жыл бұрын
value 👍🏼 thank you for this. now need to practice
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Good luck! Glad you enjoyed it!
@ประดิษฐ์จารุวิจิตสกุล3 жыл бұрын
very useful...thank you...
@wantuna5 жыл бұрын
I feel like I missed something. There is no mention of focal length or aperture. How do you select the proper aperture? How does focal length affect this formula?
@DerVagabundli4 жыл бұрын
Basically, the longer your focal length, the shallower the depth of field, the smaller aperture you'll want to use. But that's also a compromise because you'll probably have to use a tripod and also depending on sensor size, you'll get diffraction if you go too small aperture. I'd say a bit of trial and error. Try the "double the distance method" and use different apertures to see when everything is acceptably sharp, because it really depends on the lens and sensor size. That's why giving numbers isn't really helpful for this video and I'd guess he left them out on purpose for that reason.
@HR-wd6cw4 жыл бұрын
This is where you need a chart or a calculator. Or you can google the formula so you can determine what FL/aperture you need for a particular range.
@DCox-ku1qt4 жыл бұрын
well explained, i found it helpful, thank you
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@jsprite1233 жыл бұрын
Nice explanation about doubling the distance, but doesn't the aperture count? Does this work with ALL apertures and ALL focal lenses?
@PhotographyLifeChannel3 жыл бұрын
At all apertures and focal lengths, focusing at double the distance will give you equally sharp foregrounds and backgrounds. But it’s still obviously important to pick a good aperture and focal length to get the right depth of field. If you focus at DTD with something like a 70mm lens at f/2.8, sure, your foreground and background will be equally sharp as one another - they’ll just both be blurry.
@a.keithclarke79752 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this so clear, and keeping it short, which is all the explaination needs to be! #nowsubscribed
@agarwalsonika74 жыл бұрын
Very well explained!
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Glad you thought so, thanks!
@davidclode36014 жыл бұрын
Thanks Spencer!
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
You are quite welcome!
@smiff47484 жыл бұрын
Such a simple technique but is so effective. Thank you for sharing this.
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@Notaphily4 жыл бұрын
Smiff This is false. It doesn’t work that way. Hyper focal distance depends on the size of aperture also. You can’t focus on the same point (per your doubling distance rule) on different aperture to get the crisp picture.
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
झोले कामरेड़ (Given that you copy-pasted this comment from earlier, I will copy-paste my response): No, this video is correct. Even if you’re at f/1.4 with very shallow depth of field, focusing at double-the-distance will EQUALIZE foreground and background sharpness. It’s 100% true that the final sharpness of your photo also depends on your aperture, so you’re correct in that regard. But step one is focusing at the point that maximizes total depth of field regardless of your aperture. Only after that do you select an aperture like f/8, f/11, etc., that gives you as much depth of field as possible without running into excessive diffraction. In fact there is a mathematically accurate way to determine *which* aperture is the best compromise between diffraction and depth of field at this point, but explaining it went way beyond the scope of this video - you can read about it here if you want: photographylife.com/how-to-choose-the-sharpest-aperture - once you’ve read and understand that, if you disagree with any of the math related to the DTD method or choosing the sharpest aperture, I’ll update the video, but it just won’t happen, because all the information here is correct.
@Notaphily4 жыл бұрын
Photography Life it didn’t work for me. Idk
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
झोले कामरेड़ Not sure why that would be. Was the foreground too blurry, or the background? If it was both, you aren’t using a small enough aperture. If it was either the foreground or background, you aren’t focused on the DTD point and are either too far back or front focused.
@federicoacosta74314 жыл бұрын
Great explanation!
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@Reza-S13404 ай бұрын
When you mention distances of 2 feet and 4 feet from the camera, are you referring to the direct distance to the subjects, or the distance between the sensor plane and a plane passing through the subject, which is parallel to the sensor plane?
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 ай бұрын
The latter! It’s the distance between the plane of your camera sensor and the shortest line to the subject.
@KhoiThinh3 жыл бұрын
Newbie question: If I use a small aperture, say f16 to take landscape photos, then I wouldn't need to worry about the hyperfocal distance?
@timculler14544 ай бұрын
Fantastic explanation, Spencer! One question : is the hyperfocal technique going to give you as sharp focus at near and far points as focusing on each and using focus stacking ( which of course is cumbersome). In other words , do you only recommend focus stacking when the hyperfocal technique isn’t really working well or do you use focus stacking to make both near and far images maximally sharp? I sometimes think using hyperfocal technique that my far part of the image are still a bit soft. Thanks, Tim
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 ай бұрын
Focus stacking technically gives you sharper results, but I rarely use it. Too much can go wrong and focus stacking almost always gives you little artifacts in the photo if anything was moving, even a blade of grass. When I focus stack, it’s only when f/16 plus this double-the-distance hyperfocal method did not give you sufficient depth of field. Even then, to minimize errors, I focus stack with photos taken at f/11 or f/16 so that I need to stack as few photos as possible.
@timculler14544 ай бұрын
Thanks you so much for your reply, Spencer. I understand your answer, but i am still perplexed as to why my landscape photos are softer in the distance. I am following your techn and getting the close objects sharp but not the distant parts. Using a z5 with z24-200 at 24mm so must be operator error. I have searched far and wide on the internet but no help. Any advice would be very welcome-and I understand if you don’t have time to respond. Your tutorials are the best! Tim
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 ай бұрын
Thanks Tim! If it’s always the further portion that’s blurrier than the nearest foreground, it either means that you’re focusing too closely (either your initial estimate is a little incorrect or your estimate of “double” is a little incorrect) or the lens has some field curvature. In other words, its plane of focus isn’t actually a plane, but rather, curves inward. The 24-200mm does have some field curvature so that might be what you’re seeing, or maybe it’s a combination of that and inaccurate focus distance. Either way, you will need to focus a bit further than you have been. And make sure that your aperture is sufficiently narrow. If the foreground is close, f/11 or f/16 is necessary. Don’t shoot at f/5.6 if you need a lot of depth of field.
@timculler14544 ай бұрын
Wow! Thanks so much for your fast and clear response. I will work on your recommendations. Keep up the fantastic work work!
@gludeklis5 жыл бұрын
well done! thanks!
@tanweercaa4 жыл бұрын
Nice video, young man.
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Tanweer!
@profmccutch5 жыл бұрын
Nice job.
@AndrewL9 ай бұрын
Good stuff
@quentinsylwester6354 жыл бұрын
Question. Lets say i focus on an object 10 feet away and lock in the focus. Then i move forward 5 feet. wouldn't this achieve the same thing?
@PhotographyLifeChannel4 жыл бұрын
Good question Quentin. The answer is, only loosely. If your landscape has contours or a variety of different nearby elements, there’s no way that your composition will always have its closest object 5 feet from the camera as you move around. In turn, 10 feet will not always be the optimal focus distance of your lens, even if it was correct for the first shot. Remember - the hyperfocal distance method in this video is to compose the photo, find the closest object in your composition (even if it’s an empty area of dirt at the bottom of your frame), and double that distance. Unless you can guarantee that the closest object will be the same distance away in every one of your compositions - like *maybe* salt flats if you don’t change your tripod height or position of ballhead whatsoever as you walk around - focusing is something you need to do each time you change your composition.
@tsizzle2 жыл бұрын
What about stacked focusing? Can that help with getting ultra sharp landscape photos?
@PhotographyLifeChannel2 жыл бұрын
Yes! Double the distance is best when you’re trying to get everything in a single photo, but focus stacking is a huge help when there’s a nearby foreground or when you want to maximize sharpness.