The Rafale is such a beautiful aircraft, but so is every design from Dassault.
@Yvonmoua3 жыл бұрын
Great job with France's Rafale jet, God bless France and US relationships forever!
@nicolasrobineau75093 жыл бұрын
But senile biden stole the swiss contract... F16 or F18 would be more better for switzerland than bad iron plane f35. Rafale was the better choice but politics changed the rules. Look at vidéo from Ate Chuet, an ancient pilot of Rafale. No chauvinism, just a well balanced opinion.
@nicolasrobineau75093 жыл бұрын
@Frank Silvers it s not me Who said that. Read press, and french pilot. It is welknowm from many years that us administration is very influent when warplane had to be sold. The gao of f35 is too expensive. So, us had to sale many of planes to reduce cost of this technology. Tous les coups sont permis dans cette compétition. Il ne faut pas être naïf. Winning at any cost. Fair is not an option.
@nicolasrobineau75093 жыл бұрын
@Frank Silvers too easy to say that. Look at thé fact and reality. Im not anti us as you said. But explain to me u s extra territoriality policy and justice. Hix can you explain that european country buy us plane than european plane like saab, typhoon or Rafale ? Dont tell us that américan influence is not too big. To be allied but no submitted.
@nicolasrobineau75093 жыл бұрын
@Frank Silvers not at all you exagerate. You misunderstood the sense of european union Who wants to replace nations by a New entity.. Thats the aim of UE, a common program for all members of thé Community.. It s just a solidarity for members.
@yamino40433 жыл бұрын
@Frank Silvers stupid arguments...hi from switzerland
@mateusalves96133 жыл бұрын
The very cute French fighters they really got the design right Esse caça francês muito lindo eles realmente acertaram no desing
@Bellthorian3 жыл бұрын
I am an American but I love the Rafale. It is so sleek looking and compact. The F-18 is huge by comparison. That has to be an advantage in air to air combat being harder to spot.
@thedailyaviationyoutube65643 жыл бұрын
Thank for commenting....,.I will advise to look into making successful investment in crypto and other exchange markets to enable you make huge profit on it.•⬇️
@Bellthorian3 жыл бұрын
@FUCK SHIT I wonder if some of it could be cultural misunderstanding. In America with our sense of humor we pick on and denigrate our friends all the time. It is just something we do. I love France, the people, the history, the culture. Western Civilization would not be what it is today without France so know I respect you guys from the bottom of my heart. That said I love telling a French surrendering joke just as much as the next guy.
@johndoe-cd9vt3 жыл бұрын
in air combat, smaller is better, bigger is easier to spot and also it consumes more fuel, so more expensive to operate and covers less distance without refueling
@CJP-oz6hr3 жыл бұрын
@FUCK SHIT …one of the last times I was in Europe, French students were denigrating me and my friends in a Madrid bar. We did nothing to provoke it.
@heyitsme82223 жыл бұрын
@@CJP-oz6hr lol are u big ?
@gunner6783 жыл бұрын
One of the best fighters in the world without doubt!
@133_D2 жыл бұрын
Definitely better than any US made crap
@ppsarrakis3 жыл бұрын
Proud to say that the Greek Air-force got their first Rafale delivered a couple days ago yay!
@davifmcmonies23063 жыл бұрын
How did they afford that? Your to busy paying people full pensions at 50 and are in some of the worst debt in the whole of Europe. Perks of being in the EU I guess... Can get away with fucking the country economy up and just get bailed out by the western countries...
@fordforever68143 жыл бұрын
@@davifmcmonies2306 kou kou
@davifmcmonies23063 жыл бұрын
@@fordforever6814 what does that mean in English? Those words don't exist in the language I grew up with knowing...
@quantum3403 жыл бұрын
Good. Now feel free to turn on your targeting radar every time a Turkish fighter or frigate starts to feel delusions of Neo-Ottoman Empire.
@jetaddicted3 жыл бұрын
Clown alert!!! Davif, you demonstrate precisely why so many around the planet are fed up with the Anglo culture, keep up the good work, kou kou
@michaelkneringer31943 жыл бұрын
Cool aircraft. I can only imagine, any pilot should be proud to have been able to sit in the cockpit of a Rafale.
@zcomme3 жыл бұрын
Mirage 2000 the perfect shape design combining elegance and strength and powa!
@jonathan0833 жыл бұрын
Rafale is like the hot foreign exchange student in US aircraft carrier.
@jamesdouglas69773 жыл бұрын
@Sum Ting Wong you’d probably still hit it tho
@MrTaikira3 жыл бұрын
@Sum Ting Wong rafale is a so much better plane than the f35. The f35 is definitely the fat girl you mentioned Rafale is one of the best aircraft nowadays. That’s not my purpose, even us air force says that
@GTChucker863 жыл бұрын
@Sum Ting Wong A smart tablet ain't 1970's tech bud
@GTChucker863 жыл бұрын
@Sum Ting Wong 🤔 never met an american who said that
@d_san19853 жыл бұрын
@@GTChucker86 Its a chinese bot. Ignore it
@heyitsme82223 жыл бұрын
Franchement niveau aéronautique la France est bien placée
@FirebirdPower-vm2ri5 ай бұрын
The French Navy Pilotes is so Professional and good Brothers 🤙💖👍👍👍
@Thetequilashooter13 жыл бұрын
Love the Rafale. Not only is she beautiful, but badass too. India was smart to buy them. China knows damn well they’ve got nothing remotely close to its abilities. I am glad that the USA and France are allies still going strong. Just like in a marriage or relationship, we sometimes have our differences, but in the end we can count on the other.
@shermanpeabody61023 жыл бұрын
Aircraft is just a platform that carries BVRAAMs. PL-15 and PL-21 BVRAAM will be a problem for Rafale , because of its mini-AESA seekers. Mini-AESA seekers are design to track down low observable aircrafts like the Rafale.
@Ry_TSG3 жыл бұрын
@@shermanpeabody6102 AESA seekers are an improvement, but they certainly are not a silver bullet against fighter aircraft. Even a larger ground based AESA radar with tons of processing power behind it will be somewhat stumped by stealth aircraft in the right conditions. And aircraft are far more than just missile trucks, as the sensors they carry can be just as important as weapons
@HellStr823 жыл бұрын
well the french did help you with your independence war..then you didnt pay them back and that was shi.t
@shermanpeabody61023 жыл бұрын
@@HellStr82 , see Battle of the Bulge, World War 2 , or the Western Front , World War 1 and 2 .
@Hattonbank3 жыл бұрын
@@HellStr82 Why should they pay you back, they gave one in the eye to the Brits, weren't you happy enough about that?
@arabiano97193 жыл бұрын
The French always make sexy fighter jets 😍
@rdeeeezy3 жыл бұрын
Rafale has always been a sleek looking fighter plane.
@rickwilliamson92483 жыл бұрын
Except for the fixed refueling probe. Never understood that.
@tsuna1113 жыл бұрын
@@rickwilliamson9248 probably for ease of use and lower price since its fixed
@sigma_frenchie40753 жыл бұрын
@@rickwilliamson9248 for reliability purposes
@Fabio-om4kb3 жыл бұрын
Plus de debit et moins de poids, comprendra qui pourra.
@alexfournier99562 жыл бұрын
FRENCH RAFALE F4 IS THE VERY BEST WARRIOR OF THE AIR NOW .. SO CUTE IN DESIGN AND POWERFUL PRECISE IN FIGHTS...
@salseromz42119 ай бұрын
Vive la France ... Vive l' Amérique ! ! Long live France...... long live America
@camembertdalembert63233 жыл бұрын
décidément, le Mirage 2000 avec ses ailes delta restera un avion exceptionnel.
@anakyyns.10613 жыл бұрын
@Emmanuel Macron Oui, restons vigilants tant que le Delta plane XD
@zcomme3 жыл бұрын
le + beau!
@jmbig2 жыл бұрын
Oui le 2000 est le plus bel engin jamais dessiné
@dozo12112 жыл бұрын
The Mirage is one of the best looking planes ever
@miravela45753 жыл бұрын
Le mot "hypnotique" m'a forcé à cliquer
@DecalageChope Жыл бұрын
It's not the Rafale prototype that flew in 1986, it's the demonstrator named Rafale A. The aircraft was then completely redesigned and re-engined. The first prototype, the Rafale C01, made its first flight in 1991.
@martinjrgensen82343 жыл бұрын
It is a beautiful jet. So elegant and wispy.
@Krebssssssss2 жыл бұрын
God, that’s such a beautiful jet.
@MrDo0bie3 жыл бұрын
Beautifull aircraft.
@fathihasim12903 жыл бұрын
Indonesia will buy this fighter jet 😍😍😍
@nuqmanridzuan62603 жыл бұрын
Where Su35?
@saff33563 жыл бұрын
@@nuqmanridzuan6260 USA forbids them, threaten with sanctions.
@Reaper-pq6xs3 жыл бұрын
I'm french, I see it was uploaded 2 minutes ago and the title is already translated, that's fast.
@calahan593 жыл бұрын
c'est un bot qui traduit
@allenlee22873 жыл бұрын
Kick out those Rafael in US Fleet Why Mr Macron is friend of China. Traitor.
@jesusjaviersicairos54213 жыл бұрын
You aré french?
@mdkfl12203 жыл бұрын
@@allenlee2287 Do not forget that you are American thanks to us the French. There were 53 major conflicts in Europe. France was a belligerent in 49 of them, and the United Kingdom in 43. Of the 185 battles France has fought over the past 800 years, its armies will have won 132 of them, and lost 43, leaving only 10 battles undecided. Thus giving the French soldiers the record of victories in Europe and therefore in the world. France is the nation that has participated in the greatest number of wars and battles in the history of mankind. - Over the last 800 years France has beaten about over 200 years against England, over 150 years against the Germanic nations, over 190 years against the Spanish / Portuguese, and against many other nations as well. Often these wars were waged against France outnumbered against coalitions of several nations aiming to destroy it. France, warrior nation par excellence, the strategy deployed by these generals are still studied today, especially the campaigns of Napoleon Bonaparte. Remember that your country is only 300 years old. You have to stop believing that you are the most important and indispensable on this earth.
@goldorak32513 жыл бұрын
@@calahan59 Expliquez-lui aussi ce qu'est un bot.. ;-)
@josenixon13613 жыл бұрын
Thank you France for giving rafale to india.we have a long lasting relationship New Delhi and paris.jai franceeee Jai india
@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa84543 жыл бұрын
S400 from Pakistan and 0 rafale hahaha Hahahaha
@josenixon13613 жыл бұрын
@@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa8454 there is no medicine for jealousy my dear.the whole Europe is India's friendssss
@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa84543 жыл бұрын
@@josenixon1361 ha you are European now ? Hahahaha
@josenixon13613 жыл бұрын
@@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa8454 they are our brothers and sisters.the most lovely people in the world europeans
@mmadanyparfaitvosconnaissa84543 жыл бұрын
@@josenixon1361 viva Pakistan also ok ?
@shikination8920 Жыл бұрын
Incroyable les français toujours partout xD
@ivanerceg36602 жыл бұрын
great jet. i am so happy that croatia bought them for croatian air forces.
@737MaxPilot3 жыл бұрын
6:17 I love how you needed to tell us what the refueling port was for....refueling. Brilliant!
@happyseal72023 жыл бұрын
Who would have thought? 😂
@dhanie89303 жыл бұрын
I am Indonesian. We as Indonesian people really want the arrival of Rafale fighter jets.
@ricardosmythe25483 жыл бұрын
Unless your planning on operating them from carriers your better of with Eurofighters 🤷♂️ the Rafale is a slightly smaller Eurofighter with compromises made for carrier operability
@goldorak32513 жыл бұрын
@@ricardosmythe2548 Hahaha !! I think you don't know much about multirole fighters...
@ricardosmythe25483 жыл бұрын
@@goldorak3251 I know that in most modern battle scenarios any exchange is likely to be bvr at speed and high enough to try and avoid anti air systems. That's where the EF excels over the Rafale, the only place the Rafale has an advantage is at slower speeds below 10,000 feet well below where the fight is likely to take place.
@ultraman51683 жыл бұрын
@@ricardosmythe2548 the Rafael has long had a superior surface strike capability, with better integration of air to ground weaponry. This has lessened over the years with upgrades, but there are still a few things that Eurofighter can't do or can't do as well. Things like long range cruise missiles, antiship missiles, tactical nukes. The Eurofighter is a gorgeous plane with great capabilities as well. But calling the Rafael just a mini-Typhoon is a bit obtuse. And as it would happen, Indonesia is a very maritime nation, and even if they don't intend to build their own carriers, it may benefit them to have fighters capable of landing on allied carriers.
@hervescellier69433 жыл бұрын
@@ultraman5168 Not Rafael but RAFALE
@mirjanakovac3085 Жыл бұрын
❤ super .Blagoslov čuvajte se .❤❤❤
@willyageorges3 жыл бұрын
canard wings are not for low altitudes but for low speed, 2:04 not rafale cockpit but mirage 2000 cockpit
@gunner6783 жыл бұрын
Well spotted, I saw that too.
@panzerabwerkanone3 жыл бұрын
More correctly the canards are for enhanced maneuverability at low speeds. Important for an aircraft that would have to make approaches and landings on an aircraft carrier.
@wwb70913 жыл бұрын
@@panzerabwerkanone Not only maneuverability....they also counteract stalling.
@failuretocommunicate49763 жыл бұрын
What’s the horizontal bar on the tip of the tail vertical stabilizer for? At 2:45 the 2 seater
@willyageorges3 жыл бұрын
@@failuretocommunicate4976 The top end of Rafale's vertical stabilizer contains a RWR (Radar Warning Receiver ) as part of the Rafale's SPECTRA self defense system. The RWR is capable to send a signal to the Countermeasure Dispensing System (CMDS), which can eject countermeasures such as chaff, to aid in avoidance.
@tjololot37613 жыл бұрын
Hellenic Airforce new fighter jet.....the mighty Rafale. The first one (24 in total) will be delivered on 21st of July.....
@joseposadas59343 жыл бұрын
Greece has left the crisis behind cos it's buying expensive fighters
@DimitrisKoutoulas3 жыл бұрын
5:02 I was impressed by the fact that the F16 has a retractable landing gear...😆
@jabom993 жыл бұрын
It only has one wing also. A big improvement over those old biplane jets.
@paullozano14563 жыл бұрын
QUE VEUX TU DIRE MON AMI??
@MrStrat013 жыл бұрын
It's an American exclusivity ;-))
@gunner6783 жыл бұрын
Lol
@DimitrisKoutoulas3 жыл бұрын
@@jabom99 "biplane jets" 😂 😂
@johnrusac68943 жыл бұрын
Thanks for stringing together half a dozen unrelated clips... I now have A.D.D. -Oh, look a bird!
@julienstephan802710 ай бұрын
What a magnificent plane ! The Rafale F4 version is by far one of the most efficient aircraft in the world today!... However, it is only considered a fourth generation aircraft..... Long live the sixth generation in project with our German friends, in ten years!!!..... It will be a fantastic plane !!!..
@malaussenemaurice1802 Жыл бұрын
Go go le rafale un monstre de technologie
@apettit7 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the very cool inflight video!
@Carlos-cy4uc3 жыл бұрын
The world best naval aircraft.. No doubt
@cesaravegah37873 жыл бұрын
Right now yes but when the yankee fix some issues of the naval variant of the F35 it will be second, great plane and very beautiful anyways
@brianfoley43283 жыл бұрын
When one considers all the crap the military wastes money it comes as a huge relief when I read stories about things that make so much sense. The NATO allies being able to operate off of each others aircraft carriers makes sense in so many ways.
@DreadX103 жыл бұрын
Agreed!
@Aethlioss3 жыл бұрын
On est vraiment les meilleurs en faite
@EulerPaula2 жыл бұрын
Beautiful plane!
@dozo12112 жыл бұрын
2:58 holy molly, what a formation, that looks deadly
@ramandiezo3 жыл бұрын
I love this aircraft !
@ВитяПапша3 жыл бұрын
Чистого неба всем пилотам мира.
@soydechileyque3 жыл бұрын
OMG THE DRAGON-FLY... NICE!!!! ALWAYS I DREAM WITH THIS ONE IN MY HANDS.
@chrismair8161 Жыл бұрын
vive Le France!
@mobilemb31513 жыл бұрын
🇫🇷 🤝 🇺🇸
@four-dimensionalperson3 жыл бұрын
Best fighter after F-22A , elegant and dangerous , equiped with AESA and FOX-3 long range missiles , dangerous .
@four-dimensionalperson3 жыл бұрын
@StrigonKid man FOX it's shorter therm from FOXTROT , it's used to indicate tipe of air to air missile , fox-3 it's a air to air missile , like AIM-120 or R-77 , Fox-1 it's a semni active missile like AIM-7 , Fox-2 it's a infrared missile like AIM-9 or R-73 , Fox-4 it's signs gun's , but use therm of guns,guns,guns , Exocet it's a antiship missile you can't use for shot down a air target , Fox-1-2-3 indicate tipe of missile , when pilot launch a missile , indicate tipe of missile fox-1-2-3 Also if bandit launch a missile he says what tipe of missile was launched or an other ffighter pilot can't say fox-1-2-3 defensing that indicates he's attacked and , Or pilot can say fox launch if it's don't know what tipe of missile it's , Or say Fox-2 launch on 270 for or fox-2 on 3 a clock indicate what tipe of missile and where , for Fox-2 use flair's and IRCM active countermeasure , for fox 1 and 3 use chaff and electronic countermeasure ECM .
@four-dimensionalperson3 жыл бұрын
@StrigonKid for other tipe of missile it's other indications , SAM launch it's a ground to air missile like SA-10 or Patriot , GTAM launch it's a air to ground missile like AGM-65 .
@professeurklonk3 жыл бұрын
Décollez hypnotique c'est nouveau comme expression
@kakaroto3419 Жыл бұрын
Love the Rafale but the Mirage 2000s uffff ❤.
@fourniercc2 жыл бұрын
Hi From 1:53 to 2:08 it is a Mirage 2000 cockpit, not a Rafale. Rafale carries 1.5x its own weight in payload, apparently the only one with this capability. The empty plane weights 10,5 tons. Both engines are very reliable and not the most powerful but the plane sleek aerodynamics compensate by coupling with canard wings to optimise the over-wing air streams. So it flies at low speed with less drag for less power. The plane does not integrate dedicated spoiler to decelerate; the air brake is a combined position of the canards and the ailerons in opposition with elevons. So the aircraft weight is reduced even more than the sole inclusion of composite materials in the structure…
@derrickholzhey96853 жыл бұрын
Welcome 🇺🇸💪
@thedailyaviationyoutube65643 жыл бұрын
Thank for commenting....,.I will advise to look into making successful investment in Bitcoin and other crypto exchange markets to you make huge profit on it.•
@thedailyaviationyoutube65643 жыл бұрын
Thank for watching For more guidelines W••H••A••T••S••A••P••P>> *•+•1••••9••1••9••2••0••0••0••1••8••6•*
@MisteriosGloriosos9223 жыл бұрын
*Very interesting video!!!*
@user-ld7vl9sk4s3 жыл бұрын
wow that carrier landing
@danielcaldemeyer66443 жыл бұрын
With the Swiss buying a total fleet of F-35s they put themselves in danger of having too many planes out of service. The F-35 has the worst ratio of battle ready planes vs planes in the repair shop. Like I said they ARE stealthy but parts are scarce and the down time is not good. They have had problems with computers and air for the pilots and especially problems with the stealthy wing and tail edges melting at supersonic speeds. They are limited to subsonic speeds but then because of their stealth they dont need supersonic speed as much as regular fighters.On the other hand the Gripen has the best record for durability and less maintenance problems then any aircraft out there. It is also capable of refueling and re loading missiles from back roads. It also has great electronic warfare capabilities. I really like the Gripen too. I am an American and I love and respect all of the great fighters out there. Even the Russian planes. You have to look past their leaders and dictatorship to respect their technology. They make great military equipment but their cars are junk. Everything in Russia goes into the military. China just passed Russia in military strength but their military weapons are not as high a quality as the Russians but then the Russians lace spare parts and their planes will not be able to sustain air power long because many of them will be on the ground. People do not realize how much maintenance goes into military aircraft. The cost of an F-15 costs $29,000 per hour to fly, includes maintaninence. The F-16 cost around $10,000 an hour, F-22 $40,000 per hour, F-35 $ per hour $33,00 per hour, F-18 $12,000 hr, The French Rafale only costs $12,000 per hour, Eurofighter cost $15,00 hr and the Gripen only costs $6000 per hour to operate. The lowest in the world. You get a lot of bang for your buck with the Gripen plus its durability. Too many people short change the Gripen. It cant carry as large a weapons load as the other planes but it serves a very good purpose in many other ways. It will be in the air still fighting when other aircraft will be on the ground with other maintenance costs and time. I forgot to mention that the F-35 among all of its other problems has engine problems also. If I were a European country like Switzerland I would not put all of my money in one plane. The F-35. They want 30 planes, they should only get around 5 F-35s and the rest Gripens and Rafles.
@charlesmartel21673 жыл бұрын
today nearly 20% of the F35 are in the garage. US Airforce received instructions to decrease flight hours so that they do not reach the 2000 flight hours to avoid the costly revisions and repairs. this is a big joke, the Swiss will pay several billions to buy a Flight Similator. Already two years late for F35 deliveries in Belgium.
@francinesicard4642 жыл бұрын
Swiss taxpayers will surely be delighted in a while when they'll realise the astronomical costs of the F35. First of all with the purchase, to which will be added the astronomical maintenance costs, without forgetting it has still several technical issues, the details being kept under wrap by the Pentagon. Last but not least, this aircraft has never proven itself in war zones. Why such an aircraft for a country the size of a postage stamp. As usual, US diplomatic tactics are very efficient.
@joelcueto24603 жыл бұрын
This is a good thing about NATO, they have the "standards" for everything, from ammunition's, digital link system, etc, they could be made from different NATO member countries but it's interchangeable, even if the missile is a French or American made, every NATO member country can use it with only slight modifications. Like in the video, a French Rafale can successfully land and take off from an American carrier which is good. NATO may not have the numbers to confront Russia or China but this standardization is a big plus for any conflict.
@JohnSmith-np4kw3 жыл бұрын
What did you do, why did you give out the military secret to the Russian army. It has already made weapons compatible with NATO standards and they can now use NATO systems, it remains to sell this idea to China. It is necessary to give more Rafale to the NATO army, instead of the F-35. Then there will be a 'mosquito' fleet, as in 'Star Wars'.
@andreameert3 жыл бұрын
Actually, French Rafale is the only foreign fighter that is approved to land/take off from US carriers. But you are right: except that, standardization is a good thing within NATO.
@ravinpinsuwan3 жыл бұрын
Good
@rickhunter82163 жыл бұрын
I like mirage 2000 and Rafale.
@thedailyaviationyoutube65643 жыл бұрын
Thank for watching For more guidelines W••H••A••T••S••A••P••P>> *•+•1••••9••1••9••2••0••0••0••1••8••6•*
@thedailyaviationyoutube65643 жыл бұрын
Thank for commenting....,.I will advise to look into making successful investment in crypto and other exchange markets to enable you make huge profit on it.•
@soraism3 жыл бұрын
Tiny, Kitty Cute drone🖤
@beatboxbuggi68843 жыл бұрын
The way Rafales take off from their own carriers is incredible. The carriers have a ski ramp, and as the Rafales accelerate they have their landing gear as compressed as it can get. Then at the tip of the ramp, it extends suddenly and jumps the plane into the air!
@Predator42ID3 жыл бұрын
France hasn't used a ramped carrier in decades so I'm assuming you're referring to other carriers.
@rogerout74983 жыл бұрын
Half fueled and lightly armed.. there's a reason we use a catapult.
@Hattonbank3 жыл бұрын
UK carriers were built with ski ramps back in the 1970's, nothing new with them.
@Nicole-fdco603 жыл бұрын
Le Rafale est beau. Le F- 35 est laid.
@TimRobertsen3 жыл бұрын
Damn! Their AoA at landing is off the charts! Must be somewhere around 13-15 degrees
@aviationobsession7772 жыл бұрын
Awesome 😀
@ՀայաստանԵրեվան-գ9ս3 жыл бұрын
✌🏼🇺🇸🇫🇷✌🏼
@pinaky_AnVikSiki3 жыл бұрын
Fabulous power ...
@chantaltaille73913 жыл бұрын
Incroyable ! je ne savais pas que un Rafale pouvait ne décoller qu en l air...cette subtilité reste applicable dans des situations extrêmes et urgentes non?... Il faut la un deux Aviateurs experts: celui qui tracté le Rafale et celui qui le pilote... C est de la magie, le principe des vases communicants en quelque sorte! Vous êtes prodigieux.. Merci l intérêt intellectuel de ce film m a bcp intéressée.. RESPECTUEUSEMENT.
@leneanderthalien2 жыл бұрын
euh, on ne comprend rien à ce que vous ecrivez...
@chantaltaille73912 жыл бұрын
Désolée Monsieur l analyste j ai dû mal m exprimer car je ne suis pas experte mais j avais coutume de bénéficier auprès de moi d un Aviateur qui savait deviner et anticiper mes interrogations... Désolée si je ne peux m expliquer plus techniquement Cordialement
@trungphamchimcanh3 жыл бұрын
Việt nam 🇻🇳. Ilove you 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
@thedailyaviationyoutube65643 жыл бұрын
Thank for commenting....,.I will advise to look into making successful investment in Bitcoin and other crypto exchange markets to you make huge profit on it.•
@thedailyaviationyoutube65643 жыл бұрын
Thank for watching For more guidelines from admin W••H••A••T••S••A••P••P>> *•+•1••••9••1••9••2••0••0••0••1••8••6•*
@juliotrujilloduarte58783 ай бұрын
Que hermoso avion tienen los franceses
@malsawmtluangakhiangte81313 жыл бұрын
I like this figter
@AC-busso3 жыл бұрын
🇱🇷🇫🇷
@romeromartinezsalcedo84243 жыл бұрын
👉🇺🇸
@jakehilderbrand68903 жыл бұрын
@@romeromartinezsalcedo8424 🇺🇸🇫🇷
@almmax91943 жыл бұрын
@@romeromartinezsalcedo8424 f35 👍🐧
@pilout86373 жыл бұрын
1:55 its a mirage 2000-5 cockpit not a rafale AT ALL....
@hardidjo39103 жыл бұрын
super etendard - legend of malvinas war.. continue with Mirage..
@Hattonbank3 жыл бұрын
The Harrier was a better legend.
@hardidjo39103 жыл бұрын
@@Hattonbank duo legend fighter.. there are no american fighter in malvinas war
@Hattonbank3 жыл бұрын
@@hardidjo3910 What about the A-4 Skyhawk? They were involved in attacks on Royal Navy warships.
@hardidjo39103 жыл бұрын
Real dogfight - air battle only etendard againts Harrier..
@hardidjo39103 жыл бұрын
real dueller
@jlazard20653 жыл бұрын
Le plus bel avion avec les Sukhoi 30 et 33 Mig 29 et 35 russes.
@Dobermanator3 жыл бұрын
When they take off it can sound like this over the radio Weee Weee but it is actually Ouiiii Ouiii
@kemskyfarezy3 жыл бұрын
most handsome Jet Fighter
@clio2rsminicup Жыл бұрын
It's so easy for French Navy pilots to land on the runways of giant US aircraft carriers. ^^ It is more difficult for US Navy pilots to land on the smaller French aircraft carriers. ^^
@williamhaynes48003 жыл бұрын
The design reminds me of Dirge, the G1 Decepticon fighter jet.
@sebba46102 жыл бұрын
Rafale IS beautiful No?
@Ghatbkk3 жыл бұрын
What does all the stuff about the F16 have to do with the Rafale?
@stephenwalker78703 жыл бұрын
Love French fighter aircraft mirage 2000 F1 mirage
@entropy_of_principles3 жыл бұрын
Proud of Romanian Air Force, 7:14 F-16 MLU, and self-made (license-built) IAR-330 SOCAT, multi-purpose military helicopter manufactured under the communist regime.
@marc90803 жыл бұрын
Le PUMA est de fabrication française! et l'un des plus vendu au monde, un super hélicoptère, aujourd'hui il est remplacé en France par le NH90 Caïman du même fabricant français, on est très loin de l'Artisanat mon ami!!
@entropy_of_principles3 жыл бұрын
@@marc9080 messieur, avec plaisir, ours Pumas named internally IAR (Intreprinderea Aeronautica Romana) because of Romanian iteration self-mase aircraft had to be named, is mandatory, so, them were made between 70s and 80s with fully participation of Aerospatiale, the old French name back in times for company which conceived and manufacture Pumas, our regime paid bilions for fabrication, check on google better if you do not know nothing. Au revoir et merci beaucoup !
@basil06073 жыл бұрын
humanity is too carried away by war
@guillaumed.78723 жыл бұрын
In fact Mirage 2000 versions do not have the SPECTRA system
@thedailyaviationyoutube65643 жыл бұрын
Thank for commenting....,.I will advise to look into making successful investment in Bitcoin and other crypto exchange markets to you make huge profit on it.•
@thedailyaviationyoutube65643 жыл бұрын
Thank for watching For more guidelines W••H••A••T••S••A••P••P>> *•+•1••••9••1••9••2••0••0••0••1••8••6•*
@craigkdillon3 жыл бұрын
I had no idea that the Rafale M can land and launch from an American carrier. That means the Charles De Gaulle can receive and launch US Navy jets, if need be. That's great.
@andreameert3 жыл бұрын
Actually, French Rafale is the only foreign jet that is approved to land/take off from US carriers. And American jets indeed can also operate on the Charles de Gaulle. This is because US and France are the only two countries operating steam powered (american made) catapults on their carriers.
@craigkdillon3 жыл бұрын
@@andreameert And they like each other. When China has a CATOBAR carrier, I doubt any American or French jets will be using it. Thanks for the info.
@leneanderthalien2 жыл бұрын
@@craigkdillon China as no Catobar carrier
@craigkdillon2 жыл бұрын
@@leneanderthalien very true. China is building one, though. They still have problem - i dont think they have the other ships to have a carrier task force. In which case, the carrier is worthless.
@desalpagesgator49882 жыл бұрын
American planes cannot land on the Charles De Gaulle, the French aircraft carrier is much smaller than the Americans and American planes are too big and not maneuverable enough, it would take the best American pilots to land successfully.
@jrfoleyjr3 жыл бұрын
That tiny drone is the Black Hornet Nano. According to the wiki page it is VERY expensive.
@SeeLasSee3 жыл бұрын
Is the French navy refueling system the same as the US Navy uses?
@johndoe-cd9vt3 жыл бұрын
I think yes
@Hattonbank3 жыл бұрын
All NATO aircraft can refuel, off load fuel to each other
@danielcaldemeyer66443 жыл бұрын
Al of the European jets are excellent planes from the Gripin, Rafael, Eurofighter. They have a different beauty then the American fighters. The canards and sleek bodies are really cool but then you have the Russians who have the Mig Cobras and Su 29s and the Americans who have the F-15, F-16, F-18, F-35 which has a lot of problems but as a stealth fighter it makes up for those defects and then you have the best fighter of all the F-22. Its pure stealth is amazing as is the B-2. I hate it that the B-1 has been retired and then you have the ugliest fighter of all time the Wart Hog A-10 but when ground troops know it is near by they feel much safer. It is the most effective ground attack plane in the world.!! The F-35s and F-22s can go in and destroy Sam missile sites so the other planes can go in and destroy everything else. Everyone in the western world should have at least a few F-35s even with some of their problems the stealthy part is well worth the investment. I do not think the Swiss deal is a good one with them putting all of their money into just one plane. I think they would be much better served by buying around 5-7 F-35s and the rest Gripins and Rafales. Or even the new Super Hornets.
@contreleurofascisme94243 жыл бұрын
The French do not need dishonest trade pressure to sell their products....
@tsuna1113 жыл бұрын
wow it can land on us carriers nice adaptability
@n.o68893 жыл бұрын
The CDG and your carriers use exacly the same technology so yeah😅
@andresimon56542 жыл бұрын
French Rafales only foreign fighter jets in the world able to land and be launched from US Navy aircraft carriers. US F18 Super Hornet only foreign fighter jets able to land and be launched from Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier.
@ahmetsoner91063 жыл бұрын
Türkiye Rafale uçak alımı neden hiç yapmamış anlamıyorum, ABD F 16 larına bağımlı kalmışız
@gastonlagaf71692 жыл бұрын
C est de la politique, la France à livré des Rafales à la Grèce et ne peut donc pas vendre à la Turquie.
@johnduff10102 жыл бұрын
US, France. At the end of the day if you put aside aukus and Irak war. We're pretty much huge allies
@aloisdavid31293 жыл бұрын
Fier d'être français
@richardhindman18553 жыл бұрын
Wow, the F-16 has retractable gear! Who knew!?!?
@ronaldreagan55353 жыл бұрын
Rafale vs. F-18……Rafale crushes the competition.
@APACA3 жыл бұрын
iN YOUR DREAMS
@leneanderthalien3 жыл бұрын
@@APACA The F18 is a very good fighter but the Rafale is much more agile and more modern, thats only the reality...
@dragos71683 жыл бұрын
România 🇷🇴🇷🇴🇷🇴
@redbone44583 жыл бұрын
Le rafale francais ne serais ce pas l'un des seuls avions millitaires a etre autorisés a aponté sur un porte avion americain.
@fabgeronimo65963 жыл бұрын
C'est le seul non US à être autorisé à apponter sur les portes avions US.
@redbone44583 жыл бұрын
@@fabgeronimo6596 J'etais pas vraiment sûr .
@goldorak32513 жыл бұрын
@@fabgeronimo6596 En même temps, à part la France, je ne vois pas qui possède des avions, capables d’apponter sur CATOBAR.
@Fabio-om4kb3 жыл бұрын
@@goldorak3251 les chinois en construise plein 😉
@goldorak32513 жыл бұрын
@@Fabio-om4kb Les chinois n'ont pas de CATOBAR.
@malsawmtluangakhiangte81313 жыл бұрын
Wooo
@charleshennekam26133 жыл бұрын
Looks like there is awful lot of fuel spillage between the tanker/fuel hose/Mirage recepticle... (see 3:40)