I couldn't solve x^x^x=2, so I solved x^x^(x+1)=2 instead

  Рет қаралды 131,292

blackpenredpen

blackpenredpen

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 197
@blackpenredpen
@blackpenredpen Жыл бұрын
so you want both solutions to 2^x-3x-1=0 (not regular algebra) kzbin.info/www/bejne/fXvFq6ajmMh5qtk
@Mr.Pro-aksh26
@Mr.Pro-aksh26 Жыл бұрын
I recently came across your video on how to solve integrals. Although I have completed my bachelor's in computer science and currently pursuing web3 development... I am always interested in Mathematics. I want to know and learn mathematics from 0 to 100. From the very basic to the very advanced. I am ready to put in years into it. Like I'm not literally free in my life and want to learn this. I am currently 23 years old and wish to complete this mathematics in the coming 5 to 8 years. Or even maximum 20 years. I want to know what resources I should use. What books I must use. And what should be proper roadmap for it. My reason for learning maths this way is because I want to grasp all the topics 100% and take to the next level by doing a research in Physics. [I will also study Physics likewise] But I need to learn maths first. Can you guide me? (I know it's impossible to guide like this, but still can you sometimes make a post related to 0 to 100 maths roadmap)
@RithwikVadul
@RithwikVadul 11 ай бұрын
​@@Mr.Pro-aksh26I would also love that
@Unlimit-729
@Unlimit-729 3 ай бұрын
I have something new Solve x! = 2
@IoT_
@IoT_ Жыл бұрын
It can solve it numerically. The truth is "it cannot interpret the input" as it's written on your screenshot. If you explicitly write the expression using the parenthesis, it will solve it.
@mme725
@mme725 Жыл бұрын
I was about to say the same thing. However I'm glad the typo created a new video :D
@82rah
@82rah Жыл бұрын
Yes the input: " given x^(x^(x+1))= 2 find x " returns x~=1.379970...
@elmarhoppieland
@elmarhoppieland Жыл бұрын
Wait but if I type "x^x^(x+1)=2" then it does interpret it correctly
@marvinfelix6394
@marvinfelix6394 Жыл бұрын
Clickbait✅
@IoT_
@IoT_ Жыл бұрын
@@elmarhoppieland actually, you're right. In my case, it also worked out, but I was thinking that it's due to the fact that I have a premium version of Wolframalfa.
@gaurisharma2234
@gaurisharma2234 Жыл бұрын
I don’t fear the math, I fear the amount of marker boxes he has in the back
@vladislav_artyukhov
@vladislav_artyukhov Жыл бұрын
6:04 "It is not because it's cool. It's supercool."
@blackpenredpen
@blackpenredpen Жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/m5eQhYaKnJJlqassi=fHtkI67xFtStYwa3
@vasaaviarion
@vasaaviarion Жыл бұрын
You are going to help me reenter college and earn my degree while I'm in the army. Thanks
@TelPerson
@TelPerson Жыл бұрын
Nice video as always! Now I'll be glad if you try to solve this equation: x^x^(x+2) = 2 It can not be solved by using LambertW function, but it is solvable in terms of superroot! So I hope this experience will be interesting for you!
@fantiscious
@fantiscious Жыл бұрын
what is the solution?
@Tritibellum
@Tritibellum Жыл бұрын
i tried looking into a general solution for x in terms of m and k x^(x^(x+k) = m this is the closest i got: lnx (e^ ln(x + k) = lnm, no clue how to transform x+k into x or vice-versa and then use lambert, then substituting the values for m and k
@TelPerson
@TelPerson Жыл бұрын
​@Tritibellum Oh, there is no general solution to your equation because it requires different superroots depending on k parameter. Like comparing these 2 equations: x^x^x = 2 and x^x^(x+1) = 2 Solution for the left equation is 3rd superroot of 2, while for other one is 2nd superroot of 2nd superroot of 2 (which is not equal to 4th superroot of 2!). See, it even has a various amount of superroots that can not be merged into a single one. And, by the way, the first equation is not solvable in terms of LambertW function, while second is.
@TelPerson
@TelPerson Жыл бұрын
​@@fantisciousOh, if I show the solution before bprp finds it himself, I will just spoil it for him and the audience. But I can give hints on how to approach to solution ;) To solve this equation, I used these 2 cool properties of tetration: (ᵃx)^(ᵇx) = (ᵇ⁺¹x)^(ᵃ⁻¹x) (ᵃx)^x = ¹⁺¹/ᵃ(ᵃx) You can try and prove these properties by yourself, and I hope it will bring you same delight as for me, when I first time discovered and proved them.
@henridelagardere264
@henridelagardere264 Жыл бұрын
This video starts a bit fishy but ends up as yet another great catch by our favorite problem solver.
@scarletevans4474
@scarletevans4474 Жыл бұрын
I know it will sound complex, but what if the fish is not real?
@JohnVKaravitis
@JohnVKaravitis Жыл бұрын
A-hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE!
@Christian_Martel
@Christian_Martel Жыл бұрын
I’m always looking forward to listen the usual: « And you take your fish back! » Thank you Coach Bprp!
@blackpenredpen
@blackpenredpen Жыл бұрын
😆
@thegamer-nd5pv
@thegamer-nd5pv Жыл бұрын
Nice job👍 have never seen the terms ln and e being manipulated in that sort of way. I had also never seen the lambertw function before as something that is similar to a natural logarithm.
@mpperfidy
@mpperfidy Жыл бұрын
I always enjoy your videos, but I think my favorites are the ones where you make stuff up (like the fish) to keep your viewers from getting confused by yet another variable. Placeholders for the win.
@blackpenredpen
@blackpenredpen Жыл бұрын
I appreciate that! Thanks.
@neilgerace355
@neilgerace355 Жыл бұрын
When you get the green marker out, things are getting serious. Because you have reached the scenario of the four colour map problem :)
@jamilshirinov2931
@jamilshirinov2931 Жыл бұрын
4:20 Lembedari function of the Lembedari function 😂
@optimusprime9456
@optimusprime9456 Жыл бұрын
2:45 - that was a smart move O_O
@sircanisiv5462
@sircanisiv5462 Жыл бұрын
That's a W right there.
@Mark16v15
@Mark16v15 Жыл бұрын
I have an idea for when one takes the Lambert function of a Lambert function: The Lamborghini function, noted by the picture of a sleek car instead of a letter like "W".
@jellymath
@jellymath Жыл бұрын
or just W²(x)
@Mark16v15
@Mark16v15 Жыл бұрын
IDK, people might think that's like cos^2(x).@@jellymath
@jellymath
@jellymath Жыл бұрын
​@@Mark16v15Oh I see, although it is a convention that fⁿ(x) is the composition of f with itself n times, so W²(x) = W(W(x)), by convention sin²(x) is just a special situation where writing sin(x)² is more painful, and sin²(x) generally comes up somewhat often in math, like the famous pythagorean identity sin²(x) + cos²(x) = 1. And I think sin(sin(x)) is less so common Anyone correct me if I'm accidentally spreading misinformation haha
@ttmfndng201
@ttmfndng201 Жыл бұрын
@@jellymath I don't know whether or not this is common, but I've never seen fⁿ(x) used to represent composition, only (f^-1)(x) used to represent the inverse of a function.
@armanavagyan1876
@armanavagyan1876 Жыл бұрын
PROF UR videos extremely interesting.
@ElOroDelTigre
@ElOroDelTigre Жыл бұрын
With your videos I will eventually unlock the secrets of the numerical universe. But I'll never be able to answer the primordial question: why do happy-faced fish have horns?
@blackpenredpen
@blackpenredpen Жыл бұрын
Those are eyebrows 😆
@berkaymeral9145
@berkaymeral9145 Жыл бұрын
I'm wondering how to solve an equation written as a^x=(x+b)(x+c) b≠c. Could you please make a video about it? Love from Turkey 🇹🇷
@samueljehanno
@samueljehanno Жыл бұрын
Nice
@matheus-f
@matheus-f 10 ай бұрын
i think thats not possible with w function or smth
@berkaymeral9145
@berkaymeral9145 10 ай бұрын
@@matheus-f yeah you're right, Such an equation can only have a numerical solution.
@berkaymeral9145
@berkaymeral9145 10 ай бұрын
@@matheus-f For example, it is impossible to find the roots of a 5th degree polynomial by separating it into radicals. for example -b/2a +- sqrt(b^2 -4ac)/2a... I thought maybe there was a solution to this.
@r-setizs1415
@r-setizs1415 Жыл бұрын
So how start the mathematics ofline classes by you my dear Sir??
@royehoffman
@royehoffman 7 ай бұрын
To solve x^x^x=a, you need to invent a new function similar to the Lambert W function: such that X(ye^ye^y)=y
@82rah
@82rah Жыл бұрын
Great problem and solution! Wish I could give more than 1 thumb up!
@kingamhYT
@kingamhYT Жыл бұрын
Can we get more algebra like this
@cyrusthagreat6649
@cyrusthagreat6649 Жыл бұрын
Hey blackpenredpen, can you tetrate i to the length of i? Like i with an exponent tower of i's that is i long.
@pedropiata648
@pedropiata648 3 ай бұрын
A cool history for you. When trying to solve x^x^x=2 I realized that: lnx•e^(xlnx)=ln2 so if i had an x close to lnx i could solve it. So I just added an x and reverted the prossess ending up with x^x^(x+1)=2 wich I knew how to solve
@mattmantheredknight6527
@mattmantheredknight6527 11 ай бұрын
Is there any difference between x^(x^(x+1)) = 2 and x^((x+1)^(x)) = 2?
@pentachu938
@pentachu938 11 ай бұрын
As a law student that just likes math I have no idea what just happened. I'm just happy for the fish
@hyacinth5040
@hyacinth5040 11 ай бұрын
As a highschool student, I agree
@BurningShipFractal
@BurningShipFractal Жыл бұрын
I love the alpha fish
@pihvi-p2p
@pihvi-p2p 9 ай бұрын
then can you please do the general form? x^x^(x+a)=b !!!
@TheRedbeardster
@TheRedbeardster Жыл бұрын
Now I really need to decide which fish should I cook for dinner
@RikMaxSpeed
@RikMaxSpeed Жыл бұрын
How long before the few transforms of the W function are added to Wolfram Alpha so it can solve these equations?
@soupisfornoobs4081
@soupisfornoobs4081 Жыл бұрын
I just tried it and it answered correctly
@GrandProtectorDark
@GrandProtectorDark Жыл бұрын
Wolfram can solve this equation. It just has trouble correctly interpreting the input without a few more clarification parentheses
@DanBurgaud
@DanBurgaud 7 ай бұрын
Next time, after solving a difficult solution, do the Dr Payem's "Chalk Throw"!
@CC--qn4gf
@CC--qn4gf 2 ай бұрын
I really wish hyper roots were added to the calculator
@Iguoulasse
@Iguoulasse Жыл бұрын
Imagine working with tetration series n^(n+1)^(n+2)^(...)
@matheus-f
@matheus-f 10 ай бұрын
converge to infinity, because if the value of n < infinity, will have a (n+x)^y, that y will make the value of exponential positive, and if a value of the serie get positive, the serie converge to infinity. i think this without demonstration, i really no know if im right note: if n=infinity, the serie will converge to infinity too
@liambohl
@liambohl Жыл бұрын
It would be really helpful if you clearly and slowly pronounced "Lambert W function" once at the beginning. I was confused for quite a while, and the subtitles didn't help. Thanks for mentioning it in the description.
@billr3053
@billr3053 Жыл бұрын
Horrible math teacher. Fish function?? WTF.
@fermatto
@fermatto 11 ай бұрын
maybe just terrible student
@SwordQuake2
@SwordQuake2 Жыл бұрын
The Lambert W is always such a cop-out...
@sihletician
@sihletician Жыл бұрын
Beautiful 🔥🔥🔥🔥
@AhmedAli-rl3fn
@AhmedAli-rl3fn Жыл бұрын
مرحبا سيدي كنت اريد ان اسألك هل نحن في تفاضلي الدالة نقوم بضرب dy/dx في dx ام ماذا ؟ وان كنا نقوم بذلك فكيف نقوم بضرب dy/dx في dx علي الرغم من ان dy/dx مجرد رمز وانه ليس عملية ؟
@hybmnzz2658
@hybmnzz2658 Жыл бұрын
This is kind of a never ending problem! There are concepts like "differential forms" and "operator theory" in more advanced math which give different interpretations. My advice: dy/dx is an operation which takes functions and gives you the derivative. When you multiply by dx, you are just doing a weird trick which saves time. For example lets say you have dy/dx = y. You might have seen: 1/y dy = dx and then integration. But this is unnecessary! Instead you can do: 1/y dy/dx = 1 and then integrate both sides as int(1/y dy/dx * dx) = int(dx). The trick is that this is the same as last situation by substituting u=y(x), so du=dy/dx * dx. So it just saved time!
@00001Htheprogrammer
@00001Htheprogrammer Жыл бұрын
What's Sigma(i=1,b) d^i/dx^i x^^(tetration)b
@Cattooo-k3i
@Cattooo-k3i Жыл бұрын
purely curious, when will we have 100 differential equation or like 100 real analysis
@artichaug1719
@artichaug1719 Жыл бұрын
We ❤ the fish!
@Regocike
@Regocike Жыл бұрын
So X=1/W after everything cancels out :)
@AryssaRiyasat
@AryssaRiyasat Жыл бұрын
Double lambert W function
@Thebrightestgem
@Thebrightestgem Жыл бұрын
Excellent!
@anthonyiodice
@anthonyiodice 11 ай бұрын
I am so happy I can’t even begin to understand this.
@zachansen8293
@zachansen8293 4 ай бұрын
x^x^x=2 is REALLY close to "let x=1.476684 what is x^x^x" also WA doesn't give that ouput anymore. it gives an approx but it still times out trying to get the exact answer.
@michaelbaum6796
@michaelbaum6796 Жыл бұрын
Wow, this is impressive 👍
@garythesnail8674
@garythesnail8674 Жыл бұрын
Is this the first video where he’s shown an ungodly amount of markers in the background
@blackpenredpen
@blackpenredpen Жыл бұрын
No. 😆
@Reivivus
@Reivivus Жыл бұрын
It’s a business expense
@AramaxTheHuman
@AramaxTheHuman Жыл бұрын
fish for life
@GoodSmile3
@GoodSmile3 Жыл бұрын
I want more videos featuring the alpha fish 🐟
@vivekgupT______________
@vivekgupT______________ Жыл бұрын
Bro I love you❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@yoav613
@yoav613 Жыл бұрын
Nice!.wolfram can solve it (at least the numerical value) if you help him and write : x^(x+1)=ln2/lnx
@iyziejane
@iyziejane 11 ай бұрын
you can "solve" any single variable problem numerically. "Find x in the interval [a,b] such that f(x) = 0" can be solved up to an error E (some small number) in a number of computational steps that scales as (b - a) / E. (just make a grid with that many points and evaluate f(x) at each of the points). The computational cost of numerical methods scales exponentially with the number of variables, and many real-world problems have a large number of variables (e.g. simulating the price of 1000 items in an economy, or simulating a piece of cloth made of a million points that each have a position in 3D space, etc). This is one reason that clever methods for exact solutions are useful.
@ximega5875
@ximega5875 Жыл бұрын
its already been a long time to switch channels name to blackpenredpenbluepen
@tylerwarshaw9782
@tylerwarshaw9782 11 ай бұрын
The original problem is somewhere around 1.4766843
@Treviisolion
@Treviisolion Жыл бұрын
That moment when a mathematician has run out of letters, both latin and greek, to represent various obscure variables in math, and we resort to pictographs as variables. 😂
@Mark16v15
@Mark16v15 Жыл бұрын
I don't think it's so much that he's run out of letters, it's just that we don't have a letter that conveys the idea that it could be a number or equation, but is probably an equation, and ANY equation. Thus although if y = x^fish, that means dy/dx = fish*x^(fish-1), since we rarely run into the fish being an equation in this instance, we use letters like "a" which usually is for a number, especially since derivatives are taught to first year calc students, whereas the Lambert function is taught way further down the road.
@erikkonstas
@erikkonstas Жыл бұрын
LOL the fish is tradition at this point... 😂
@Treviisolion
@Treviisolion Жыл бұрын
@@Mark16v15 In other words, all the greek and latin letters are already largely taken as they usually represent various other things in math, so he's using a fish because nothing else uses a fish pictograph. Or to put it more simply, we've run out of letters and are resorting to pictographs
@bean06942
@bean06942 Жыл бұрын
wow
@Peter_1986
@Peter_1986 Жыл бұрын
I wouldn't be surprised if blackpenredpen genuinely is better at calculating math problems than WolframAlpha.
@getblooned3092
@getblooned3092 Жыл бұрын
Wait, how is 1.3 (+ other decimals) tetrated 3 times (and the fact that last power is 2.3...) equal to two tho? Please do let me know if i am being plainly dumb, or if i am latching on to something😅 peace
@AttyPatty3
@AttyPatty3 8 ай бұрын
I know this is pretty late but in tetration you start by calculating the power tower from the top so first you take 1.37 raised to 2.37 which is approximately 2.11 then you take 1.37 raised to 2.11 which is approximately 2
@getblooned3092
@getblooned3092 8 ай бұрын
@@AttyPatty3 thx 😄
@matthewtallent8296
@matthewtallent8296 8 ай бұрын
I love the fish ❤❤
@Grimlock1979
@Grimlock1979 Жыл бұрын
If you switch to "math input" wolfram alpha can solve it just fine.
@BurningShipFractal
@BurningShipFractal Жыл бұрын
Can we solve x^x^(x+2)=2?
@_-M-_
@_-M-_ Жыл бұрын
Could you not plot x^x^x into a graphing calculator? I feel like i am missing something, could someone clarify this please.
@iyziejane
@iyziejane 11 ай бұрын
Yes, the clarification is that he is seeking an exact solution in terms of known functions, rather than a numerical approximation to the solution. It is the difference between pi and 3.14... . Exact solutions are useful in pure math as the methods to obtain them lead to new ideas. If you are solving an engineering problem (e.g. building something in real life) then numerical solutions tend to be fine. Any single variable problem of the form "Find x in the interval [a,b] such that f(x) = 0" can be solved up to an error E (some small number) in a number of computational steps that scales as (b - a) / E.
@NghiaBui-cq3xm
@NghiaBui-cq3xm Жыл бұрын
W(W(ln 2) = world war ln 2
@wolframalpha8634
@wolframalpha8634 Жыл бұрын
With the premium membership plan , it's possible 👀
@blackpenredpen
@blackpenredpen Жыл бұрын
I see!
@MrMatthewliver
@MrMatthewliver 11 ай бұрын
If x^x^x=2, x=1,41421356231... which approximately equals square root of 2. Now, it is widely known that infinite tetrate od sqrt (2) is 2, but I have not supposed it becomes so close even with sqrt(2)^^3.
@scottleung9587
@scottleung9587 Жыл бұрын
Nice!
@blackpenredpen
@blackpenredpen Жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@LouisEmery
@LouisEmery Жыл бұрын
5:30 I suppose you didn't prove that identity.
@sumanshukla3369
@sumanshukla3369 Жыл бұрын
Sir why don't you tell us about your degrees
@winstonvpeloso
@winstonvpeloso Жыл бұрын
Simpler way to solve is to notice x^x^(x+1) = (x^x)^(x^x) Which reduces the problem to 2 iterations of solving x^x = c
@Zdv0rz
@Zdv0rz 11 ай бұрын
can you explain how x^x^(x+1)=(x^x)^(x^x) works please?
@fermatto
@fermatto 11 ай бұрын
look at the video@@Zdv0rz
@OrdinarySonicfanMmKay
@OrdinarySonicfanMmKay Жыл бұрын
Fun fact: W(ln(x))=ln(ssrt(x))
@OPNisheeth_Gamerz
@OPNisheeth_Gamerz 5 ай бұрын
Woah, looks like I need to invent X(n), which is the inverse of ne^(ne^n), and if x^x^x = y, then x = e^X(ln(y))
@christianfunintuscany1147
@christianfunintuscany1147 Жыл бұрын
Great !
@kauanfsantos9112
@kauanfsantos9112 Жыл бұрын
3^x+x=30, Solve the value of x thank you
@blackpenredpen
@blackpenredpen Жыл бұрын
3
@kauanfsantos9112
@kauanfsantos9112 Жыл бұрын
I forgot to mention, I want you to prove that x is 3, I'm curious how to find out
@adityasinghi
@adityasinghi Жыл бұрын
I dont understand anything but I like watching this lol
@ricodegeus1210
@ricodegeus1210 11 ай бұрын
Sorry its wrong. Doesn't for x=5 orso. Then it becomes x exp 125. But alright i guess with either 2 or 1 it works.
@mathematician369
@mathematician369 7 ай бұрын
Sir, please solve x^(x+1)=2
@ahmetd.yazgan718
@ahmetd.yazgan718 Жыл бұрын
I don't understand how to pass from the second line to the 3rd line.
@diegocabrales
@diegocabrales Жыл бұрын
a^(bc) = (a^b)^c = (a^c)^b, a, b, c > 0 We have a = x, b = x^x and c = x with x > 0*. You apply this property in the second line and you have the third line. * x = 0 cannot be a solution since x^(x + 1) = 0^(0 + 1) = 0¹ = 0 and then we have x^(x^(x + 1)) = 0⁰, which isn't defined. x < 0 cannot be a solution since - for x rational or irrational, we get complex values instead of real ones (the equation is equaled to 2 and 2 is real). - for x integer, we have • x = -1 implies (-1)^((-1)^(-1 + 1)) = (-1)^((-1)⁰) = (-1)¹ = -1 < 0 and 2 > 0. • x = -2 implies (-2)^((-2)^(-2 + 1)) = (-2)^((-2)^(-1)) = (-2)^(1/(-2)¹) = (-2)^(-½) = 1/(-2)½, which is not real and 2 is real. • x = -3 implies (-3)^((-3)^(-3 + 1)) = (-3)^((-3)^(-2)) = (-3)^(-⅑) = 1/(-3)⅑ < 0 and 2 > 0. We see that odd negative integers give negative values (and 2 is positive) and even negative ones give complex values (and 2 is real). Therefore, if x isn't zero nor negative, then it must be positive (x > 0).
@vinijoncrafts7213
@vinijoncrafts7213 Жыл бұрын
Me watching the whole video without knowing what is the lmperdabliu function
@r-setizs1415
@r-setizs1415 Жыл бұрын
Sir I am from India
@edersilvadossantosjunior9885
@edersilvadossantosjunior9885 Жыл бұрын
What is W ?
@jbrady1725
@jbrady1725 11 ай бұрын
The Lambert W function. You can Google it for a good answer.
@alvaroarizacaro3451
@alvaroarizacaro3451 6 ай бұрын
Geniel, hermoso, fabuloso, divertido, ...
@giuseppemalaguti435
@giuseppemalaguti435 Жыл бұрын
x=W(W(ln2))=1,37997....
@SuperDreamliner787
@SuperDreamliner787 Жыл бұрын
Haters will ask why you cannot cancel the Ws at the end.
@mohamadaborokti7032
@mohamadaborokti7032 Жыл бұрын
can you solve this [ 2^x+x²=0 ] ???
@abdulrahmanabukharma7969
@abdulrahmanabukharma7969 4 ай бұрын
Microsoft Mathematics Version 4.0.1108.0000 from 2010 solved it.
@en-zoricon2360
@en-zoricon2360 Жыл бұрын
Sir , by any chance u could solve the equation. D/dx ( d/dx ( intergal where the max is 7 the minimum is -2 , ln(e^x-1)
@General12th
@General12th Жыл бұрын
Don't conjure the math man!
@bastibob660
@bastibob660 Жыл бұрын
It says: cannot interpret the input On Wolfram Alpha: x^(x^(x+1)) = 2 Numerical solution x ≈ 1.37997039661106...
@aditplayz1014
@aditplayz1014 Жыл бұрын
That’s some complex “fun maths” there
@wassollderscheiss33
@wassollderscheiss33 Жыл бұрын
I wonder why you never explained, what W() is, how it works.
@blackpenredpen
@blackpenredpen Жыл бұрын
I have. Check this out kzbin.info/www/bejne/h5Oae3yKqMesgdUsi=05xAbHwlaj9ChD_W
@kianmath71
@kianmath71 Жыл бұрын
Wolfram alpha does give a numerical solution, x = 1.3799..
@viktorsagi
@viktorsagi 11 ай бұрын
Nice!
@kiwithemaniaguy
@kiwithemaniaguy Жыл бұрын
So, I discovered something and want to call it "Euler's Reciprocal Loop". e^(i•pi) = (e^pi)^i because of power law, lets say e^pi is any number, lets call it x. x^i = i-th root of x^(i•i), i•i is equal to -1, so we have i-th root of x^-1, which is the reciprocal of x. (i-th root of 1)/(i-th root of x). Any root of 1 (even complex numbers) is just 1 itself. So we have 1/(i-th root of e^pi) because we have x=e^pi earlier. For the root-power law (n-th root of x^m is equal to x^(m/n)), we have 1/e^(pi/i). 1 raised to any number (even complex numbers) is just 1 itself, we can use this to have (1^(pi/i))/e^(pi/i). Due to having the same power (pi/i), we can have (1/e) ^(pi/i). Now we dont need to worry about 1/e, we just need to get pi/i = i•pi because we need it to have 1/e^(i•pi). Here comes the a bit hard part. Pi is basically 3,so we can use it to have the square root of pi squared, or square root of 9.i is just square root of -1. Due to root-fraction law ((square root of x)/(square root of y) = square root of (x/y)) , we can use it to have square root of 9/(-1) which is just -9. the square root of -9 is i•sq(9) or i•pi! Now we finally have (1/e) ^(i•pi), simplify it out and we have 1/e^(i•pi)! For the proof, we gonna check the results. e^i•pi is just -1, so 1/(-1) is just -1, or e^i•pi. We can do this forever and we still have -1.
@soupisfornoobs4081
@soupisfornoobs4081 Жыл бұрын
Be careful when manipulating complex exponents. Some exponent laws don't hold for complex numbers, for instance a^b^(1/c) ≠ a^(1/c)^b
@Bhuvan_MS
@Bhuvan_MS Жыл бұрын
Sorry, but you violated a lot of rules related to exponents and roots. When dealing with complex numbers, the rules of exponents do not apply. Similarly you cannot combine 2 square roots into a single one when negative numbers are involved. It's a conceptual error.
@p.g.wallychopin
@p.g.wallychopin 10 ай бұрын
Easy... x = scbrt(2)
@roberttelarket4934
@roberttelarket4934 Жыл бұрын
What the hell is this fish business?!
@Isaac-Mor
@Isaac-Mor 11 ай бұрын
is this a joke? the 3rd line is not the same as the 2nd line x^(x*x^x) != (x^x)^(x^x) not always ...
@scoutgaming737
@scoutgaming737 Жыл бұрын
I have a video idea Is there a closed form solution to ∞ Σ (n^(-n-1)) n=1 or ∞ Σ (n^{1-n)) n=1 Wolfram alpha can only give a decimal aoriximation
@erikkonstas
@erikkonstas Жыл бұрын
There's most definitely an exact solution to both, what you might be asking if whether there's a closed form of that solution.
@scoutgaming737
@scoutgaming737 Жыл бұрын
@@erikkonstas yeah I just didn't know that term
@fantiscious
@fantiscious Жыл бұрын
what is the solution
@scoutgaming737
@scoutgaming737 Жыл бұрын
@@fantiscious I can't solve it and neither can wolfram alpha, but bprp is good at math obviously so maybe he can figure it out
@Hardest001
@Hardest001 Жыл бұрын
headache..
@roberttelarket4934
@roberttelarket4934 Жыл бұрын
Wish you didn't have a fish!
@myst-6
@myst-6 Жыл бұрын
@anitatripathi2666
@anitatripathi2666 Жыл бұрын
could you integrate (sin^-1(x))* e^2x
Solution of the transcendental equation a^x+bx+c=0
10:57
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 163 М.
Solving sin(x)^sin(x)=2
10:46
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 406 М.
HELP!!!
00:46
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН
MY HEIGHT vs MrBEAST CREW 🙈📏
00:22
Celine Dept
Рет қаралды 93 МЛН
Fake watermelon by Secret Vlog
00:16
Secret Vlog
Рет қаралды 33 МЛН
solution to the logarithmic triangle
10:52
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 241 М.
Looks so simple yet my class couldn't figure it out, Reddit r/askmath
5:45
bprp calculus basics
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
3 factoring tricks that you probably didn’t know
11:34
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 152 М.
Math for fun, sin(z)=2
19:32
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
2 to the x = 9, many don’t know where to start
16:17
TabletClass Math
Рет қаралды 1,8 МЛН
solving equations but they get increasingly more impossible?
11:25
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 555 М.
How Math Becomes Difficult
39:19
MAKiT
Рет қаралды 177 М.
Precalculus teacher vs WolframAlpha student
11:27
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 625 М.
At what point does y=ln(x) have the maximum curvature?
10:27
bprp calculus basics
Рет қаралды 24 М.
derivative of tetration of x (hyperpower)
10:58
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 524 М.
HELP!!!
00:46
Natan por Aí
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН