Yeah like he puts actual effort into that shit. Respect man
@blzr83 ай бұрын
wallpapers are his 2nd thumbnails its cool
@demolazer3 ай бұрын
Such a great teaching style. And the lack of LSP or Copilot and minimal syntax highlighting he has is lovely to follow the code. 10/10
@Recreman3 ай бұрын
Thank you needed me some tsoding today!
@МатвейРовчак-в4о3 ай бұрын
Эти рабочие столы скоро меня с ума сведут, Love your content so much
@yglyglya3 ай бұрын
пенгер
@kirillvoloshin20653 ай бұрын
спасибо вам за стримы! после видео по рэй кастингу открыл для себя векторы с другой стороны, и в целом замечаю, что стал более доступно решать и описывать рабочие задачи
@iamdozerq3 ай бұрын
Я уже очень давно зозина смотрю - просто смотря в экран в стрим от и до на протяжении последнего года значительно улучшили мои навыки ориентирования в коде, отладке и написании нового кода.
@isaacalves68463 ай бұрын
i3 is back
@TankorSmash3 ай бұрын
1:28:12 the plugin is written by tpope, called vim-abolish, it's great. Also allows changing case too, so turning some_var into SomeVar with a command.
@gamezoid12343 ай бұрын
It's kind of sad that Functional programming lost to OO. As someone who generally prefers procedural programming languages, I find it very hard to understand OO, but when someone describes a functional concept, even if it takes a moment, I understand the point of a concepts. Kinds vs kinds is immediately understandable. Sorts I haven't seen/used before so are less obvious. Dep injection, factories, and other OO patterns still allude my understanding.
@MagpieMcGraw3 ай бұрын
See what people don't get is that C is the ultimate OO language. Structs and functions is how you do OOP. Inheritance is just putting a struct inside another struct. Encapsulation, abstraction and all that other nonsense have nothing to do with the concept of "programming with objects". It's just enterprise programming "best" practices that somebody tried to bolt onto OOP.
@Eugensson3 ай бұрын
@@MagpieMcGrawyeah, OOP has not delivered on the premise of abstractions and encapsulation. The promise was to make the code easily replaceable and reusable. In reality the code becomes so hairy people are afraid to even touch it.
@artemiasalina18603 ай бұрын
1:18:00 ROM-based Microsoft BASIC chose me! That explains a lot!
@DomenicoPezzullo-ib9bg3 ай бұрын
bro did NOT like xfce
@Kknewkles3 ай бұрын
I see many of the regular things(Penger, formerly Porn folder, for one) from the old streams have been restored. But where is my end-of-stream(EOS, lol) screen, Zozin? :^)
@REALsnstruthers3 ай бұрын
35:20 it does; you just have to declare the size _before_ the array parameter: e.g. void some_function(size_t sz, int arr[sz]);
@ettyxcbyrcburcbtxcfhcdtyurt3 ай бұрын
i paid attention - this account is attended
@gamezoid12343 ай бұрын
"100 kilobytes is too much" mean while my work be downloading like 50mb whenever I open a ticket.
@ferdynandkiepski50263 ай бұрын
#embed is in fact in a stable release, since clang 19. So indeed recent, but stable nonetheless, and doesn't require building llvm. Work on the GCC side is continuing. Not sure where it's at.
@sofiaknyazeva3 ай бұрын
Embed requires you to enable C23, and it's not complete even in LLVM yet. Embed was implemented by a ISO committee member in LLVM/Clang, so I'm not surprised that GCC yet has to implement this. Not a lot of in production software actually uses C23, in fact, maybe a handful of them.
@hubstrangers34503 ай бұрын
Thank you....
@gempf3 ай бұрын
Love from Argentina!!!
@MarekFajkus3 ай бұрын
My internal Haskeller speaking: Kind is not type or variable. Kind is either a type or a thing that given a type produces type. Kind of Int is Type, Kind of Maybe is Type -> Type. This comes to play in type classes most component. instance Monad Maybe where... The Maybe is not a type. Maybe a is of Kind Type, but Maybe is of Kind Type -> Type (something that waits for a type to become a type). Kind is higher-order type operator.
@layarlaut3 ай бұрын
Kind isn't a higher order type operator. It's a type for type. It covers more than Type and Type -> Type. For example Monad has kind (Type -> Type) -> Constraint meaning Monad takes a higher ordered type and produces a constraint, Proxy has kind forall k. k -> Type, etc.
@MarekFajkus3 ай бұрын
"Higher order type operator" is term often used in math. It's another way to say type constructor - the term to be avoided since most people confuse value constructors and type constructs. Constraints do exist in Haskell and are important for its system of ad hoc polymorphism but that is a specific implementation of kind system.
@CoderBen-zz4kw3 ай бұрын
I think title of video should be - "C3 makes Packaging Assets Too Easy Wtf". 😅😅😅
@IamPyuDev3 ай бұрын
That was the title before Mr. Zozin changed it
@Nothing866203 ай бұрын
I wonder c3 already takes some way to avoid .o file explosion, doesn’t that mean c3 dev have some way to include .o file while using exec?
@Recreman3 ай бұрын
If only c3 didn’t collide with the ai company named c3
@Eugensson3 ай бұрын
The AI companies come and go. The language will remain.
@wermair3 ай бұрын
what is that noise?
@hellopv3 ай бұрын
Love from Brazil
@jorenheit3 ай бұрын
Is it allowed to write Asset[] assets = $exec(...); ? That way the type and name of the array are visible from the top level source.
@eclipsehunter823 ай бұрын
Probably
@Cyberbeni3 ай бұрын
I wonder if he's gonna try out ninja as a build system. It's basically the LLVM of build systems, half of the world seems to just generate ninja files and then just uses ninja for compiling nowadays.
@professionaluwu3 ай бұрын
Java found me because of Minecraft Modding. I don't know if I should be happy or upset
@gamezoid12343 ай бұрын
I haven't finished the video, but I'm curious if there's any reason why you wouldn't use something like musl for the clib functions.
@conscious-agent3 ай бұрын
The language definitely found me. I did not like how all teachers/teacher-likes told me (the learner) "the compiler can handle that" or something like that.
@rostislavarts3 ай бұрын
I3 is finally back 🎉🎉
@p00laris3 ай бұрын
Where can I get these wallpaper, man they are so fancy
@Lorenzo19383 ай бұрын
Wasm to WHAT
@iamdozerq3 ай бұрын
When I try to program something i was interesting in a desktop application(like just simple calculator or whatever). I just wanna know how it works in OS level of abstraction. I know only c/c++ as main huge(single lol, no like c AND c++ or whatever but somehow just "c/c++") programming language of them all. I installed visual studio, was 13 at that time i guess and for whatever idk it was with strange version of compiler or something and program that i was simply copy/paste from video - it fails with error so bizarre i cant comprehend that. I was missing .h at the end of imports. Only after about 5 or 6 years i was doing my engineering course and told use matlab for it. So i was chosen by matlab... It was a huge mistake but i survived that.
@bobby95683 ай бұрын
Which keyuboard and mouse do you use?
@realSimonPeter3 ай бұрын
It’s a good thing isn’t an ARM64 MacBook Pro running Asahi Linux, or else Mr Zozin would turn into an anime girl vtuber (required by law when running that OS)
@Odod40003 ай бұрын
Can you try the D programming language next stream pls?
@SimGunther3 ай бұрын
Smart cookie language for smart cookies like me. I'd love to see him do a no-GC stream in that language. 😅
@evergreen-3 ай бұрын
He solved one of the Advent of code 2020 problems in D, you can check out that stream
@FlanPoirot3 ай бұрын
D missed its chance, its dead now, move on
@dreamdeckup3 ай бұрын
47:10 bayzed zozing
@guitarbuddha743 ай бұрын
If I don't know C very well is it not the best idea to try and learn C3 ?
@john-sr3fi3 ай бұрын
do what you want, just have fun! but i recommend to learn some C.
@purpasmart_48313 ай бұрын
Learn C, learn pointers, implement data structures, and have fun!
@iamdozerq3 ай бұрын
Doesn't matter actually, just do any and after some time you will get what you want.
@theevilcottonball3 ай бұрын
You can learn C3 without learning C. But why? C is more relevant, more ubiquitous, more libraries, more everything, and everything useful in C3 will eventually call C anyway.
@twenty-fifth4203 ай бұрын
@@theevilcottonballBecause C has more foot guns, not many people document their libraries or linking them, and generally is a bit more hands on to handle with FFI and interop. I would recommend C3 and C together, and which you start with is personal preference. In my experience, C3 is best learned if you have used some lower level languages before, but it is not a requirement because it is just that much easier to work with.
@ArtikLamartik3 ай бұрын
cool stream!
@MuhammadJamil-ho6wl3 ай бұрын
Which distro you used for dev.
@samuraijosh15953 ай бұрын
He changed to void recently I think
@rigobertoitachijohnson3 ай бұрын
void linux
@iWillAvert3 ай бұрын
@1:24:05 io::printn and io::printfn have existed since you first did a video on this language (and I assume earlier) lol
@TsodingDaily3 ай бұрын
lol
@Dosek43 ай бұрын
what's the name of his emacs font?
@kernelk19313 ай бұрын
iosevka
@colonthree3 ай бұрын
The keyword "this"?????????
@naranyala_dev3 ай бұрын
new c3 version
@yyvan51253 ай бұрын
The wallpapers just keep coming...
@purpasmart_48313 ай бұрын
i3 is back eh?
@kcvinu3 ай бұрын
IIRC, c3 can take c source files
@MuhammadJamil-ho6wl3 ай бұрын
Motivate me to create a ransomware in c for educational purpose .
@EStartive3 ай бұрын
do it
@theevilcottonball3 ай бұрын
I tried to hack myself once, but not seriously. The program always segfaulted before it could run the shellcode.