Head to squarespace.com/floatheadphysics to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code FLOATHEADPHYSICS Do you prefer such long videos with all the historical details of how our scientific models evolved? [I got a lot of stuff to share on quantum mechanics - so do subscribe to stay tuned for more]
@andrewfarrar7413 ай бұрын
To be clear, this transpired after the so-called "Carrington event" of 1859, is that correct?
@ScientificGlassblowing3 ай бұрын
Wait, so Planck's constant is a spoon? ;)
@Starteller3 ай бұрын
Dear pseudo-scientist, answer this (I'm the author of this question) "What was the temperature of the film inside the camera while being on the Moon?"
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
@@Starteller What moon?
@Starteller3 ай бұрын
@@Mahesh_Shenoy Earth's moon. That's the ONLY called "the Moon" The others are "a moon" or "the moon of"
@notimepass94563 ай бұрын
please never ever, even in the dream, think of deleting/removing this video from the internet, at any cost. Already shared with many. This is a treasure.. A true tenacious treasure. I really do feel unlucky that I didn't get to know all these in my college days. I hope this *historical explorative explanation* continues...
@flashwebby3 ай бұрын
This comment is on the thumbnail
@Kawsar00073 ай бұрын
Congratulations!! your comment is now on the thumbnail
@Starchybugger3 ай бұрын
More should do this , first time here first vid of his I'm watching, because this comment
@danielhenderson70503 ай бұрын
Same here, fantastic video. He has an infectious passion for science - I totally love it
@DamonNeri3 ай бұрын
Food for thought. Does the gravitational wave collapse when detected? What does this say about the nature of the graviton?
@photon4344 ай бұрын
Your videos aren't just informative, they are a complete joy to watch.
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Glad you like them! :)
@canuckprogressive.34353 ай бұрын
I love how you have conversations with the great scientists!
@JorgeFalconOnline3 ай бұрын
Absolutely
@Starteller3 ай бұрын
He is a fraud. I challenge him with a REAL physics extremely easy question and he refuses to do it.
@kanakTheGold3 ай бұрын
@@Starteller But he has a niche where he is helping the larger world. There are true frauds and scamsters in the form of those donning suits and proclaiming to be fund managers. I do not sense danger at all from the gentleman putting across this content for free.
@thomasraywood6793 ай бұрын
Your enthusiasm combined with your willingness to pretend you're conversing with dead physicists makes you a truly phenomenal teacher.
@saketrashmi3 ай бұрын
How did you know they are dead. Did you open the casket to observe the body?
@griffincash6613 ай бұрын
I love when the dead scientists say "but Mahesh...". You know you're about to learn something good
@icejuice93162 ай бұрын
@@saketrashmi they could be dead or alive until you open it
@ZenxyK2 ай бұрын
@@icejuice9316 Schrodinger's physicists
@Alienn-o_oАй бұрын
@@icejuice9316 such a gold reply this is 😂
@Grandy_UiD3 ай бұрын
What makes these videos so good is not just that it explains the science but the fact that you are a really good storyteller. Even besides the science, it's just genuinely entertaining to hear you tell the story of how this all went down.
@rushikeshkirtikar61474 ай бұрын
No. We don't need any break. We can continue watching your videos endlessly
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
@@rushikeshkirtikar6147 🔭🔬🧬🧫⚗️
@harshitpatil23683 ай бұрын
❤
@Starteller3 ай бұрын
I understand his videos are entertaining but a least do not BELIEVE in them. It is not REAL science. He uses science to explain something that does not exist and fool you all. there's no such thing as Quantum Physics.
@DamonNeri3 ай бұрын
Food for thought. Does the gravitational wave collapse when detected? What does this say about the nature of the graviton?
@noelic67442 ай бұрын
I do. I need to give my brain some time to recover from this video.
@rashishsaini503 ай бұрын
I never understood the photoelectric effect really in my chemistry class, Our teacher just spat out the formulas and didn't gave any intution, thank you mahesh sir, you really helped a lot of students here
@generalmarkmilleyisbenedic88952 ай бұрын
This isnt only useful to students…
@nicksalvatore5717Ай бұрын
That is a problem in many classrooms. So often, students ask “what’s the point” when given formulas and math problems. There should be a unit in every class demonstrating the practical use of these equations and formulas and why they are important
@anirudhramesh1352Ай бұрын
That is because NCERT just slaps us in the face with Kinematics, Gravitation, Mechanics, Electricity, Optics, Quantum mechanics in one year (Class XI). LIke what the fuck are we supposed to learn? The timeline of all these things are parallel. Who did what first? How did we reach here? God knows. Not to mention: The previous 2 years are JUST newtonian physics. Just when you start learning about quantum mechanics (Orbital) in Chemistry, you will be learning Optics in Physics. And when you learn about Quantum mechanics in Physics (Plank, Heisenberg) - you will be learning Material science in Chemistry. What the fuck NCERT?
@enzorb3 ай бұрын
This video is an intelectual and emotional journey, because your story telling is excelent. I am a physics proffesor and i really love and apreciatte this videos... favourite channel on physics by far. Greetings from Argentina.
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
@@enzorb Greetings professor!! So good to hear this :)
@johnbgibbsАй бұрын
Try this on: We ALREADY KNEW (way back in 1831) that an Induced voltage is proportional to rate of change of magnetic flux. There is no reason at all to be confused when light of higher frequency imparts more kinetic energy to liberated electrons. It should have been 100% expected! It is only the quirkiness of biological vision system (that interprets frequency as colour instead of brightness) that confused Einstein and others. The observed quantitization is entirely due to the course detection method (while matter is granular, and clicky - light is certainly not) The same applies when considering black body radiation. The light is coming from MATTER, which, unlike light, is granular, this naturally affects the nature of the light that it emits. So ignoring Faraday's discovery that Induced voltage is proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux, and then also imputing the course nature of the measuring method (counting liberated electrons) onto light, we chose to believe that light traveled in discreet lumps, carrying precise and specific measures of energy. This is not reality. Photons are only an accounting system that gives us the right numbers. We should not conflate abacus beads with dollars. Light is not like ice cubes. Our finest means of measuring light is by counting liberated electrons. If your only means of measuring water is in complete buckets full, you will have a very odd way of thinking about water. We need to stop conflating the nature of the measuring medium with the nature of what is being measured. Photons do not exist. The photoelectric effect is easy to understand in terms of 1831 knowledge, plus the fact that matter is granular. Yes, photon theory delivers useful and reliable predictions - but nobody believes that abacus beads are dollars.
@ChaseNoStraighter3 ай бұрын
Taking the time to go through the thoughts and experiments at the time is so important to a deeper understanding.
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Yes absolutely!!
@johnbgibbsАй бұрын
Try this on: We ALREADY KNEW (way back in 1831) that an Induced voltage is proportional to rate of change of magnetic flux. There is no reason at all to be confused when light of higher frequency imparts more kinetic energy to liberated electrons. It should have been 100% expected! It is only the quirkiness of biological vision system (that interprets frequency as colour instead of brightness) that confused Einstein and others. The observed quantitization is entirely due to the course detection method (while matter is granular, and clicky - light is certainly not) The same applies when considering black body radiation. The light is coming from MATTER, which, unlike light, is granular, this naturally affects the nature of the light that it emits. So ignoring Faraday's discovery that Induced voltage is proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux, and then also imputing the course nature of the measuring method (counting liberated electrons) onto light, we chose to believe that light traveled in discreet lumps, carrying precise and specific measures of energy. This is not reality. Photons are only an accounting system that gives us the right numbers. We should not conflate abacus beads with dollars. Light is not like ice cubes. Our finest means of measuring light is by counting liberated electrons. If your only means of measuring water is in complete buckets full, you will have a very odd way of thinking about water. We need to stop conflating the nature of the measuring medium with the nature of what is being measured. Photons do not exist. The photoelectric effect is easy to understand in terms of 1831 knowledge, plus the fact that matter is granular. Yes, photon theory delivers useful and reliable predictions - but nobody believes that abacus beads are dollars.
@sleethmitchell3 ай бұрын
one of the weirdest, saddest, results of my psychedelic use in the 60s, was the loss of my ability to understand math and physics. BUT, watching your videos i almost GET IT! thanks!
@knq12 ай бұрын
What substance was it? Did you gain anything positive despite your loss? Was that the only thing you lost?
@sleethmitchell2 ай бұрын
@@knq1 i tripped maybe 200 times, the last time being the altamont stones concert at the end of the 60s. there were many positive gains as well as real losses. we were taking lots of 'brown mescaline' which was probably just acid. the 60s were wonderful, but there was also a ton of bullshit hippies to wade through... but the real ones were worth it.
@ghost_ship_supreme2 ай бұрын
That’s very strange
@eleghari2 ай бұрын
@@sleethmitchellKnow exactly what you are talking about (though my count was much, much less -- like only 3 🤭)
@fooboomooАй бұрын
yea, I think I only lost, no gain
@corngrohlio3 ай бұрын
The joy in your presentation is infectious. I can't wipe the smile off my face while watching this! If only my teachers/lecturers had this enthusiasm
@gayatri5552 ай бұрын
Ideally if u are truly understand ing physics u shd have a frown on ur face 😂
@sulaco11562 ай бұрын
For many years, I tried to understand the concept of quantum mechanics; I passed quantum mechanics courses by pure memory and practice without really comprehending it until I started watching your videos. I realized how little I actually knew. Thank you.
@dovbarleib32563 ай бұрын
What Millikan did was not diabolical. It was good Science. It is what one is supposed to do, to test a theory in the lab. He tried to disprove the theory and ended up proving it. Kudos to Millikan.
@phyphor2 ай бұрын
Yep, science requires testable, i.e. disprovable, hypotheses and it is good science to attempt to do so
@Superabound22 ай бұрын
@@phyphor Thats why Climate Change isn't science
@wbaumschlager2 ай бұрын
He ended up not disproving it.
@infn8loopmusic2 ай бұрын
Attempting to disprove a theory is often the most direct approach to solidifying it's evidence for acceptance / proving it.
@phyphor2 ай бұрын
@@infn8loopmusic it's the only way to test a hypothesis. It is only if a hypothesis avoids being disproven whilst making accurate predictions that it can be accepted as a theory.
@rb98054 ай бұрын
Please make a video on BLACKBODY RADIATION AND RESEARCH OF MAX PLANCK
@noelstarchild3 ай бұрын
Definitely, until Planck mankind misunderstood the universe and suddenly Planck revolutionised our understanding and now, directly due to his work, smart phones, electric light, a moon landing, satellites and all the good stuff we have realised from the smallest to the largest of this amazing universe. Max Planck, a superb physicist that changed all our lives. 👍
Awesome set of videos. Mahesh is one of the best science educators. Right up there with NDGT, Sean Carroll, Krauss etc. breaks down complex theories into something very understandable. Excellent channel, cannot recommend enough.
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
🎉❤❤🎉🎉
@billbauer97952 күн бұрын
Comparing Mahesh to "NDGT" is an insult to Mahesh.
@garysdayКүн бұрын
@@billbauer9795 Regardless of your overall opinion of NDGT, as a science educator he is very good at what he does, you may not like his politics or his opinions outside science in general but he does a good job of breaking down science and is still a very good science educator. Mahesh's videos do cover the topics in more depth and are totally awesome, they are very explanatory and this is why I say he (Mahesh) is a fantastic science educator along with the other listed names.
@billbauer979522 сағат бұрын
@@garysday We all understand that you did not add his name to the original post, and are not being a "white knight" in this post because he is a good science educator.
@michaellabhard90912 ай бұрын
You have told this story like it has never been told before, with clarity of the wonderment that it truly deserves. Textbooks give us the results. But to know the real magic you have to follow the path that was taken, and you have done this here with unmatched excellence. Bravo and thank you.
@iamamish2 ай бұрын
If you think about it, it is one of the great jokes of the cosmos that the guy who discovered Planck's constant also happened to be named Planck.
@rayzecor2 ай бұрын
Wasn't it just named after him?
@iamamish2 ай бұрын
@@rayzecor :|
@rayzecor2 ай бұрын
@@iamamish I understand you had to have been joking but I really don't get the joke
@iamamish2 ай бұрын
@@rayzecor it’s a version of the Texas sharpshooter fallacy
@fantomas49352 ай бұрын
@@rayzecorthe joke is the absurdity of the statement.
@bobfree3 ай бұрын
The way you break down theoretical/experimental process is fantastic while being entertaining and NOT patronizing. Amazing! Thank you for your work!
@theOtherNism4 ай бұрын
21:04 So you have a new theory for me? Albert: Yes sir I do
@Mahesh_Shenoy4 ай бұрын
hahah :D
@skun4063 ай бұрын
oh wow wow wow... wow
@tepan3 ай бұрын
"No matter how intense the light, the electrons don't come out any faster." "These electrons are *tight*!"
@tepan3 ай бұрын
"How do explain that?" "Super easy, barely an inconvenience."
@DamonNeri3 ай бұрын
Food for thought. Does the gravitational wave collapse when detected? What does this say about the nature of the graviton?
@vatsalshinde12528 күн бұрын
32:00 your asking if i liked it? i loved it man keep it up mahesh sir , i would love to see more of this
@BlueBearOne2 ай бұрын
I tip my hat, Sir. Most excellent explanation. SO good in fact, that I have a BIG request. Can you please do the same thing but for the Double Slit experiment? My understanding is that they had the same experience with their off the wall results. I'd love for you to use your amazing talent to retell that historical moment in time with the same in depth storytelling telling used for this one! Many thank yous! We appreciate you 🤗
@doge_693 ай бұрын
When I saw the thumbnail of this video, I was really excited, and I literally waited 2 days before clicking on it so that I could watch it with proper time, and despite all the expectations I had, you still blew my mind man. You literally answered one of the biggest questions I had for years. Hats off. I hope you cover the entirity of the quantum revolution, your explanations are the only way my small brain can comprehend such things LOL.
@rolandvoellmer56793 ай бұрын
I wish you would have been my teacher in physics. Our teachers could not explain so powerful. Congrats on your work.
@SpaceFrogFromOuterSpace3 ай бұрын
Absolute fire 🔥 You're so good at encapsulating these discoveries into a digestable and intuitive story. I'd love to see a video on Planck and his experiments. The Planck units are mind bending.
@jmchez4 ай бұрын
Incredibly, Lenard's great experimental skills not only led to Einstein getting his Nobel Prize, it led to Roentgen becoming the first Nobel laurate in Physics and superfamous. Roentgen asked Lenard if he could borrow one of Lenard's electron gun tubes, the most powerful up to then. Lenard was busy doing other things and agreed. Roentgen ended discovering X-rays (Roentgen Rays in Germany) and Lenard became deeply envious. He said that he would have easily discovered X-rays had not Roentgen pestered him and asked for his device.
@Mahesh_Shenoy4 ай бұрын
Yes yes. Also, I think Hertz passing away suddenly distracted Lenard as well! It was right around that time
@DrDeuteron3 ай бұрын
tears in the rain bro.
@ksdnsdkumar1375Ай бұрын
Lenard's great experimental skills not only led to Einstein getting his Nobel Prize - How X rays anything do with Photoelectric effect which bought Einstein Nobel prize?
@tracymetherell87443 ай бұрын
I love how you use the history of the discoveries to help us to understand it all step-by-step Your joy is infectious
@BHBima3 ай бұрын
I love when you explain physics along with a bit of history. Great video!
@kaiftbl3 ай бұрын
love this sir! im 15 and cannot wait to learn these in detail in the future
@diogocoletto91353 ай бұрын
Definitely the best photoelectric effect video on KZbin
@Valdagast3 ай бұрын
There were also solid theoretical arguments against Einstein's theory - it went against Maxwell's equations. And that's no small thing. I can also add that Millikan still didn't believe Einstein's _explanation_ for the photoelectric effect, but he admitted that it gave the true result.
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Yes yes and yes! Which only makes it more impressive!!
@ginalley3 ай бұрын
16:30 A much COOLER idea indeed
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
@@ginalley haha! Nice, you spotted it!!
@masudmasudpatwary54514 ай бұрын
Your all topics are helpful and you make every topic so easy that I can easily understand those . Thank you sir
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Always welcome 🙏
@sharmanraval70413 ай бұрын
I just watched this incredible video on light particle duality, and it's the day before my test on the topic. I've learned more from this video than I did in the past two weeks at school. Thank you so much! You saved me !
@Alagukarpagavalli3 ай бұрын
I have not seen such a clear explanation anytime before. Mind blowing!!
@Alagukarpagavalli3 ай бұрын
I was waiting so excitedly for this. This is extraordinary!!
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Yay! Glad you enjoyed 🎉
@LucasPlay1712 ай бұрын
After watching this video i literally said out loud: "WHAT, I UNDERSTAMD LIGHT NOW" DUUUDE this is what ive been looking for for years, this alongside all my previous knowledge of light makes me just understand it, thank you dude props to you
@Kamble-bu6jz4 ай бұрын
Been looking forward to this for a while now. Thank you for getting into quantum mechanics 🙏
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Hope you enjoy it!
@billness26353 ай бұрын
Just stumbled upon a couple of your videos today and I have to say that you come across as a very talented science communicator who can explain the who’s, how’s, what’s and why’s clearly and enthusiastically. Well done and keep up the great work! You have a new fan!
@marki76614 ай бұрын
With all the potential energy in the universe, yours burns the brightest! I’ve been enjoying all of your content for some time now, especially when you start having hypothetical conversations with Einstein. I hope you know, your explanations and animations are so well done that even a 40 year old like me, who never opened a book in school, in fact, barely graduated high school and since have worked in construction, can fully understand and appreciate these concepts, and at the same time make me want to know everything there is to know. I’m certain that if growing up I had teachers who were half as enthusiastic, energetic and engaging as you, and a few of the other creators who’s content I’ve become enthralled within the last few years, we would all be better for it. 🫶🏼 Thanks Mahesh, I’ll see you in next one!
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Wow! This instantly made my day 🎉🎉. Thank you thank you!!!
@jeffPeck993 ай бұрын
💯 💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
@sorry67263 ай бұрын
I just dive in joy with you like i am sitting in front of you and you are talking directly to me . Knowing what i am asking 😅
@stevedixon97343 ай бұрын
Your teaching style and passion is exactly what I need
@duckamuck17563 ай бұрын
Bravo, fantastic video, perfect to simply this very unintuitive concept. As an engineer always trying to explain things in everyday terms, this truly is one of the best I have ever come across on KZbin. Been a huge fan for a long time, looking forward to more!
@johnbgibbsАй бұрын
From another engineer... Try this on: We ALREADY KNEW (way back in 1831) that an Induced voltage is proportional to rate of change of magnetic flux. There is no reason at all to be confused when light of higher frequency imparts more kinetic energy to liberated electrons. It should have been 100% expected! It is only the quirkiness of biological vision system (that interprets frequency as colour instead of brightness) that confused Einstein and others. The observed quantitization is entirely due to the course detection method (while matter is granular, and clicky - light is certainly not) The same applies when considering black body radiation. The light is coming from MATTER, which, unlike light, is granular, this naturally affects the nature of the light that it emits. So ignoring Faraday's discovery that Induced voltage is proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux, and then also imputing the course nature of the measuring method (counting liberated electrons) onto light, we chose to believe that light traveled in discreet lumps, carrying precise and specific measures of energy. This is not reality. Photons are only an accounting system that gives us the right numbers. We should not conflate abacus beads with dollars. Light is not like ice cubes. Our finest means of measuring light is by counting liberated electrons. If your only means of measuring water is in complete buckets full, you will have a very odd way of thinking about water. We need to stop conflating the nature of the measuring medium with the nature of what is being measured. Photons do not exist. The photoelectric effect is easy to understand in terms of 1831 knowledge, plus the fact that matter is granular. Yes, photon theory delivers useful and reliable predictions - but nobody believes that abacus beads are dollars.
@palakmalik37173 ай бұрын
The way you explain these complex yet beautiful theories with mathematics included, is just so amazing... Your style is gonna help me a lot in writing my own book about quantum mechanics for the young curious minds... Thanks a lot man! ♡
@bipindhakal78883 ай бұрын
I had read in class. . I just knew formula.But never understood this well. Incredible ❤
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Fantastic!
@IO-zz2xyАй бұрын
It is honestly amazing and sad that at 68 yo I have gained so much understanding, through a wonderful video, of something so complex yet so obviously simple dynamics. WOW, thank you. Things just clicked. Regards from South Africa
@vikraal69743 ай бұрын
I love the fact that Planck tried to pay his respect to Maxwell by keeping his hypothesis aligned with wave nature of particle. He did not claim that light was a particle but light transferred energies in discrete chunks. On the other hand, Einstein abolished the whole idea of wave nature of light.
@capturedbypapri17383 ай бұрын
You make science look like a freaking suspense thriller. Glad I found your channel. So grateful 🙏🏼 Love from 🇧🇩
@hrihsikeshpatil44864 ай бұрын
These videos are always so fun. i learned all of this in my class as well, but the way u present it as a story is just chef kiss There is so much more to concepts and ideas in physcis than just solving questions
@fishrsa90462 ай бұрын
I love how you are clearly enthusiastic about this topic. Only a handful of people who make similar content are able to convey their enthusiasm (hanna fry, matt Parker, like them) I'm glad I found your channel, subbed
@boyanfg4 ай бұрын
Hi Mahesh, you are such a passionate and exceptional tutor! I love your videos. Please make the effort to explain Planck’s contribution to explain the black body radiation.
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Thank you very much! Yes, will do!! 🎉
@lulzeeАй бұрын
"...Right? RIGHT??" this is golden!
@bokunokira4 ай бұрын
I wish you could upload videos more frequently
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Yes, I have an animator onboard now! :)
@MrFib1123583 ай бұрын
The spoon/water/ice cubes analogy is brilliant, very nice video. It gives me strong Dr-Jorge-Diaz vibes. One correction: I am astonished that you think that the bro next to Einstein at 21:56 is Max Planck, that's Fritz Haber, man! Another correction: Einstein never called photons "photons", the name photon was coined by Gilbert N. Lewis in 1926. Despite this, great video, loved it.
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
😅! Thanks for pointing it out, my bad
@gxzmic4 ай бұрын
Perfect timing for my special relativity course! Your video explanations are amazing
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@crayons91203 ай бұрын
I like the way you explain things in an initiative way. But more than that, your obvious passion and joy for the subject is infectious. I absolutely love the delivery of your content. Keep it up 🙌
@NewMessage4 ай бұрын
He never gets credit for inventing the Hertz Donut, though. And it had WAY more impact on me in school. Grade school, anyway.
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
I need to look it up!!
@Frank-si2jd3 ай бұрын
Hamesh you’re incredible and your enthusiasm combined with your incredible teaching skills makes everybody love physics! I came across a piece of text, which revealed you have grown your interest in physics by watching Dutch physicist Walter Lewin and his incredible lectures. With the help of your amazing animations you do a better job, but Lewin was limited to what was available to him at his time. Thanks Hamesh it’s a pleasure following you on KZbin.
@Mashrit4 ай бұрын
BRAVO!! Mahesh BRAVO!!! I until recently did not understand what a photon is, now I do all thanks to you
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Thank you! Thank you 😂
@Rod-f4u3 ай бұрын
Without a doubt, the best science KZbin channel. Awesome explanation in this video. Respect 🙏
@physics_enthusiast_Soorya3 ай бұрын
Great video ^^ Thanks alot for the beautiful explanation, it helped me in this year syllabus. Please make more videos, I love watching them
@oneevilchefАй бұрын
Imagine how revolutionary it would be if a data signal or radio frequency were added to a point of plasma from intersecting 3 large laser beams, it'd be as cool as quantum entanglement of a neutrino.
@ThunderSky3 ай бұрын
Very good presentation! I'm definitely not a scientist but you are explaining it in such a good way that is understandable for everyone :D
@noelsussex916315 күн бұрын
For 50 years I have been reading about this stuff. It is only now, after this video, that I have a glimpse through the cloudy glass and have a basic understanding. Thank you and 'Bravo'. More, more, more... smiles.
@sgiri20124 ай бұрын
The intro music just give a positive vibe.
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
I know right? 😊
@palakmalik37173 ай бұрын
I wish to meet this man someday in future... As a quantum physicist whose journey has a special role played by him... Thanks dear... You are the photon that triggered my electrons(curiosity) even more... Love from India!
@k_a_bizzle3 ай бұрын
You’re one of the best science educators out there! Not an easy job. Bravo.
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Thank you 🎉
@jcjcortz85262 ай бұрын
This guy's transitions to squarespace is just so seamless.😅
@subhamdekhawat56084 ай бұрын
Please make video on how the exchange of photons leds to attraction and repulsion of particle
@EvanzoZubinsky28 күн бұрын
I got to join all the praise, dude, you are one of the most underrated scientific communicators, things that I vaguely understood after watching another videos got much more clear after watching your explanations, just brilliant!
@rjhat34 ай бұрын
Your videos are outstanding! Love your attitude and energy, as well as your delivery. Keep it up! Subscribed!
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Thank you! And welcome 🤗
@gokulkrishnans72692 ай бұрын
Please do the bb radiation and ultraviolet catastrophe. I am a graduate student i still dont understand how quantizing fixed it. It would be really helpful. Really love your videos. The way you explained special relativity helped me a lot last semester. Cant beleive these videos are free. One day i hope to become a teacher half as good as you. Thank you so much for the videos❤
@Chicolatino-t6p3 ай бұрын
Would you please make a video about Max Plank, the black body radiation and the ultraviolet catastrophe? Just as you do it always, with some History backgriund and passion for physics. ❤
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
That's coming next!
@robwilliams47733 ай бұрын
Can't tell you how much I enjoyed that video! Amazing. Understanding the history behind scientific advances gives you a much deeper insight into what is going on. Even understanding the personalities of the people involved provides perspective. Thanks for making another great video.
@MichalPlichta3 ай бұрын
Nice one, didn't know full details of story!
@donutwindy3 ай бұрын
I think there should be several nobel prizes with Plank/Einstein. Plank just kept shoving values in to make things work. Einstein kept explaining why. Neither would make any progress without the other.
@voidmain95192 ай бұрын
Isn't it a strange relationship between them on genius levels 😂 your comment made me lol especially about Plank shoving values in to make things work haha!
@tushargehlot46184 ай бұрын
Hey i was waiting for this video for soo long 😭😭
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Worth the wait!??
@tushargehlot46183 ай бұрын
Yeh ❤
@gauravbatra99872 ай бұрын
Never dare to stop your work. You are the only one on whole of the youtube who doesn't use memorized words but gives intuitive understanding. You are really underrated. Also please add the title "photoelectric effect" somehow after your title of "we discovered......by accident" so that people get your video after they search for photoelectric effect. I learnt about the effect just this month but was not recommended your video when searched youtube about it. I clicked this video for just curiosity and voila.
@arnesaknussemm24274 ай бұрын
One of your best. Bravo sir 👏🏻 👏🏻 👏🏻
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Really???
@arnesaknussemm24273 ай бұрын
@@Mahesh_Shenoyyes, your ice cube analogy is brilliant.
@iamamish2 ай бұрын
Man the history of physics is more educational than learning about physics itself. Are there other domains where this is true? Maybe in biology to some extent, though we've figured so much stuff out that the current field is more exciting than how we got here.
@aditi23264 ай бұрын
i was waiting for this video for soooo long
@PsRohrbaugh2 ай бұрын
I wish I saw this video 15 years ago when I was in university. A bad grade in my EM fields class made me switch from electrical to industrial engineering. I might have passed with a good explanation like this - specifically visualizing electron volts. Genius.
@jimmytaco67384 ай бұрын
Upcoming video: How a tiny lab accident in 2024 led to the end of the world
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
@@jimmytaco6738 coming to space theatres near Saturn, soon!
@harshitpatil23683 ай бұрын
Ha ha would love to come❤
@g.g.16633 ай бұрын
"It's a glitch" (Robocop film)
@mategidoАй бұрын
At first I was skeptical cause "we" souded like your team or something like that, but when I realised "we" is used as we humans, wow, subbed, what an incredible video
@TeraVАй бұрын
Hey, Vstop Michael here. Are your electrons moving too fast?
@dwrenzim13 күн бұрын
Underrated joke.
@Synkronized7Ай бұрын
I never thought someone could make learning about physics this interesting for me
@scienceisdope3 ай бұрын
Taking me back to 12th grade, this one!
@scienceisdope3 ай бұрын
Also, wonderful story documentary here! At school i only learned the end results of these ideas! Now I know the logic behind all these! Thank you Mahesh!
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
@@scienceisdope I know right! So glad you resonated :)
@kamakaziozzie30383 ай бұрын
If you were learning this level of physics in a standard curriculum public high school (and not in an A/P class) your school district is excellent. Our district only required 9th and 10th grade science for a diploma.
@d.v.faller9251Ай бұрын
The historical perspective and the illustrative figures you present are so informative and entertaining. As a lapsed physicist, i learned all the equations, but never the history and perspective. You rekindle the joy in science and discovery. Thank you.
@Devendr74 ай бұрын
Stunning work. Hats off to you
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@saggitt2 ай бұрын
I feel like you found a new fascinating approach to telling stories of discoveries. This imaginary dialog between you and the scientists, it's so good.
@gm133t4 ай бұрын
another great video.... The history of the discoveries is very intriguing. Please do a follow up with the standardization of the dual nature of light
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Great suggestion!!
@ShikharSrivastava2 ай бұрын
My God. What an educational achievement this video is! Stunned by this. I will keep watching more of these till my eyes peel off. I NEVER say this but ~ "Let's f-ing gooooo!!"
@b.s.76933 ай бұрын
Fun fact: in today's science, we use these so called photoelectrons to determine of which elements a material is made of bc they have show specific energies depending from which atom they com from. It's called analysis by XPS.
@milindadpaiker3 ай бұрын
Thanks @Mahesh_Shenoy The water/ice analogy for explaining the quantization of light was brilliant and effective. I've watched many KZbin videos but hadn't come across such a simple visualization. Explaining science with its detailed history has a greater impact. Teaching science through laws/hypotheses, and the experiments that go with it is essential. However, taking students through the journey of discovery helps develop critical thinking. For instance, understanding what led a scientist to design an experiment in a particular way, how they overcame technological limitations, and how human emotions influenced their choices of experiments can foster a better scientific temperament among students. I'd love to see an explainer video on black body radiation that traces its history.
@parthhooda37134 ай бұрын
23:16 sometimes your worst enemies turn out to be your best friends and your best and most trusted friends turn out to be your worst enemies.
@guruyaya3 ай бұрын
Your description of the actual experiments that lead to this revolution is amazing.
@chokkammal123453 ай бұрын
Brilliant video 👏👏👏It is amazing to see how scientific knowledge takes shape 💯💯
@chokkammal123453 ай бұрын
Now I know what 1eV exactly means. Back at school when I was learning this I had no idea
@Mahesh_Shenoy3 ай бұрын
Thanks!! And yes, eV is deceptively hard :D
@mnomprakash3 ай бұрын
Why are you not super famous? Too underrated! Please keep doing what you do! We simply love your videos!
@aarathiselvam91943 ай бұрын
Just loved the way you explained 👍😊
@Random13Guy3 ай бұрын
This channel has made me fall in love with physics.