Western philosophy needs 2500 years more to first mature itself, and then try to understand and appreciate Ibn Tayimiah. He is one of the great scholars who refuted Aristotelian logic and ontology.... Which according to Martin Heidegger has wasted 2500 years of Western philosophy. (c.f Being and Time, Martin Heidegger). ... All i can say is I have never seen a genius on the level of ibn taymiyyah (rh) till date. Its just mindblowing. His caliber as theologian is almost unmatched. Not to mention he is a giant figure in Tafsir, Hadith science and Fiqh. Truly the person deserve the title of Shaikh al Islam. I am more fascinated in his work in logic. The man was brilliant. He is of the caliber of Godel easily. true, IT is Godel of 13 th cen when it comes to logic and rhetoric. That alone makes him awesome. However, he didnt limit his work to that only. He worked extensively in Quran s tafsir (his work Principles of Tafsir) Hadith, and fiqh. His major few students were Ibn kathir (tafsir specialist), Ad Dhahabi (One of the biggest figure in haidith science in sunni school), Ibn Mufith(one of the biggest fiqh expert in Hanbali school) and his magnum opus student Ibn Qayyim who worked on theology logic and fiqh and is tremendously well known for that. More I study this guy more i get baffled. his intellectual smackdowns of deviant sects was absolutely mind blowing to read .. A true lion of the Sunnah .............. Athari creed, this has predated more popular creeds such as Ashar’i and Maturidi who were heavily influenced by Ilm al Kalam (Science of speech) (Philosophy In layperson terms). The Athari creed affirms what Allah SWT has described Himself as being within His holy scriptures. Companions such as Abdullah Ibn Abbas and Abu Musa Al Ashar’i RA make this topic clear. Classical figures such as Sufyan Ibn Uyaynah, As-Sha’bi, As-Shafi’e and Ahmed Ibn Hanbal all believed and wrote about this. If you condemn Ibn Taymiyyah then condemn the root of the tree which are names previously mentioned. Even the founder of Ashar’ism, Abu Hasan Al Ashar’i rejected the idea of this creed and accepted Atharism, later in his life he wrote a book, al-Ibanah. . ibn Taymiyyah didnt affirm the kayf he denied modality of God but affirmed the statement of Quran which says Allah has hand the manner of Hand is unkown. On the other hand asharis take the view because they agree with aristotelian philosophical modes of essence separate from attributes which is unkown in islam. And athari creed which ibn Taymiyyah holds predates ashari and maturidi creed and they were kicked out of damascus for being heretical jahmi while ibn Taymiyyah was champion of of it.é "Shrine cult" Sufis debunked... Plus Ibn Taymiyyah discovered economics... Well sort of before Adam Smith. Ibn taymiyyah was a great scholar and Imam... He never supported sufism.... He was the real Muslim who fought against the two big deviant cancers started affecting Islam on that time, Shiaism and Soofism. Muslim scholars called it: Shaykh al-Islam * Books on Fiqh and Islamic Unification * Exposing false doctrines affiliated with Islam * Response to other religions and their invalidity * Explain that Islam is the ultimate religion of life - a philosophy that is famous for it finally * Excelled in reply and martyrdom. * Pain with all the cultures of the religions that experienced to answer them you mean he knows all the cultures.....etc May God mercy on him Orientalists are very shrewd in what they choose present and what they choose to hide about a given subject they endeavor upon, not to mention how they present him as contradictionthrough a Western lens orientalists and western academics are gatekeepers for there jewish overlords. If you really want a grasp of islamic texts learn arabic. Learn hebrew to see how corrupt jewish texts are. Ibn Taymiyyah is the sheikh of tolerance and an encyclopedic scholar who has emerged in every art Ibn taymiyyah rahmatu allahi alayhi was a distinguished scholars that the world witnessed for his virtue,knowledge and seeking justice to all muslims He is the greatest scholar in Islam after the "Salafus Salih" [Sahaba, Tabe'in and Atba' Tabe'in] era!!! -------- True. Actually if Ibn Taymiyyah was alive today he would denounce Osama Bin Laden ideology. Osama bin laden quotes the things he need and ignores the ideas that opposes him. For example, Ibn Taymiyyah wrote a lot against Khawarej ideology and the necessity of obedience to the rulers of Islam for the benefit of the public even if they have some downfalls. He also wrote a lot about criteria for Takfir. Which is all against the ideology of Osama bin Laden. you can only blame the few ignorant followers that obviously misunderstood/couldn't grasp his balanced intellectual thinking. Its factual that both ISIS and Usama b. Laden constantly quoted Ibn Taymiyyah. That does not mean Ibn Taymiyyah was like those extremists, but its a fact that those movements represent an extreme branch of Salafism which as a whole ties itself to Ibn Taymiyyah. These are undeniable facts. Ibn Taymiyyah was a genius of huge caliber, he part of the Islamic tradition and majorly influential. ُThank You! I hope to upload some lectures in Islamic studies and Qur'anic studies. I think KZbin is very important platform for education .Thank you again 🔹️ EVIDENCE ISLAM IS TRUTH The following are Scientific, logical, and historical proofs that Islam is the Truth: www.islamreligion.com/category/33/evidence-islam-is-truth/ 🔸️ For more information about Islam: www.islam-guide.com 🔹️ The Prophet of Mercy Website (Everything to know about the Prophet of Islam) www.mercyprophet.org/mul/ 🔹️ "Myths about The Prophet of Islam" www.muhammadfactcheck.org 🔹️ Islam and Racism Islam with its universal concept of brotherhood rejects all artificial and man-made marks of distinction. 🔹️ How to convert (revert) to Islam Basically to become a Muslim is very simple.. you need to say the decleration of faith oraly while you believe in it by heart with a firm conviction and unshakeable faith. The decleration of Faith in Islam (The Shahada) The Shahada (in Arabic) can be declared as follows : “ASH-HADU ANLA ELAHA ILLA-ALLAH WA ASH-HADU ANNA MOHAMMADAN RASUL-ALLAH” The English translation is : “I bear witness that there is no deity (none truly to be worshipped) but, Allah, and I bear witness that Mohammad is the messenger of Allah.” However, it would not be sufficient for anyone to only utter this testimony oraly either in private or in public; but rather, he should believe in it by heart with a firm conviction and unshakeable faith. If one is truly sincere and complies with the teachings of Islam in all his life, he will find himself a new born person. 🔹️New Muslim Guide (in several languages) newmuslimguide.com/ar/languages 🔹️New Muslims eLearning site (It is for new Muslim converts who would like to learn their new religion in an easy and systematic way. Lessons here are organized under levels.) www.newmuslims.com/ 📖Order your Free Copy [English Translation of the Quran] www.quranproject.org/freequran.php ■🖥 🎧 Watch and listen to "| Quran recitation: Story Of Mary and Jesus |" (with english subtitles) kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYu3Z2qum7qJaac
@عبدالله-ت6خ6ي2 жыл бұрын
Ibn taymiyyah refuted ontology?😂😂😂 bro honestly I don’t know if you’re being serious. Ibn taymiyyah refuted classical logic ? No that’s a lie. As for imam al ash’ari he never repented from his creed in al ibanah for 2 reasons: 1- he used kalam in al ibanah to prove some of the attributes 2- al ibanah wasn’t his last book, but according to most of the muhaqiqin, al luma’ was his last book which clearly depicts the ash’ari creed known today So brother, my advice for you is stop copy pasting ridiculous arguments from salafis cuz it do be cringy, hadak Allah
@jasonvoorhees88994 жыл бұрын
رحم الله شيخ الإسلام
@aj_abdel71133 жыл бұрын
رحمهم الله اجمعين
@linsaisissableintrepide22893 жыл бұрын
De la même manière que le précurseur de la croyances asharite s est repenti et à écrit un livre, chacun ses argument et chacun son chemin mais une seule vérité et allah est plus savant
@Hassan_Hanafi5 жыл бұрын
Très intéressant qu'Allah vous donne le succès et la force de continuer amine.
@equity38824 жыл бұрын
.لماذا يحرص الشيعة والصوفية والازهر على اخفاء اجماع الاشعرية المالكية واجماع الاشعرية الشافعية على تكفير الامامية والباطنية وغلاةالصوفية؟؟
@عبدالله-ت1ن9م4 жыл бұрын
Subhân'Allah l'Adhime wa bihamdih. La lettre de cheikh l'islam ibn taymiyya à ses amis ://kzbin.info/www/bejne/bKnZZ2eXnrSBh8k Jazâkom Allah kheir
@yacinealmalikiyy53474 жыл бұрын
Asalam Wa alaykoum Ou est le cours en entier en arabe
@zahaqalbatil59134 жыл бұрын
Wa alaykoum assalam, sûrement trouvable sur internet.
@enzogg90593 жыл бұрын
Ahlul sunna n'est-ce pas : athari, Ash'ari et maturidi ? Car votre cheikh parle seulement de Ach'ari et maturidi. Ça fait sortir la plupart des Hanbali de ahlul sunna.
@jundullah98693 жыл бұрын
Salam Il a peut être juste oublié, allahu A3lam.
@YATclubbb Жыл бұрын
Si mais y’a des faux athari dcp C’est compliqué
@maciltim2333 Жыл бұрын
Il n'a pas oublié, simplement l'atharisme n'est pas une école stricto sensu de kalam. peut etre parlait il simplement des ecoles de theologie discursives sunnites
@kurulusosman71053 жыл бұрын
Au sujet du contenu de la vidéo, il y a beaucoup de mensonges et diffamations dans la vidéo. Ils ne font que mentir et conjecturer. Il ne cite aucun exemple de tout ce qu'il prétend dans la vidéo.