If Ukraine had Nukes??? 🇺🇦🇷🇺

#Russia #Ukraine #NATO #russiavsukraine #UkraineUodate #USSR #soveitunion #USA #UnitedStates #uk #Finland #Germany #NATOfunfacts #Russia #russiafacts # #comparison #facts #geography #geopolitics #population #gdp #military #maps
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
todays video Shows What if Ukraine still had its Nuclear Weapons,
So During its time as part of the USSR, Russia stored approximately 1900 Nukes on Ukrainian land, After USSR's collapse Ukraine returned these Nukes to Russia, But what if Ukraine had kept those Nuclear weapons,
Firstly even the US and other Western countries were not in favor of having another nuclear-armed nation, meaning a nuclear-armed Ukraine would have been perceived as a threat in the West,
Secondly despite possessing nuclear weapons Ukraine had no capability to deploy them, Moreover thousands of unmaintained warheads could have resulted in accidents,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This video is also inspired by real life lore channel
links:
Real life lore: / reallifelore
Thetruesize:thetruesize.com
Wendover productions: / wendoverproductions
Spaghetti Road: / spaghettiroad
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tags:
Russia,Russia Nukes,Russia Geography,Russia vs Ukraine,Ukraine vs Russia,What if Ukraine had nukes,Ukraine with Nukes,Ukraine Army,Ukraine Geography,Ukraine Allies,Ukraine war,Ukraine Updates,Russia Army,Russia Geopolitics,Russia Military,Russia History,USSR,Soviet Union,Communism,NATO,NATO countries,Germany,UK,France,Spain,Poland,Italy,Finland,Sweden,United States,USA,USA vs Russia,Europe,European Wars,Maps,Geography,Geopolitics,Happy Earth

[@Reptilian54]

i think kazakhstan also had many Nukes but it also returned them to Russia

[@Kievanrus1]

And Belarus

[@LilDigga69]

​@@Kievanrus1they got some now

[@LiamCatboy]

​@@LilDigga69 Only Russian nukes are stored in Belarus

[@Alright281]

Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia?

[@BlockdaCoolguy]

​@@LilDigga69owned by Russia. Just like how USA has deployed them in Turkey.

[@Mr_ARYAN_OP]

Bro the intro in which Ukraine took the entire russia in a sec got me 💀

[@RealMadtalks7]

Yeah Dude💀

[@USStateOfSiberiaGHWBush1992]

Once Russia loses the war, Ukraine could take over. Either, 1: because temporarily there will be neither Russia nor any other Country where Russia is. So no country would be invaded in the process of Ukraine taking over Russia if Russia loses the war, or 2: With Russia collapsing or about to collapse, Russia can vote for peace, on the condition that Russia be annexed to Ukraine.

[@ArthurMorgantherealone]

​@USStateOfSiberiaGHWBush1992 you should delete your comment before people start embarrassing you

[@Jepsiboi]

​@@USStateOfSiberiaGHWBush1992you should delete your comment before people start embarrassing you

[@Bigsmallman]

​@@USStateOfSiberiaGHWBush1992Bro is onto absolutely nothing 🔥🔥🔥

[@scorpionpower2008]

The video 😮 The intro 💀☠️

[@Dracheplayz]

best intro

[@aftrrdark]

Just showing their future

[@W4emTP]

@@Dracheplayz *worst

[@W4emTP]

@@aftrrdark we gonna see about it lil bro 🤣🤣

[@Dracheplayz]

@@W4emTP *🪃

[@strategistaow3520]

If Ukraine had nuclear weapons NATO wouldn't support Ukraine and will just stand and look

[@valdi1038]

I think the war wouldn't even happen

[@Whome-bf4df]

Yeah

[@Whome-bf4df]

Yeahhh same idea bro

[@notvergingai1053]

​@@valdi1038And USA would have never sponsored the coup in 2014 which would never result in Russian takeover of Crimea. Ukraine would still be a pro-russian country like Belarus if only USA has not staged the coup in Ukraine

[@Cronix_64]

And that's why west europa are amateur's, cus they only cared about ukraine, just because they were attacked by russia

[@RaryEd]

Economy of Ukraine: 🙁 Economy of Ukraine with nuclear weapons:💀

[@Polity29]

Согласен

[@anonymuz796]

Price of safeness.

[@winterinvicta]

@@anonymuz796 You probably don't understand how bad the economic situation for Ukraine was in 1991 they simply didn't have the money.

[@furymysteries3276]

They legit could not work if they even had so much as 1 nuke lol​@@winterinvicta

[@644myy4]

​@@winterinvictaденег было много на вооружение

[@ZoreslavKvitenko]

The conclusion: don't give up nuclear weapons in exchange for empty promises

[@dje583]

Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014 because Ukraine tried to join Nato and that broke one of their agreements so they took Kiev and made Ukraine give up Crimea if Russia wanted land they would of took all of Ukraine in 2014

[@pureteddybear_]

​@@dje583There was never a formal, signed agreement between the United States and the Soviet Union about the expansion of NATO. The ridiculousness. Do you realize that NATO was sort of just a side thought before Russia started all these shenanigans? Putin literally justified it's continued existence, and look now, even Finland, who was adverse to joining NATO before the invasion, has changed it's mind. Let's all give a hand to Putin, #1 NATO recruiter of the decade. Oh, also, even if there was an agreement, that doesn't justify violently invading your neighbors. These are things that are solved through diplomacy, not war.

[@rebellion4418]

​@dje583 Russia took Kyiv??? That's news to the rest of us. Russia tried to take Kyiv and was chased back across the border.

[@moiGospodin-kp6sn]

Did Russia invade in 2014? Why doesn't the world know about this?​@@dje583

[@DMlTREl]

What the point of keeping nuclear weapon which you can't use or maintain in workable state? Plus if one of them will be detonated by Russia then they can just say what's it's just Ukraine government incompetence of keeping them safe

[@Newtwo_]

It is important to realize that it is not enough just to have nuclear weapons, it is important to maintain and keep them, which is a large expenditure of money and resources. Which Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and other former Soviet countries, all but Russia, could not afford

[@moiGospodin-kp6sn]

Yes? And all the access codes to the missiles were only in Moscow.

[@Newtwo_]

@@moiGospodin-kp6sn And yet it was the US that blackmailed Ukraine and forced it to sell all nuclear weapons

[@paramhayaran2052]

Well having nukes dosesnt means that you can use them if Ukraine used nukes then everyone would turn against them

[@Kama_zorra]

​@@paramhayaran2052Сша так не считает😂

[@antonina-fk7lq]

One voice of reason

[@Serbianwarcriminal_0]

If ukraine had nuclear weapons everything would stay the same becouse all the codes were in moscow

[@Слобожанський_Мухомор]

Хуйні не неси. Керування переробити ніхрена не проблема

[@kyostim]

We wonder why people make this kind of nonsense talking here in net

[@Slavdya]

codes are recoded. never heard of this?

[@Just_rusmal_ok_just_that]

Huh?

[@bananaok6194]

Dumba. Ss

[@redellafestafd1084]

Russia: Give me back my nuclear weapons! Ukraine: NO. Also Ukraine: How could I use those weapons? Someone help me. Every nuclear power in the world: 🤦🏽

[@Grandflea02]

Ukraine: *Gives up nuclear warheads* Russia: *It's free real estate*

[@aleong.9566]

It was RUSSIAS nuclear weapons. Ukraine hasn't give up anything. False narratives. They had no choice but to return them back.

[@seailz]

The channel name: Happy Earth😊 The video: ☠️

[@skandaholla6158]

fr

[@Randomman_4826]

Ukraine couldn't use them either because all the launch codes were in Moscow and Russia didn't let Ukraine have them. I don't Know if this is accurate correct me please

[@GOLOBOPE3]

its like u cant use computer cause there is password and u return it

[@Baisalio]

​@@GOLOBOPE3It was simply located in Ukraine, but they had no control, it’s like saying that the nuclear weapons located on the territory of Turkey belong to them, but in fact they are US missiles

[@anonymuz796]

What is about bombs and strategic missile vehicles?

[@FalconsEye58094]

Their biggest mistake in retrospect

[@hrvojelasic5794]

nah, their biggest mistake was to trust the US and the UK.

[@xxbacarixx9227]

Yeah, even if the nukes were all unable to explode, their presence would make russia think twice before launching an invasion

[@LiamCatboy]

Keeping the nukes would literally be self destruct for the Ukrainians. Russia controlled the nukes in Ukraine and let's say the war happened and a Russian nuke stored in Ukraine went off in Kiev, then Russia could just say "it was Ukrainian incompetence of storing nukes that caused it"

[@luccamdr_xd2202]

@@xxbacarixx9227No because they would know that Ukraine has no capability of using them and after 33 years without mainteance they would be a threat to Ukraine instead of being helpfull or evading a war

[@epmuoibon]

​@@luccamdr_xd2202 yes. most of youtube users think a nuke warhead just like a dumb bomb. and think ukranie gov at this time tranfer warhead is stupid 😂

[@Ulle2419]

The standard of living in Ukraine was already terrible, the economy and the population were constantly falling. They simply wouldn't be able to contain so many weapons. Except for the fact that they will cooperate with Russia, the main supplier of useful resources for eastern Europe. Russia would send experts to Ukraine and help build joint projects (as with Belarus)

[@KrivMih]

Nuclear weapons would have been sold to third countries, as well as other Soviet weapons. And where would nuclear weapons be today without a concept. Maybe in Mexico or Ireland or Somalia.

[@DMlTREl]

​@@KrivMih What the point of selling nuclear weapon which can't be used?

[@ACuteWhaleUWU]

Correction: what if Ukraine still had RUSSIA’s nuclear weapons

[@УкраїнаПовнаАнімацій]

soviet*

[@SimpleGeopolitics24]

That's not only Russian. They were developed in the Soviet ear. Sure there were in Ukraine and Ukrainians forced to join the project.

[@prosteslavek]

Soviet nuclear weapon

[@_Iyaan]

American:​@@SimpleGeopolitics24

[@hrvojelasic5794]

@@SimpleGeopolitics24 Ukraine left SSSR, so not Ukranian

[@cozyProgramm5883]

Lets not forget that ukraine gave nuclear missles to russia in exchange for peace, which has been broken by russia

[@lumated2854]

lets not forget that this comment didnt read history

[@AradomnamecalledYT]

And don't forget Russia's War crimes in Ukraine ​@@lumated2854

[@notvergingai1053]

Let's not forget that the regime that signed that agreement was overthrown by the current neo-nazi Ukrainian goverment and broke the agreement first by trying to join NATO.

[@Clandestine12367]

Ukraine aslo committed that they aslo not committed genocide in Eastern Ukraine but they done that

[@Gidochrome]

​@@lumated2854Ukraine did not promise anything to russia

[@user-in8zo4lo4i]

Пам'ятаймо: негативна селекція, якщо так можна висловитись щодо людей у довготривалому періоді дуже небезпечна, таке відбувалось у радянській імперії, тому дуже важливо мати критичне мислення, бачити популізм політиків, розуміти що зараз з твоєю державою. Бажаю здоров'я всім свідомим людям. ❤❤❤❤

[@user-os4qh9is9x]

Человек выше - based. Respect

[@peter4735-f1g]

In Fact, without returning them, they still will be an Russian Staate. It was an condition to leave the USSR

[@Native-SO2]

А как бы она бомбами управляла бы если все для запуска в России находилось🤔

[@anonymuz796]

Бомбардировщиками и Точками-У.

[@Native-SO2]

@@anonymuz796 так а ракетами как и как она бы это все содержала на какие деньги после развала у украины не было бюджета на ввп надо было страну восстановить так что ядерки им не выгодно было бы содержать

[@ЕлизаветкаБогданова]

Впервую очередь, как бы она содержалоа ядерные шахты? На какие деньги, ведь тот, кто забирал ЯО, тот и забирал на себя все долги РИ и СССР перед международными кредиторами и долги за ленд-лиз. Украинская экономика схлопнулась бы ещё в октябре 1991 года не прожив и двух месяцев независимости с такой долговой нагрузкой.😅

[@Native-SO2]

@@ЕлизаветкаБогданова НУ а я о чем

[@jesushernandezzavala]

Ucrania libre❤

[@rexnewman3859]

The nuclear weapons were stationed in Ukraine but couldn't be used only Russia could launch them as they had the nuclear codes

[@wallrider4194]

Austrian moustache painter? No, Ukrainian 3d animator? Yes.

[@sheilazacarias6865]

The intro is the best

[@user-bf3ys7dr3l]

Real

[@mrptiato4730]

Kids they are not know what happened in Gaza

[@어르므]

​@@mrptiato4730bro took wrong video 💀

[@Bill.Cipher.000]

@@mrptiato4730 Wrong Video bud.

[@user-bf3ys7dr3l]

@@mrptiato4730 Ok. But I know, what happenING in Ukraine.

[@akgamingyt6305]

This channel is peak example of Western brainwash propaganda and i love it 😍

[@SealandIsBestCountry]

It's calling Ukraine poor

[@misterbean4059]

Ok, Russian bot

[@akgamingyt6305]

@@misterbean4059 bro I am Indian 🙄

[@akgamingyt6305]

@@SealandIsBestCountry everyone does 😄

[@chrissommaddux3351]

​@@akgamingyt6305everybody calls you poor

[@shiteshchourasia]

Ukraine might have got nukes but all those nukes were under moscow control. There was no way Ukraine could have kept it peacefully unless moscow agrees. Like most soviet nations Ukraine was broke at that time and exchanged it peacefully for favourable deals.

[@user-nz2lh7ee6z]

Дуже цікаво дякую Very interesting, thank you

[@skillgamesnow6680]

As a Ukrainian, I can say that it is bc we didn't have money to keep them

[@potatoeslover-m5q]

Crimea: yay I’m finally independent

[@Help_palestine_gaza]

It will be a nuclear base for Russia Moscow is the only one with the nuclear codes

[@TBrizzle01]

Well they'd still have Crimea.

[@stevestevensofficial]

Bro forgot to mention Budapest memorandum. Russia promised it will respect Ukraine's sovereignty and won't attack them if they gave the nukes back 🫤

[@urihun4534]

who cares about it lol ukraine is the one who started befriending with nato its their fault even us hungarians hate ukraine and support russia where the budapest memorandum signed

[@ZOV477]

а Украина обещала, что будет соблюдать пакт о независимости

[@stevestevensofficial]

@@ZOV477 What independence pact?

[@ZOV477]

​@@stevestevensofficialкоторый подписали все страны бывшего СССР, после его развала

[@Manuel_Fal_Conde]

bro forgot to mention that the Budapest Memorandum was never ratified 😂

[@worldofcolorz]

That intro is Ukraine's ultimate dream 🤣

[@Taisa_Army]

Непоганий вступ, мене вразило! Але думаю, деяких росіян це не хіло зачепило)

[@Zelenskiy_rab]

Чем? Что это ролик правды?)

[@КириллФедоров-и5ч]

No(Нет)

[@Taisa_Army]

@@КириллФедоров-и5чРанимі ображенки)

[@blazemapping]

That thumbnail caught me

[@sebastianlup]

You said at the begining, Russia stored... So basically weren't ukrainian.

[@andremacko5408]

They weren't Russian either. They were Soviet. Many of those weapons were not Moscow controlled and even the ones that were could have easily been reengineered to Ukrainian control as far as firing the middle. But removing the warhead and retooling it certainly could have been and should have been done by Ukraine. Look at the meds we're in now because of giving Russia the Ukrainian nukes.

[@LiamCatboy]

​​@@andremacko5408 It was owned by the Russian High Command in the Soviet Union. Also Ukraine did not have the money to focus on its people, let alone its rearming of nuclear missiles in which they knew little about due to Soviet laws making Russians able to only engineer Nukes.

[@luccamdr_xd2202]

@@andremacko5408Russia was the head of the USSR so those nukes were basically russian and those stockpiles were still russian and full of russian soldiers

[@notvergingai1053]

​@@andremacko5408All soviet nukes were under the command of Russian high command and Ukraine didn't have the silo to fire those nukes and let alone the maintainence

[@basedandredpille]

​@@andremacko5408Russia is officially recognized as the successor of the Soviet Union

[@codrutaoprea9463]

Honestly, I already had a discussion about this, and I made three points: Number one instead of using those nukes, Ukraine could’ve also melted down the radiation inside to create nuclear fuel for reactors Number two, Ukraine would’ve been in possession of the ultimate deterrent, which is a really handy card to play on the world stage And number three, I believe that the Russian invasion of Ukraine. never would’ve started.

[@Catscounteratack]

More peace . Good . The problem is that at that time Russian government was pro nato /:

[@gumelini1]

Except none of what you said is true.Ukraine had no means to maintain or use those nukes because Russian high command had the launch codes and Ukraine served only as a base.They wouldn't be able to use them in any way, because they weren't Ukrainian nukes to begin with

[@austinorsomeonealt]

@gumelini1 yup, its like US nukes in Turkey,yes it might be located there, but the turks can never get access to launch it

[@fnafgames2302]

Запустить ракеты без пультов в Москве 👍🏻

[@anonymuz796]

По Москве может не получится, но по приграничным областям можно несколько десятков точками-У и тяжёлыми бомбардировщиками, которые правда в реальности были проданы Российским ВВС

[@ВМФ_СУ-57]

​​​@@anonymuz796что будет Украина запускать из точек-у? Бомбы и боеголовки? Это же не ракеты

[@Слобожанський_Мухомор]

Тех самых пультов, которые переделать можно, и которые у нас делались. Слушай дальше кравчуковские байки, про то как другого выбора не было.

[@fnafgames2302]

@@Слобожанський_Мухомор ну да , военные не догадались , а хлопец под руинами такой умный догадался 🥰

[@kardun_32]

As a Ukrainian, when I saw captured Russia I immediately turned it on to the video, I also had to turn on the subtitles

[@kolagg2043]

If Ukraine had nuclear weapons, it would not be able to control them. The author does not know how the nuclear missile launch system works) All the nuclear arsenal management centers were located in Moscow, so after the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine would not be able to do anything with this arsenal, and it is expensive to maintain. It was easier to give it to Russia than to spend millions on a toy that would be unable to do anything in case of an emergency

[@ThePudenDY]

Day 2 of having a wish that you make a video about things you might now about Bosnia and Herzegovina without you adding the 20 KM coastline

[@poganka45]

giving up the nukes by ukraine was the dumbest thing in history, as you cant trust other countries to protect you

[@zanchiso1934]

Also america was with ukraine returning there nukes

[@notvergingai1053]

Those Ukrainian nukes were under the control of Russian high command and Ukraine is too poor to maintain or fire one nuke, lmao. You obviously skipped history lesson

[@poganka45]

@@notvergingai1053 Haha, tell it to north korea that its too poor to maintain or fire one nuke lmao. Pakistan tested its first nuke in 1998, having nomnal GPD much lower than Ukraine. It was possible to remove the warheads and taking them apart to repurpose the fissile material for new weapons. Ukraine had many socientists remembering the soviet nuclear program. Get your facts straight, Poozer

[@notvergingai1053]

@@poganka45 Are you high? You do know that there was more than 1k nukes which were built by soviets, which are expensive asf when compared to and difficult to maintain when compared to North Korean and Pakistan junk nukes. And those nukes needed key and code for it work and all of them were controlled by Russian high command and not only that, Ukraine did not have missile silo and building missile silo is also costly asf. You obviously don't know how nukes work. Are you an American? Your stupdity resembles them

[@basedandredpille]

​@@poganka45The nukes would be on Russia's watch still, Russia is not that kind of guy who watches how you dismatnle their nukes and does nothing about it lmao

[@PashkenS.]

You know its important when both Russia and USA wants something from you☠️

[@H3ISS]

All those nukes would've been Russia's tho, they didn't actually own any single one of them 😄

[@H3ISS]

No way i got a heart 🤑🗿🗣

[@anxiousswedish4856]

It was Ukrainian nukes Bastard 😊

[@W4emTP]

@Usernamedefault. tf u saying lil bro??

[@jolobas472]

It was Ukraine's nukes, Ukraine was allowed to keep them after the breakup of the Soviet Union but got rid of them for security promises.

[@F-22-Rapt0r]

@@jolobas472nope Russia has the launch codes and was the successor state to the Soviet Union meaning they get the majority of major military assets especially nuclear

[@user-lq3nx9rf2u]

Читаешь всю эту хрень, сколько тут неразвитых людей с детским мышлением

[@user-bz5yg8tr1h]

Вот именно, особенно те, которые пишут что надо Украину разбомбить

[@User-wi3jz]

Причём и русских и английских.

[@ShannonCoxie]

Поки тільки вас двоє

[@User-wi3jz]

@@ShannonCoxie Да, ты и твой друг.

[@Православный.русский]

@@ShannonCoxie🇵🇱

[@thehackking4419]

Hey! Try making a video about what if all Germanic speaking nations unite (nations that speaks a language included inside the Germanic family). I would appreciate it!

[@ruasonid1911]

That’s literally what Mr H tried doing in ww2 bruh

[@Manuel_Fal_Conde]

funny comments. Ukraine has never had nuclear weapons. Ukraine never existed before 1991. Nuclear weapons belonged to the Soviet Union. Not Ukraine. Not Belarus, not any other country. According to a number of treaties and agreements, the Russian Federation assumed all the debts of the former USSR, declared itself the legal successor of the former USSR, and took over the nuclear weapons that were located in the former territories of the Soviet Union that received statehood. The United States has nuclear weapons in other countries. But these are American nuclear weapons. If Ukraine had retained nuclear weapons, then there would be a third world war now. Have a nice day

[@undefined7704]

Аnother russian bot that reviewed an interview with Putin

[@Слобожанський_Мухомор]

Ну да, нікоґо нє бьіло до 1991 ґода, а Гетьманщина, Русько-Литовська держава, Київська(Руська) держава врешті решт. Ета всьо прідумкі австрійскоґо ґєнштаба. Як казав князь Володимир Великий - залішанам слова не давали.

[@unknownguy1006]

blud learnt history from the comment sections💀

[@sergius9246]

Please read history and documents🤦🏻‍♂️

[@_Dio_Brando]

​@@Слобожанський_Мухомор Лєнін прідюмаль Украену!!!!

[@user-jd9un7dh3o]

You are so good❤

[@Trenxhgter]

2ND!

[@Cjnw]

Normie

[@amarsven]

Handing them to Russia was actually a part of the Budapest memorandum - guarantee the territoral integrity of Ukraine in return. And Russia accuses the west and Ukraine of breaking an oral agreement behind closed doors.

[@moiGospodin-kp6sn]

On February 19, Ukraine violated the Budapest Memorandum, the Constitution, the declaration of independence, nuclear-free and non-aligned status. Zelensky announced his accession to NATO, the termination of all treaties of 94 years. And he wanted to unleash World War III by attacking Russia. You don't even know when this war started.

[@user-xk3rr1bn2j]

Team Ukraine Team Russia 👇. 👇

[@contyx4417]

Украина

[@contyx4417]

Украина

[@contyx4417]

Украина

[@contyx4417]

Россия или шото😂

[@ten99969]

Мир 🇷🇺🤝🇺🇦

[@comp0t]

Wrong. 1. Ukraine produces nuclear nukes in Ukraine within USSR. 2. Ukraine could keep tactical nukes. That's enough.

[@danielefabbro822]

Italy refuses the use of nuclear weapons. Despite the fact we developed our own nuclear technology, we never designed any kind of nuclear weaponry. So... we are not exactly among the countries that "owns" such weapons. We have just agreed on having some american nukes on our soil as deterrence.

[@Tungdil_01]

The nazi-fascism lost the war. Get over it.

[@unknownguy1006]

because Italy is a peaceful country and it doesn't have any aggressive enemies in it's are that could potentially start a war

[@danielefabbro822]

@@unknownguy1006 indeed. Despite our past errors, since 1947 till today, Italy have always used its politics, its economy and its armed forces to build a stable region all around itself. The equilibrium we made with Gheddafi regime was a proof of such policy. But it's not the only one and it will not be the last. If it is in our powers to do so, we are here to build a better world and a prosperous future for everyone.

[@SLOpyro31]

Even if ukraine kept thoose nuclear warheads they won’t be abble to use them beucause code’s for thoose Rockets were in Moscow,Kremlin and ukraine had no acces to code’s so keeping them would hawe no reason beucause they coulden’t use them

[@timezero4644]

Ядерная кнопка все ровно у Ельцина была + Украина бы не смогла его содержать

[@user-bf3ys7dr3l]

У тебе на аватарці український мем до речі.

[@timezero4644]

@@user-bf3ys7dr3l Кот прикольный, поэтому и поставил

[@user-bf3ys7dr3l]

@@timezero4644 Ну це зрозуміло. Я просто нагадав цей факт.

[@KazakhNurpiisov]

​@@timezero4644 думаю россия всё равно распадётся, вы же не развиваете другие автономные республики, например как Башкортостан, Буряты, Монголы, так же ваш призидент пУпИн делает их жизнь ещё хуже, якутцев, бурят, алтайцев, монголов, чеченцев, дагестанцев, татар же он отправляет войну против украины, их население падает, экономика падает, нету производства, нету хорошего правительства, нету промышленных здании, нету счастья, нету свободы. Башкиры уже начали восстание и скоро может быть все народы россии кроме этих грёбанных русских восстанут и россия распадётся, слава Башкортостану, Казахстану и Украине, пусть Башкортостан получить независимость.

[@gmddarknet9014]

​​​​@@KazakhNurpiisov Сначала тогда отдайте северный Казахстан. У всех просто не хватит духа и припасов отколоться, только у чеченских террористов хватило ума. С чего ты взял, что автономным республикам плохо? Вроде живут и не жалуются. Да и зачем ты вообще в нашу страну полез? Видимо хочешь мигрировать из своего нищего Казахстана.

[@marduk3633]

the agreement for dissolution of USSR was for Nato not to expand. unfortunately, nobody kept their promises anymore.

[@lordbekon6133]

Bro studied at university of Tiktok and played HOI 4 💀

[@hansfranken9290]

People from the West promised that they would protect her if she gave up nuclear weapons, but no, they don't keep their word. They give some kind of equipment from the 80s that is not serviced.

[@user-in8zo4lo4i]

Расказывать глупости - пренебрегать уважением к людям, слышать глупости и воспринимать их всерьёз - быть не очень сообразительным. А спорить с глупцом, доказывать что то ему - это не признавать глупца таковым, ибо таков, от того что самодур и любознательность у него поверхностная. Всем нормальным желаю крепкого здоровья ❤❤❤❤

[@sawe6051]

Вы о чем вообще?

[@Cyancloud13]

And yet they still managed to do a accedient… TOO THERE LITTERAL ALL-

[@vaibhavkumar5954]

3RD!!

[@Cjnw]

Normie

[@user-zb2du6ev7x]

I don't like Nuclear weapons😢 because it did not show humanity and mercy

[@adamkas8396]

They would just stand and watch to see who would drop the nuke first

[@SMA_Mapping]

Nice

[@Cjnw]

Nice is in France, not Ukraine!

[@SimpleGeopolitics24]

Russia would not invade Ukraine.

[@BebekingX28]

They could not launch them since the keys for the nukes wer in Moscow

[@jacobfrost2131]

Those nuckes would have gone rusty by 2007. Ukraine has never had capability to maintain nuckes.

[@Markyboyplaysgames]

💀🇮🇱🤨🇦🇹🇮🇲🇩🇪🎨

[@abdulwadood6531]

@@jacobfrost2131 well they could've had advanced in this field

[@SealandIsBestCountry]

@@Markyboyplaysgames 🙋🏻‍♂️🙋🏻‍♂️🙋🏻‍♂️

[@reywind8895]

If Ukraine still had that, it would attacked Russia in 2014 with nuclear bombs without warning.

[@Ц1ох2005]

Украина отдала нам их бомбы, но мы по старой дружбе возращаем их обратно домой ❤😊❤

[@Goofy_Dominican]

‘Accident’ said Stalin calmly

[@vanchik13]

Team Russia

[@jesushernandezzavala]

Ucrania es mejor no Rusia

[@hahlih228]

У украины не хватило бы средств ухаживать и поддерживать состояние ядерного оружия в норме...

[@MinisterHenry-jc3vk]

Could you imagine the Nazis in Ukraine having nuclear weapons. We already had a problem with the Nazis killing over 14,000 innocent civilians Before the War started

[@Gidochrome]

Source: trust me bro

[@Gidochrome]

Does defense count as Nazism for you?

[@MinisterHenry-jc3vk]

@@Gidochrome bombing cities of ethnic Russian woman and children. That is not defence. The Breakaway republics did not attack Ukraine . Ukraine sending the Army to attack them so that is not defense. If ukrainians weren't bombing them and trying to push them out of the country they would never have separated. For 7 years Bulgarian Romanians hungarians and Russians have been complaining about the atrocities against their people what kind of Defense are you talking about

[@Gidochrome]

@@MinisterHenry-jc3vk where evidence of that?

[@MinisterHenry-jc3vk]

@@Gidochrome it snowed in the United Nations and they have evidence of it. You should go read the site and see you a little bit more of what's going on instead of living in denial that if you don't know it.... it means it doesn't exist. That's the most ignorant response I ever heard so if you don't know it it doesn't exist that's how it works in your mind right

[@user-wp6eq8zw4o]

Firstly, Russia has a good air defense system that knocks down even nukes, but this air defense is only around Moscow, secondly, Russia has more nuclei

[@EN4GAMING]

If we learnt one thing from the past is that Ukraine doesn't know how to deal with nuclear

[@Bigmonkey_gaming19]

Not just 1700-1900 nukes, 1700-1901, the 1 is Chernoybl...

[@alivetwo7860]

Если бы у неё было ядерное оружие, оно всё равно было негодно к моменту начала сво, содержать его слишком дорого, да и технологий у Украины нет, поэтому тогда и отдали

[@KasierFF]

why is crimea green

[@user-xw8nb7tm9m]

❤Ukraine 🇺🇦👍👍

[@Artur_Khazin]

Ukraine never had nuclear weapons, all they had was a storage barns. No carriers no controlers no capability to launch anything and no money to suport and maintain them.

[@TheKaiserofeurope]

If they did they ould be shune from everyone

[@user-zo7bn4vh9u]

Why did no one pay attention to Crimea? All countries in the world have recognized that Crimea is Ukraine, Crimea is the territory of Ukraine temporarily occupied by Russia.

[@PINthegreatgoat]

actully all soviet countries was had got nuclear bombs and after soviet collased they give the bombs back

[@ChrisStryker09]

Irony- When The US disguised at Nato places nuclear bombs and missile silos in Ukraine... causing ONE of the reasons why Russia invaded Ukraine.

[@RyanMW]

Using nuclear weapons against Russia would result in Russia also Using Nuclear Weapons against them

[@Mongolia1991]

"Nothing happens" 🗿

[@TheKnightoftheSkull]

In any case, Ukraine would not be able to use it

[@basedandredpille]

yep, they didn't have the codes for them

[@dstallionlerwa7299]

That's why Nort Korea and Iran have nuclear weapons to prevent what happened to ukraine from happening to them. All nations ought to have nuclear weapons.

[@Cesar_ZV]

What would be? Ukraine would have blown up in 10 years, because it did not have the money to maintain a huge cloud of missiles. Brief and to the point

[@pepefrogii1978]

fun fact: uk, us and russia promised ukraine that if someone would invade them, they will join a war and fight for ukraine

[@intel386DX]

If Ukraine kept the nuclear weapons, Russia never even think to invade

[@sonofzaneandnatalienguyen2726]

Exactly, the Ukrainian economy would collapse trying to maintain all these nukes before going to war against Russia. Perhaps they could annex Donbass and Luhansk while Ukraine is in chaos so a war wouldn't be necessary.

[@intel386DX]

@@sonofzaneandnatalienguyen2726 like now it is not collapsed LoL. BTW Pakistan have nuclear weapon and is poor as fuck :D

[@user-aq1]

I think Zelensky is not stupid enough to start a nuclear war.

[@orangecobraEU]

He is an american puppet like all european leaders. Usa using his country, if ukraine would have nukes america will wanted even more ukraine. And zelensky is a scary guy, he is trying to explode the zaporidha nuclear plant, where there is russian soldiers inside, and saying that russua destroyed it and nato need attack russia. Lats time you remember when zelensky has sayed to the world russia plant bombs inside the nuclear plant and is ready to explode it? Even sayed to their citizens that russia doing thag cause they want to kll all ukrainians. Nothing had ever hapened, alot of poeples forgetting that.

[@pizdavatiy]

Sadly we gave all ours nuclear weapons and today we got a war

[@tijmen-N]

They would have preferred not to use them. Russia is much too close to the other side. Russia is also not going to use nuclear weapons so quickly for the same reason.

[@tijmen-N]

They were also fighting at Chernobyl at first, but they also stopped fighting there because if things go wrong there, they too will suffer from it again.

[@Masihiy_Shoxrux]

Europe: hi ukraine!!!! we are best freinds right?

[@EeOneGuyFun]

there are a lot of mistakes in this video, first Crimea is a part of Ukraine that was occupied illegally, and Crimea is not recognized as part of Russia in the UN. second, all the nuclear bombs that were in Ukraine were created in Ukraine itself and not in Russia. Therefore, Ukoaina did not give up nuclear warheads and donated them. and when Ukraine donated these nuclear bombs to Russia, there was an agreement that in case of war in Ukraine, Russia and the United States would be obliged to help them.

[@Veselyi_Porosya]

Ни у Казахстана, ни у Украины не было своего ядерного оружия. Даже если бы они, по какой-то причине, не стали бы его отдавать, все коды запусков были в России. Так что на их территории было ядерное оружие, но они не могли его никак использовать

[@мистер_ревут]

Where's you live? Crimean tatar:🟢 wtf?

[@ArturMusaev7811]

And even more, in 90-s Ukraine didn't even have enough money to maintain its nuclear power. Because having of nuclear weapon western countries refused to give credits for Ukraine

[@YamnayaSintash]

Ukraine couldn't use those nukes anyway, the launch codes where in Moscow

[@vladislavshevchenko634]

Russia, while being a part of the Soviet Union did not have any nukes, same as Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Republic, same as Kazakh Soviet socialist Republic. The Union as a whole had nukes, none of the Republics it consisted of, including Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, which didn't own a single nuke during the Soviet era

[@Spipan1]

Russia and Ukraine: ⬆️↗️↙️⬇️↘️➡️ Crimea: 🟩🟩🟩

[@YegorZayrskyy]

What happened to Krimenian island?

[@Gidochrome]

Its disputed

[@markmackan3274]

We gave up our new weapons so that the USA, UK, France and Russia would protect us. Now when Russia attacked us we need help. And France. USA and UK dont want to help. But they must. Atleast send us weapons