no contest. klampar just wiped li off the table. tibi lemosta az asztalrol.
@ВалераГоршунов-о9г9 ай бұрын
9
@pakrosulmental9 жыл бұрын
Speed glue was the difference. Although stiff like rods Klampar shots were like rockets. Today they would not stand a chance against Chinese players.
@ulanyep29939 жыл бұрын
+RODOLFO TACSAN such comparisons don't make too much sense. Most likely Ma Long would have played the same slow motion game in the 70s, if he was young then. Talent and the quality of training matters, regardless of what the dominant playing style is at any time.
@marsa745 жыл бұрын
On that floor, which was very common at that time, Ma Long would not have a chance against Klampar. When you had collected enough dust under the shoes it was slippery as ice and the reason why TT players could not play with the same athletics as today. Instead, they were required to play more with their hand, ankle, and arm.
@dickn.ormous10643 жыл бұрын
That's bollocks.Stiff would describe Ma Long's backhand,in a essence a block-drive with hardly any wrist action.Klampar would still be relevant cause he had impecable wrist timing and ball contact.He would still have one of the backhands in the world.Modern game is more and more backhand centric.His failings had more to do with problems with his association which often took disciplinary action against him. Soviet players were notorious head cases:Klampar,Grubba,Primorac,Kreanga the list goes on and on...