INCREDIBLE BUDGET SYSTEM! PERFECT 50%!

[@JackAceDotCom]

At 11:25, I meant to say “a little *less* than half your bankroll”

[@CristianCarvajalC]

Greetings, I was working inside a mining project and I couldn't connect, but thanks for analyzing my new game system. Positive variance is definitely the best tool we as roulette players have. I'll probably give myself a gift and buy a cap from your channel, a big hugs from Chile and Merry Christmas

[@DirtBikingwithDonnie]

I used this system this past weekend on a Interblock ETG. The game had a 25 cent unit with min $2 per spin. I was low rolling using 25 cent (1 unit), 50 cent (2 units) and 75 cent (3 units). It was $8 a spin betting this way. I did 10 spins, won about half of them and hit 32 twice so made a decent profit. I came back later for another 10 spins but the wheel was hitting a lot of 2nd dozen numbers. It’s very challenging to set it up in 25 seconds but the repeat button helps after the first setup. I think the D’alembert progression could work well for this but anything after the 2nd step would be very difficult to set up. Thanks for sharing systems. I enjoy the no-nonsense approach of your videos.

[@dtt3494]

Right off the bat, if this system suggests to bet on #32 and the surrounding numbers touching 32, then you definitely need to cover #17 and #20 as well. These two numbers are next to #32 in the wheel.

[@gregorydaniels3884]

I want to ask Jack, have you ever heard of the Kavouras betting strategy? What do you think about it?

[@legojenn]

Thanks Cristian for submitting and Jack for demonstrating the system. I wonder if a bet like this would be better serving as a result of a trigger rather than a repeated strategy. I understand the maths and statistics. The odds of winning whether we sit out ten spins or play consecutive spins remain consistent. To your point of liking different payouts, I wonder if the fun would increase by mixing up high and low-risk bets rather than clicking repeat consectutively. When I play roulette, I fear path-dependence and falling into the gambler's fallacy which leads to chasing. To each their own. That's what makes roulette fun (and confounding).

[@das_bouk]

the toughest part of playing roulette is not paying attention to the spin history. i also don't like just hitting repeat bet. i have resigned myself (after countless hours testing strategies) to just betting randomly on a random game.

[@CristianCarvajalC]

My plan when I go to the casino is first of all to have fun. I take a black Russian, a white Russian or a michelada (one of these drinks) and I go to the roulette to see what numbers are coming up, then I take 32,000 CLP (Chilean pesos) and I put them in the position that I indicate, it's just one bullet. By that time I have drunk my drink and if I win, excellent and if not, good too, I go home calm because I made the best strategy that makes me feel calm about myself.

[@rickfernandez1104]

Good for ETG but not live play

[@Ambientmopar]

🎉🎉🎉 This was good works well on simulator. Did add 3 units to moddle column that worked out okay

[@jiarongchan6369]

Try on real money results will be different

[@jiarongchan6369]

@@SixlineForever just try it and come back here again

[@garryparnell7727]

Hi just wondering what do you do when 2nd dozen hits 15 times in a row

[@rodrigocardoso3810]

cry because, when it happens, was god that didnt want you to win

[@James_Ford4815]

just be happy when it does happen you'll only be losing 350

[@bilottag]

Run...run away and never use this system again

[@hunglikeafruitfly6722]

If you hit 15 in a row and blown bankroll , have a $740 bankroll ready for the next 15 spins bet $64 per spin , chances are you will win your previous bank roll back or at least some of it , then start over

[@PetStuBa]

I have been thinking about an idea ... I'm not sure it beats roulette, but I will test it ;-) You seem an intelligent man , that's why I share it with you here already. I was thinking maybe we do can beat roulette when we play MULTIPLE wheels. Now the question is 'how many wheels?'. Lets say we bet zero green with flat bet. There is a mathematical principle called 'the pigeonhole principle' . f.e. if there are more people walking around on earth than there are hairs on one person's head then, there must be at least two persons with the exact number of hairs Now lets translate this to roulette.... there is a 37 cycle of numbers, that means to create a potential CLUSTER effect of zeros we need to play at least 38 different roulette wheels all chasing zero green with a flat bet the probability is very high I think we will get a cluster of zero greens in a certain time periode clustering means ... winning !!

[@PetStuBa]

an example first spin on 38 tables, if nothing hits, our cost was 38 euro if 1 table hits zero ; our cost is 2 euro (38-36) if two tables hit , we win 34 euro (72 - 38) etc there must be some cluster effect, and great potential...

[@williamfoster7920]

Interesting but not a layout I would play.

[@Ambientmopar]

🎉🎉 Made another change, Bet in red chips($185), same pattern. . Place one red unit on 14, 17, 20, 29, 26 🎉🎉🎉

[@kyleclark7449]

You dont even have enough time to place all them bets !

[@keysersoze6603]

The original is better

[@bilottag]

Horrible system. Bankroll lost within first 20 spins

[@bilottag]

when to walk away should read "Before you even start"

[@shahramamini6106]

not good very poor system