Excellent video. I've lived in Oregon and Washington my entire life and love to hear about our native heritage. So sad to hear about the Wooly Dogs being extinct.
@avafaye4164 Жыл бұрын
coast salish native born n raised in Alaska here! Very informative, accurate and interesting. I learned many news things&good sources too. Hilary stewart is amazing! I like that u spoke on the distinction between our culture from other american indians. All too often we are just lumped in together. Thanks for sharing!
@njandrews41053 ай бұрын
You must have other non-Salish family as Alaska is pretty far away from Salish lands
@rosemaryhanderson61229 ай бұрын
I grew up sand went through school with many members of our local tribes. My brother married into one of them and I worked for one a long time. I have been to many gatherings. This video explained lot to me I’m so glad I found it.
@lane90436 ай бұрын
As a non-Indigenous person who has lived in the Pacific Northwest basically all of my life, it was really cool to hear that a lot of these languages use the sea and the mountains to tell direction as opposed to the cardinal directions, because that's what I do! I have a really hard time using the Cardinal directions, or trying to figure out which way I'm going based on the sun and time, but if I know where the water is, or where the mountain is, I can generally piece it together. Even when I'm trying to figure out something cardinally, I figure out which direction the water is and from there I put together whether I'm facing north, west, east, or south. Connections to the land really do define a people!
@IndigenousHistoryNow6 ай бұрын
I do the same thing. I’m never worried about getting lost in the Olympics because I know I can just find a river and follow it downstream.
@tannerpeterson61675 ай бұрын
Same here! As someone who grew up and still live around Tacoma, Mt. Tahoma is quite literally a lighthouse if I am needing to navigate around town.
@johnogden6668 Жыл бұрын
Ancient Americas brought me here. Thanks for making this video! Subbed. Can't believe you don't have more subscribers! Your channel is a hidden gem!
@moss_quartz Жыл бұрын
Same here!
@MrSpookyfeed Жыл бұрын
Same. This is awesome!
@irishdeception2214 Жыл бұрын
Yo! Same, this video is incredible!
@zhcultivator7 ай бұрын
Same here
@qarljohnson4971 Жыл бұрын
Regarding the original peoples of the PNW, perhaps it is worth looking at their form of subsistence not as "hunter/gatherer" but rather a civilization built upon permaculture (cedar/ camas/berries) and mariculture (clams, fish, marine mammals). And the gift economies (potlatch) made the PNW rich in culture and practices, which lasted for millennia. A much better ecological and social stability track record than the recent European experience.
@Ocean18MediaServices Жыл бұрын
Interesting… exploring this. Thx.
@zhcultivator7 ай бұрын
interesting 😊
@ISawABear Жыл бұрын
As someone who works in ecological restoration on the coast and who's dad work in Aboriginal affairs Canada and growing up learning about Western First Nations culture (and a history nerd on the side) this presentation pretty much goes over and blends all the info i could possibly want to learn and hear about in 1.5 hrs. Well done!
@julianaandersson87032 жыл бұрын
Cedar is the tree of life in the PNW... ❤
@ForageGardener Жыл бұрын
Absolutely. Fun fact the Douglas fir is a false hemlock not a fir at all. and the Cedar is a Cyprus not a cedar at all! 😂
@SLVYER1 Жыл бұрын
Sequoia but ye
@d142711 ай бұрын
@@ForageGardener cedar is cedar and cyprus is cyprus- Thuja is not Chamaecyparis
@d142711 ай бұрын
Better said- it used to be. Most indigenous youth now a day cannot distinguish between cedar and fir and have little interest in learning traditional practices or even the language of their ancestors [fewer and fewer elders who can speak it fluently are still alive in most places]
@swirvinbirds197110 ай бұрын
@@ForageGardenerDespite its common names, it is not a true fir (genus Abies), spruce (genus Picea), or pine (genus Pinus). It is also not a hemlock; the genus name Pseudotsuga means "false hemlock". It's a distinct species.
@SaskiaMagdalena119 ай бұрын
This is so incredibly interesting to a new PNW resident. So much information and knowledge is packed into this, I have to view it in sections just so I can retain more of what can be learned here. Thank you!
@Nemo_Anom Жыл бұрын
PNW cultures are my favorite! I only started getting into anthropology as a hobby because of them. Thanks for all the hard work!
@Naheenmather Жыл бұрын
We are the cedar people 🙏🏻🙂🙏🏻
@mspqrstuvwxyz Жыл бұрын
Shout out for ancient America's for recommending this video and consequently introducing me to this channel! This has instantly become one of my favorite channels. So excited to see the new videos to come!
@jip230 Жыл бұрын
Same for finding your channel from ancient Americas. Thank you for researching these peoples and doing their history justice
@ethanmagnuson2988 Жыл бұрын
Found this video from Ancient Americas! Excellent job, as a new resident of the PNW I’ve been looking for a resource like this
@StevenCranston Жыл бұрын
Your channel is criminally underrated! Just subscribed!
@nowhereman601927 күн бұрын
The version of wealth accumulation in the Pacific Northwest is a very interesting alternative to the Western Capitalist version. Under a capitalist system, you accumulate wealth for the purpose of growing and building your ability to accumulate more wealth. The justification for private property ownership is for the sake of personal enrichment and further accumulation of private property and resources, thus giving you more power in society on a material level. Meanwhile here in the Pacific Northwest, the justification for wealth accumulation is so that you can distribute those wealth and resources to others in exchange for affirmation of your social position and the power of influence that holds. It is essentially a form of bribery, or buying loyalty through gift giving. People become reliant on you to supply them with valuable resources and wealth, and are therefore more willing to go along with what you say because of it. The Potlatch says "I have the ability to gather or create a large amount of wealth and resources, so much so that I can gift them to you freely. If you work for me/do what I ask, I can continue to give you all of this, and maybe more". Meanwhile, Capitalism says "I own everything you need to live. If you work for me, I will give you currency which you can use to purchase those resources from me".
@SilentStories Жыл бұрын
I am so grateful you put so much effort into allowing us to learn more about the North Pacific indigenous cultures. I live in the Bay Area and have always been fascinated by california ethnobotany and how these “hunters/gatherers” actually controlled large swaths of food systems for human consumption. The fact indigenous communities were able to produce large yields of acorn meal on larger scales than domestic farmers is astounding (example from the coastal Miwok that lived in the area I grew up)
@fullmetaljackalope84082 жыл бұрын
Their art is so beautiful
@kidmohair8151 Жыл бұрын
you can thank Ancient Americas for me being here, and your content for my subbing and liking! this is just the kind of info we all could use a lot more of.
@nerdwisdomyo9563 Жыл бұрын
Here from ancient Americas, only 13 minutes in and had to sub, this channel looks s tier
@malachimusclerat2 жыл бұрын
this is terrific stuff as always, i've lived in the pnw most of my life and i still learned a lot here. truly one of the most illustrative examples of how environment shapes a culture
@julianaandersson87032 жыл бұрын
This video was a lot of work! Thank you for doing such impressive and accurate research!
@derekhendrix2358 Жыл бұрын
Awesome awesome awesome video! Thank you for making this. I learned a lot!
@eriquitabonita Жыл бұрын
this was a very valuable learning opportunity, thank you so much
@moensbruno9 ай бұрын
I very much enjoyed watching this video. Thank you! It really broadened my worldview
@RaymondPerrault6 ай бұрын
Haida and Tsimshian here. So far away from the PNW tho. I live in Oklahoma and i really miss it out there
@BajaBandit9 ай бұрын
thanks for this amazing video! i look forward to binge watching your entire channel :)
@alghirab Жыл бұрын
I had to dig through my history to find this video again, because I was looking for the word for human cultivation and management of wild species (as opposed to domesticated ones, which is agriculture). Every search engine was failing me. Turns out there isn't a word for that - the word I remembered from this video (silviculture) is specific to forest cultivation and management. It almost certainly says something about western cultural views that we don't even have a word for what was practiced so widely by indigenous people of the Americas. Anyways, now that I have the term for what native peoples in my region were doing for land management and food production, I can link people to this video when I tell them about it (saved the video so I don't have to ransack my history again). Thank you for this incredible resource!
@IndigenousHistoryNow Жыл бұрын
That’s a great point about the cultural disconnect. Yeah, I’ve gotten a comment or two saying silviculture isn’t the right word or is at least inadequate. I realize it has limitations. I use it because it’s what I see getting used most frequently in the archaeological literature here in the US. Especially by people that I really trust like Nathanael Fosaaen who has his own KZbin channel if you want to check it out.
@alghirab Жыл бұрын
@@IndigenousHistoryNow I understand where you're coming from. The trouble here isn't word usage, it's that there doesn't seem to BE a word for that kind of cultivation. Silviculture certainly applies to traditional indigenous forest management, and aquaculture applies to their marine practices, but those are subcategories of a larger thing (altering ecosystems for food production without domesticating the species in them) that was/is practiced in all kinds of biomes. And that larger thing doesn't have an academic term, or at least not one that's well known enough to be used in the literature. Probably someone with more etymology knowledge than me could coin one.
@cyankirkpatrick5194 Жыл бұрын
New subscriber here, also cedar is used as a talisman, and it's fragrance repels moth larvae, I came from Ancient Americas he recommended your channel. A very good recommendation.
@chadcowan69126 ай бұрын
I can't quite the PNW. It is an amazing, mysterious, and spiritual place. I feel blessed to be born and raised here - between the Pacific and the Cascades 🌊🥰🔥 Water and Fire make alchemy! As a compliment to you and your show, it is rewarding to hear the implement of eloquent language. It is a rarity today, especially in younger generations.
@terrymiller43085 күн бұрын
Excellent video. Keep up the good work.
@clairerobsin Жыл бұрын
@1:21:39 ...not forgetting the 'Murdering of Slaves' you mentioned earlier
@derrickbarney8731 Жыл бұрын
Lillooet language family representing
@PythagorasHyperborea Жыл бұрын
This is one of the most mind blowing things I’ve ever heard. Wow.
@carlahelin52036 ай бұрын
Ok. I’m hooked. Thank you for bringing so much information to the table in such an easy to consume way. Very interesting. Some things you brought much more detail to then I knew about and then there are those things I never knew about, like the woolly dog and the shaming pole. I admit even the slavery and occasional sacrifices was shockingly new information. Well done, sir. We sure can learn much from these beautiful people.
@tsibdatixpayac9594 Жыл бұрын
On wooly dogs, I know for certain that the Snohomish (now part of the Tulalip Tribes) raised and bred wooly dog colonies, keeping them on designated islands. I'm pretty sure that č̓əč̓əsəliʔ (Hat Island) was one of these, but it might be a different island. It was definitely agriculture.
@eldermillennial8330 Жыл бұрын
I’m somewhat suspicious now that the modern bichon frisé dog breed has some woolly dog genes.
@tsibdatixpayac9594 Жыл бұрын
@@eldermillennial8330 I highly doubt it, I was told they are all extinct now and were never introduced to other dogs because they were extremely valuable, along with their fur. I could be wrong, I'm no expert
@rosemaryhanderson61229 ай бұрын
I have a tribal friend who spins and weaves. Next time I go see her I’ll ask about the wool dogs she has been doing this all her life. Love to visit her.
@rosemaryhanderson61227 ай бұрын
Very interesting . I’ll ask a couple of Whatcom County tribal friends who keep good track of history. We live in Snohomish County.
@marne.lierman Жыл бұрын
I am thoroughly impressed with the research, thoughtfulness, and presentation of this video. It was a great overview of many key aspects of a very unique, yet very broad and diverse cultural area. And it has motivated me to find out more about how specific tribes fit into and adapted the culture of the Northwest Coast. As to the final statements of the video, I appreciate that you tied the environmental sustainability element of the culture into a call for action (that modern economists and others can learn from). But I do feel that in practice, individuals in those PNW cultures were motivated more through religion and respect, than the knowledge that they were part of a sustainable system. And while their religion may have evolved to encourage that system, I believe that it is an integral part of that system's success. So I guess what I'm trying to say is: Yes, we could use the PNW culture as a model for some economic changes, but until we, as a society, focus more on respect (and dare I say... religion) in our lives, I don't see those changes making any long term improvements.
@fullmetaljackalope84082 жыл бұрын
Great video! I learned so much.
@pprehn5268 Жыл бұрын
thank you for theses lessons how sad this isn't part of our required lesson
@leilanimuse2 жыл бұрын
Great video!!
@clairerobsin Жыл бұрын
Capt. Cook records in his Journals the scrupulously fair but shrewd trading practices of the People he encountered in the Pacific Northwest.
@123ana211 ай бұрын
I find your discussion of not putting judgement similar to the way Murray Bookchin discusses it, in his ecology of freedom in that he specifies that he uses the word civilised in the original latin context, referring to those who dwell in cities and not as a moral judgement. I highly recommend checking his work out if you haven't.
@42rcampbell Жыл бұрын
Great video
@rurone Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this series! I really like the detail that clearly goes into your research and enjoyed the story of the Bering Land Bridge Theory's rise and fall. If you do more about the PNW, I'd appreciate more about what life looked like after a potlatch -- it's hard for me to picture what the host got up and did the next day, and how prestige works to make them more powerful in the long run.
@IndigenousHistoryNow Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the feedback! I’ll add that to my suggestion list
@shanesalyers54336 ай бұрын
I'm a year late, but great video! Moved to Seattle area last year and this is really interesting.
@conlinbryant5037 Жыл бұрын
This Tsimshian approves
@Jack-2day Жыл бұрын
Look forward to checking out more of your well researched vids! In particular, the art of the PNW. (This was only the first lol) Cheers
@DracowolfieDen Жыл бұрын
It is so amazing and sad to hear about these religious beliefs. To think of all other species as equal to humans, as actually human in essence, to only take what is necessary because of consideration for others, to redistribute wealth. Obviously their society wasn't perfect, as with slavery and inheritance, but the underlying idea of equality and compassion is just.... I can't even put into words. Imagine what our society would be like if those ideals and practices prevailed in the US instead of the intense, unaware-of-consequence consumption that drives everything. I am from the pacific northwest coast, and it makes me all the more frustrated to know that ideas like this were not only possible but actively the norm for thousands of people and societies where I myself grew up. Also I LOVE the shame poles. Absolutely hilarious and perfect.
@BladeFitAcademy Жыл бұрын
It seems to me that in the absence of minted currency, the person holding the potlatch was a vehicle for creating the community currency. So giving away all the liquid assets wasn't a big deal as a potlatch was just the minting process. Having ownership of all the wealth creation ensured they didn't have to labor physically in order to have control of the currency. It's much the same today. Brilliant that they had figured this out back then. Its not about the cash in hand, its about control of the flow of currency which makes a person wealthy.
@redwater4778 Жыл бұрын
They made a big show of giving away their wealth at the potlatch. Usually they would ask for it back the next day.
@BladeFitAcademy Жыл бұрын
@@redwater4778 I'm curious as I haven't studied this and I find it fascinating. What do you mean by "ask for it back the next day?" How did that work and was that social flow conducted?
@redwater4778 Жыл бұрын
@@BladeFitAcademy It's hard to find truthful history these days. Where I live the British made the natives stop potlatching. This I learned in grade 5 in the 60s. They told us it was about them giving their wealth away . I do now believe the gift giving was just for show. The chiefs expressing "Bravado" I have since learn the real reason for ending the potlatching was because the chiefs had contest among themselves to see how many slaves they could kill. The British also made them end slavery.
@PythagorasHyperborea Жыл бұрын
(14:00 food) (1:04:00)
@eldermillennial8330 Жыл бұрын
1:21:00 here is the thing: it doesn’t scale up past that size of community, and even at that size, it HAD to develop organically with super strong family ties to work so well. It would take hundreds of years to redevelop an equivalent strong system, and one of the greatest weaknesses of our age is extremely self conscious impatience with systems experiments. Nobody wants to plant a tree for our great grandchildren, we want that shade OURSELVES in our lifetime, so we muck with the plant to make it grow faster, risking weird abnormalities. That’s just the mindset we have and we have to somehow get out of that before we could try to adopt such sustainable but multigenerational experimentation.
@cyankirkpatrick5194 Жыл бұрын
This Cherokee/Choctaw bloodline person and as well as a multi grain saltine has given this a great review
@kipross5728 Жыл бұрын
Which source refers the silviculture parts? Also, great video.
@IndigenousHistoryNow Жыл бұрын
That section was synthesized from a bunch of different sources, not all of which I cited here. The aquaculture website and the Handbook are the two in the description under this video that talk about it. oregonencyclopedia.org is another website with some articles on the topic. Beyond just the PNW, Charles Mann’s book 1491 has a couple chapters talking about silviculture across the whole continent. Nathanael Fosaaen’s KZbin channel also has a few videos talking about it mainly in the Eastern Woodlands. He’s a North American archaeologist. There are lots of other sources, but that’s a good start.
@kipross5728 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the information. I'm trying to compile data for a project in my biocultural conservation class. @@IndigenousHistoryNow
@IndigenousHistoryNow Жыл бұрын
@@kipross5728oh cool! In that case I also suggest Braiding Sweetgrass by Robin Kimmerer, Tending the Wild by Kat Anderson, and Indians, Fire, and the Land by Robert Boyd.
@davidmarrstrees6798 Жыл бұрын
id like to see some info on the war canoes and war parties
@IndigenousHistoryNow Жыл бұрын
I will eventually have an overview video on indigenous warfare across the continent. I unintentionally overlooked that aspect in this script.
@Whatalovelyday907 ай бұрын
My family Ancestry comes from the James Town S'Klallam and Samish from the North.
@AnAmbientGrey5 ай бұрын
Being a massive history/archaeology nerd for decades now, it's not often that learning things make me go "wow!". But learning about the wooly dogs certainly was one. Another to add to the infuriating list of things lost after colonisation
@ikengaspirit3063 Жыл бұрын
19:44 No its a case of Farming not Agriculture. Agriculture refers specifically to plants, this is animal husbandry, a type of farming. 21:15 Do you have a source on Hunter-Gatherers closely following migrating game?. From what I have read in Southern Africa and the Near East, they followed game but only through their rough territory and that's it.
@IndigenousHistoryNow Жыл бұрын
I’m using “closely” as a relative term here. You’re right, generalist hunter gatherers in North America would follow in the rough territory of their prey. I’m meaning to say that generalists are following their game in such a way that they’re moving around much more than just twice a year.
@ikengaspirit3063 Жыл бұрын
@@IndigenousHistoryNow You know, Ignore the agriculture comment might just be different use of terminologies. And I meant the rough territory of the foragers not the rough territory of the hunted beasts.
@johnpatterson8697 Жыл бұрын
What a fascinating culture. They have my Awe and respect. However, I can't resist to make this one joke. 23:26 You've head of the Tomahawk Chop? Now get ready for.... The Copyright Strike. * giggles under my shame pole *
@brennansawyer8688 Жыл бұрын
I would love to get in contact, i am kwakwakawakw and grew up in my culture, i think your video is very well done. It would be cool to talk about the culture.
@IndigenousHistoryNow Жыл бұрын
I would love to! Shoot me an email: indigenoushistorynow@gmail.com
@BrennanSawyer-o3vАй бұрын
@@IndigenousHistoryNowfor sure man!
@tedwilliam5564 Жыл бұрын
well my society revolves around the wooly dog, did you ever think of that?
@seanbeadles74216 ай бұрын
1:17:50 people really underestimate how self aware Hunter-gatherer cultures often are about their lifestyle
@williamhale6808 Жыл бұрын
Your Mic. Is very tinny ! I hope you can fix that would subscribe!
@AnHonestDoubter11 ай бұрын
15:19 so it's the self-sustainable, most functional form of agriculture?
@TraphouseTCG Жыл бұрын
But did they use cedar??
@williamowen4706 Жыл бұрын
You allude to it briefly, but I have heard arguments that the cultivation of camas in some areas was more or less agricultural as well.
@TawasiSoce6 ай бұрын
in the unceded territories in so called B.C. they still have their wool dogs.
@D_R7577 ай бұрын
Cedar
@evanbrowne14399 ай бұрын
Anyone here know anything about Maggie Roe?
@EmpressKadesh Жыл бұрын
We still would have needed a word for things that we call 'savage'.
@IndigenousHistoryNow Жыл бұрын
I’m not saying savage is an unnecessary word to have in the vocabulary, I’m saying it gets unnecessarily used as a slur against hunter-gatherers
@cyankirkpatrick5194 Жыл бұрын
I'd rather share than keep it and be miserable. I'm too much like my dad
@pinkfloydeagles34 Жыл бұрын
Oh yes, people certainly can break private property laws 😊 but should they? Yes, yes they should
@olympictreehugger Жыл бұрын
ozette potato
@MasterFireraptor Жыл бұрын
You first deride the concept of the tragedy of the commons then go on to explain the social and physical pressures that cause this to be the case amongst pacific northwest cultures. As a mechanism to explain how the concept falls apart, in modern western society (or imply perhaps). When the concept was created by a westerner about westerners, not indigenous peoples. What I'm trying to say is: why turn the last section of this into a political speech? The information that you present (which is comprehensive and interesting) clearly demonstrates why these innovative(to us) systems work for them and how they're maintained, and thus also demonstrate why they are far less applicable to the western world(at least without modification). Here's an example, you mentioned droves of leeches suckling not being present in indigenous society. This is true, but if you look at the mechanism of wealth redistribution in those cultures you'll see that it's fundamentally different than the kinds employed by europeans (and I am referring to welfare and grain doles as wealth redistribution because they definitionally are). Whereas these indigenous peoples redistribute means of production(in this case: land and fishing rights), europeans distribute goods and commodities (food and money). Why these two mechanisms would work so differently should be obvious. "Give a man a fish" as it were. Now, I'm not saying that it's a bad idea to attempt to follow their example, on the contrary I think it has some very good concepts and ways to make social safety nets more functional. However the way you present the politically relevant part of your last section implies that you're not. Or rather, the way you discuss modern ideas in relation to indigenous cultures is incoherent because you don't properly explore the nuanced differences between western ideas and indigenous application. If you're going to be political, you should go all in and actually delve into the application of these ideas in the modern world or simply present the ideas themselves as they manifested in native societies and allow the audience to ask "Could this be applied to the modern world?". Aside from that, pretty good video.
@IndigenousHistoryNow Жыл бұрын
Thank you for your thoughts, and I apologize if what I’m about to say didn’t come across as intended in the video. I’m not deriding the concept of the tragedy of the commons. It’s a very real thing and I don’t dispute its existence. What I’m deriding is the idea that private ownership of land is the only (or even best) way to deal with it. This section presents multiple strategies used in the PNW to avoid the tragedy of the commons other than private land ownership. That they had a multitude of solutions for the tragedy of the commons attests that they were aware it was a potential issue. I’m not disputing that the problem exists, just that there’s only one way to deal with it. Also, I don’t mean to be disrespectful in any way, but I don’t know where from this video you got the idea that PNW wealth redistribution only redistributes the means of production and not material commodities. The potlatch did both and I talk about both in the video. Yes, titles and rights to land were conferred at potlatches, but only to select individuals. On the other hand, material commodities were redistributed to every guest present at every potlatch-things like food, clothing, tools, canoes, weapons, artwork, blankets, etc-and the concept of holding status-holders accountable for stingy potlatching applied mostly to their generosity in this distribution of material goods. There is a lot of “giving a man a fish without teaching him to fish,” as you allude, in the potlatch system.
@MasterFireraptor Жыл бұрын
@@IndigenousHistoryNow I apologize if I misread your implications regarding the tragedy of the commons. Thank you for clarifying, and I agree with you on that. It's alright to be disrespectful, I was a bit rough in the initial comment too. I actually didn't think about that second bit, about only select individuals getting things like land rights. It kind of throws my statement on its head. Makes the potlatch seem less like wealth redistribution and more like a mechanism of intertwining high status individuals with a side effect being some goods gifted to lower status individuals. The concept of holding status-holding individual's accountable is pretty huge, although I didn't touch on it. I reckon it might be *the* thing that holds it together.
@Schlabbeflicker Жыл бұрын
The primary value of private land ownership is not to eliminate over-exploitation, but rather to encourage capital investments which have the potential to generate more value on the same plot of land. In the context of hunter-gatherer societies, the latter point may be moot, as hunting and fishing grounds will generate very little additional value when capital improvements are made, compared to farms, factories, and mines. You can even see the problems with collective or trust ownership on modern reservations, where individuals have very little incentive to invest in anything more than mobile homes because the tribe can ultimately remove them from the land at will.
@jaymelou1106 Жыл бұрын
the part of communism i mean communal land sharing is it seems what helped make it possible is it relied heavy on slave labor.
@jaymelou1106 Жыл бұрын
not that capitalism does not, i am just saying lol
@jaymelou1106 Жыл бұрын
great vid though thanks
@IndigenousHistoryNow Жыл бұрын
I would disagree with that. All of my research indicated that slavery was not so central that the economy relied on it. You could’ve removed it and had the same social and economic structures largely unchanged. In fact, beginning in around the 1850s tribes up and down the coast ended the practice under pressure from Western governments, and didn’t have to change anything else in their societies as a result. It really only served to enable faster, more dramatic wealth accumulation by status holders.
@jaymelou1106 Жыл бұрын
@@IndigenousHistoryNow hard to say because colonization changed the dynamic of life for modern indigenous, but i see what your saying, Hell i want to believe that a utopia of peace and cooperation can exists, but seems no one else can replicate that social environment now a days, greed is to rampant, and materialism too idolized,. everyone's claim is always socialism works it just hasn't been instituted properly i guess now i see why this claim is thrown around.. maybe in a smaller, simpler world my friend. i think that maybe within generations, mindsets need to be changed, children need to be raised differently.
@jaymelou1106 Жыл бұрын
would give the good a better chance against the wicked, if the wicked dont develop it
@VoteThirdPartyorFourth2 ай бұрын
Settled Agriculturalists are Native, not Indigenous... no matter where they are or how hard they got colonized. AND IT MATTERS.