wow thanks for posting this up. I'm learning induction right now. Usually I would have expanded the term and go from there. It's nice to know I can look at it from another perspective. Much love from Canada.
@glenprideaux10 жыл бұрын
Eddie, I love your work but I think the logic used here is circular. Using T_{k+1}=D_{k+1} - D_k to prove D_{k+1}=D_k+T_{k+1}, but that's a tautology and proves nothing. A better approach, I think, would be to use a geometric explanation of why T_{k+1}=k-1: add a point between P_k and P_1 and how many new diagonals are added? The new point can connect to k existing points, but 2 of these are edges, not diagonals, giving us k-2; in addition the line segment connecting P_k and P_1 was an edge but is now a diagonal so we have k-1 additional diagonals.
@asthargf6 жыл бұрын
Thank you. I've just watched the video and I thought the same, that he is using circular logic. Thank you for adding an extra/alternative explanation ^^
@azizmanva84322 жыл бұрын
Exactly my thought. The logic is circular.
@big_mike79509 ай бұрын
This logic is flawed. You essentially just "proved" that Dk+1 = Dk + Dk+1 - Dk. This isn't how to solve this problem.
@pancada201010 жыл бұрын
Hi, I'm from Brazil. I can not understand much Inglês but I'm learning a little math. Very nice!
@yoavshati7 жыл бұрын
How is your English now?
@summerxx94933 жыл бұрын
How is your English now?
@joebush6402 жыл бұрын
how about now?
@pancada201010 жыл бұрын
Hi, Could you help me with this n^2 | (n+1)^n- 1, with n ∈ N?