Influencers Might Get Away With Alleged $114 Million Pump & Dump

[@wiguy1818]

The fact that they are already back on social media and people are already investing with them again just proves how gullible people can be

[@pertainedorangeman3056]

A fool and his money ...

[@aitoluxd]

are soon parted

[@mpazinambao2938]

Can't really hate the scammers at that point.

[@crescentprincekronos2518]

​@@mpazinambao2938 you still can. After all, they still know what they're doing is wrong.

[@stevedavis3828]

@@mpazinambao2938 I sort of agree, sad but true.

[@laserproof]

If someone is making a financial recommendation and they say "That's not how that works, but let's do it that way", it's time to leave

[@juddyyoutube]

$114 million for 8 people and they aren't even that popular. Wtf am I doing working a regular job. Hopefully the government appeals or goes after them with a different angle. This is horrible for society if allowed.

[@MrMadvillan]

the thing is if you do a massive yolo scam and get away with it, that's it for you. There's no normal life anymore. No one will hire you for anything. The only thing you can do is talks at crypto cruises.

[@manyulgarprsch]

They will not be able to go after them under a different angle if this goes to the end procedurally, because of the ne bis in idem principle. They may be able to modify it a little bit, but not change it significantly.

[@defeatedbyego758]

they were pretty popular on fintech side of twitter and had a big trading discord

[@MrMadvillan]

Their ill gotten wealth is cursed. Back in the day it was understood that selling out comes at a cost but everything now is just aesthetic.

[@Infotainment-cb6cy]

There are two kinds of humans. the bonobo-humans, and the chimp-humans. only one type of human has a soul, the other is a predator that preys on everyone else.

[@tayzonday]

I feel like securities fraud is not prosecuted unless it defrauds big entities. No state pension funds nor Wall Street brokerages follow these guys for investment advice. It doesn’t take an MBA to see their posts are for casino entertainment in which they’re the house 🤷‍♂️

[@jadengrant]

Maybe that is why Elon wants to move all his companies to Texas.

[@samsonsoturian6013]

​@@jadengrantTexas is less business friendly than Delaware, Musk just doesn't know anything about corporate law

[@jpanda79]

You can do whatever you want just don't mess with the big guys.

[@exentrikk]

Damn bro you alive?

[@Jeez001]

Or they go after smaller folks like janitor who was accused of making $$ by stealing secrets from financial company he worked for because he boasted about making $$ from his stocks by overzealous employees in that firm. He was acquitted and those employees were found to be lying (but didn’t get chatged) but lost his job

[@kendalson7100]

One of the guys admitted they were basically "stealing" people's money but they escaped indictment. Whatever.

[@calyodelphi124]

They escaped indictment _as charged_ but the judge dismissed without prejudice meaning the department of justice can come after them again but with the charges drawn up differently. They're not off scot free yet. Give the DOJ some time, they've gotta do some more rigorous due diligence now.

[@obsidianjane4413]

@@calyodelphi124 Also they will (probably are, I didn't check) being sued civilly for the fraud.

[@dragoonzen]

They can keep on charging these guys over and over until they get them. It's just a matter of time.

[@owensthethird]

Imagine you give money to someone, they buy a fancy watch to show off to you, then you ask them for financial advice because you want a fancy watch too. That’s financial social media

[@rogergeyer9851]

No, it's a PART of it. There are channels like Patrick Boyle's and "The Plain Bagel" that offer FINE, sound, and even insightful advice, and even make fun of channels that show off cars and watches, etc. The problem is experienced investors GET this of course but noobs may not.

[@drevil2675]

These are criminals.

[@jorgeson3586]

I guess people also need to smarten up especially when it comes to Finfluencers

[@tanner9956]

People never will. The people buying these stocks are lazy and just looking for a quick pump.

[@samsonsoturian6013]

Technically there are "finfluencers" that are licensed to give financial advice and they're generally honest including Richard Coffman, Patrick Boyle, Ben Felix, and Keith Gill.

[@ViralVicecom]

@@samsonsoturian6013 Did Keith Gill lose his license or was it suspended after GME rocketed?

[@Infotainment-cb6cy]

never gonna happen

[@wilfredpeake9987]

I hate that immoral people making so much money

[@tevinabeysekera6038]

I hate stupid people giving immoral people money

[@1lollmaolol1]

Stupid ppl gave them that money This is a net plus for human evolution

[@jimbrown5091]

Typically that's who makes money. The people doing it "by the book" mostly are fighting over the same scraps.

[@ShaggyRodgers420]

these guys may be awful, but there are A LOT of people who should know better. They see cars and material items and get greedy. People are largely dumb, and off they think they can get rich quick they will fall for whatever scam. Then they cry for bailouts. They are already back to trusting these guys and will be asking for another bailout shortly. 😂

[@stereo-soulsoundsystem5070]

That part

[@bdogsp0012]

Judges still make awful calls and let these people keeping getting away with these scams.

[@shamoblamo9625]

These kind of dudes disappear very frequently

[@samsonsoturian6013]

That is not how the courts work

[@joez.2794]

@@shamoblamo9625 Lol, oh _that_ kind of disappear...

[@ktktktktktktkt]

Did you listen to the part where he explained the ruling though? It was dismissed without prejudice (meaning they can refile) because the case law underlying the prosecution's case had been struck down by the supreme court, meaning that the whole case would have to be redone. The judge is completely in the right here. It's a shame that it'll take a long time to go through all this again but hopefully it will be refiled.

[@wizzyno1566]

Tbh people just heard what they wanted to hear, and watched those that reinforced what they thought already. It's funny when idiots get robbed. Darwin at work.

[@jamesodell3064]

I would hope that in the absence of criminal action there will be a class action lawsuit against them. They should not be allowed to profit from deceiving their followers.

[@stevedavis3828]

Would that apply to religious scammers too?

[@jamesodell3064]

@@stevedavis3828 Definitely

[@robertmurphy3014]

Civil lawsuits are extremely expensive, and these defendants have money for good lawyers.

[@jamesodell3064]

@@robertmurphy3014 That is why I suggested a class action lawsuit since it would be cost prohibitive for individuals to file a lawsuit. They made millions of dollars and their viewer lost millions so the money it there for a class action lawsuit to be worthwhile.

[@ShaggyRodgers420]

There won’t be a class action. And this case highlights the problem with individual federal judges making rulings. The defendants also were in Texas, were many federal judges are notorious for letting scammers and theft go free.

[@3mPeRaToR]

Someone should look into the judge overseas account.

[@Mr_Boifriend]

😂😂😅

[@iterativegrowth]

probably jockeying for a political position - plenty of ways to bribe someone without direct payments. =]

[@michaelsasylum]

Or his family, it sounds like he's trying to provide indirect cover for a family member engaged in similar activities.

[@3mPeRaToR]

@@michaelsasylum really?

[@samsonsoturian6013]

Watch the video. The case was dismissed without prejudice (can re-charge them later) because of a mistake the prosecutors made.

[@gbpg2016]

Jim Cramer went on TV and said as a fund manager he would knowingly lie about companies so their share price would drop. Yet nothing happened to him and went on to host a show on TV. Hopefully this opens the flood gates for the government to go after every influencer on this right to control.

[@petelipson3769]

Probably not...

[@ViralVicecom]

I can't find that comment anywhere; did you hear it first-hand?

[@DaveVoyles]

“That’s not how that works, but let’s do it that way anyway.” 😂

[@AllHailNannerpuss]

Already stopped listening after that.

[@SageOfEchoes]

These guys are back on the X app shilling away. Be careful out there.

[@vanesslifeygo]

of course it's X

[@JimboSlice-t5i]

​@@vanesslifeygoWell yeah, most people are doing all kinds of shit on there. You just like to pretend "elom bad" because you don't like his political views. 10 years ago you were all the way down in your throat. There's something wrong with your brain, and it's affecting millions of people, and it's really sad to see.

[@RinaldiMeteoric]

Politicians lie about not having inside trade info all the time, wait this is different.

[@DoctorBiobrain]

Yeah, this is different because it has nothing to do with inside information, it was a Pump & Dump. Using insider info is a sketchy crime, especially when you’re referring to things politicians know which isn’t actually insider info. But Pump & Dumps are obvious fraud. Different crimes are different.

[@ViralVicecom]

Most politicians have a blind trust or trade S&P level stocks that are already highly recommended by every analyst on the street; you wont find many (if any) microcap or small cap trades by politicians in the US.

[@djpuplex]

Technically Jim Cramer and CNBC do what they do everyday.

[@djayjp]

Not true. He has never said a company has a market cap or assets of X when it was actually Y (very significantly different and intentionally misleading).

[@samsonsoturian6013]

Liar. He won't even talk about stocks that he could influence the price. I saw him cut himself off during a Mad Minute speach when he mentioned a mid-cap

[@samsonsoturian6013]

​@djayjp no one cares. Cramer is richer than they are and said unkind things about short squeezes

[@WillyJaheruddin]

A case for the Equalizer

[@icemanleo]

What are u talking Abt? Equalizer???

[@natwally7869]

Beekeeper

[@WillyJaheruddin]

@@icemanleo This is a movie with Denzel Washington.

[@auraguard0212]

Not Patrick Boyle's funniest victims!

[@Zuranthus]

defraud the public? no problemo, defraud a large company or the government? straight to jail!! ...typical boomer economics

[@wishteria234]

it is actually not a boomer concept, more younger lazy scammers

[@Zuranthus]

@@wishteria234 these kids didn't invent penny stock scams lol, this has been going on since the 60's maybe even sooner lol

[@tomlxyz]

​@@Zuranthusit predates boomers tho, it used to be much worse

[@Zuranthus]

@@tomlxyz my initial comment is referring to the litigation aspect at hand here, obviously market scams have been around since it's inception...like everyone knows (or should) about the tulip scam of the 1600's

[@djdjdjshhsuss3941]

​@@wishteria234 South sea, anyone? Not exactly boomer though, much older than that

[@jamesecarson5631]

If someone has a good investment opportunity, why would they disclose it publicly.

[@DoctorBiobrain]

This can be somewhat legit if the person giving the advice already bought the stock and was planning to hold longterm. That’s exactly why so many successful investment gurus can be successful, because they tell people to invest in things they already invested in; making them look like geniuses because the price always goes up. It’s only true fraud if they were lying about holding longterm to trick people into buying with the intent of selling as their suckers were buying.

[@samsonsoturian6013]

Warren Buffet said as much. They also buy directly from management so they can get a large amount without moving the share price.

[@DistrustHumanz]

The issue is not scammers. The issue is the widespread desire of obtaining money without producing something that is truly beneficial to society. Once the concept of free money became commonplace throughout most of society, society began to fail. Greed became the norm on a macroeconomic level. It really is that simple.

[@12pentaborane]

Underrated. Nobody in this scheme is innocent, from the podcasters to the bagholders.

[@samsonsoturian6013]

True, but if you post that on Wallstreetbets you will receive suicide requests and if you say that on television you might get sued.

[@santiagosastoque650]

So you think Warren Buffet has not been beneficial to society?, financial markets are a pillar of civilization, we would be nowhere today without investments, they are risky but can payoff because you're investing in the future, investing in the future of society is beneficial to society, just think about pharma research... now, what is a manager at Mcdonalds doing that is beneficial to society? Investing is not free money, I take issue with your statement. Are there bad players in finances, absolutely, think Bernie Maddof, the issue is the lack of regulations, and the enforcement of said rules.

[@TruthyToo]

Fraud is fraud.

[@thebuzh3rd]

Far too reductive of a statement to be meaningful.

[@danpatterson8009]

This is what happens when parents teach their children that the only sin is getting caught. There is no end to the supply of people who want something for nothing, and the clever ones feed on the stupid ones.

[@DaweSMF]

This is what happens when parents shelter their children from reality. Iam sorry but i feel like you need to be special kinda person if you give money to influencers. Imo biggest issue is lack of social experience. Anybody with decent social skills nowdays can do whatever with lot of people. You cant protect everybody, there always be predators, same like their prey. Such is life.

[@hume1234561]

In the U.S. fraud has been legalised. Congress insider trading. The largest companies on the S&P are engaged in vendor financing and capitalising their losses through accounting shenanigans. Then there's payment for order flow and marking trades short when they were executed as longs. The list is endless. How can they go after this group when they allow far worst to happen and deliberately look the other way.

[@msgtwarmonger3603]

If SCOTUS ruled that the theory under which the defendants were charged is not legal, the judge had no option but to dismiss as a matter of law.

[@bingledingus420]

ya ppl are hating on the judge for this specific case but right to control was invalidated so his hands were tied. bigger question is why did scotus make that ruling?

[@JayeK47]

@@bingledingus420 Because it expands the scope of fraud statutes so much that practically any conduct involving a transaction can be viewed as criminal as there will always be informational asymmetry between seller/promoters and buyers. Secondly, it absurdly reduced the elements of fraud from deception and loss of value to just deception since mere exchange of money was enough satisfy the second element. It's really about limiting prosecutorial power and preventing them from straying too far from the text of the statute with such novel legal theories. Besides people should be wary of influencers hawking financial products and investments on social media. Caveat auditor and caveat lector apply to social media. Finally I find most of the victims in these social media influencer pump and dump scams particularly unappealing. They're just as greedy as the scam artists themselves.

[@bulltraderpt]

"A fool and their money, aree lucky enough to get together in the first place."

[@janibeg3247]

Fools and their money are easily parted

[@XENUGOLFCLUB]

I found your channel 2 weeks ago and I’m addicted. Fantastic content, I love it

[@offbrandsoup2579]

Sounds about right for the US. You don’t go to jail for robbing the poor, you’re only punished for stealing from the rich and powerful

[@samsonsoturian6013]

You should get charged with fraud just for saying that. Shut up and get a job

[@offbrandsoup2579]

@@samsonsoturian6013 😂 sounds like someone’s a triggered snowflake

[@johnqpublic4012]

The net net of this case was that the Judge ruled that these guys can do whatever the fk they want so long as they aren't working in finance. Meaning, they operate outside all the regulations that govern the financial industry, despite the fact that they are clearly providing financial advice. Yes, it should not be legal. Leave it to the pro-business d-bags of the Southern District of Texas (SDTX) to once again undermine anything that might remotely resemble consumer/worker protection. Why do you think it has become so popular to use the SDTX for corporate bankruptcies to escape debts? Texas lawmakers love a good scam.

[@KnightGab]

Anytime you see Ferraris and Lamborghinis in the equation, it is quite probably as scam

[@dezzie6885]

Being in the US is just slowly losing all of your rights to people/businesses making enough money to take them from you.

[@jacekpiterow900]

Happen for me as well. There is company selling solar windows. I sink in it 5k because of wideo I saw on KZbin. I am an idiot...

[@jamesbillingsby8043]

I am tired of working so hard, about to go lie cheat and steal my way to victory.

[@samsonsoturian6013]

You'd lose money

[@csours]

This fool is tapping the table that he's recording on. I would have been saved by my pet peeves.

[@jeremymcauliff8485]

Once again, my vanilla investing style has saved me from losing money. I have never heard of any of these people and that is a good thing.

[@thecomrade302]

Abject failure of the justice system.

[@machenka]

So penny stock pump and dump schemes just became a legit business!? I wonder if they understand what they just opened up for with this decision. I don’t like to defraud people but if that’s a completely legit business model I might as well do it as well.

[@kuebby]

Texas courts don't care, they're just trying to tear down America as quickly as possible.

[@elymanic3497]

A true free market I guess

[@WestCoastTruckingCEO]

Go try... you still need a following so not just anyone can wake up and do it that day

[@snakeplissken1754]

It still blows my mind that there are still people out there so easily tricked into "investing" their money into a fraud/scam. In this day and age you have the world wide web to do some own proper research, just listen and believe is the best way to get screwed. Are people that stupid or are they just blinded by greedy promises?

[@jeffdavis4151]

don't forget there is always offshore for anything you want to do without any kind of trail

[@royed31]

Everyone has the right to be stupid , but some abuse that privilege

[@michaelsasylum]

When someone acts as an authority on something they should be held responsible for their actions, same reason we don't let anybody off the streets perform surgery.

[@SgtCrypto]

So, the judge just threw out the Howey Rule. 😏🧐

[@samsonsoturian6013]

No....

[@chessdad182]

Sounds like the judge is Supreme Court justice material. LOL.

[@yruhatin100]

Now I know why Tesla is moving to Texas.

[@Godsavethecrumpets]

They basically had chat logs of them bragging how it's a scam, totally bizzare for the judge to let them off

[@amonnoble9580]

Look at them.

[@TESkyrimizer]

it is kind of funny how fianance guys can grift their audience repeatedly people either have short memories or platforms just keep feeding them new unwitting fresh audience to exploit basically negligible opportunity cost from reputational damage unlike the snake oil salesman who had to leave town for fresh pastures to avoid getting lynched

[@chiquita683]

Watch the financial news like Bloomberg

[@toomanyaccounts]

give you a hint scammers sell their client list to other scammers. people fall for the same scams repeatedly

[@samsonsoturian6013]

Many of the victims are also ponzi schemers. It's lower risk to simply jump on someone else's scheme since you can claim victimhood

[@samsonsoturian6013]

​@chiquita683 do you have a death wish

[@abelardoruiz5544]

The line between lying and fraud?... wait that?.

[@wmpx34]

Finally finished this one. Good video. Can't rely on the govamint to save us...gotta be smarter than the scammers.

[@agedvagabond]

There are so many traditional and Web based media companies doing the same thing... you can't protect people from being stupid, unfortunately.

[@999NINE99]

I always invest with advisors that send me ballpoint pen marked up photos. High level of sophistication always equals returns. I also require that they send me a photo of them with a hideously speced Lambo.

[@mariocondello2353]

They need to be jailed for many decades.

[@jackofallglass165]

they did nothing wrong... they had no insider information. they talked about a stock and people bought it. exactly what happened with Roaring Kitty and game stop.

[@samsonsoturian6013]

Not that much

[@theMarcoLee]

I mean if you listen to these clowns it's really your own fault for losing money.

[@Proj_Doomsday]

Time to get into the pump n dump business from TX.

[@dosmastrify]

I see a car but it can't help but think of GameStop... Wonder what this video will contain after this ad is over

[@lightaiyee]

where can I download the court filing?

[@Ravencroft81]

Made 19k on TRCH. Dumped it before the closing bell the day before merger. Something was fishy.

[@rhythmandacoustics]

The SEC can't even jail these scammers and yet they target Roaring kitty! Shame on the SEC.

[@shadowninja6689]

IMO there should absolutely be regulations on people like Roaring Kitty. It's WAY too easy for someone with his kind of influence to manipulate the market and engage in harmful actions.

[@adityarana2897]

Well, the thing is, the person investing knows this is a pump and dump, so he thinks he can be part of the dump and dump on others. But now everyone investing is thinking the same, leaving everyone on edge about who will dump on whom. So, the best way to overcome this is to dump first, even though you made a low margin-better than nothing. Slowly and steadily, the time between pumping and dumping will decrease, and then these pump and dumps will happen in seconds, leaving bots trading amongst themselves.

[@mandude6566]

Appreciate your research on these cases

[@maxwellblackwell5045]

They wont escape me. People like this dont realize this isnt a game of nickles and dimes. It a game of life and death.

[@samsonsoturian6013]

It's only a matter of life and death if you plan to off yourself when you receive a margin call

[@maxwellblackwell5045]

@@samsonsoturian6013 you misread that.

[@sunnydayempire6964]

If anything does happen to them, I guess the FBI will know who to talk to first.

[@maxwellblackwell5045]

@@sunnydayempire6964 probably someone who lost money. Lucky for me I'm not stupid enough to fall for fools like this. Their trickery doesn't escape me.

[@ZingsVideos]

If this is made illegal, an industry of stock brokers and analysts will be destroyed. Do you think they follow the advice they give to the suckers... i mean clients?

[@LynnnnnnnnnN]

If people want to give their money away to finfluencers, who are we to stop them. Its their money 🤷‍♀️

[@JFirn86Q]

It pains me seeing these people steal millions from their followers.. even if their followers are being dumb, they are being lied to.

[@gintsdobbermans4346]

They could not judge the guys, because it would give a precedent to judge the entire Wallstreet. This is exactly how the smart money operates.

[@mikeharryfinn]

Not surprising that a Supreme Court that doesn’t see anything wrong with lavish gifts to themselves doesn’t come down on corruption

[@stephenm3470]

It really depends on who you rip off. Normal retail investors, no one cares, institutional investors will be another matter.

[@jonr6680]

Allegedly. Lawyer up, bad people are bad, but RICH bad people are a nightmare. There's no crime of being a... Liar Ahole These fine citizens are the epitome of the American dream with a side order of PSYCHOPATH. But ain't that the nature of things?

[@samsonsoturian6013]

You deserve to lose money

[@ktktktktktktkt]

They are conceptually similar but I think the big difference is that these are social media posts. From reading that article, it looks like they didn't go into the podcast. Maybe they would have a better case with the podcast since it seems they talked about ripping off people.

[@suprcrzy]

How do they live with themselves doing this shit..

[@LordMazafeff]

The money helps alot with that.

[@PXAbstraction]

"On top of a pile of money with many beautiful ladies."

[@samsonsoturian6013]

They didn't steal anything people couldn't afford to lose

[@Muffles]

@@samsonsoturian6013 you must not understand desperation then... gurus prey on the most vulnerable of people who will do anything to escape their terrible situations. I'm sure many of the people commited self die after this

[@kyleturley7098]

Dang does that mean I can sue the federal reserve for not releasing interest rate decisions under right to control.

[@ConnecticutinColorado]

Lol that discord was the best thing ever

[@BeyondEcstasy]

"that's not how that works but let's just do it that way"

[@Bewilderebeest]

Well, the outcome (charges dismissed without prejudice due to legal theory invalidated after the charges were brought) isn’t as dire as it first seemed. I hope the govt figures out how to charge these bloodsuckers!

[@rogergriffin9893]

If the followers bought penny stocks at one price and then after the influencers sold their stocks the price dropped, did they not lose money as a result of the influencer's fraud and from which they made a profit? And they therefore lost money?

[@G-sr2bs]

It’s not the same situation as Marc Johnson. Because there was no contract in exchange for information.

[@EventHoriXZ0n]

I’m guessing not a lot of the top comments watched the full video or bothered to understand its content. With the way that the judge’s ruling was presented here, yes, I actually agree with it. “Right to control” is not a real or implied right in the way that they say it is. This is just a way the government can take more power away from individuals, by saying you’re too irresponsible to conduct your own risk management. Government does this ALL the time- claiming that the individual has too much freedom, power and responsibility to be able to handle, so it, itself will relieve him of that burden by taking control. It’s misleading, deceitful and false. The government CANNOT asses your risk better than you can. 100% agree with the dismissal, and I’m glad the DOJ just now has to do bring normal charges the old fashioned way.

[@Garycarlyle]

Maybe you just misspoke but I don't think it's clear they harmed anybody. Nobody had to follow them. Nobody was attacked. However, it was definitely immoral.

[@Adam-zd2bk]

That's so fucked. up. I thought there was chat logs of them admitting it

[@samsonsoturian6013]

The case has to be refiled, it ain't over

[@name-oc2df]

pump and dumping on going in raw lmao who could’ve seen that going poorly

[@LastSider]

Reminds me of when MeetKeving was promoting penny stocks and how it was obviously a pump and dump. Did anything happened with that?

[@1boi593]

Although what they did was wrong, i always wonder who are the people that actually got scammed by this? They made 114 million dollars with this but how is it even possible that the people who are dumb enough to fall for such a scam have 114 million dollars ? From where ?

[@hellzshotgun]

They didn't necessarily make all of their money from their followers. There were other (almost certainly retail traders) buying and selling those same securities at the same time.

[@silversurfer8237]

As was discussed by another influencer, people are feeling desperate and the stock market seems to be the only hope for making money. Undoubtedly many will be swindled.

[@oliviao2238]

If it seems too good to be true, it often is. Whenever you consider parting with your hard-earned money, be well-informed.

[@djayjp]

Re the Meta Materials example--you confused their assets with their market cap. The latter could be much higher than the former (though still likely not that much ha).

[@oldleatherhandsfriends4053]

Market cap can be drastically higher lol

[@stuartegrin7543]

Where is Finra and the SEC?

[@johndavidson4210]

The Supreme Court ruled that the "right-to-control" theory is invalid because the right to information isn't a "traditional property interest". The court's opinion, written by Justice Thomas, stated that accepting the theory would mean "almost any deceptive act could be a crime". ⤴️. it'll be a while before a can get my head around this decision

[@anograsek]

Hmm curious, a provenly dishonest person doesn't wish to criminalize lying for profit...

[@edbardoe2195]

The judge will retire to a senior sinecure position at these guy’s defense attorneys, legal scams go on forever.

[@scottlauren3145]

Dude had to second guess himself on what 25% of 5 billion is. I mean if you cant do simple math like that I dont want anything to do with due regarding money.

[@judyArsh]

Another gift from the Supreme Court

[@kaystephan2610]

Sounds like the judge got a couple millions. Dude should be investigated.

[@oliverseiler2871]

Cool, only muppets listen to influencers when it comes to money.

[@MrMadvillan]

Watching Gen Z enter the workforce makes me feel like that last baby in Children of Men, but instead of a baby its skills or knowledge.

[@Mocktailmetal]

''My name is Vic Chaos and I'm going to make you rich beyond your imagination, I got deal for you,...''

[@goldmembership9063]

Sounds like Xrp 😂😂😂

[@Wo9i7sj5l2a]

No consequence when you have money. Im surprised

[@sikachukuning2473]

Always question other people's opinion and their motives

[@MrJorgitogrande]

Where’s Saul Goodman when you need him?

[@LaurentiusTriarius]

Influencer wasn't credible as an occupation it almost became legit but now down the drain... If your kids want to be influencers you know what to do. ADOPTION

[@sznikers]

You cant scratch them out past 12 weeks 😅

[@MangoKitty]

I think proving loss is going to be fairly easy when theres record of them saying theyre 'robbing f*ing idiots' lol

[@geoffbell2906]

Anyone who "invests" in their tips deserves to lose every penny they have. Good old America, home of the greedy and gullible.