Informatica : Partitioning Basic Example - Part 1

[@mrgogate]

Hi, Thanks for your comments, m going to re-post all videos by re-cording those using external mic...

[@indrajitsen746]

Nice basic Video ... I have used this load 720 million data and it was very helpful.

[@narsimhareddymalreeddy1849]

great work and very clear explanation..

[@himanshukarki]

Thank you very useful for knowing Partitioning in informatica

[@smile_ride]

Please do somthing about the noise. It feels like you were in a fully loaded truck on uphills.

[@sangeetakapoor3004]

Good job!!!

[@amitpimparkar]

Very Informative. One qq. How did u decide on number of partitions ..for ex 7 in ur case? How to come up with that number?

[@mrgogate]

I my case, it was a client requirement. They had foresee that after some period data load will be 3 times of what current is. So to keep the SLA same they need to process the data faster...

[@rahulkalra9]

Hi , Thanks for the videos, they are very helpful, just want to know how to enable partioning since I dont have this powercenter option, could you please share your license file, I am just going to use it for self learning, my version of informatica is 9.0.1. Many thanks Rahul

[@soujanyasomisetty5212]

Ur videos are nice. But ur voice is very low and there is a lot of background noise. Please make sure these won't be there in ur next videos. So that it would be interesting.

[@roopnatt5290]

Hey Rahul, Where did u get the version 9.0.1 for self learning ? Is there any free source? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks

[@rahulkalra9]

mate , you didnt reply on my post .. i am seeing your post after 4 years .. i have informatica dump .. and you can get it from oracle website ..hope it helps .. else you can contact me : [e-mail] .. cheers

[@rufaelh]

very informative. i liked it. but the sound quality is very poor.

[@rahulkalra9]

Hi Mandar Gogate, I dont have a paritioning option in my informatica.. the license file that i have doesnt allow paritioning, I am gonna learn informatica paritioning again after 4 years .. could you please help me with the license file please .. any help would be highly appreciated .. cheers

[@khyamanidhisahoo5140]

Hi, I followed it and created 2 partiion points. My session is taking data from source and transfering to a target. No transformation involved, just one to one. But what I see is that the target table has double the data. That means it is populating the target twice with same data which I don't want. Could you suggest the reason for this and how to solve it ? Thanks in advance. Khyama

[@Naveen-qz1rv]

Hi, did u get the solution. If yes, then plz let us know

[@prathapse]

What if source is oracle table?

[@mrgogate]

that was just a hit and trial... earlier I tried with 2 & 3 partitions, but for 7 partitions, results were better

[@sivaganesansivalingam6332]

Audio is not good

[@1s_a_m_ir]

Bro's pc have v6 engine 😂

[@mrgogate]

I my case, it was a client requirement. They had foresee that after some period data load will be 3 times of what current is. So to keep the SLA same they need to process the data faster...

[@mrgogate]

I my case, it was a client requirement. They had foresee that after some period data load will be 3 times of what current is. So to keep the SLA same they need to process the data faster...

[@mrgogate]

I my case, it was a client requirement. They had foresee that after some period data load will be 3 times of what current is. So to keep the SLA same they need to process the data faster

[@mrgogate]

I my case, it was a client requirement. They had foresee that after some period data load will be 3 times of what current is. So to keep the SLA same they need to process the data faster

[@mrgogate]

I my case, it was a client requirement. They had foresee that after some period data load will be 3 times of what current is. So to keep the SLA same they need to process the data faster

[@mrgogate]

I my case, it was a client requirement. They had foresee that after some period data load will be 3 times of what current is. So to keep the SLA same they need to process the data faster

[@mrgogate]

I my case, it was a client requirement. They had foresee that after some period data load will be 3 times of what current is. So to keep the SLA same they need to process the data faster

[@mrgogate]

I my case, it was a client requirement. They had foresee that after some period data load will be 3 times of what current is. So to keep the SLA same they need to process the data faster