Insane Theoretical Physics Discussion with ChatGPT and DeepSeek

The recent development of AI presents challenges, but also great opportunities.
Want to attend the Demysticon Conference? Go to demystifysci.c...
My books: www.amazon.com/Alexander-Unzicker/e/B00DQCRYYY/
Mind also my backup channel:
odysee.com/@Th...
My books: www.amazon.com/Alexander-Unzicker/e/B00DQCRYYY/

[@bjh3661]

Professor Unzicker, I am a layperson but I have been fascinated by your channel for many years. Thank you for your courage to speak that "the emperor has no clothes!" Your open-minded and rigorous engagement with Large Language Models such as chatGPT and Deepseek is PIONEERING WORK. We are all grateful to you and people like you, if there are any others on your level. I doubt it. But perhaps you have some peers. I would appreciate any recommendations. Thank you.

[@ChrisLehtoF16]

Yes! It is only a matter of time before we get to stop hearing the ridiculousness of modern physics and their dark age thinking.

[@brandonb5075]

Very interesting stuff! Nice clip Dr. U!✌🏼

[@SinisaSusnjar-hd7vm]

Fascinating! Please keep in mind that GPTs are trained on a huge corpus of data available on the internet, so chances are high that it also ingested your proposed solution that you mentioned at <a href="#" class="seekto" data-time="150">2:30</a>

[@vinaynk]

Physics bro, your glass reflections make you look like an alien. Great video nevertheless.

[@Artyom178]

😂😂😂

[@zyxzevn]

Small error at the start: Last maxwell equation is wrong: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_equations -> curl(B) = u0 *J + u0*e0*dE/dt That would give c^2 *curl(B) = J/e0 + dE/dt NOT c^-2 *curl(b)

[@aaronfranklin324]

Maxwell? Or Heavysides mutilation of Maxwells 23 equations?

[@revbem141]

I thought i would make you aware of this paper by Marek Danielewski and Lucjan Sapa: Foundations of the Quaternion Quantum Mechanics. Entropy 2020, 22, 1424; doi:10.3390/e22121424 . In this paper they derive the gravitational constant as well as the wave equations from first principles. Seems like its right up your street.

[@WillfullyWondering]

Ideally you use them to refine the theories. It's easy for the simple things, but for the more cutting edge stuff it can take a lot of fine tooth combing. Using Gemini to keep them on task and Claude to hit it with a firm understanding helps. 😅

[@Matlockization]

Let's just see what you both come up with.

[@Gerry-t1w]

At this rate, most physics students will be worried about their career prospects as physics teachers or physicists.

[@TejrnarG]

@@Gerry-t1w That is not really a change, if what you mean is a permanent position in academia. Too few of them for too many PhDs produced each year.

[@cornfall]

🗝

[@carparkmartian2193]

Ok so the issue that I find repeatedly is that you need to know physics better that the model in order to challenge current physics - the gpt model takes current physics as gospel and tries like hell to prop it up in the face of contradictions. The contradictions in Maxwell's equations are the following; 1. Gauss's law of electricity insists that electric fields must flow from a real positive charge to a real negative charge. But then in the development of EM waves we dismiss this and override it with an add- hoc assumption that the EM waves are self-regenerating. This is done despite the fact that we physically measure real charge polarisation of the "empty" space as the EM wave / photon electric field oscillates. I.e. The physical / empiracle observation that physical charges are present ( in "empty" space in the E field oscilation must override the theoretical model - which supports the original Gauss's law of Electricity. Yet we continue to maintain the self regenerating model - which contradicts this. The empiracle evidence asks us to look for the real but invisible charge source behind that real polarisation. Secondly, Maxwell's displacement current is treated as a mathematical / notional current and not a real physical current. Yet that notional current processes real information and results in real physical effects. The foundational principles of quantum theory - specifically conservation of information, informs us that the real information the displacement current produces must also be present prior to and during the virtual processing event. As real information must be held by real physical states it informs you that the displacement current is a real but invisible current. So by stating that the current is notional we sidestep the imperative to deconstruct the physical origin of that current. Thirdly the self regenerating wave model requires a source and sink for the energy to be exchanged between "empty" space and the visible fields that are generated. The entire energy of the wave needs to be stored physically somewhere when it's E and B fields are zero or in any point in between a maxima. As this takes a wavelength - it informs us that it exceeds the very short time allowed by the Heisenberg time-energy uncertainty principle by many magnitudes - to simply shove that energy borrowing off to vacuum energy fluctuation - like we usually do. So again you need to look for the real but invisible physical system that is storing and exchanging that real energy. The point being that chatty will not offer these contradictions, but will agree that there are contradictions - if you persist and have solid reasons to support your argument. Ok so onto overriding the speed of light....You need to deconstruct the underlying physicality of the system you are dealing with ( above) before you can start manipulating it. So that means you simply don't ignore these strong physical clues. But instead you track them to the underlying real but invisible physical system at work. That will lead you to deconstruct the physicality of GR spacetime. ( The real but invisible quanta of spacetime). Then you can deconstruct that particles are persistent emergent disturbances of that spacetime. Then you can deconstruct the emergent invisible scalar superfluid that they form that densely populates space and makes up spacetime ....and developes the invisible but real physical properties of electrical permittivity and magnetic permeability. Then you can understand what fields to apply to push these particles aside to manipulate the density of spacetime and thus manipulate the speed of light. ....you need to identify the clues and follow the clues. Chatty can help but you need to persist to penetrate the BS we have made ourselves regurgitate.

[@pentagrammaton6793]

And if spacetime itself is illogical horseshit (which it is)...?

[@cremasca]

❤👍❤️