Read more on CNET.com: Inside Joby's Air Taxi Facility, I Saw the Future of Air Travel Take Flight cnet.us/l7j
@HydroWorldOutlookPrimary57692 ай бұрын
Thanks for the update, @CNET! :)
@Blanaba17 күн бұрын
Are these good for flying in new Jersey at night?
@abdelakarumb615613 күн бұрын
what about the secret tunnel in brooklyn? xD
@JakStoll9 күн бұрын
I worked for Joby Energy about 14 years ago and it was a great experience Im glad they are still around doing their thing
@ODog23232 ай бұрын
We've been seeing these videos promising "possibly starting next year!" since 2005 from many companies. I'll get impressed when it's real.
@skatedurr2 ай бұрын
problem with drones is no wings, one problem ur cooked
@ODog23232 ай бұрын
@@skatedurr that's true of an airplane too. Sure there's redundancy just like there is here, but just the right tiny issue can bring it down. Gravity never takes a break!
@jizzlecizzle13882 ай бұрын
@@skatedurr, obviously, it's not true. There're redundancy, as it is a explained in the video. Most aircrafts do. Even a plane losing one engine out of two can safely land.
@jizzlecizzle13882 ай бұрын
Obviously, it takes years to bring a new type of aircraft to the market. Joby, and others, are on the last leg to commercial operation.
@mahbubhossainsamm2 ай бұрын
Next year .. Awesome 🔥
@tylerhill94832 ай бұрын
I own 13k shares of this. Going to try to get to minimum of 20k. I hope the price doesn't skyrocket too soon before I can get some more. I think this will be a 10 bagger within the next decade.
@flinx2 ай бұрын
Do you own Archer shares too? If not but you compared the stocks, why do you favor Joby?
@tylerhill94832 ай бұрын
@@flinx I don't own Archer. I don't know what you mean, I didn't compare the stocks? I think Joby is better, and my bet is Joby will dominate the eVOTL space. Stanley Drukenmiller owns Joby too, but he doesn't own Archer, albeit his position in Joby is small. Stanley is a very smart Billionaire investor and I respect him a lot.
@flinx2 ай бұрын
@@tylerhill9483 I see. I asked because Joby and Archer will be competitors after eVTOL deliveries commence. So anytime someone thinks only one of the companies is the better bet, I'm interested in understanding why.
@farzana6676Ай бұрын
@@tylerhill9483 This is a glorified helicopter. Nothing special.
@tyapkaАй бұрын
@Newworld-teamT it's trading on NYSE
@mkotadia2 ай бұрын
Love your work Lexy!
@GeneralMerchandiser-r7v6 күн бұрын
Archer and Joby gonna bring exciting investment returns for believers. Both have huge multi-bagger potential.
@Greguk4442 ай бұрын
Very interesting, thank you. This looks like it could be a possible real transport option soon, but not as a taxi, more like a short hop plane alternative
@cemdursun2 ай бұрын
It is not a short hop plane alternative, its range is 100 miles.
@haterhayder2 ай бұрын
vapour ware you mean
@Greguk4442 ай бұрын
@@haterhayder well yes, you have a good point. I have been reading about air taxis for 20 years and they are still about to happen, as you say, vapour ware
@haterhayder2 ай бұрын
@@Greguk444 yep, regulations would do that. oh well
@tyapkaАй бұрын
@@cemdursun they actually have already tested a fuel cell variant which flew for 500 miles.
@TheTanman4122 ай бұрын
Most people are unaware of the massive advancements in battery density, chemistry, price, fast charging ability, & longevity in the last 6 years. Unlike EVs, flying electric craft have just been waiting for lighter batteries.
@danielwhyatt32782 ай бұрын
HECK YEAH. Their time is fiiiinally upon us.
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
@TheTanman412 when magic batteries are invented then it will be easy for anyone to make them. Like kids make little ones now.
@TheCiardellas2 ай бұрын
I really love this company
@bikebudha012 ай бұрын
If this makes it into production... WE ALL LIVE NEXT DOOR TO THE AIRPORT...
@suniselinАй бұрын
As it is vertical landing and takeoff capacity one can set up an airport anywhere
@user-ed7dy1mq9u2 ай бұрын
Carbon fiber manufacturing is cool, but it’s been around for 50 years and not exactly new tech or this aircraft. Same with flight simulators. I was hoping they spend more time on the stuff I was really curious about, but they rushed through it. How exactly is it quieter, is it spinning slower? Is it the blade tips? How quiet is it? Like what are the decibels? How many engines can it loose and still fly? How about when it’s hovering? I have lots of doubts because on my small drone, any engine failure causes it to flip and fall out of the sky. I would love to have seen test video to prove it can still fly with those failures.
@charliedoyle78242 ай бұрын
It sounds like a big leaf blower or giant electric weed trimmer, like a big air whoosh with an electric whine. There is no big helicopter thumping or airplane engine noise that travel so far. When it flies overhead at 1000 feet it's pretty quiet; probably barely audible when it's windy. When it's taking off and you're nearby it's not so quiet, but much better than normal aircraft. They manage it with redesigned wingtips of the props and spinning them slower. They can do that because they have lots of propellers providing lift. Electric propulsion systems are also inherently quieter than reciprocating engines. Joby has fewer propellers than other EVTOLs, so they may have less redundancy. Most have eight props, some even more. Joby can lose all engines and glide in if it's within glide-reach of a runway or field. It can lose one engine for sure and still land vertically. I have to think it could lose two and land vertically, but I'm not sure if it can lose two front engines on the same side. It can probably lose over 50% of its engines and land horizontally like an airplane. Having six tilt propellers plus wings with three-axis stability and sophisticated control systems and software make it nothing like hobby drones. These electric motors also are double motors, with two separate windings in one unit. If one unit fails, it powers it's other unit, and doesn't miss a beat. Other EVTOLs have double props hooked to one unit, one on top and the other below it. They all also have three or more battery arrays with three or more different controllers that should fail for different reasons. These things are far more redundant than any other aircraft. And electric propulsion is far more reliable and needs less maintenance than conventional propulsion systems.
@HanguorenshishabiАй бұрын
Don't be curious, you have to act, don't be smart, you can think of problems, Chinese engineers can also think of, you think you are smarter than the Chinese?
@robertonavarro8701Ай бұрын
How much luggage would you be allowed to bring? If you search it, it says 1000lb load. With an avg weight of Americans at 185lbs (multiplied by 5), it doesnt leave much at all.
@actlove72 ай бұрын
lets go joby
@tyapkaАй бұрын
Amazing. Technology. It's a difficult and a long road to get this certified and being used in production, but any endeavour of such significance is not easy. Joby is doing all the right things to make air taxis a normal thing - production, training, contracts with other players. Go go Joby.
@markindy86222 күн бұрын
I love the negative or "glass half empty" comments. Blade Air, Archer and Joby are doing this. It is happening. Not only them but companies like Heart Aerospace are making an electric plane. Spend some time to try and understand. If you don't believe now, "Then you better start swimmin' or you'll sink like a stone, For the times, they are a-changin" - Dillon
@FriedaFuzzypaws-f3h2 ай бұрын
Canny believe they named it "Joby"
@philipbassett5129Ай бұрын
Fantastic and I look forward to the day that I can ride in one, but the only issue I can see is it’s grounded footprint; you’ll need a large drive for you want to be dropped off at home and even businesses will need a large area of parking lot
@az640819 күн бұрын
AMAZING
@dans.81982 ай бұрын
@4:24 How is it possible that using “a third less energy” (-33%) lets you go “three times as far” (+200%).
@garyvermaak94702 ай бұрын
Airtaxis (private air charter) dates back to 1919, while the flight hailing app was in 2008 (Evolux) before Uber's ridesharing app.
@hochsung743110 күн бұрын
Did CNET do a similar video for Archer?
@BillFleming-q8oАй бұрын
Very cool! 😎👍
@summerchina6568Ай бұрын
Key question is how much are they gonna charge for a ride. And where are they gonna land?
@swim_xoc2 ай бұрын
"Easy to fly" is a double edged sword - too many autopilot systems stop working and suddenly the pilot doesn't know how to safely descend in an emergency.
@philzail25322 ай бұрын
I chuckled when she called the autoclave a giant tunnel. 😅
@HydroWorldOutlookPrimary57692 ай бұрын
Surely we will see these "air taxis" take flight only in the bigger, busier cities first as airport transfer vehicles before they trickle down to those smaller cities and rural areas that have fewer established transit services and really need them (like Las Vegas, NV and Emporia, VA). Los Angeles and New York City will, inevitably, be first in line. But I will keep following updates on the service, and we will see how well it performs in the transit/travel market.
@undeze2 ай бұрын
I would like to have heard more about the FAA aircraft certification progress. What are the contingency procedures in the Joby for critical systems failures? What happens if a motor fails? What happens if a propeller gets stuck in a horizontal or non-vertical position? Does the aircraft then have to land like a conventional airplane? If so, where? How much battery reserves (time) does it require at its planned landing time? Lots of questions. Hopefully the answers are coming…?
@HydroWorldOutlookPrimary57692 ай бұрын
All good questions that need answers before I pay them a dime to fly me anywhere.
@AdHernandezАй бұрын
I wonder where are they going to park while waiting for the passenger? The area it occupies is bigger than a truck, so waiting for passenger in Manhattan would be difficult. Aside from that, pretty cool industry, which I hope will work.
@eemil333.2 ай бұрын
So they basically call a drone an air taxi and compare it to a car. Looks more like a helicopter but with a few more rotors to me..
@hunterhart12 ай бұрын
I’ll hop in for test trials
@donotbelieve90percentАй бұрын
probably mentioned below. But what about real world weather? you book your flight for your final leg home and then a nasty snow squall hits. Would you be stranded at airport?
@thedoublep4342 ай бұрын
Screw air taxis, I want one to fly myself!
@Holyorderofkeith_0532 ай бұрын
FOR REALS
@technojunkie213Ай бұрын
what are the use cases in usa? i have heard some NYC use cases like airport to manhattan or similiar.
@heehaw840119 күн бұрын
Archer has a plant near Atlanta.
@KoreaTopRich_Buy_Bros_RGTI2 ай бұрын
Joby Aviation, Dutch Bros 이 두 종목은 2010년의 테슬라와 같다고 생각함.
@bryangopan2 ай бұрын
Dubai baby
@dsp43922 ай бұрын
There's no way this thing will ever be faster than a car if its max range is only 160km. Better pivot to aerial sightseeing/tourism _quick_ .
@maximiliandegarnerinvonmon64572 ай бұрын
Why does he sound like he's asking a question every time he speaks 🤣🤣🤣
@manfyegoh2 ай бұрын
got air con inside?
@donovyegg12 ай бұрын
That’s cool!
@Somehow_Logical2 ай бұрын
Helicopter?
@charaznable11312 ай бұрын
Finally!!! Its just an electric helicopter and considering how bad climate change is gonna get, the crosswinds will make this thing fall from the sky like a fly
@jizzlecizzle13882 ай бұрын
Of course it isn't. As it is explained in the video.
@hunterhart12 ай бұрын
Helicopters have 1 main rotor and 1 tail tail rotor which means no failsafe. In this case there are multiple props which allows for multiple failsafe options. Way safer + autonomy helps navigate better than humans although people will be navigating and overseeing the systems.
@bernob97702 ай бұрын
WOW!!
@ericfranke92716 күн бұрын
They have these things called helicopters….
@thisisreallife90262 ай бұрын
So it is a complicated helicpoter, got it!
@andybrice271116 күн бұрын
It's a less complicated helicopter.
@thisisreallife902616 күн бұрын
@@andybrice2711 it is more complicated because it has 4 motors to drive 4 blades which increases the chances of failure
@andybrice271116 күн бұрын
@@thisisreallife9026 I’m not so sure. The mechanics seem much simpler than a helicopter. Even if the avionics are more complex. And even if multiple engines fail it can still land. Helicopters are notoriously dangerous and difficult to maintain. I predict eVTOLs will largely replace them in the future.
@jzen145519 күн бұрын
I don't care about the technology of their eVTOLs. If they keep the name JOBY, the business won't take off. I know it's "just a name", but a company's name can make or break a company.
@sbbudj24 күн бұрын
Yea, there's no way they allow her to air the part where she crashes into a house, killing mom,dad, and the 4 kids
@JasonB8082 ай бұрын
Not a taxi. These Giant Drones that can carry a few humans will not fix transportation for the masses. Its real goal is to be a cheaper alternative to helicopter. Still only rich people will be able to afford it. I think we will see Giant Drones ferry the rich over specific routes that avoid places with a lot of buildings or people on the ground.
@jasourwnjl2 ай бұрын
Definitely let them fly from one compound to another and not have to interact or even see the underclass on the street. A dream come true for the modern oligarch.
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
@@JasonB808 they wish they could carry a few humans.
@Mrwiseguy1016902 ай бұрын
It's significantly cheaper and more accessible than helicopters
@KhattaMeethaOficial2 ай бұрын
It’s For Rich People….😂😂
@galileo34312 ай бұрын
By that logic we should have also stopped building these expensive automotive vehicles a 100 years ago, because they were only for rich people anyways. It's actually rich people who pay for the necessary development cost to make high-tech scalable and therefore cheap.
@adak205011 күн бұрын
Needs to be simplified. The Chinese already have a 2 passenger autonomous version of this. Contrary to what some people below are saying autonomous air taxis are the wave of the future. Why drive, when you can fly everywhere.. The vast majority of Americans don't go more than 40 to 50 miles in a day, so a pay to play autonomous air taxi will eventually replace most cars and roads. Autonomous air taxis and humanoid robots are coming soon and about to change everything...
@mofosoto2 ай бұрын
Brought to you by the people that have never heard of the invention called the helicopter
@zachb17062 ай бұрын
Easier to build and control a quadcopter
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
It will always be next year. Show it carrying the weight necessary the distance necessary one year and then i might believe people will ride them next year.
@JB-gr6om2 ай бұрын
Wow it looks like the Osprey… which has crashed many times. 😂
@martinandersson598215 күн бұрын
It does not seem to be cost efficient production. What happen to JOBY when Tesla enter in a few years
@glennlewman41862 күн бұрын
What is the advantage over a helicopter
@amirahmari2 ай бұрын
oooo, u've explained everything except that most important thing and thats related about elecric motors, they have how much power and works for how far that go? after how long does it need be recharge and what is capacity of the battery? that has how many km/hr speed?
@livingroomguitarist72 ай бұрын
Top speed 200 mph, range of 100 miles not including reserve. I believe the S4 has a service ceiling of 18k feet.
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
@livingroomguitarist7 I think they would say its designed to do that not that it can do that.
@ReallyFarFarAway2 ай бұрын
⚡⚡ Electricity power ⚡⚡ through battery storage is just one out of many features of this vehicle .. !!! ... wich ... actually very likely will disappear in the not so distant future due to technical developments .. !!! ((( - Yes indeed !!! )))
@damienspectre42312 ай бұрын
been hearing about "air taxis taking off" since biblical times
@pleka2 ай бұрын
1/3 less energy or 1/3 of the energy?
@DigitalRosePodcast2 ай бұрын
Until a flock of birds come out of no where
@NoalFarstrider9 күн бұрын
This is what i think the new jersey lights are.
@urbanstrencan2 ай бұрын
Can't wait to be able to actually use it in the public ❤❤❤
@micham82782 ай бұрын
As a plane and helicopter pilot that spent years learning and mastering flight, this is quite insulting to watch.
@livingroomguitarist72 ай бұрын
That’s what technology does. Makes what was once difficult now easy to do.
@micham82782 ай бұрын
@@livingroomguitarist7 It'll replace all of our jobs in the near future.
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
@@micham8278don't worry. Its vaporware.
@livingroomguitarist72 ай бұрын
@micham8278 No it won't. It will add jobs.
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
@micham8278 real helicopters can be made autonomous already and made to fly by wire. I have a toy one where you can make it hard to fly and it can do flips or make it easy to fly so its like one of those skill crane games in the air and it can even fly and land itself.
@symply_ajay2 ай бұрын
Can it autorotate like a helicopter?
@Bodan_Takanuva2 ай бұрын
It has wings for gliding but it can't autorotate.
@symply_ajay2 ай бұрын
@@Bodan_Takanuva well, that sucks.
@tallertwink2 ай бұрын
Thought we were going to see an actual flight with CNET inside. Color me disappointed the climax was just a simulation.
@Groegselmaschupp2 ай бұрын
Airtaxis exist! They are called Helicopters…..
@rocsocom3166Ай бұрын
Who will be the first guinea pig to ride that at least a helicopter can auto rotate if lose power that drop like a rock.
@cesarbrown20742 ай бұрын
These will be great for states like Texas with multiple big cities.
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
They need an airconditioner if they want to fly them here. That flying greenhouse is going to get hot if it can even fly with weight. They still haven't proven it can for more than a few seconds. They haven't even shown a 5 minute empty flight without edits.
@cesarbrown20742 ай бұрын
@@TheBagOfHolding lmfao.
@Satronaut-pw3ij15 күн бұрын
When can I buy one of these?
@SharadPatil-hu7yv17 күн бұрын
भारतातले राजकारणी व सरकारी अधिकारी यांना पैसे खायला मिळणार नाही.
@The_vincepryor20 күн бұрын
Great Idea, But where can you travel less than 100 miles that can't travel faster by car? Round trip from Austin to San Antonio is 145-170 miles round trip. Downtown Houston to Katy? 45 miles. Again why? Cost prohibited. In my opinion.
@matthewbarry702619 күн бұрын
I live in an area where little puddle jumper planes taxi people all the time. There is a good demand for this niche.
@The_vincepryor18 күн бұрын
@matthewbarry7026 OK. But the cost to keep this thing charged Is Significant. You have to burn way more fossil fuel. A puddle jumper is way more cheaper in the long and short run. Unless they pair this with a micro nuclear power plant. ($$!) 🤔🤣😂 Solar ain't reliable enough to depend on. I have a Tesla it's cool but I charge it way more often than I fueled my ICE car. If I didn't get free power after 9:pm I would go broke.
@matthewbarry702618 күн бұрын
@@The_vincepryor that's the thing right, but there are places where energy is relatively cheap. Not going to work everywhere, but these guys will sell thousands of these things.
@haterhayder2 ай бұрын
The CEO hasnt answered a single question as it was asked lol
@David0gden2 ай бұрын
He's not the CEO
@maximiliandegarnerinvonmon64572 ай бұрын
It's starting in bangalore 😊
@Евгений_Грабинский2 ай бұрын
It must be full autopilot
@SuperChicken6662 ай бұрын
My question is, if I'm fabulously wealthy, can I buy one?🚁
@DHM10302 ай бұрын
I think this is a bad idea....what if it malfunctions while your flying somewhere 🤔
@David0gden2 ай бұрын
Redundancy and breathe easy.
@silverwolf2643Ай бұрын
Same can be said about airplanes and helicopters
@theaouch47492 ай бұрын
For rich people.
@WilliamEnwerem-p5lАй бұрын
Imagine getting in a flying car in West Virginia and Kentucky and Ohio and they sell them at all the car dealerships in West Virginia and Kentucky and Ohio
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
That sound test was a different model with different motors that had gears and it crashed. The new craft is different and doesn't have gears. The sound will be different and louder if its carrying a load. Empty would be quieter but that shouldn't be the test.
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
@David0gden how much weight is it carrying and how long does it stay in the air? Take a video of it if it's longer than 2 minutes because that's longer than joby ever shows. The sound doesn't matter if it can't lift the necessary load and move it somewhere. The more it lifts the louder it would be. I think joby is going to go down like a lilium if they don't prove they can move something somewhere soon. I know they can lift 1 man for at least a minute but is that it? Please take an unedited video of the entire time its airborne of it happens frequently and you are telling the truth.
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
@David0gden question: what is the difference between joby and lilium? Answer: a year. Being honest is cool, dude.
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
@David0gden umm no they were actually a hoax.
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
@@David0gden not jets, ducted fans and it ended up being all lies. Marketing and lies. Like this.
@TheBagOfHolding2 ай бұрын
@@David0gden lilium is out of buisness, they are bankrupt. This one will be after archer goes. They aren't competing they depend on eachother to keep up the charade that it's possible.
@Fundraiser9997 күн бұрын
Autopilot would be nice
@creator_way999Ай бұрын
Бесплатно добро раздают? А как же баланс во Вселенной! Сколько добра столько и зла!
@JB-gr6om2 ай бұрын
Not me.
@samtownshend2 ай бұрын
It's very misleading to ignore the addition of their composite epoxy, making all the parts terrible for the environment. You'll be making videos about how we scrap all the carbon composite parts in a few years...
@JB-gr6om2 ай бұрын
So when it crashes the carbon fibers will protect me? 😂
@dfou812Ай бұрын
At 8:12 he says "it uses 1/3 less energy, so it can go 3 times as far." But that is not how math works. Saving 1/3 energy will make it go 1.3x as far. How can I trust anything he says when doesn't even know basic math? Am I wrong on this?
@chethiyaprasanga2 ай бұрын
When tesla comes this business.. near days.. another fear to this company 😢
@SocialistSociopathPK4422 ай бұрын
When will india become like this
@BF_Yuna2 ай бұрын
To the moon ~
@JJs_playground2 ай бұрын
The amount of technical skill and machinery this company has is very impressive. I think for air flight (these drones, airplanes) should use hydrogen instead of batteries.
@David0gden2 ай бұрын
Joby's Hydrogen EVTOL is blue 🤓
@fokerfakerfuker7 күн бұрын
will pilots lose their jobs soon?
@P455x32 ай бұрын
Amazon air
@thill6771Ай бұрын
Eventually, maybe SOMEONE will ask about the glide ratio of a fully loaded JOBY..................
@Native7222 ай бұрын
I wonder if Elon will get into this space as well.
@justinlange32142 ай бұрын
I think Elon was worried about thousands of these creating noise pollution over cities, so he started the boring company instead.
@David0gden2 ай бұрын
You have to see and hear this EVTOL fly in real life to believe what I'm telling you right now, however it sounds about as loud as an air conditioner or 45dB. Noise pollution won't be an issue.
@davidcoxon47102 ай бұрын
Yesterday in London, I sat in my room looking at the sky, with a huge beautiful post full moon. There were two or three helicopters ruining the sky. I sat there and watched the perfect Oct night looking at the sky, empty blue, memorising with it's space that is free for everyone. Then I thought we are approaching the era when it is about to end. The human race must and will progress. But in that progression we also lose much. And the days that the night skies are filled with these things are something I look forward to with utter dread.
@sebastianzukowski79852 ай бұрын
Wasn't similar with cars? E.g. you had a house, a cottage and an open field with wilderness. Now in many places there are motorways and other roads
@davidcoxon47102 ай бұрын
@@sebastianzukowski7985 most human beings don't want to live next to a motorway or major road😂
@sebastianzukowski79852 ай бұрын
Of course they don't, but sometimes it's unavoidable. These also appeared over time, same as flying vehicles will.
@davidcoxon47102 ай бұрын
@@sebastianzukowski7985 I'm in stoke Newington looking at the moon and a clear sky. It gives me peace and freedom of spirit to see that space. In 10-20 years that will be gone. I've dreaded it for a long time to be honest as it's that close. We need some escape from a city and the sky is the best we have
@sj_life_and_science18 күн бұрын
Don’t worry mate these won’t be around Stoke Newington for awhile 😂 enjoy your clear night skies
@Aragorn78842 ай бұрын
This product is a solution to a non-existent problem 🤑
@capsulecorp23092 ай бұрын
I think if this became affordable or even a taxi service. I would alleviate ground traffic for lots of others. So not entirely a waste of time
@jizzlecizzle13882 ай бұрын
@@capsulecorp2309, it won't alleviate road traffic outside of very specific areas. There's virtually no chance it will become a solution for mass transit.
@jizzlecizzle13882 ай бұрын
There're already people paying for heli taxi. Other riche people would select this solution to avoid traffic, instead of, currently, ordering a chauffeur.
@Bodan_Takanuva2 ай бұрын
Traffic is a present problem, but some places reached the limit on lane expansions.
@Aragorn78842 ай бұрын
@@Bodan_Takanuva 😒
@adamchicagoone20969 күн бұрын
I dread the day these fill our skies...cool tech in theory but this will turn our natural skies into dystopian nightmare.
@iblackfeathers2 ай бұрын
joby makes mini tripods. that's a big jump in their product line to flying taxis. 😅
@David0gden2 ай бұрын
The Joby tripods were invented by Mr. JoeBen, they were Joby Aviations founder's first project from college. That's how he got his startup capital in 2009 along with a couple other investments I believe. In fact he's been developing this EVTOL taxi ever since 2009. Today the furthest along and leading the industry safely into the future.
@withoutwroeirs5 күн бұрын
Who is demanding air taxis as economies are about to enter a multi year recession? Why would people who need such a service transition from a certified reliable helicopter with a proven safety record?
@seanhardman19642 ай бұрын
Thats a helicopter plane
@lotusflowerrr2 ай бұрын
So a helicopter but quieter
@BBAERSTANCE12 күн бұрын
Who’s insuring this? Also what about weather and cost of pilots? No one in the middle class can afford this