Exciting news, I am happy to announce that I have found a cameraman+video editor for Inside The Cockpit! What's the big deal you ask, surely that's nothing special! Well, it is for me - I've been doing all by myself so far. Previous attempts to get someone to help out were difficult, as the niche content was difficult to work with (e.g. imagine I talk about the leading edge and suddenly you see footage of the gear...). Anyway, I've been working with 'Josh' for some time now, and it seems to work really well. He is going to be shooting and editing Inside The Cockpits in the future, it's a learning process so if you see minor rough edges for a few episodes, just close that eagle eye of yours - but feel free to give constructive feedback :)
@stamfordly64632 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear this. I hope it allows you to justify filming trips further afield such as Cosford. If you are up in that area I am told that there is a private collector near Bridgnorth with a Harrier GR 3 that he likes to show off
@cannonfodder43762 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear, hopefully a good and fruitful partnership that frees up much more time for other things.
2 жыл бұрын
Nice that you get some help. He did a good job. Every youtuber should habe a Josh in their life. Of course Nigel would have been a more apropriate name for an aviation channel based in the UK, but you cant have eyerything :)
@Akm722 жыл бұрын
Good video but it's a shame you didn't get access to the back seat!
@xijinpingpong44262 жыл бұрын
It would be nice, if you could do a video about the NH90 disaster and maybe interview some soldiers who use this helicopter. It seems like most of the users already want to get rid of it, only a few years after it was bought.
@QuinchGaming2 жыл бұрын
My father was in the team that designed the wings for the Buccaneer. Story: He was called to inspect an early model as "the wings are rattling", very serious of course, MOD not happy at all (new plane, unhappy that design flaw found etc). After extensive investigations.. it turned out the pilot hit a mountain with a wing tip during low flying tests in Scotland.
@garnix63902 жыл бұрын
Speaks well of the plane, that it remained in the air after this hit.
@grizwoldphantasia50052 жыл бұрын
@@garnix6390 And the mountain, it gets no credit?
@anselmdanker95192 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣 so the pilot was not aware about the incident
@QuinchGaming2 жыл бұрын
@@anselmdanker9519 apparently the test pilot wasn't entirely aware no, he thought it was a stress failure as he heard the thump & felt the vibrations during a really low, tight banking turn. He'd caught the tip I was told. To me as a kid it was just the story of the RAF pilot who hit a mountain & didn't know 🤣
@anselmdanker95192 жыл бұрын
@@QuinchGaming thank you what a story- the Buccaneer was built like a battle ship 😄
@davange772 жыл бұрын
Spent many years on 208 sqn Buccaneers as a weapons engineer. Yes we used to fit Chaff in the air brakes secured by black tape after cleaning for better adhesion. This was later replaced by AN/ALE40 CHAFF AND FLARE DISPENSERS fitted at the rear holding 40 each if I recall . These were used during Beirut Buccs operation PULSATOR as well as during my time at Lossiemouth .
@adriangray79792 жыл бұрын
I made the arrester hook arm, the long section of the flight refuelling probe and the bomb door hinges when I worked at Brough. It was an amazing aircraft, your video did it proud!
@MartinHopkinson9 ай бұрын
I’m a bit late in commenting but I just wanted to say what an excellent video this is. It was 30 years, almost to the day (18 Apr 1994), that I flew the very last RAF Buccaneer, so the cockpit tour, in particular, was a great trip down memory lane. (Just one error - the highlighted ‘wing fold mechanism lever’ is actually the oxygen on/off switch.) That aeroplane also makes me smile. I flew it in Op Granby (not ‘Desert Storm’, thank you!) on my longest mission: 5 hours and 30 minutes. And, when we got to the target, it had already been destroyed! Fog of war, as they say!
@greggron Жыл бұрын
Speaking with an ex-RAF Squadron Leader last evening, Buccaneer pilots made very good use of its ground effect characteristics. When properly trimmed it would fly comfortably hands-off at an altitude of 29ft (8.84m).
@britblue2 жыл бұрын
I may possibly be dreaming this - but i think i remember stories of Buccaneers at Red Flag exercises, where the Yanks scoffed at these "old" planes when they first appeared there - but never got a "kill" with their shiney new kit in all the combat missions flown against them!
@RetroGamesCollector2 жыл бұрын
Sounds about right. All the gear and no idea. 😉
@clacicle2 жыл бұрын
I think I heard a story of this on Aircrew Interview.
@timgray52312 жыл бұрын
Rumour has it on approach they increased altitude to clear the perimeter fence on the first strike. No radar locks on the aircraft and resorted to Mk1 eyeball for air defence.
@babboon57642 жыл бұрын
@@RetroGamesCollector Not really. The cousins are very professional flyers. But, like the Vulcan simulated raids before that, they hadn't really appreciated what high-speed low level antics the Buc crews were capable of and they hadn't got a prepared strategy. (IF the US Airforce has a fault its that it does like 'plug & play' pre-prepared strategies (which they can implement extremely smoothly).
@gusty90532 жыл бұрын
No dream, saw it some documentary years ago, the Buccaneer was flying so low the american F15 s couldn't get a radar lock. When the buccaneer inverted to go over a ridge upside down at what was probably close to top speed they kind of gave up :)). The Buccaneer crews were used to map up attack runs that hugged the terrain so closely that any radar system was loosing them in the terrain "background noise".
@danieltaylor52312 жыл бұрын
Very nice video Chris. Especially love the bomb bay door opening sound effects!
@MilitaryAviationHistory2 жыл бұрын
My pleasure
@davidbarton74632 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the excellent walk around of this Buccaneer, I have a photo of this very aircraft taken in Bahrain during the 1st Gulf War, as well as other aircraft that took part in operation Granby which was the RAF name for our efforts during Desert Storm. Perhaps the artist hadn't finished it when I took it but the name Pauline wasn't present on the artwork or some of her clothes!.
@indigohammer57322 жыл бұрын
I have been fired from a Martin Baker ejector seat taken from a Buccaneer. I will say, it was a compressed air actuated version used for training. About forty years ago in George Square in Glasgow, there was a display from the Fleet Air Arm, who brought the forward section of a Buccaneer to view and an Ejector seat on an angled rail which you could be fired up. Lots of fun for an eleven year old boy!
@PaulP9992 жыл бұрын
Can we just take a moment to applaud Josh for his steady clear camera work and his agility in following you round.
@tmussOfficial2 жыл бұрын
Brings back memories of my time on 237 ocu at Raf Honnington on the flight line
@RetroGamesCollector2 жыл бұрын
The Buccaneer was so far ahead of it's time when it first flew in the late 50s. Great video and well done in doing it in one take!
@HeliophobicRiverman2 жыл бұрын
"Before I do that though, let me just take that stick in the hand ... and just enjoy the moment a little bit." You dirty boy, you 😉
@detritus232 жыл бұрын
The Buccaneer appears to like both stout and single-malt.
@csoanes012 жыл бұрын
Excellent video as always, just a couple of notes: the specs in the buccaneer, unlike the phantom, weren’t fitted with reheat. Yes, reheat - only septics call it an ‘afterburner’
@michaelchevalier98592 жыл бұрын
I was stationed at Quonset Point Naval Air Station in 1969 and found one of these on the flight line. A very impressive aircraft.
@tonyhaynes90802 жыл бұрын
So many stories abound about the Buccaneer, you never know true from false. However, based at Holbeach Range we had a flight of four Buccaneers call up for a first run attack as they had weapons onboard and couldn't land in the UK with them. The controller said to the American RSO (from the 48th TFW at Lakenheath,) 'This will be interesting'. As they pulled up over the sea wall, calming calling in hot, the RSO was just lifting his jaw up off the floor. He was totally gobsmacked at the skill that they were displaying.
@monstrok2 жыл бұрын
So happy to see this video! Truly an unsung hero in the first Gulf War. A better explanation of the variable Center of Gravity (CG), with multiple fuel tanks and associated pumps, is that it optimizes the weight and balance of the aircraft for stable trimmed flight in the longitudinal axis. EG: it makes the a/c easier to fly with fewer trim and control inputs without putting the aircraft out of its limits.
@TDOBrandano2 жыл бұрын
As far as I know, keeping the engine spooled up and managing the speed with airbrakes is common on naval jets, because it is quicker to retract the airbrakes than to spool up the engine in a go around. It's true that on planes like the F4 or the Buccaneer you need to keep airflow to the blown flaps, but the technique is also used on the Fouga Magister, that I don't think was equipped with them.
@20chocsaday2 жыл бұрын
There is a site where former pilots talk about the planes they used to fly. A US pilot said about the F4 that the Spey engines that the British used did not spool up so quickly as those he had flown. Bad for carrier landings. I also heard on a similar site that the Spey engines were more fuel efficient. It made me guess that they had a higher bypass ratio.
@wbertie26042 жыл бұрын
They considered having a longer wing span, but realised it would just catch on the ground when banking at the standard operating altutude, so didn't fit it.
@RichardSekmistrz2 жыл бұрын
I have always lovvvved the profile view of this bird. Ever since the 70s/80s when I was a kid.
@zenzen91312 жыл бұрын
Designed using the principle of "area rule" like the Thunderchief, which made it more efficient in the transonic speed range.
@FrankWilkinson-ig6co2 ай бұрын
@RichardSekmistrz Can we use the grown up description, it's an aeroplane, not a bird!, a bird has feathers.
@spacedock8732 жыл бұрын
My dad worked as a Buccaneer dorsal fitter at HS Brough when he left the army in '69. I remember once being in an RAF recruiting office and seeing a video of a Buccaneer diverting into Gibraltar with an engine problem. Having since flown into Gib I think that was a very brave decision! I saw these aircraft at air displays many times when I was young and always loved the rugged look. There are many stories about Buccaneers amazing opposition military units during exercises! I spoke to a Buccaneer pilot at one airshow who told me that the aircraft was a bit of a pig to fly until you got it above 300kt at which point it was lovely to fly and like it was on rails. He also told me that if you lost an engine (and with it the blown wing on that side) it flew like a brick! Thanks for the tour of this amazing aircraft 👍😁
@grahamstanley73119 ай бұрын
I was listening in on a test flight (as the ground based avionics guy) when over the North Sea at low altitude the test pilot pulled high G. (Can't remember if it was 4 or 5). The port engine failed.... Half of it was missing when it got back to Bitteswell, the BAe airfield it was refurbished at. The climb on one engine was approximately 1000ft a second. Despite a related failure of his main navigation stuff, he flew back and land easily.
@mattheweagles51232 жыл бұрын
Not far from RAF Lossiemouth, where quite a lot of these Bucks were based, there is a petrol station with one parked on the forecourt.
@firefox31872 жыл бұрын
Take off check list: Throttle Full V1 rotate Guy in black has altitude nosebleed ? Raise Gear Descend to cruise/sheep sheering altitude Start ‘show the tornado how it’s done!’ Mix tape
@irvan36mm2 жыл бұрын
28:36 Weapon Select dial indicated in the lower left of the box with a position marked “NUCLEAR”
@rockstarJDP2 жыл бұрын
Man I choked on my cuppa at the Quick Erection comment, but Voodoo Machines and LuftWaffles caught me off guard a second and third time - well played good sir 👏
@Hockernant2 жыл бұрын
That is a very nice Buccaneer, I've been to see it myself
@RoaroftheTiger2 жыл бұрын
Funny how the "Nose Art" is NEVER addressed. Morale is paramount for Any Mission. 😉
@Nalarnixos2 жыл бұрын
Chaff stuffed behind the speedbreak, I heard that in Dave Morgans account flying the FRS1 Sea Harrier when attacking Port Stanley during the Falklands War. The Harriers did not have much for self protection except for a simple RWR, so this was the least they could do to protect the aircraft from being shot down. The Argentines did have some sophisticated kit like Roland and Swiss Fledermaus radar, so there was a realistic scenario of shooting down Harriers with SAMs.
@desert_jin62812 жыл бұрын
30:07 - I will behave against my better wishes but I am still giggling 😁
@rays.57642 жыл бұрын
Can't wait to see you do the A6 intruder.
@faeembrugh2 жыл бұрын
A great aircraft and amazingly effective at its job even up to its retirement from service.
@fenman19542 жыл бұрын
My favourite RAF aircraft, I was lucky enough to be attached to 12 squadron when they flew these in the 1970s .
@davidmuir6849 Жыл бұрын
Fantastic review of the Buccaneer. I worked on the Buccs in the 80s at Raf Lossiemouth on 237 ocu . I’m going to be making a vr simulator using a real buccaneer aircraft 😀 Regards Dave from Scotland
@davidmuir6849 Жыл бұрын
By the way How do I get the buccaneer for war thunder do I pay for the model ?
@RallyAddict5552 жыл бұрын
There used to be one of these parked outside a petrol station near RAF Lossiemouth , was always cool to see it but sadly it got moved someplace else recently
@20chocsaday2 жыл бұрын
They had to keep the petrol somewhere till they got a hole dug.
@cannonfodder43762 жыл бұрын
Ah the Buccaneer, the one Blackburn product that worked and did very well. Ugly as sin but very serviceable. Another excellent video Chris and well done on doing that walkaround in a single take.
@cellokid5104 Жыл бұрын
Very ugly
@stephenlewis91592 жыл бұрын
Well done on that cockpit, possibly the most complicated you have had to describe. No wonder you did the audio later with the manuals at hand. ;-) Thanks to Hendon. Now possibly a walk around IWM Duxford?
@christopherfinn79862 жыл бұрын
To answer Babalonkie's question, the chaff dispensers were fitted on the inboard sides of the outboard wing pylons. The flare dispenser was in the holdback (redundant on land-based aircraft) compartment, just forward of the airbrakes and underneath the rear fuselage.
@bonzomcdrumcat4989 Жыл бұрын
I sat in the cockpit of this exact aircraft a few days ago, very comfortable seat for a warplane
@GSteel-rh9iu2 жыл бұрын
Looking good; nice work Chris and Josh!
@tomo870 Жыл бұрын
Op Granby for us Brits mate, Desert Storm was U.S. 😎
@neilbone94904 ай бұрын
Would have been good to have had a tour of the Navigator’s office. Although I appreciate that that maybe out of your control and down to the museum. Other than that another excellent video Chris.
@ch940862 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much for a fantastic guided tour of historic aircraft. Please keep this up. When you describe drop tanks etc. It would be great to know the extended range and maybe time in holding pattern for the tank.
@tendymusic90952 жыл бұрын
Bis the best war thunder ad you could give is the clip of you singing with bo
@Spifftron2 жыл бұрын
Nice video, neat stuff to know, but I never actually flew the S2B. However, I got very interested when Chris made the walkaround down the right side at about 13 minutes, as I do have a whole grunch of time in 553, flying wx recon out of KBIX in Biloxi for several years.
@lesgl2 жыл бұрын
A great Aircraft...West Germany came pretty close to ordering the plane back in the day for the Marine Flieger but got the Starfighter instead..
@shermansquires39792 жыл бұрын
Blackburn... they made so many bad aircraft, I'm amazed they survived all those years, to finally come up with the legend of the Buccaneer! what a weapon!
@ibluap2 жыл бұрын
Another first for the Bucc: its sight was intended to be fed with info about the basic fligh and target info, hence becoming the first HUD in history.-
@jackharrison67712 жыл бұрын
Another very interesting and easy to follow video, as with the F4 Phantom. 10/10
@Sagefrog-z1k2 жыл бұрын
Honestly it would be really cool to see an inside the cockpit on a fitter, Su-17M4 or Su-22M4 would be great, thanks for making videos that are both informative and entertaining :D
@johnduncan8844 Жыл бұрын
My dad was one the Blue Parrot development engineers with Ferranti in Edinburgh for 30 plus years. It was a formidable aircraft, and took 'low level' to the max. The pilots wanted my dad to take the terrain clearance to 2 metres, he politely declined and set it to 10 metres, he wanted them to survive. The Buccaneer pilots would invert before cresting to hill so they could pull positive G and not 'pop up', scary stuff.
@grizwoldphantasia50052 жыл бұрын
Interesting to see the ground refueling control panel. Do any other planes have that? I would have guessed there's just the fuel line hookup and never thought that there should be some way to tell how much fuel is onboard. And what is in that huge long tailcone? Only thing missing was inside the rear cockpit. Other points of interest could be a detailed look at the wing folding halves, and inside the landing gear bays. But darned good to have you back!
@paulqueripel34932 жыл бұрын
i don't know if you asked before he mentioned it, but the long tail cone splits open as the airbrake.
@grizwoldphantasia50052 жыл бұрын
@@paulqueripel3493 Looking at it closed, I can't tell how big they brakes actually are; it looked to me like it was just 1/3 or 1/4 of the length. I've never seen any other airbrakes as big as that entire tail cone. Maybe it's just the camera angle makes it look big...
@20chocsaday2 жыл бұрын
@@grizwoldphantasia5005 It is big and once at an airshow I saw one being opened in flight.
@grizwoldphantasia50052 жыл бұрын
@@20chocsaday I finally image searched and by golly you are right! I wonder why they wanted such a big one -- maybe it helped on carrier landings, but trying to land with it open looks like a disaster, and I doubt it opened fast enough to matter once the plane caught the cable.
@gusty90532 жыл бұрын
@@grizwoldphantasia5005 It was a size saving measure to make it fit on the british carrier elevators. The initial requirement made it impossible to fit all the capability in the specified frame so the designers "cheated". The nose cone flips backwards or rather sideways and the tail cone flips open to shorten the plane. My guess is they decided to do something useful with that split tail and designed it to work as a tail air break. If you give a search on you tube for an older documentary on the buccaneer is covered in that.
@jeffreyskoritowski41142 жыл бұрын
Fleet Air Arm: May we have A6 Intruder please? Parliament: You already have an Intruder at home. A6 Intruder at home.
@Quadrant142 жыл бұрын
The Intruder was a magic aircraft, you cannot compare a Buc with the A-6
@Alex-cw3rz2 жыл бұрын
I don't know about Buccaneers but Executive Outcomes would put chaff in the air brakes of the Mig-23's they used in Angola as you say just when they pulled up after a bombing run it would be opened.
@rocketman482 жыл бұрын
chris happy new year i love your videos.Bill in Ireland
@JohnnyBoy-tw9mh2 жыл бұрын
I just have to visit that museum!
@JDWDMC2 жыл бұрын
Getting Chris to pronounce a "W" in English is like trying to get a Scotsman to say, "Purple Burglar Alarm."
@gordonclark76322 жыл бұрын
I watched the in cockpit description and I wondered how pilots were able to fly these type of airplanes with all the controls that had to be monitored. To a non pilot, it seems very confusing.
@kineticdeath2 жыл бұрын
I can totally understand the no gun loadout. What i find strange is these big planes which clearly are not built for air to air combat getting a sneaky fox-2 missile (aka sidewinder) or 2. Especially earlier planes where you had to maneuver behind your target to have any probability of the heat seeker seeking the heat and not just flying away without meaning. Almost seems like it would be more meaningfull to have something more like an AMRAAM or similar with the obvious requirement to fit some kind of radar for initial lock and launch purposes. Something to suppress and push away any approaching air threats
@Akm722 жыл бұрын
The Sidewinder was just there so you had something to shoot at an opportunity target popping up in front. I don't think they ever expected to outmaneuver a fighter that was aware that they were there.
@Finleymcg2 жыл бұрын
You're forgetting the psychological factor. The missiles make the pilot feel better and give them something to fire if they end up being bounced by a fighter.
@pgmetcalf2 жыл бұрын
I remember sitting in class one day about 1979-80 and one of these passed by around 40 metres away and about 10 metres above the houses. it made the windows rattle a little bit. They wouldn't be allowed to fly that low these days
@marcusott29732 жыл бұрын
The flying banana, carved from solid what a machine 💪
@throwback198412 жыл бұрын
11:30 tl;dr For all the Kerbal players out there, center of mass should be just slightly ahead of center of lift.
@throwback198412 жыл бұрын
I love how much of this aircraft folds up to fit the elevators in the old Ark Royal. Nosecone, wings, airbrakes (everything aft of the tailfin). Oh yes and the blown flaps to reduce landing speed. Amazing watching carrier landings with this thing, putting a fairly large piece of machinery on a teeny tiny deck about half the size of a US supercarrier. Doing cat/trap circuits in this thing was a hobby of mine in FSX/Prepar3d many moons ago. Always very satisfying, actually relatively easy to land on a carrier (at least compared to the phantom)
@vandor19762 жыл бұрын
I loved the celebration
@gojuancamilo1022 жыл бұрын
Great video as allways. It would be very interesting if you could make an inside the cockpit of a german alpha jet!
@rogerramgoolam693911 ай бұрын
Fantastic nose art as well
@frostedbutts434010 ай бұрын
If you look up photos some lad did matching pinups for the whole squadron, pretty cool.
2 жыл бұрын
Nice Video. Very interesting. I like the Plane and the Name. When I was a kid my Father had a book with priat stories from the Caribean. And of course quite a few of those guys were Bucccaneers. But I am surprised that Chris does play Targets in War Thunder.
@mensch10662 жыл бұрын
As someone who was not familiar with this plane before Chris filmed this and gave a live tour of the museum as well, I actually really appreciated the War Thunder footage. My first reaction to this plane when I saw Chris' live stream was that the plane was butt ugly. It is painted an unappealing brown color and the wings are folded. I am not criticizing the museum's choice to keep the plane in its Desert Storm "camo", and I totally understand folding the wings for space related reasons. But the plane made a very poor first impression on me. The War Thunder footage with a more generic RAF paint scheme really shows this plane off in ways that are honestly quite appealing looking.
@timgray52312 жыл бұрын
Ah, when buying a house always look beyond the Decore, focus on form and finish 🙂
@MattJones675GR92 жыл бұрын
Can you please do the Harrier GR7 / 9 ? There's one on display at the Fleet air arm museum in Yeovilton
@xvdd12 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video, I have noticed that you are referring to hydraulic systems as hydraulical and although you have the word electrical when referring to electric systems that does not apply to hydraulics the plural is just that hydraulics.
@kilianortmann99792 жыл бұрын
It's almost inconceivable how the Buccaneers could operate from the smaller British carriers, especially HMS Hermes.
@jeffreyskoritowski41142 жыл бұрын
The RN made the Phantom work. Kinda
@kilianortmann99792 жыл бұрын
@@jeffreyskoritowski4114 And the Sea Vixen, with an even larger wingspan. There is a video with Scimitars and Sea Vixen landing on Hermes here on KZbin, it looks absolutely crazy compared to an F/A-18 landing on a super carrier.
@Quadrant142 жыл бұрын
How about the huge Sea Vixen on say HMS Victorius, smaller still!
@Akm722 жыл бұрын
The blown flaps and powerful turbofans had a lot to do with it. The Mk.1 version had turbojets but struggled to operate safely.
@hongshi82512 жыл бұрын
Always very interesting, thank you. I anything, I would ask how the deicing system worked. Heated leading edge, glycol, or another system?
@grahamstanley73119 ай бұрын
The leading edges were blow from the engine, and the compressed air was quite hot. No chemical required.
@backwashjoe78642 жыл бұрын
Where in the museum is this Buccaneer? I was at the London museum in September and somehow missed this room / plane.
@MilitaryAviationHistory2 жыл бұрын
It’s the hangar next to the restaurant bldg.
@backwashjoe78642 жыл бұрын
@@MilitaryAviationHistory ah dang! Looking at the map again, and that is the hanger that we missed! Did Hangers 1 and 2, then lunch (interrupted by a fire in the kitchen!), then 3 to 5. Just overlooked hanger 6 (and was out of time anyway)! A reason to go back. Also, thanks for these videos. An earlier one is how I heard of this RAF museum and the reason that we added it to our London itinerary. It was so freakin' awesome!!
@americanpatriot24222 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@ianbell56112 жыл бұрын
Thank you great video.
@michaelmaybury2102 жыл бұрын
What's the gauges under the clear cover on the nose where Pauline is written?
@mickregan26202 жыл бұрын
Main and Standby brake accumulator pressure gauges, so the pilot can check before he climbs onboard.
@michaelmaybury2102 жыл бұрын
Now that's something I would have never thought of but it makes sense now thanks
@alexis_ian2 жыл бұрын
Hot take: But this is what the Marineflieger should have bought instead of the Lockheed F-104G Starfighter not saying the F-104G is bad fighter rather it was design to be a fighter-interceptor and could have been used as a "stop-gap" while waiting for the F-4 Phantom II to become available for the Luftwaffe (Post-WW2). The Buccaneer is better suited as naval strike fighter until the arrival of the Panavia Tornado IDS!
@johnnunn86882 жыл бұрын
Not sure if it had nose wheel steering; I though it was done with the foot brakes 🤷♂️.
@dahutful2 жыл бұрын
If aircraft can be ugly, the Buccaneer is in the club. Still very interesting that it was developed in response to Russia building warships. Instead of building ships of their own to combat the threat - they built a plane to go after them. you the man Cris!
@doraldeddy18362 жыл бұрын
Great vid young man. Thoroughly enjoyed. It’s probably a “Flying myth” but was it said that the Buccaneer reached operational altitude when it retracted its undercarriage ?
@DCS_World_Japan2 жыл бұрын
The weathering on that paintjob looks more like a scale model than a real aircraft. Is that really natural weathering or did the museum add artificial weathering to make it more interesting to look at? I've seen lots of dirty aircraft but never such uniform dirt specifically around panel lines and nowhere else.
@davidribeiro10642 жыл бұрын
I think this might be desert camo.
@mickregan26202 жыл бұрын
The desert camo scheme for Desert Storm was supposed to be temporary, so it wore off quiet easily. Also, the Bucc had a habit of venting hydraulic fluid, which is a pretty good paint stripper. That’s why the belly of the aircraft always looked dirty, typically on the right hand side of the bomb bay door.
@notmenotme6142 жыл бұрын
0:55 People who knowingly walk into the frame of someone filming are the bottom of the barrel pondlife. The decent thing to do would be walking behind the cameraman. It’s not hard.
@guidor.41612 жыл бұрын
I believe you can call those ailerons with "flap function" flaperons...
@petecollis44192 жыл бұрын
No, they are drooping ailerons Flaperons are flaps and ailerons combined
@chuckygobyebye2 жыл бұрын
Pegged the one-shot performance about a minute before it was mentioned. Is this a one-off stunt or are we to expect this as the new standard?
@leipajuusto29642 жыл бұрын
Could you do mig 21 or draken?
@PeteCourtier2 жыл бұрын
I think he already has a video on a Finnish Mig-21
@keithhawkins79072 жыл бұрын
@@PeteCourtier The draken has an interesting history to it, so yes it would be good if he did a documentary on it.
@SteeGrav2 жыл бұрын
The Buccaneer is a descendant of the Mosquito. It's a fast bomber..
@Lorenzo-fm6wp2 жыл бұрын
The Brits just maked the complex airplane ever i just wonder how was like to work on the maintance team there😂
@williampaz20922 жыл бұрын
Why were these Strike Fighters retired? My research shows that they were STIIL effective when retired and capable of upgrading.
@johnfrewin77172 жыл бұрын
Really sorry about my language ( your English is great by the way...) but “hydraulic” is irregular ( because of course it is....) so the systems are “ hydraulic systems “ rather than “ hydraulical” , sorry to seem picky but I can see how much you care about this stuff 👍
@MilitaryAviationHistory2 жыл бұрын
Danke!
@dicktiionary2 жыл бұрын
Yup, English eh. The plane has an electrical system but not a hydraulical system.
@GSteel-rh9iu2 жыл бұрын
so fussy!
@20chocsaday2 жыл бұрын
My native language is English so I just say, "Hydraulics".
@thebigone69692 жыл бұрын
You da best of the best Chris!!! Save some of those bodacious babes for the rest of us!!!!!
@neilcam2 жыл бұрын
I believe the Canberra bomber also had a rotary bomb bay.
@petecollis44192 жыл бұрын
The US built ones did; as did the F-105
@davidmeek80172 жыл бұрын
Aloha; well done sir! Mahalo
@hlynnkeith93342 жыл бұрын
Chris, Have you done 'Inside the cockpit' in a rotary wing aircraft? Will you?
@MultiZirkon2 жыл бұрын
"As I pass the nuke here..." as blasé as only Chris can be....
@_bernat91322 жыл бұрын
this plane goes hard feel free to screenshot
@darriusdias2 жыл бұрын
30:10 🍆😉
@HeidiLandRover2 ай бұрын
Love the Bucc - they look much better in FAA livery though ;-)
@Nipplator999999999992 жыл бұрын
Looks like Miss Pauline had some wardrobe additions when she was added to the collection. A couple pieces of her lingerie are slightly different than the rest.
@davidbarton74632 жыл бұрын
Don't worry I have a photo of the original artwork on this aircraft taken during the war along with a Tornado with Snoopy Airways and a Tornado with Garfield artwork. Interesting times.
@Nipplator999999999992 жыл бұрын
@@davidbarton7463 I have to ask, was I close with my educated guess?
@davidbarton74632 жыл бұрын
@@Nipplator99999999999 Yes indeed, guess they sanitised it for public consumption.
@Backwardlooking Жыл бұрын
A terrific British aeroplane.
@matthewolivier28832 жыл бұрын
Why do you never mention that a particular aircraft type saw service with the South African air force 😂