you have helped this struggling uni student so much this semester. thank you so much
@guillaumenikitits1653 жыл бұрын
I disagree
@inchbyinch49853 жыл бұрын
@@guillaumenikitits165 nothing to disagree about
@rafsans_frame3 жыл бұрын
This guy knws the core of maths
@kanhaikumar33736 жыл бұрын
Fabulous tutorials
@wesleysantoso65004 жыл бұрын
Hai Mr. Woo, I have watched every video regarding this topic, but I'm still confused about the concept of Integration by parts. As far as I know, we integrate a function by the reason of getting its original function. However, if that's the case, why is the subject that we want to find is the integration of u*dv, not u*v as its original function? Thank You for your concern :)
@Mel-oc7pi3 жыл бұрын
hi! don't know whether you are still confused a year later but to answer your question (as i was confused too!) it's because we define parts of the function as u and dv, we take each part of a function and call them u and dv. for example for y=xcos(x) we say u=x and dv=cos(x) so the function y is now u*dv (then when integrating, that's why we find the integral of u*dv) hope it helps
@jeffthevomitguy1178 Жыл бұрын
It’s because it’s important that one of the functions is an anti derivative of another function to make it easier to write as a part of another integral.
@asgovindarajan55973 жыл бұрын
For the integral of product of 2 functions (say f(x) & g(x) or simply f & g ), why can't we say $ (f•g) = f•($g ) - $ [ ($g) • f' ] ??? (here the $ Symbol is integral Symbol)
@asgovindarajan55973 жыл бұрын
@@randomguyontheinternet_69 ohh okay! Thanks for clarifying! It's just better to use the Asian one😃 as it's effortless
@asgovindarajan55973 жыл бұрын
@@randomguyontheinternet_69 😂
@isobar58575 жыл бұрын
Why don't you show this method with a definite integral and thus show the ambiguity in the uv term,i.e, where's the integral sign for this?
@billakhurst14687 жыл бұрын
hello Eddie Woo. Was wondering if you provide 1:1 private tutoring.cost not an option