Interior. Leather Bar. | Trailer US (2014) James Franco

Darsteller / cast: Val Lauren , Christian Patrick , James Franco
Genre: drama
Regie / directed by: James Franco , Travis Mathews
Kinostart Deutschland: 17. Oktober 2013
Kinostart USA: January 2nd, 2014
offizielle Filmsite:
Verwendung mit freundlicher Genehmigung von
used with authorization
/ moviemaniacsde

[@TheProdigyJin]

Not gonna watch this but I respect Franco for this!

[@liamarunbennett8282]

i hear mark kermode's voice "it's NOT terrible"

[@JJJackson777]

So he was trying to recreate missing scenes from Cruising deemed too pornographic in the 80s and still is now?

[@agoroyagoroy517]

What's Franco's character in the movie

[@romn23]

Ok gonna have to watch this 3 times to understand...

[@stephie-jaxx3216]

Im sad that i didnt really understand this i may have to try again but we'll see

[@deathlarsen7502]

Figures James Franco

[@CallemJay_McNeill]

I've had this simpering crush on James Franco for years, and I'd love to come face to face with him in a gay leather bar. Even if he were just to be the type to enjoy watching.

[@therealtalk2591]

Wow got a lot of questions on this: So is James Franco gay or Bi? Asking because he essentially wants to make a gay porno film ( This is what it is, he stated he wanted to show gay sex because it’s not really shown in movies and re-create the gay bar sex scene from the Al Pacino film the Cruising that really didn’t show gay sex and actually put it in) So the question is he gay or not actually has merit because why would he care to make this as a straight man and if he only has gay tendencies meaning he likes men just not going far enough to sex. Then shouldn’t an actual gay man direct this if it’s meant to show the intimacy between gay men or for gay sex not to be looked so down upon? I don’t know but my gut feeling is he is doing this for attention because he hasn’t had many acting gigs in the past few years. And because of the social justice movement and how the left praises this kind of thing. I truly believe he wanted to get the attention of some big wigs in Hollywood by saying “ Look I’m cool with gay people and not the stereotypical straight white man, see look I made a gay porno film to show how liberal I am…Please give me a role…I’m starving over here” That is what he did because this is just a gay porno with a little better acting. It doesn’t tell really any kind of story about the struggles of gay men or have any story line in general other than raunchy gay sex scenes.He complains about the Al Pacino film not really showing gay sex but that truly wasn’t what the movie was about. It was about a serial killer who was closeted going after gay men and killing them and showed some of the struggles gay men were going through at that time especially in the late 70’s and early 80’s were being gay was truly looked down upon. And you had to hide your sexuality because at that time you really could be targeted and lose your family and job over and even sometimes worse by being beaten and killed for it. So Franco lost the plot on this one because all he focused on was just complaining that gay sex wasn’t shown. And instead of making a movie about gay men with intimacy in it ( Meaning real love and being passionate for one another) he just makes a gay raunchy porno. This is what happens when someone virtue signals! They talk a lot about shit that they don’t understand or have ever gone through ( Kinda like Munchausen Syndrome by proxy where you don’t actually want to have to live through a horrible situation or struggle but you want the attention and sympathy so you use other people’s real pain and hardships for your own benefit Without ever having to go through it yourself) I seriously can’t stand these kind of people. I swear these are the kind of people if anything bad were to happen they would just break because they are truly weak people. So James leave it to an actual gay man to tell the story or at least ask one and actually make a story instead of a porno.

[@schizophrenic_AI]

You're overthinking it. He's just your average hollywood predator with Epstein-esque tastes and tendencies. He used the fact that the petty-bourgeois Colbert-class of progressive "intellectuals" can't distinguish fact from fiction. He's a rich coddled midwit who leaned into the transgressive-as-progressive accolades from a dimwitted public. Like every single hollywood A-lister who pushed the boundaries of consent (or the age there of) he realized that most of the "liberal" art world is filled with sycophantic enablers or their brain dead admirers. Name all of the top pdf files and predators in hollywood and then take a pen and cross off the names of those that didn't mimic the standard progressive socio-political ethos of the MSNBC-educated class; in other words add up everyone involved and then subtract 0. But don't fret over the fate of his adult victims. I mean, "victim" is a strong word; they wanted a taste of fame and he gave it to them.