Interpretation of Tongues | The Science | Kirby de Lanerolle (2023)

[@glyndarandall7537]

The Holy Spirit then prays and intercedes perfectly through us ,

[@jasonjohnson905]

Intelligent church Intelligent leaders Thank you WOW

[@christopherdayalan]

Yes tongue is the most higher frequency of above human mind and understanding. Realm of Tonga brings Wisdom ability and Knowledge. (Reade - Exodus 31:2-5) Bleeing word WOW. Love you Brother Kirby Your understanding of Christ is another leave.

[@sunnyvarghese2179]

Wow...awesome Prophet for bringing in the proven knowledge of science into spirituality ❤❤❤Love & blessings upon your life always !!!

[@KathyPianoHarp]

We're finally seeing more science behind speaking in tongues! Thank you, Kirby, for bringing this out. Can't wait for your live teaching on INTERPRETATION of tongues. ❤ This will spur more research on the science of tongues, interpretation, and prophecy.

[@bENNYeBENEZER]

My dear Even jESUS Christ would ask those He healed to go get tested, by the approved Physicians of His day-the Priests("...show yourselves to the Priest...") Secondly, Kirby is not saying we interprete tongues with our heads or science; he's simply showing us that science has proven how beneficial this beautiful gift, is I trust that u can now see how much on the same page, u both, are!❤

[@AndSarahAppeared]

Thanks pastor Kirby 🎉

[@djjsfidget1838]

I am going to speak in tongues more now for a job it really helped me

[@JenniferStormyWeather]

Yes so good!

[@lornajoelson]

Excellent!!

[@saraha3909]

Quality video

[@loyaltytothethrone]

This is awesome

[@New-LifeChurch]

🔥🔥🔥

[@benjohnstonmentoring]

So good prophet

[@DominicIsaiah]

Wow amazing, more on the topic of speaking in tonuges dear man of God!

[@kalasinilelin]

This was great. Thank you ❤

[@jessypriyanka4739]

That’s awesome…..wow!

[@benantone1439]

Hallelujah

[@sunnyvarghese2179]

Thank you wow ❤

[@monanaranje3265]

Woww, So helpful.. thank you Kirby..

[@PastorAlexJamesOffical]

So good

[@drsadie]

Great teaching. Love how you did a mix of science and theology. Especially enjoying about anxiety and burdens. You mentioned about a prayer list. What video is that in?

[@gladiesang-nz3fn]

Where can I get the full recording?

[@vivitan2872]

what about going to manifestations? is that possible.

[@djjsfidget1838]

How do I get the teaching on meditatiin

[@WorksOfWonder]

Hi you can access it here www.kirbydelanerolle.com/neuroscienceofmeditation

[@jenniferpietersz8776]

Interpretation of tongues is another gift of the Holy Spirit and science should not be involved in this. The Holy Spirit needs to give you the Interpretation of the message. If it is done by any other way the message is not from God.

[@kavikv.d.hexenholtz3474]

There is absolutely nothing mysterious about Biblical "tongues" - and there is only one type - when referring to something spoken, they are nothing more than real, rational language(s); usually, but not always, unknown to those listening to them, but always known by the speaker(s) - it’s their native language (in some cases, it is a language the speaker has learned). The “tongues” Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians are producing today is an entirely self-created phenomenon. It is non-cognitive non-language utterance; random free vocalization based upon a subset of the existing underlying sounds (called phonemes) of the speaker’s native language, and any other language(s) the speaker may be familiar with or have had contact with. It is, in part, typically characterized by repetitive syllables, plays on sound patterns, alliteration, assonance, and over-simplification of syllable structure. It is also interesting to note that any and all phonological rules (rules governing how sounds are put together in a given language - what is allowed and what is disallowed) governing a speaker's native language, will _also_ govern their tongues-speech. Further, this subset of phonemes mentioned above typically contains only those sounds which are easiest to produce physiologically. Occasionally some speakers will use two or more subsets of phonemes to generate glossolalia, producing what, to them, sounds like two (or more) distinct “tongues languages”, thus claiming to be able to speak in “divers tongues”. There is absolutely _nothing_ that “tongues-speakers” are producing that cannot be explained in relatively simple linguistic terms. _Nowhere_ in the Bible is modern tongues-speech advocated or evidenced. ‘Tongues’ (read, *‘languages’* ) - the divine gift, is the God given ability to effortlessly learn to speak and be understood through real-language barriers. It is not xenoglossy, nor is it the self-created non-cognitive non-language utterance of modern tongues-speech. “Interpretation of tongues”, which goes hand-in-hand with ‘speaking in tongues’, may also be said to be a self-created phenomenon. Interpretation is a ‘spiritual improv’ of sorts, inspired by one’s deep faith and beliefs. What do I mean by this? Well…. Interpretations are typically characterized by being inordinately longer than the actual glossic utterance, rather generic and non-specific in nature, and perhaps not surprisingly, open to multiple non-related ‘interpretations’. In other words, have ten interpreters listen to a glossic string and you’ll get ten different (typically unrelated) “interpretations”. In ‘tongues’, ‘The big brown dog is slow’, can also be ‘The small white cat is quick’. These latter two characteristics (‘generic-ness’ and multiple interpretations) do not suggest anything that is divinely inspired. It fails even the most basic tests and criteria that define ‘communication’ itself. A common come-back to the multiple interpretation issue is that God/the Holy Spirit gives different interpretations to different people. As one writer put it rather succinctly, “Pentecostal Darwinism does not exist - there’s no mutation or transformation of one message into several for the sake of justifying what is an obvious discrepancy. If this were the case, it would completely eradicate the need for ‘tongues’ in the first place”. I'm not doubting or questioning the 'tongues experience'; glossolalia as the spiritual tool that it is, can be very powerful and, for many people, the experience is profound. Both the spiritual and physical benefits of using this tool are also well documented. Again though, it is important to note that this same statement can be made for virtually _any_ other culture that practices glossolalia. Religious and cultural differences aside, the glossolalia an Evenki Shaman in Siberia, a vodoun priestess in Togo and a Christian tongues-speaker in Alabama are producing are in no way different from each other. They’re all producing their glossolalia in the exact same way; they just have different explanations and beliefs as to why they’re doing it, and where it comes from. It is only in certain Christian denominations where is it construed as something it never was.

[@ballislife515]

No one read your copy and paste buddy. Your pride has got you mad. You’ve and thousands have had that view but have never been open to the experience. So stop the talking to seem more knowledgeable it only puffs you up.

[@fightsatan2408]

You are ignorant , but man you can write comments like essays

[@kavikv.d.hexenholtz3474]

@@fightsatan2408 And on what do you think me ignorant? What about what certain Christians are producing today and calling "tongues" do you think is accurate?

[@fightsatan2408]

@@kavikv.d.hexenholtz3474 because you said there is only 1 type of tongues.... Made it clear you dont know your bible

[@kavikv.d.hexenholtz3474]

@@fightsatan2408 It’s pretty straightforward - when referring to something spoken, the word “tongue(s)” in the Bible refer to real, rational language(s). The modern distinction of “two types” (private and public), or in some cases four are distinguished (two private, two public), is a modern construct - the direct result of the Pentecostal redefinition of ‘tongues’ in the early 1900’s in order to fit the modern phenomenon. It is a way for them to skirt around what would otherwise (for them) be a phenomenal discrepancy between the language(s) of Acts and Corinthians. Nowhere in the Bible is such a distinction referenced as tongue(s) is all one and the same - real, rational language(s).