Introducing KODAK VISION3 500T Color Negative Film 5219/7219

Welcome to the next step in the evolution of motion picture film: KODAK VISION3 500T Color Negative Film 5219/7219. The first in a new family of films, VISION3 500T Film gives you more control and flexibility at every phase of the filmmaking process-from capture through post, in both digital and traditional workflows. VISION3 500T Film retains the overall look and image structure you've come to love in KODAK VISION2 Films-then adds a host of improvements. Our proprietary advanced Dye Layering Technology (DLT) gives you noticeably reduced grain in shadows, so you can push the boundaries of exposure further and still get excellent results. And when scanning low-light scenes, VISION3 500T Film yields higher signal-to-noise ratios for unprecedented image quality. What's more, VISION3 500T Film's extended highlight latitude gives you greater flexibility when lighting extreme situations, and lets you pull even more detail out of highlights. Whether you're behind the camera or in the postproduction suite, you can bring your project to life as never before. KODAK VISION3 500T Color Negative Film. Your vision is continually evolving. Ours is, too.
Product Information:
motion.kodak.co...
Purchase Online (US only):
store.kodak.com...

[@sixpooltube]

Kodak, please keep film alive!

[@Rebassed]

***** You dont know shit

[@SMGJohn]

Rebassed I do not want to know about your shit either, please keep such repulsive kindergarten thoughts to yourself tiny person.

[@Rebassed]

Yeah you dont know shit if you think you can emulate the ''film'' look with digital.

[@tallaganda83]

I believe that Digital is superior at this point in most regards, and even the ones it is not such as DR, that can be fixed and outdone using digital blending techniques, in saying this being superior is not the be all and end all of life, film cameras are really fun to shoot, and if it gets people out in the real world shooting, instead of just on the internet all day researching the next new technology then this is a good thing. Another thing about film is that each film stock has its own very unique characteristics, and once you load one up thats it you are stuck with it, and it will change the way you shoot that day, there have been many studies done on creative limitations, and the paralysis of choice, that have found writers block etc, is cause from too many ideas, and the need to condense them. If i put a roll of tri-x in on a cold rainy day, and make the choice to push it to 800-1600, then i have to take dark gritty moody shots, so i just get in the zone, and it is suprising how much it frees the mind, even if it is all psychological it doesnt matter, the more you learn about the Velvia 50's, Portras, the Ektars, the Cinestills, the Aerochromes, etc and what they can and cant do, the more you find ways to apply them to your own creative visions.

[@Rebassed]

Dont compare 35mm film with 35mm motion picture film please

[@slashman6110]

Props to Kodak for keeping the tradition alive.

[@tallaganda83]

+Slash Man Props to Nolan and Tarrantino etc for signing a contract with them to keep making film

[@ADKPeakboy1]

Although I've never shot a single frame of this wonderful film, I can honestly say that it has been a passion of mine to insure that every foot that leaves the factory is absolutely the best it possible can be for you, the professional users who make emotions with this film. Long live film! Long live Kodak.

[@nebukadnezzar3578]

Absolutely outstanding!! You know how you could make us film geeks truly happy?? Upload a 4K-scanned version of this!! KZbin artifacts are so horrible!!

[@martyjackson4166]

I know this is several years after the fact, but... Kodak really knocked it out of the park here. The 500T 5219 is such a beautiful, versatile film and is simply a joy to shoot on

[@36andburned]

It's been 8 years since this video uploaded. I hope Kodak still keeping the film alive. ❤️🙏🏻

[@dmytroyehorov2905]

Still.

[@MatteoPreziosoPH]

You guys are so good at this. Please, never give up.

[@Sinatra192]

I love the Vision 3 500T film. It is so versatile that I use it for everything from dark interior scenes to high key exteriors.

[@nonsoville]

Kodak, the imperfection of film is what makes it perfect. I'm up for innovation but I prefer the 5218 series in this regard. Thanks for not dying.

[@megacap55]

Look so nice in fact the colors are superb

[@NEGAHEst]

i shot super 8 version of 500T , and it was great , thanks Kodak keeping film alive

[@philpritchard5173]

The was a great companion. Thx. The Vision 3 is very subtly better whilst keeping many of the great characteristics of vision 2. That said, I sorta like the less saturated look! Could always adjust in the grade I guess. Would love to see some select older vintage stocks brought back..!

[@jftvrwk]

gotta say 5218 looks pretty much awesome too. tad more character.

[@jasper232323]

Outstanding footage. It would be great to do a 4K transfer of this.

[@genius2005]

Star Wars will look absolutely magnificent as it goes back to film.

[@UrielX1212]

Anything is better than the sterile CGI laden filth of the prequels.

[@intensitydigital]

most movies are still shot with 70mm imax film. Also I don't see anything wrong with CGI (I'm a 3d modeler and vfx artist)

[@genius2005]

***** You're right, I love CGI especially because it keeps getting better and better, however, I like the fact that JJ Abrams is shooting the next Star Wars in film.

[@intensitydigital]

genius2005 Same here. I hope JJ doesn't betray my trust

[@UrielX1212]

***** Too many times "movie makers" over use CGI instead of actually working character development and a good story. Besides, traditional methods of special effects hold up better over time. Star Wars Episode 1 looks like utter filth now. CGI ages poorly.

[@chazable]

Glad to hear Star Wars VII is being shot on this beautiful film stock :)

[@fabriziobatisti9439]

Thank you Kodak to make this wonderful product!

[@arianhoorn]

Long live film! Long live Kodak.

[@KevinVelazquezAniPower]

I keep coming back to this video cause it's so cool

[@whoopsydoodle5933]

This is so beautiful. I’m definitely choosing this stock for my film.

[@damoderndance]

Film is glorious.

[@sinfulcreations9523]

i love ur film keep it going

[@nurtester1]

I love such comparisons... more please

[@JordanService]

While this is cool... It is absolutely pointless to see this on youtube. The h264 compression is going truncate any sort of the minute details that are being covered. Please provide a high quality DNxHD or ProRes version that we could download. I would love to see this video in a less compressed format.

[@IAMiamiSteve]

Chung-hoon Chung brought me here from the trailer of Last Night in Soho....Thanks Chung-hoon.

[@nickbedford]

This film stock is phenomenal!

[@unseenrecordings]

keep hand processing alive too !

[@DannyPops]

Apparently this is the same stock or starting point for the CineStill 800 T film. Looks so good.

[@DannyPops]

Epin Hervin Yeah, but then you got that remjet backing to deal with as a still photographer. Agreed though that it's probably a lot cheaper!

[@joenickselby8557]

This is so so so beautiful

[@nazarmelconian3349]

I LOVE this stock!!!!

[@frametheory]

Yes, just put an 85 or 85b filter on your lens.

[@monwhooperinvasive8064]

EU TE AMO KODAK!

[@robiulahmed]

If film was cheaper, I wouldn't mind shooting with it. They'd still be crappy videos, but at least they'd look nice!

[@nicolaslabra2225]

well you would be able to say " crappy film" wich elevates it a bit

[@projektmetaphor]

Yes.

[@MightyEFX]

a damn shame movies didnt get to look better with the replacement through digital cameras, imagine if film stocks kept being the thing

[@rajendrabiswas]

is this film stock colour graded? or the colours are natural

[@Slamrush06]

Alguien sabe cuánto cuesta un rollo de esta película?

[@bletheringfool]

Was this shot on 35mm?

[@Biosynchro]

Yes. The camera is certainly a 35mm unit, most likely an ARRI 435. The '5' in 5219 refers to the gauge, which can be either 65mm or 35mm. The camera is obviously not a 65mm unit, so you can conclude without doubt that this was all 35mm. :-)

[@Karmagheden]

Sold.

[@aisadal2521]

Is there a version available that has the entire boxing story without commentary and stuff?

[@imeakdo7]

this has to be digitized

[@carlcoleman1615]

Could you cut this and use it in a 35mm film camera?

[@motalinda]

This is sooo nice! What camera was used for this? Many thanks!

[@dunke10]

I think it was a Arricam St.

[@fusisnotapunkrocker]

When the grain appears, hwo did they underexposed? throught camera? or post? or throught lighting?

[@VariTimo]

fusi isnotap in camera or lighting have the same effect. You can’t underexpose in post.

[@timtheenchanter9583]

how high is the estimated resolution of this product? i hear rumours its higher than 4k. cant find it on the web... but i see why tarantino & co choose for film and not digital. these colours are really warm and i'm only watching at 480p! 200 dollar for the longest reel, expensive hobby :)

[@SMGJohn]

35mm can be scaled to 8k in digital resolution if you use low noise and shot in good light conditions you should be able to cramp out 8k, 70mm is a bit trickier because there really are lacking in scanning technology to make use of that massive format, but as far as we done its got to 32k, but the process of editing and using it is massive pain and no computer is powerful enough to edit 32k in real time.

[@timtheenchanter9583]

thank you john for this clear answer, its like vistavision a bit. endless resolution it seams but maybe you know this answer: how high is the resolution of a human eye? it seams 32k is a border for man and machine :)

[@tonythrowaway3327]

its not just the colours why film looks better. its mostly the tonality spectrum.

[@kellylarue5344]

Wow! Move over technicolor

[@claireroche8920]

What is the camera used for this? lens?

[@Biosynchro]

The camera looks like an ARRI 435. The magazine is usually mounted at 45 degrees on that camera, and the 300E magazines are either specifically for the 435, or compatible with it. Not sure which variant. Not sure about the lenses but they could very well be Zeiss Master Primes, based on the style of the numbering on the lens barrel.

[@KevinCBurke]

What does 'applied a window to the exterior' mean at 7:59?

[@charlieweston2292]

How do u even design a film stock

[@AR7271]

Science.

[@titotato1656]

So they are using this for the new Star Wars movies?

[@VariTimo]

tito tato Only the Episodes.

[@caiodlimaM]

hi, i have a curious question. how does the negative film becomes a slide film so it can be projected in a cinema?

[@blu0065]

Slide film is usually different than projection film. Slide film is usually a "reversal" film which is fine for viewing immediately after processing. On the other hand, a positive film print is created from the negative on a print stock and involves projection of the negative onto the print stock and processing of that print.

[@Tony23says]

i'd say through the fstop on the lens

[@ASideEntertainment]

what camera?

[@shayamaddex996]

A-Side Entertainment probably arriflex, but I don't know

[@AidanCronin]

What ISO is this film?

[@Davidbcinema]

500

[@pavelkildau971]

is it 16mm?

[@VariTimo]

Pavel Kildau super 35. 16 is much grainier.

[@BOBMAN1980]

Sure. Why not?

[@staswlad]

5+

[@sixeyesopen]

super nice. which camera did you use?

[@RafaelFyen]

Good god why don't you guys hurry up and get this in the hands of still photographers? I'll pay a premium price to get this on C-41!

[@thomaslesain4920]

It's called Cinestill 800T (they label it as 800 ISO as it pushes quite although I do prefer it shot at 500). The problem is that the remjet is removed (and it thus has no anti-halation layer) and it's cross-processed in C41 which consequently induces color shifts. The best solution is to buy Kodak Vision3 500T as bulk, cut it and respool it for 35mm, then have it developed in ECN-2 (many pro labs do it).

[@polymetric2614]

@@thomaslesain4920 I've found numerous sources for still rolled Vision3, but I can't find any labs that process ECN-2 for small batches of still rolls. Do you have any recommendations?

[@benjaminvleugels5609]

@@polymetric2614 silbersalz35 you do have to buy 4 rolls of 36 exposures at once it's like 50 euros tho and 60 I've you want your negatives back but you do get really good tiff scans they are extremely flat so they are perfect for editing they also do discounts quite a lot so it will probably be a little cheaper

[@gggkinc]

No, 32mm is higher definition than 16mm? I would have never known...

[@GabrielUrena]

Digital bla bla bla Red bla bla, bla bla bla Alexa...

[@earlisonline]

Kodak pls lower the film prices

[@drcringe7873]

What Camera is used here and where can I buy it?

[@vl6ne68]

I thought Kodak black was in here

[@FindecanorNotGmail]

Star Wars brought me here.