Thank you for taking the time to make this video sir! Your content is still helping individuals learn ECON 12 years later! May God bless you and your family in Jesus name! 🙏🏽
@exposurebyanjum12 жыл бұрын
Thank you Sir, It really helped me in understanding the topic!!! God Bless You!!!
@LucisFerre112 жыл бұрын
Jason, What do you think of Obama's outlook, raising tax rates (& supposedly tax revenues) whilst also increasing government spending simultaneously? What in the world is that supposed to achieve in regard to increasing aggregate demand and lowering unemployment?
@jacobchristianglover365510 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for taking the time and effort to produce this video, it helped me a great deal. I subscribed to your channel and hope to find more work like this. Be Well!
@koyaraghunadh31138 жыл бұрын
A very lucid, powerful and cogent interpretation of the topic.
@StreetDancer1718 жыл бұрын
A very extensive vocabulary you have there. I approve.
@JasonWelker12 жыл бұрын
You don't have to increase taxes to increase government spending. You can borrow the money, called "deficit spending", which increase the national debt instead.
@DELTASierra-1311 жыл бұрын
This video was really informative, thank you! I've been given a project to "Consider whether it would be appropriate for the British government to focus on using fiscal policy to expand demand, in order to promote economic growth in the United Kingdom." How best do you think I could answer this?
@joangayle-reid71107 жыл бұрын
Thanks for making this video! It really help... continue doing this.
@mysticmacho14703 жыл бұрын
Mwali twafwa sana pa fresher yama lesa ale mipala, 👏
@jonyjony7336 жыл бұрын
what an explanation.... really genius thank u
@JasonWelker12 жыл бұрын
Given your logo, I suspect I know your position on the matter. The taxes Obama hopes to raise are on the highest income earners, who have the highest average propensity to save in the economy, meaning that much of the increase will reduce savings, not consumption. This way, savings (which is a leakage, contributing little to economic activity), is turned into spending, contributing to employment through investments in the economy's infrastructure. This is not Obama's outlook at present, however.
@JasonWelker12 жыл бұрын
That is a good suggestion for a future video! Thanks!
@x3xconx3x12 жыл бұрын
I love you!! Thank you so much. this video helped me out with my assignment sooo much!!
@mararodriguez22017 жыл бұрын
could u upload any pdf notes? your videos/notes are so useful
@mikeymarinakis87062 жыл бұрын
anyone got the answers to the worksheet that links to this
@mrpureism11 жыл бұрын
hello admin,namastae! can u tell me that in contactionary case,is the increase in real gdp from Ye to y1 is boom or something opposite to recession that existed in case of expansionary effect.why is it bad.is inflation the only reason we consider contraction step .why that increase is not desirable from Ye to y1
@spiritrapt11 жыл бұрын
in liberal economics, does the government not interfere in economic life? therefore this does not apply to the ideal liberal economy? thanks
@peterbarach40866 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir. I understand ur teaching better.
@tinahflindornah49756 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir 🌼love from South Africa
@QuestionConvictions12 жыл бұрын
My macro principles class covered this in about 3 minutes. Thanks!
@chelseyskeete249 жыл бұрын
Thank you, this really helped a lot !
@meenuvarghese92939 жыл бұрын
do you have a contractionary monetary policy video
@ImSuperVince11 жыл бұрын
What happens if you ^G and ^T, I'm assuming it means ^AD so it's expansionary? But why?
@saurabh2singhal13 жыл бұрын
Nice Explanation.. Very useful video
@mosab4959 жыл бұрын
what amazing explanation .. .thank you so much
@AllaahuAkbarr12 жыл бұрын
Greetings from SULTANATE OF OMAN
@samiullahafridi946 жыл бұрын
think u sir i understand ur teaching better.
@walusunguvital6869 Жыл бұрын
this was so helpful
@sriramsenthil12 жыл бұрын
what about Non-discretionary vs Discretionary
@mehjabeenshaikh35810 жыл бұрын
thanks alot this video helped in my assignment thank you
@198151310 жыл бұрын
very good explanation.
@kuhelibegum3 жыл бұрын
Nicely explained. Anyone else wonder why our college professor can’t teach like this?
@trustmadare23179 жыл бұрын
thanks sir for your video very helpful
@nt-fo3xr7 жыл бұрын
I am so failing economics :')
@JasonWelker7 жыл бұрын
You'll do fine! Let me know how I can help! econclassroom.com
@zuriiima9366 жыл бұрын
Did you pass? lol
@lovedieyoung28469 жыл бұрын
thanks for your video, it's helpful :)
@maximiliankaiser98383 жыл бұрын
Great Video! But you may want to consider investing in a less crunchy microphone to spare your viewer's eardrums!
@bammbamm1211 жыл бұрын
I don't go to the store to buy stuff. I go to ebay or Craigslist.
@StreetDancer1718 жыл бұрын
You trying to ruin the economy?
@bammbamm128 жыл бұрын
WaveDancer171 - No - I filter out ex USA sources.
@AmrAbouelela8 жыл бұрын
wonderful!
@1sockmonkey17 жыл бұрын
yuh what the hell is a discretionary and non discretionary BOIIIIIII
@abbieyi7 жыл бұрын
boi discretionary is when congress creates a new law or regulations to change AD trough tax and spending. For example, if there is recession, gov has to shift AD to the right to bring back to equilibrium, so they will decreaase tax and increase spending. Non-discretionary is already existing law or regulations that prevents inflation or recession. For example, unemployment benefit is an example of non discretionary regulation, because if unemployment rises, people spend less, thus bringing AD down. However, because of unemployment benefit, gov spend more money bringing the AD back up. Understood??