Introduction

[@Dedog0]

Really loved this series! Though it may never be relevant for my academic, nor professional career. I really enjoyed these lectures! Fantastic presentation and content! Wish I could find more lecture recordings of Economic History.

[@wujekstalina]

what is the correct order you are supposed to watch this?

[@shway1]

world gdp tripled from 1000 to 1700. population also increased gradually from the neolithic revolution up to 1800 (and was accelerating). why is he denying this?

[@dosomething3]

What is the name of this course? I need to quote it as a source in a paper.

[@williamk2531]

Great course package (MALTHUS UCDAVIS). Concepts useful for estimation of market size, eco growth, business life cycle, business valuation, impact of Schumpeter innovation, effects of incentives, role of govt and regulatory bodies, effects of public policies, taxation, regulations, demographic shift, trade and commerce mechanics etc. Can the CROWD on KZbin suggest any more applications (& how) for these MALTHUSIAN CONCEPTS.

[@dosomething3]

The last few lectures seem to be missing.

[@ArupGuhaideasanctuary]

its true that hunter gatherers worked only 6 hours a day (sigh). But didn't early agriculturists work as hard as today with his entire family including children just to make ends meet?

[@Maestroxxx1]

Can someone give me the right order of these lecture slides? They are soo out of whack...

[@stevo728822]

Umm....doesn't that suggest that the trigger for the industrial revolution was the book by Malthus?? Appears very coincidental that once the pre-industrial process is explained by Malthus it should suddenly capitulate.

[@ArupGuhaideasanctuary]

you mean people read an essay and suddenly the way to mechanize textile spinning and industrialize steam power sort of magically appeared to them? Malthus didn't write the bible as far as I am aware

[@mustafabodur1463]

this was written 7 years ago but i am going to answer anyways, the revolution took place at the 18th century, so, when Malthus wrote the book it was already happening, but it was not named Industrial Revolution.

[@jimibeckert]

Most people don't get the choice to work less like buying a car.

[@ajones3038]

Buy a used dependable car and you'll save money. I'm 40 years old and only spent about $15,000 on buying cars, had 7 total. A bigger problem I think is cost of dwelling.

[@augnkn93043]

This is the next lecture : kzbin.info/www/bejne/hXjNfH6tp7aVgZo

[@dosomething3]

Good question.

[@lowe8778]

Brilliant!

[@Abbyliciousable]

why are you coming up with the africa' statement , if you do your homework you would have known that it is a continent and that some countries in Africa at that time were rich!

[@Adrian-qi5ii]

Yeah! Rich in ignorance!

[@augnkn93043]

Santa Maria When and what constitutes richer?

[@nillejoslin]

If they were rich they had troubles documenting it with no written language...

[@gto433]

The pay rise increased, because for poor people to become rich, they first need rich people funding. Rich gets richer, and poor gets slightly richer

[@DipakBose-bq1vv]

The money came from the exploitation of Bengal in India since it was occupied by the East India Company in 1757. India also provided the market in the 19th century and as a result industry in India was wiped out due to the free trade with Britain. It is a shame that you are brainwashingstudents by talking about unimportant things but hiding the real reason why industrial revolution took place in England, not in Italy or Germany or France or Spain.

[@augnkn93043]

Dipak Basu Indian industry was wiped out? This is disputed and can’t be decided because there is a lack of census data. Indian textile industrialisation began in 1850. Because of high wages in Britain and low wages in India British textile exports to India didn’t begin in any real quantity until after 1860.