Is AI Art Legal? (Copyright Nightmares)

Are machines stealing our creativity? Or is it just progress? What do you think about it? 🤖💡
#ai#aipredictions#aicopyright
Looking to get more out of ChatGPT? Get my free E-Book: myaiadvantage.com/newsletter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
🤯 E-Book with 400+ ChatGPT Use Cases: myaiadvantage.com/ebook
🌱 KZbin Membership: / @aiadvantage
💬 Discord: / discord
🐦 Twitter: / theaiadvantage
📸 Instagram: / ai.advantage
💃 TikTok: / aiadvantage

[@thommccarthy1139]

I know it's futile but any attempt to wipe this evil shit from the face of the earth is noble.

[@Malthizar]

I get why artists would feel a certain kind of way but this has no legs. It's more of a conversation starter than an actual lawsuit. The AI isn't copying the art. It's copying the art

[@ventis_dead_twin]

Style should not be copyrighted. That's basically saying that only one person can have an anime art style. That's taking the job of mangakas. And only one person can have a semi-realistic artstyle where there is a lot of shines in it that'll take a lot of digital artists' job. So it's like a sword with two edges, one you'll get rid of AI ar but on the other hand a lot of people will lose their job

[@augustuslxiii]

Strongly disagree. And I've been making my own art since elementary school. (Not much profit, back then, but hey.) I can understand on an emotional level why artists feel like wrongs have been done to them, but nothing has changed except speed.

[@alexadigitalradio]

I, as a human, can look, read or hear something and copy it OR, use what I learned and generate something new. If I use what I learned and don’t copy things either exactly or very similarly, that’s fine in terms of copyright. I don’t see a difference because AI isn’t copying things. It learns from them. This is why I take issue with generalizations about AI that don’t take into account the nuances. The abilty to prompt “in the style of” is all that needs to go, not AI art or music itself. That type of prompting is where you end up with most plagiarism. Otherwise, there’s a need for the public to understand how AI learns and generates something before making judgement on it.

[@fzhardacher]

Style is not copyrighted.

[@randombleachfan]

I think where it draws the line is most likely the art style. Artist can already look up pictures of anybody on the internet and incorporate those things into their art. Therefore, if an AI incorporates those things based on user-input is most likely okay.

[@Julia-dk1ox]

ich denke im DACH Raum wird man über Copywriting mit AI 10x nachdenken wollen, bevor man es ernsthaft anwendet.

[@k.rahimi4969]

Do you think humans do anything else than 'remixing data'?

[@LS-kg6my]

And AI is not copyrightable, so anyone can reproduce and sell an AI image legally

[@rickesping1586]

Naa, it's BS.

[@Geilolp.]

Are you saying styles should be copyrighted? My man, thats not how it should work

[@Iamwolf134]

We might actually see some artists choosing not to complain about this form of automation and instead embracing it for its advantages.

[@samthesomniator]

Not a remix. AI is not photobashing!

[@diaxpora]

Why not just pay micropay each artist registered on the blockchain and included (tagged) in the prompt?