Here is a short clip showing just how powerful aphe is over any other ammo in War Thunder.
Пікірлер: 223
@icy3-12 ай бұрын
Haha tiny nuclear ball of death in tank go boom
@randomstuff49972 ай бұрын
soviet 57mm APHE goes insanely hard
@U.S_Drifter2 ай бұрын
Boom
@trololl270292 ай бұрын
Bro the next video i saw was about a nuclear bomb
@tangohotel25992 ай бұрын
Realistically the shrapnel from the APHE exploding would be in a cone shape, not a sphere
@LittlePenguin1-172 ай бұрын
only in Sweden tree APHE in explodes in a cone shape.
@Kwisss2 ай бұрын
@@LittlePenguin1-17 Was for a time. I played it recently and its a sphere.
@LittlePenguin1-172 ай бұрын
@@Kwisss they changed it
@TheRealSteve422 ай бұрын
That isn’t true. The explosive charge is in the center of the rear of the shell, there’s no reason why it would only go forwards, it is not a HEAT warhead
@Skykid33072 ай бұрын
@TheRealSteve42 Irl heat shells mostly fire shrapnel in a cone. This is basically univeral, I don't know the specifics but, I don't think nations were able to get APHE to explode like that before the shells became obsolete
@spidersaremean89172 ай бұрын
Realistically APHE irl was genuinely very bad. It was mainly just used for ships, tanks mainly just used solid shot AP rounds.
@humanhuman50242 ай бұрын
This isn’t true. Badly made rounds were bad but that’s the case with every round. Reality was it was just more expensive and harder to make than a solid shot thus most nations other than the Germans and late Soviet designs used them.
@CMepTb74262 ай бұрын
@@humanhuman5024 plus the fuze that needed to be designed to break and arm as soon as it hits the armor would cause duds or bad rounds to this dudes opinion
@humanhuman50242 ай бұрын
@@CMepTb7426 no that was mainly the case with Russian shells as they were badly designed but so were most of the solid round shells from them as well.
@micahklein26272 ай бұрын
Does everyone forget about Shockwave damage? Yes the APHE should have a more cone shape when it detonates but the explosive shockwave in a tightly confined area like a tank would wound or kill the crew. In June 1944-April 1945 there was 502 American tanks lost to gunfire, 579 crew casualties from gunfire, 24% of the crew lost, 22% commander deaths, 21% gunner deaths, 20% driver deaths, 20% bow gunner deaths, and 17% cannoneer deaths; the death percentage is slightly lower due to light tanks not having a cannoneer. 346 tanks were burned, 552 were not burned
@SeanFicken2 ай бұрын
iirc about 80% of the energy from the charge is used in breaking the shell, there isn't a strong shock wave, let's not forget that the actual amount of explosive used in APHE rounds isn't exactly high, it may rupture ear drums though*. i believe there is also a situation where a tank took a hit from an HE round through a drivers hatch and it killed the turret crew but the machine gunner survived (the driver took the shot in the head though so he was definitely dead)
@shiningamaterasu25792 ай бұрын
Fun fact, irl solid shot had simular post pen damage to aphe cause of spalling
@zeloth72 ай бұрын
Yep. Americans not only said it was similar. It was indistinguishable
@ZacharyDavidMartyn2 ай бұрын
Realistically the other shells should perform better at thicker and more sloped armor but it just doesn’t work that way in game so APHE it up!
@Conraf2 ай бұрын
good thing gaijin is in the process of changing it to what it should be: more like solid AP but with a cone of additional fragments in the direction of the round and not like the sphere it is now
@SeanFicken2 ай бұрын
It's based on player vote, I really hope it passes as I find the handholding APHE makes transitioning to APDS a lot harder for people when they get to higher BR's.
@Haaton-of-the-Basement2 ай бұрын
@@SeanFickenUnless they are British/French mains.
@cjofulue52182 ай бұрын
British main here, and I hate every second of the random APHE bouncing off the side of my turret and taking my entire crew offline @@Haaton-of-the-Basement
@Haaton-of-the-Basement2 ай бұрын
@@cjofulue5218 You tell me. I was playing Ground SB yesterday with the Australian AC.IV 17pdr and somehow Panzer IV, Italian Sherman and Captured T-34 were bouncing the sh*t out of my Shell with flipping 190mm of pen. Like seriously it did not make any sense but my Churchill VII somehow turned out to have like 300mm of pen cause i was penning everything even if they didn't die one shot.
@michaelbryant40492 ай бұрын
According to the United States army, during the testing for APHE compared to AP the army found that the small coning was almost identical with no differences unless the APHE prefused. something or thunder doesn't get right is a APHE fusing
@I_am_looking_for_GF2 ай бұрын
The British did similar tests and found the same
@crazedgamer53552 ай бұрын
I love when my round hits the ammo
@LittlePenguin1-172 ай бұрын
Same, I love the fireworks effect to tossing the turret in the air
@Thetruesuitguy2 ай бұрын
Especially when it only makes ammo yellow
@cjofulue52182 ай бұрын
I love when my APDS and APBC shells pass through 3-5 shells with no explosion, yet APHE grazes the side of my turret and I turn into a box shaped sparkler
@CallofDutyBlackOps282 ай бұрын
and just makes the ammo useless and doesn't explode.
@Thetruesuitguy2 ай бұрын
@@CallofDutyBlackOps28 Even better if it's only yellow 🤗🤭
@grand6master2 ай бұрын
I'll tell you what's broken. It's CAS!
@nade55572 ай бұрын
CAS is only broken because the gamemode is broken. 1 cap and an assist gives you a flying tank farming simulator
@DecayLe4Ай бұрын
@@nade5557 i completely agree with this, except i still feel CAS should be more medium difficulty to get, as if you limit the top 50% of your team to CAS, they can mark tanks and destroy more valuable targets (like german tank destroyers etc) while not letting little jimmy who stole his teamates kill and cap get in his overpowered 2000 pound bomb lobbing fighter and murder everything
@devlintaylor9520Ай бұрын
@@DecayLe4I feel like cas should be grindable in ground battles, so more people have access to it. Makes AA actually have a use
@tektier40092 ай бұрын
I think the idea that a 57mm Russian APHE is just as powerful as American 75, 76, and 90mm APHE is broken, but APHE in itself is not broken as it usually has much less armor pen that HEAT and APDS or even solid rounds
@mashedpotato72192 ай бұрын
Thing is APHE has better angle penetration compared to APDS with most tanks having sloped armor. Not to mention shell shattering and the inconsistaint damage of APDS so APHE is just plain better in 98% of situations
@twurtle12hd392 ай бұрын
Different levels of explosive filler causes that
@dominiksoukal2 ай бұрын
It is plain broken and does not work even close to how it works in real life.
@cjofulue52182 ай бұрын
@@mashedpotato7219in game yes. IRL...that's a different story 😅
@BARelement2 ай бұрын
How is it in any way equal to the 90mm APHE of the US. Please explain. Truly. The filler is so tiny you end up not one shitting PZ IVs. So pls tell me in what way.
@Localnimation2 ай бұрын
Yeah in realife they prefer solid shot bc its cheaper, and reliable, Also if u pen a tank in realife doesnot matter how many man u kill in there, the rest of the crew will just ditch the tank out of fear💀
@dominiksoukal2 ай бұрын
No, in real life, APHE does close to the same damage as AP.
@Localnimation2 ай бұрын
@@dominiksoukal yes, the damage will not as powerful as in warthunder, bc the sharpnel will be cone shape, But its not only about sharpnel, imagine something expload inside a xlose compartment, the shockwave and preasure?, It will atleas make the ear and nose bleeding not forget the brain damage feom the shockwave, So even if u didnt get hit by any of those spalling, the shockwave will still bouncing arround the close compartment, APHE also have a high chance of dud, it did not explode inside instead it explode upon impact bc the armor is too thic or imperfection in production. Sorry bad english btw
@Rain-ju2ge2 ай бұрын
Gaijin: we will let the player to vote if we should change APHE from spherical damage to cone damage Also Gaijin: Left on the voting
@l3_war_thunder2 ай бұрын
Nah bro imagine APHEFSDS
@ACGustaf2 ай бұрын
The ammo wouldn’t even fuse on time bc of the speed 😂
@andrewjack57552 ай бұрын
Already a thing but it’s not used
@LeoMkII2 ай бұрын
Mfs after getting a quarter of a kilo of tnt inside their tank be like "but da cone"
@BARelement2 ай бұрын
The video didn’t address the issues with APHE. It is broken in the sense it’s unrealistic. If it’s going be unrealistic just give every Ammo type before HEAT, and APFSDS HE filler at this point. Realism is already out the window. WHO ever opposes that is hanging onto a thread. No one can complain if everyone can one shot.
@SeanFicken2 ай бұрын
This is more about asking a question on people opinion, I don't think it's work explaining why it's unrealistic in short form content though.
@birdbrainedboy2 ай бұрын
“it doesn’t do that much damage” the propellant case that got destroyed: 💥
@SeanFicken2 ай бұрын
Relatively speaking :)
@Boris_The_Turtle2 ай бұрын
I know it’s supposed to explode in a more conical shape but, wouldn’t ricocheting fragments end up producing the same effect than the completely spherical explosion we have currently?
@SeanFicken2 ай бұрын
The fragments really wouldn't bounce the way you think they would, they would hit the back end and spread out, maybe if the fragments were perfect spheres they would ricochet around like you think. For more evidence the amount of US crews dying to penetrations was quite low with an average of 1.15 per tank loss 1.28 crew if the tank was burning and 0.78 if the tank wasn't. Mind you they were fighting German tanks, and those used APHE rounds.
@BARelement2 ай бұрын
@@SeanFickenAnd the only weak HE filler were the 75mms. But I presume shell quality, caused a lot to not even fuse at that point.
@Философ2 ай бұрын
@@SeanFicken Only US sources aren't enough. Gotta compare them to others too
@eggshapedisraelioperative63172 ай бұрын
@@Философthe Brits have a very detailed report on the matter, it is linked in a very good bug report on the forums that discusses APHE performance
@velvetthundr2 ай бұрын
If a grenade going off kills the whole crew, imagine shells at Mach 2.5 going through RHA and with a more explosive filler than a grenade does going off inside the tank.
@SeanFicken2 ай бұрын
A few issues here, most grenades have around 180+ grams of explosive filler, most APHE in game don't have that much, second thing, due to the shape of APHE projectiles they will not have a spherical fragmentation pattern in real life just based on that, then you add the forward momentum of the shell going above the speed of sound you have a even more conical fragmentation pattern. Lastly, the charge to mass ratio is significantly smaller than that of a grenade, as the walls of an APHE round are significantly thicker than that of a grenade a lot more of the energy from the filler is used just to break the shell apart.
@BARelement2 ай бұрын
@@SeanFickenisn’t M82 160 grams, and some shells are in the 180 - 200 + grams region I think. ApHE still shouldn’t work that way but yk.
@kchapo_42028 күн бұрын
And the t95 why it’s getting wrecked by the new aphe is cuz what you said, shrapnel also the cupola is very close to where the crews are located so that would make sense that shrapnel would make it down that far in the lay out. We’re not fucked that bad like ppl are making it out
@humanhuman50242 ай бұрын
I mean it also depends on if the spalling hits modules or internal armor that you cannot see in the armor indicator.
@five_eleven_tac33932 ай бұрын
BR-472 my beloved
@NicholasBova-wc4sx2 ай бұрын
I killed a IS 3 in that spot with a hell cat doing 40 mph
@LeoMkII2 ай бұрын
The only based amurican ww2 tank, the Shermans are ugly
@muhammadzaki21912 ай бұрын
Look the tnt equip in aphe is 2 150 grm tnt but stufter emil 200
@teentitanss18452 ай бұрын
Gaijin is gonna make a poll about Aphe and if there gonna fix it. Aka make the shrapnel a cone instead of a ball. I'd say we all vote Yes on that
@SeanFicken2 ай бұрын
I really hope most of the player base votes yes on that, will see relatively soon I guess, as the road map mentions that will be during this summer.
@eggshapedisraelioperative63172 ай бұрын
I am not optimistic, there are hordes of low-mid tier Russia/Germany players who are carried through the game by APHE performance. I don’t see them voting to get rid of their nuclear arsenal
@yacinealg1522 ай бұрын
That's why i avoid tanks that don't carry APCBC with explosive filler in Warthunder mobile It's the only effective ammo against tanks
@BARelement2 ай бұрын
Wrong. I play plenty of solid shot tanks. If you do well, it just displays your skill difference harder. APHE is ez mode lots if times. And gets boring alone
@CatGamer747-82 ай бұрын
APHE my beloved only low tier friend
@magicmidget11832 ай бұрын
The conqueror could just shoot directly into critical areas though 💪😤
@aigaming41702 ай бұрын
Depend on how much tnt equivalent did the APHE have
@Geskawary2342 ай бұрын
as i know apfsds are overpowered too, they actually kinda like apds - they dont form that much spall. I wish gaijin just boosted every other round damage(heat, apds, ap) and it would be fine
@TransNationNorthAmerica2 ай бұрын
* super casual voice * "It killed 2 of the crew members and hit some ammo." 😂
@MagoVenezolano2 ай бұрын
This boy is the reincarnation of humility and humanity
@lokikinch2 ай бұрын
Realistically, it would have a delayed cone effect spraying shrapnel deeper into the vehicle, rather than just detonate in a full 360° radius while inside
@janniklaue7767Ай бұрын
I can only agree to most comments, it is not broken, rather not realistically modeled as the explosion would face the direction of velocity in a cone shape rather than the tank grenade exploding to all sides equally
@ambush_akula52612 ай бұрын
“Easy one shot” until your ammo is unable to penetrate the target (brought to you by solid shot/APDS gang)
@The_ThunderMan2 ай бұрын
In real life APHE exploded forward into a cone while in WT it sends shrapnel everywhere
@NotSanakan2 ай бұрын
Man, westerbros really want to spend 5-8 shots per tank and hate oneshot kills in general.
@KekusMagnus2 ай бұрын
I really hope they do not change it. APHE "one-shot" gameplay has been consistently the most fun part of WarThunder ground forces. It is completely unrealistic that a tank's crew would continue to operate as if nothing happened after a penetrating hit that knocked out half the crew. In general, post-penetration is very poorly modeled in warthunder. Instead of nerfing APHE, they need to buff the postpen of all other ammo types
@dilbertdonges9102 ай бұрын
Some thing that needs to be taken into account is reliability of ammo. Ammo is cheaply produced and meant to be expended, and in world war 2, ammunition that had complex functions were less than likely to actually work. This same concept can be seen in warthunders planes, where we see singular HE ammo from a 20mm cannon shred off the wings, tail, and knock out the entire crew of a B-17. War thunder functions in the sense that EVERY SINGLE SHOT is a perfectly made projectile with no faults, and where everybody can have the opportunity to get their hands on the best ammo at some point or another (via research and modifications) which is where it falls short of historical accuracy for the sake of making sure a vast majority of your shells wont fail randomly
@LeoMkII2 ай бұрын
Dude you have 1960s/1970s spaa taking down ww2 propeller planes, who tf takes "historical accuracy" for real in wt??
@Sh4quille0atmeal2 ай бұрын
bro L1G just kept going up in the air forever
@ArrabelIa2 ай бұрын
My friends used to take American T20 tanks into top tier, and just side shot the hell out of everything.
@Razzbow2 ай бұрын
Warthunder players will say anything is broken except Sabot
@infectedonstix99082 ай бұрын
Both swedish reserve tanks have sabot shells that mostly one hit. So yeah sabot shells are broken
@CanuckBacon2 ай бұрын
But the sabot performs fairly close to IRL down to the spalling (most sabot rounds melt from the high pressure and then explode when they contact the space inside the tank) what they need to get right is squash head rounds
@Monarch_E.2 ай бұрын
APHE in war thunder seeks modules, it always seeks crewman or modules even if it was behind the shell itself, realistically it should be random or coned and ive heard that historically aphe shells have fuzes too
@danielspoon12342 ай бұрын
Tetrartch godmodes at high tier be so easy atm
@neizei2 ай бұрын
His is how one change forces another. They cant make realistic APHE because tanks live until last 2 crew members when in real life death of commander would be game over.
@AkseliKorhonen2 ай бұрын
It works like it's supposed to. Armor piercing high explosive
@SkyeVolt2 ай бұрын
This is why they’re changing APHE to explode in a cone and not a sphere since rn it just goes in and the shrapnel loses all momentum
@justsomebeanz2 ай бұрын
APHE in real life showed not significant difference compared to solid shot. APHE blatantly over performs
@maximbelokon35182 ай бұрын
Wish Gaijin would stop fucking with my APHE rounds and give me proper damage. Or even better, fix the pen mechanic
@CZMajkee012 ай бұрын
Solid shots are better in my opinion because they generaly have better pen and I am a french main so I kinda stick to them
@soddy59642 ай бұрын
You forgot to mention, that APHE have lower pen tan solid AP.
@kyizelma2 ай бұрын
some aphe has more pen sometimes, like the m3 75mm gun,
@elnewbie26112 ай бұрын
APHE performing its task just like it irl. Players : wait too OP, we want realism not unbalanced gameplay. Gaijin : 😐
@datcheesecakeboi67452 ай бұрын
It doesn't tho, solid shot and aphe act the same, infact solid shot should do more damage then aphe
@Reichtag2 ай бұрын
A yes Shoot 128mm Sturer Emil 550g TNT bugged INSTA KILL
@etoyamegatron14792 ай бұрын
Снаряд, что вызывается попав внутрь, наносит больше урона, чем сплошняк, охуеть Дисбаланс сука)
@Patches-vq8cd2 ай бұрын
I think aphe is op in warthunder. The simple fact that you can cupola shot and kill a tank is just something that no solid or apds can do. Yes solid shot in general has higher pen. Buuut why shoot 2 or 3 shots to kill a tank when you can just nuke it with aphe. The argument is though, get better and hit ammo! Buuuut aphe you can 1 shot nearly anywhere. So why make a high skill ceiling when you can nuke it with aphe! Then mix that with the russian ammo that can pen on almost any angle dose not help the matter at all. Heck i even got killed in conquerer because got shot by aphe that detinated in the engine bay and it still just knocked out the crew.
@SeanFicken2 ай бұрын
Aphe reducing the skill ceiling so much is why I think it should be made realistic, it causes people who are used to its current performance that they struggle with APDS when they get to them. Of course, apds has the ability to shatter u like other ammo.
@Patches-vq8cd2 ай бұрын
@@SeanFicken ahhh the shell shattered mechanic... has killed me more times id like to admit. But yea i 100% agree with you in your statement.
@chrisviljoen92452 ай бұрын
Nobody mentions that you wouldn't there with AP shots? It would be a one shot with Conq if you just don't shoot at the worst possible spot
@Pheramix2 ай бұрын
In real life APHE had just a slightly wider spread compared to AP, with the cost some penetration. Besides, a single shot is generally enough to disable a tank or persuade the crew members to gtfo
@kukurickacz33552 ай бұрын
HEAT 🔥🔥🔥
@notazombie...notatall85772 ай бұрын
APHE is modeled incorrectly, APHE should explode in a cone of action in front of the shell, not as a grenade causing damage in all directions, but gaijin will *never* fix it, because of Russia!
@mrduck56792 ай бұрын
I would like if aphe was a little more realistic
@jimthegentleman24462 ай бұрын
Guys guys. Realistically the APHE doesn't work as well as it was designed But we all know that if it weren't for APHEs, matches would last a century trying to kill enemies
@rainbowappleslice2 ай бұрын
Funny that almost everyone in this comment section didn’t even check what other people have commented so every 3rd comment is the same thing, saying ‘oh did you know that AP performed just as well or even better???’
@major_kukri24302 ай бұрын
It wouldn't be so bad if they made AP do more spalling.
@Do_not_ask_me_idk_either2 ай бұрын
The first one killed the loader
@stansearcheslife63632 ай бұрын
Yes
@ariaakers78182 ай бұрын
Nah. As a Brit main. Just give APHE shell shitter I mean shatter. It will be fun. Sure making APHE realistic via cone is fun, but imagine the rage that people would have when they cannot do shit without perfect shots.
@Neos4532 ай бұрын
First! Nice video bro
@PvtCat2 ай бұрын
Maybe the HE part of APHE stands for "high explosive" and that might be the reason it does more damage than APDS
@vilgame36452 ай бұрын
Americanium moment
@MicahGreen-ng4wf2 ай бұрын
because of the fuse on the 122 it just goes straight through a lightly amoured anything right?
@blackginkgo81692 ай бұрын
APHE was the standard ammo on german tanks, while the brits used AP rounds until 1943 for example. Nothing is broken about it 😂
@noahsawesomevids4222 ай бұрын
Do m247 saphei round its way overpowered can 1 shot pretty much everything if it hits the driver hatch or engine vent or very edge of all Russian cupolas
@Tempest132402 ай бұрын
Thanks ima hunt that tank before i launch is3
@matheusm70542 ай бұрын
APHE isn't broken AP and APDS that are purposely shit ingame
@DarkBalladYT26 күн бұрын
I vote no on the change apds is already strong enough you take out half of one side of the tank with one shot something needs to be stronger than this to counter nations that have actually good ap rounds otherwise the first shot from ap will always win and no not all german tanks one shot this doesnt just effect the tanks you dont like
@DarkBalladYT26 күн бұрын
Ive played italy and enjoyed it so i should know
@SeanFicken26 күн бұрын
My biggest concern is that solid shot deals damage based on residual penetration, aphe completely ignores this and gets cupola shots to boot. How about we all agree to remove residual penetration based damage while all agreeing that getting hit is a skill issue in the first place.
@DarkBalladYT26 күн бұрын
Nah i like things how they are
@Shardian1176Ай бұрын
APHE will always be op. Why? Armor Piercing High Explosive Its in the name of why its op. It punches through your armor than blows up launching shrapnel all over the inside of your tank.
@Helloiexist12 ай бұрын
Don’t give them ideas
@Helloiexist128 күн бұрын
Edit you gave them ideas
@No_fritz012 ай бұрын
Bigger 90 mills or 100mms guns suck imo The m36b2 has the best gun imho.
@DaCouchWarrior2 ай бұрын
Kinda not. Its how aphe works overall. Other thing is how bad HEAT shells are. They are unrealistically bad.
@SoggyToast1232 ай бұрын
APHE in game usually has much lower pen though
@idkiatecorn2 ай бұрын
I only use APHEBC because I think APHE suck
@WaThu_Unidentified2 ай бұрын
It depends on how much he filler the bullet has
@orionsalt82882 ай бұрын
Above 50g is enough.
@WaThu_Unidentified2 ай бұрын
@@orionsalt8288but I think some shells got like 2kg and those are called nuke shells because they absolutely annihilate the crew so it might be overpowers with the right vehicle but some got like 2kg I think and those are just poor
@orionsalt82882 ай бұрын
@@WaThu_Unidentified if you're talking about large HE shells then yeah. But APHE is usually around 20g to 250g. The highest amount of tnt in a aphe Round has been 890g.
@cavmenwarthundergroup2 ай бұрын
No. It’s not OP. It’s just normal
@user-dv5qx5kv2o2 ай бұрын
UMMM NOOOOOO its called overpressure your in a heavy metal box and a large amount of explosive goes off inside that box when its closed the explosion will rapidly heat the air and cause a extreme pressure zone inside the tank crushing the crew killing them instantly 1.4 bars of pressure is enough to kill a human a explosion does well over 10bars
@SeanFicken2 ай бұрын
So, what amount of explosive does aphe need in real life to do that? I ask because, as far as I know, data on US tanks lost to German guns shows about 1.2 crew members lost per tank loss due to enemy fire. Lets not forget that the Germans were using aphe.
@theSCARB2 ай бұрын
No, just other rounds are underpowered
@skullduggery79172 ай бұрын
What isnt broken in warthunder
@janniklaue7767Ай бұрын
Its Not overpowered, its just realistic...like wtf
@beebbaab30292 ай бұрын
bro wdym the most basic round in this game is APHE
@mattjohnstone93312 ай бұрын
No
@user-pf1rl7hy2r2 ай бұрын
You didn't answer the question
@SeanFicken2 ай бұрын
That's because I'm asking for peoples opinions and starting a conversation.
@LiterallyNobody02 ай бұрын
Well I’m pretty sure a “high explosive armor piercing round” is pretty broken in real life to.. because it’s effective 😂
@ok-gs5ly2 ай бұрын
it's actually much less effective than what is depicted in the game as the actual IRl spread is described as a narrow cone rather than an even spread in all directions which ment that it's not that much more effective tham solid shot in damaging a tank.
@LiterallyNobody02 ай бұрын
@@ok-gs5ly you must be the guy doing the document leaks I keep hearing about 👀😂 jk jk
@LeoMkII2 ай бұрын
Meh, Idgaf, it's a fricking game, if they nerfed aphe my chi tos and the ho ri production would suffer, I'd rather it stayed as is
@nexusinc.43672 ай бұрын
It is one of the best rounds ever created, it SHOULD be overpowered. The thing basically fires a railgun sabot on impact then explodes again
@icy3-12 ай бұрын
That's a bit of an oversimplification there
@fishywishyfishfisk2 ай бұрын
That's just plain wrong lol, real APHE sends shrapnel in a cone shape much like the spall pattern of solid shot. Negligible upsides with the downsides of it being harder to produce and potentially having less penetration than solid shot.
@nexusinc.43672 ай бұрын
@@fishywishyfishfisk the AP part is a core of tungsten and the cone charge shoves it forward. Usually it is so hot from the cone wave that penetration causes it to shatter
@SeanFicken2 ай бұрын
The shell body consists of special treated steel to resist shattering on impact, that same steel body is what does the penetration, after penetration the bursting charge detonates accelerating the shell fragments outward, but the velocity of the rounds is typically above the speed of sound so the shell fragments spread out in a cone as the momentum is carried forward. I'm not certain where you got that APHE has tungsten from.
@icy3-12 ай бұрын
@@SeanFicken Must be one hell of a source that claims APHE has tungsten