Is nuclear energy making a comeback? | Inside Story

Europeans are facing major increases in energy bills driven by Russia curbing gas supplies to the continent.
Natural gas prices continue to rise in Europe and are now about 10 times more expensive than a year ago.
That's prompted several leading governments, including in France and Britain, to prioritise an expansion of their nuclear energy programmes.
But is it the right solution?
And what are the risks?
Presenter: Hashem Ahelbarra
Guests
Jonathan Cobb, Senior Analyst at World Nuclear Association.
Shaun Burnie, Senior Nuclear Specialist at Greenpeace East Asia.
Phil Chaffee, Deputy Editor of Nuclear Intelligence Weekly and the Bureau Chief for Energy Intelligence's London office.
Subscribe to our channel bit.ly/AJSubscribe
Follow us on Twitter AJEnglish
Find us on Facebook aljazeera
Check our website: www.aljazeera.com/
Check out our Instagram page: aljazeeraenglish
@AljazeeraEnglish
#Aljazeeraenglish
#News #Nuclear #NuclearWar #NuclearPower #energy #gas #russia #Europe

[@musafawundu6718]

That Green Peace guy is part of the problem, with his absolutist take on renewables alone. The likes of him and their ideological inclination to refuse to embrace nuclear power as part of the solution alongside renewables is the greatest thing hampering the full transition away from fossil fuels.

[@well_letters]

Green Peace has always been a morally bankrupt joke in the way of progress, only occasionally truly righteous. Would rather have a blind continent than vitamin producing GE plants.

[@fredrikellertsen3495]

The greenpeace guy clearly has no idea how electrical energy works. Scary to see that people are so unmotivated.

[@crabbyappleseed8190]

Right!

[@wtfbros5110]

Greenpeace are well known to get money from BP oil

[@Nill757]

I don’t blame twisted crack pots. Plenty of them every street corner. I blame AJ Inside Story for putting them in air. They might as well have KKK members on stories about race.

[@nathshaw]

The great irony, is that the VERY people who have opposed construction of new nuclear, are now the people who are most responsible for the increased risks from accidents from 1950s and 1960s nuclear technology still being used today, well past design life. Had there not been so much resistance - we'd have much safer, newer nuclear in use today - and those ancient reactors would have long been shut down.... And sorry, people who espouse a big transition to renewable over nuclear are generally people who see the dots - but dots realize the complexity with which they are connected.

[@rb8049]

They don’t even see the dots.

[@johnsoncylee]

When referring to renewables people are actually talking about wind and solar, which are unreliable non-firm sources of energy. All utilities know they need some firm supply of energy and some place have hydroelectric supplies but with global warming and drought conditions it's also not sustainable as the single source of power. Nuclear has a part to play and it's not a binary yes or no nuclear.

[@solarheat9016]

Yes. Hydropower is firm.

[@killcat1971]

@@solarheat9016 Unless it doesn't rain, or snow.

[@taniakeen4375]

Ursula vonder leyen statement never existed until USA said Germany would be sanctioned if they used North stream 2

[@ashithvalleriyan463]

Al Jazeera is a state-owned TV broadcaster of Qatar and Qatar is one of the leading exporter of liquefied natural gas and other fossil fuels. So Al Jazeera will obviously try to paint a grim picture about nuclear energy. They know that renewable energy is too intermittent and energy storage lasting days or weeks is practically impossible to the extend that we would always have to rely on fossil fuels to stabilise the grid. Nuclear energy coupled with renewable energy is an idea which is a direct threat to every fossil fuel company or any country which exports it. So these companies and countries try to market intermittent renewable energy as our only future and sadly they have the financial and political resources to do so. Independent energy Organisations like International Energy Agency IEA has confirmed that we need more nuclear plants to reach net zero.

[@gerardlbol8622]

Germany with the most aggressive Renewable Energy plan, is considering restarting some of their COAL Energy plant!! How about that for being ecologically conscious 🤣

[@jeffreystorer4966]

Germany has a huge coal mine that produces some of the dirtiest coal on earth don't let a few solar panels distract from the truth

[@rafiqintraffic9532]

Nuclear powerplant gives you energy security especially to developing countries. With nuclear powerplants, they can save their people from sudden oil and gas price hike.

[@traceler]

Nuclear fusion reactor is good, nuclear fision may be dangerous and pollute and last a long time, it may do some harm in case of accident, hard to store the waste... beter to invest in nuclear fusion. Germany and Japan are smart enough to do it before chinesse.

[@markcasila8310]

@@traceler the waste can be recicled to use again france already recicles and reuses arround 70% of the residues from its nuclear plants

[@JF-NG]

This is fear based logic and mostly fake news. Nuclear waste can safely be handled, recycled and if needed stored. If you want to worry about waste worry about the waste of old discarded solar panels or the dangerous chemicals that nobody wants you to know about that goes into making solar panels. Do your own research and you will see. Nuclear is 1000 times cleaner, greener, more reliable and less destructive to the environment than anything else. When you look past the fear mongering, the picture is clear.

[@markcasila8310]

@@JF-NG and dont forget the blades of the windmills that cant be recicled and are burried ..... lots of bulshit going arround

[@buildmotosykletist1987]

@@traceler : Fusion is fifty years away, it's been 50 years away for 50 years and in 50 years it will still be 50 years away.

[@gregorymalchuk272]

Unreliable wind and solar parasitize off of the reliability of conventional and nuclear power sources. Renewables plus backup is WAY more expensive than just plain old nuclear energy. Germany has spent 500 billion dollars and haven't managed to decarbonize anything. France spent about 80 billion dollars and has some of the cleanest and cheapest energy in Europe.

[@justsomeguy1141]

I don't understand why the press keeps pushing renewables when its clear they won't solve this crisis!

[@SpencerHHO]

It depends entirely on the region. In Australia solar is ridiculously cheap and we get good sun year round where solar output is pretty predictable and states here that have massive wind and solar output like south Australia and the ACT have actually seen less price hikes than elsewherr but for Europe, abandoning nuclear in Germany was insane. There is no reason to close a single reactor untill every single coal and gas plant can be shutdown without issue.

[@justsomeguy1141]

@@SpencerHHO agree with everything you said

[@1337Jogi]

Replacing all of frances current reactors with newer ones (because the old one will reach end of life in a not so distant future) will cost 500-1500 billion dollars. Decomissioning the old ones will add another 250 billion Also they would need to build probably 5 reactors per year to replace the old ones. Currently they have managed to build half a reactor in the past 10 years. Oh and and out reliability: Currently germany uses more gas than ever to make electricity because france needed to shut down around 30 of its 56 nuclear reactors due to maintenance, damages and low levels of cooling water. So there is that.

[@1337Jogi]

To make it short frances energy sector will be a massive headache for europ in the near to middle future.

[@musafawundu6718]

That host, from his questioning, did not include nuclear power as a form of clean energy, is telling us just how badly informed people generally are about nuclear energy. Nuclear reactors do not produce GHGs and gaseous pollutants while in operation. That is what makes them clean.

[@cow_tools_]

Yes!! Nuclear is the way!

[@LongDefiant]

Can you show me a business plan that consistently creates profit over the next 10,000 years for the storage and disposal of nuclear waste? Because that's what capitalism will demand.

[@cow_tools_]

@@LongDefiant Recyling the waste obviously. It still contains fissile material for alternative reactor designs. I'm sure you'll agree technology will advance enough in merely 100 years let alone 10,000. And even then, nuclear waste never hurt anyone thus far. It's not a serious problem. Not compared to climate change.

[@Kriss_L]

@@LongDefiant Coal power plants release significantly more radiation and radioactive contamination directly into the air than nuclear plants.

[@stanleytolle416]

Wind, solar does not work for winter. What is needed is zero GW power that works when renewable power does not worj.

[@stijn2644]

the statement from mr. Burnie that Europe has generated more electricity from renewables than from fossile and nuclear is just wrong. Europe got 65,6% from non-renewable sources. fossil(41,3%) and nuclear (24,3). The rest of the mix came from renewables(34%). 5,3% solar, 14,7% wind and 13,8% hydro plus 0,2% from geothermal.

[@solareagle7281]

With no grid level power storage available, wind and solar are useless, a part time availability solution to a full time demand problem...Nuclear is the only near zero carbon source of energy we have that is reliable.... judging the safety of the new nuclear designs based on old designs is silly and ignorant....but even the old designs are the safest of all power generation technologies, having caused the fewest deaths...the new designs promise higher efficiency, hydrogen production on a massive scale, and water desalination that can provide the fresh water needed so badly around the world....Nuclear power is the future, it always has been, we've wasted so much money chasing rainbows, it's a sin....

[@Charliesvue]

Europe will survive without energy or not because they have been survived for millions of years. No gas no problem.

[@egalahmed729]

Hopefully everything works out.Afterall it is the common man that will pay the price.

[@AntimatePcCustom]

Sadly how it has always been...

[@Pid75]

Maybe a bit of foresight would have identified the risk of being so reliant on a country that isn’t really your friend.

[@gerardlbol8622]

shortsightedness was the stubborn and unreasonable OPPOSITION to Nuclear development. We could have developped "walk away" Nuclear Power plant with generating very little nuclear waste. (See Molten Salt Thorium, LFTR reactor). Whatever research done so far has been with small private funds. The unreasonable ECOLOGIST share the blame.

[@solarheat9016]

How is natural gas green?

[@illuminate4622]

German idiocy pushed that. Deutschland ist dumm

[@gtobw]

I think every country must have nuclear energy

[@diegomorata2885]

More nuclear accidents

[@LongDefiant]

It took Keynesian economics to electrify the US. Power generation is a social problem, but our culture insists on relying on fickle capitalists to make the right investments. Don't complain when your lights are out and the owners of the power companies are comfy and warm

[@CarrotCakeMake]

Don't trust anyone who pronounces France as Frons.

[@mihneaciurea8209]

Big bias against nuclear. We have to consider all the implications in going all green - if all nations will start all at once to invest how many orders will be filled? There is a limited amount of resources and companies that could mine the materials we need for PV and WT; think about the sudden increase in demand and the increase in price => this will have again negative impact in the poor regions where mining usually takes place; also I guess this increase in demand will facilitate the increase in "artisan mining" with big environmental issues, probably child labour and violance. All this will also put pressure on the equipment providers to increase at all costs the production (other problems could emerge). One other question: is there a plan on how to recycle at the end of the panel's or the wind turbine's life. Just to know the scale of this issue: one medium turbine needs about 250mc of cement just for the foundation and also each blade weight few tones of composite materials used in their production that are challenging to recycle. I know the new ones in the best conditions could be recycled in a greater proportion but we'll see...

[@Nill757]

Price of new PV and wind already up sharply last two years. Only one source of large scale PV. Only one source rare earth magnets for turbines.

[@mihneaciurea8209]

@@Nill757yes, but the price could go exponentially higher from here. About the PV and wind resources we'll need we have to add copper, aluminium and iron ore extraction for all cables; after this we have to consider adding the batteries capabilities ( especially to equilibrate the grid) this will require specific materials doesn't it?

[@LongDefiant]

Never entrust nuclear waste to a capitalist.

[@restinga01]

FINALLY I understood this awful energy war. The only way to convince people to use NUC electricity at a higher prices.

[@CSGATI]

About time

[@linmal2242]

With EV's gradually displacing oil fuels Elon Musk says that electricity demand will double or triple!

[@jeffreystorer4966]

Ev don't run on wishful thinking burning coal to charge em not really helping

[@marcwinkler]

Look at prices.

[@surojeetchatterjee]

Its perfect solution for Europe, seeing the opportunity of solar power is less.

[@illuminate4622]

As a European, I agree. And it's a huge part of the solution for everybody, for the entire world.

[@Nill757]

“fighting amongst ourselves” Yea, that’s what needs to be done given much of the punditry is paid to sell BS by backing lobbies.

[@mandoist]

This is now the time for CORPORATE WEASELS, CEO's and GENERAL ADMINISTRATION to "give back". Forego portions of their years of billion dollar profits and UNWARRANTED BONUSES. No person in such companies should be allowed to reap obscene bonuses and salaries while those who feed their lifestyles suffer (and potentially die this winter).

[@jakepistolero]

all you have to do to show america and its european vassals have no principle is just let them hit themselves in the pocket. nobody forced them into this ridiculous energy problems (well, america did, but not to hard).

[@andreasniedam9945]

The basic problem with nuclear has not been addressed though: Sure, you might get around the "energy crisis" now, which is in reality though just a crisis that got triggered by a lack in subsistency, but what do you do with the question that has not been answered since the DAWN of nuclear decades ago: WHERE DO YOU PUT THE WASTE? To some edge of the civilized world, where the next conflict will blow it all up?

[@andreasniedam9945]

@@FowlorTheRooster1990 Nice to see that you have obviously absolutely ZERO ideao what you're talking about. Maybe invest some 5 minutes of google research to actually take at look at for HOW LONG you have to store radioactive waste, you moron.

[@pyroromancer]

"...fallout moving forward..." the host is brutally morbid with his words regarding nuclear power

[@МаксимБромберг]

And, surprise-surprise, ROSATOM is a world leader!))

[@TTR83]

A world leader? Russia has only 38 nuclear power reactors.

[@МаксимБромберг]

@@TTR83 in engineering

[@freeworld7724]

There is misleading information right at the beginning of the article: The energy prices are not 10 times higher than last year. Other than some temporary price fluctuations following embargo on Russian gas and oil products, the electricity prices went up just the same as in last 20 years.. between 2020 and 2024, my bills are now about 20% higher.. Reporting from the Czech Republic, with respect to all nations in the world that stand for peace, together, united against aggression.

[@johangulec9513]

Nuscale smr is the future

[@upupandaway5646]

Go oil and gas ⛽️. I bought a ton in the crash and made a FORTUNE..$$$$$$$$$

[@jeffreystorer4966]

China and 150 reactor's. Swell it's not like everything else they build is falling to bits

[@hazlinabdulhamid7461]

Malaysia alert...✌️😊✌️🇲🇾

[@awolpeace1781]

Shin Ra gets the return to nuclear power they always plot for

[@tka-tpa-prapatankalisari45192]

_oh _*_Al Jazeera English_*_ 🤗_ *YOU'RE THE BEST* 👏

[@syedmaricar9946]

It's is dangerous can we do without it. Make it if it can benefits.

[@lorenzoceresa99]

No it’s not.

[@traceler]

Japan is working with the U.S. and other countries on the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), which is now being built in France. The project aims to see if the technology is technically feasible, though it will not generate electricity. Assembly began in 2020 with completion slated for 2025.

[@kelvinbritz9051]

So in the meantime Europe can freeze in the winter and sweat to death in the summer!

[@JamesSmith-er2pn]

hopefully they opt for the salt plugs that reactors can drop into in the event of a melt down. /// they cam make plants that are fairly safe even if they melts down.

[@stanleytolle416]

Molten Salt Reactors do not melt down since their fuel is already liquid. If someone tries to overheat this type of reactor a freeze plug will melt and the the fuel will drain into a self cooling drain tank. This will happen even if the people trying to overheat the reactor kill all the operators of the reactor. This is what I would call an all the operators shot dead safe reactor.

[@marcwinkler]

@@stanleytolle416 Fukushi was safe before the accident. Any equipement is safe until going bust.

[@stanleytolle416]

@@marcwinkler yes the Fukushima was a safe reactor except for the pla jng for a tsunami. A nuclear plant up the coast, suffered no damage even closer to the earthquake epicenter, simply because it was better prepared for a tsunami. The main advantage of an inherently safe reactor like a molten salt reactor is that even if someone was trying to make the reactor leak radiation the reactor could not do this. Essentially a molten salt reactor could be hit with a bunker busting bomb and not spread radiation beyond the plant area. This would be an inherently safe reactor design.

[@solareagle7281]

@@marcwinkler Still nobody died as a direct result...it's estimated that over 1 million people die from fossil fuel energy production each year....think about it...

[@cmw3737]

Lots of energy storage and generation methods may not be competitively viable long term as renewables and the most efficient methods of storage ramp up but every method that can be ramped up fast like pump air storage, flywheels and wind turbines are needed now knowing they will be loss makers and might only be temporary to get us through this crisis. If it gets really bad then local provisions for people to crowd together for warmth might even be needed to get through the worst of this winter. Putin has pretty much declared a state of war and conditions could get that bad that rationing is needed. Longer term this will accelerate the transition to a more stable resilient energy system.

[@taniakeen4375]

Remember nuclear power does not become a material part of your cloths paints or food. Like gas and oil, start with Vaseline or oil for your vehicle.

[@marcwinkler]

Remember disintegration chain.

[@AngelicaAtomic]

This interview is really not up to Al.Jazeera's usual standards and the presenter appears to have an anti-nuclear bias.

[@Nill757]

Well Qatar is a essentially a big nat gas station , and a nuclear build out could wipe them out, as nuclear in France did to their oil fires power fleet in France. Now, there is no French oil power. Not a few cut backs, or held in reserve, they’re gone.

[@allyourcode]

But why is nuclear an "either-or" choice? Can't we walk and chew bible gum at the same time? Can't we pursue wind, solar, AND nuclear? Yes, nuclear has problems, but nobody is saying we must live with it forever. What we need is something that can tide us over in the meantime. The only reason that I can see why not is that it takes a long time to bring nuclear online, which won't help with the immediate Russia problem. But we should assume that Russia will be a problem in the future as well. Restarting nuclear now is potentially a powerful solution for THAT. Hope a future episode can address this question.

[@swatboy763]

Did you mean “bubble gum” ?

[@aoknights4425]

Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes

[@nyranstanton203]

how are you going to power everyones houses with stupid wind turbines? its a joke. Some of them barely give off 240/hr watts of power. lol. "Lithium mining destroys the soil structure and leads to unsustainable water table reduction. In the end, it depletes water resources, leaving the land too dry and exposing ecosystems to the risk of extinction." Who knows what the answer is. But i looked up recyclable lithium batteries for this green future of yours and they better start creating recycling avanues for lithium batteries soon.

[@md.mohaiminulislam9618]

only for small countries like japan,korea nuclear power is a not needed danger. Big countries can easily minimize the risks and take caution to use nuclear power for years.

[@haldir108]

Japan is the 3rd largest economy in the world, and the 11th most populous one. Hardly a small country, except for in land-area. Any kind of power plant needs to be somewhat close to the population, so most are built urban-adjacent. A large empty plain/desert/steppe/mountain is not a good fit for any kind of power plant. Aditionally, nuclear power has a great safety record, measured in deaths-per-terrawatt/hour, coming in at 90DPTWH, compared to wind's 150, solar's 440, hydro's 1400, and coal's 100'000 DPTWH. (Both nuclear and hydro's death counts are heavily skewed by outlier disasters, namely chernobyl and the banqiao dam failure, wind and solar's death's come from accidents in instalation and maintenance, while coal kills through air pollution, waste disasters, and accidents). The arguments against nuclear are real: They take a long time to construct, they are more expensive to build and operate than renewables, political will for managing waste is lacking, and the public is uninformed and scared of them. The advantages outweigh it to a point though: Clean, safe, not intermittent(!), small footprint, and with huge potential to technologically improve from current designs.

[@МаксимБромберг]

too late, to little

[@mikepict9011]

Have you co considered the possibility that your workers are zombies? Ie MOVING TO SLOW TO SURVIVE AS A SPECIES.

[@estebanpardo9611]

I mean everyone in Germany better have induction stoves and water heaters because winter might be a bit cold

[@Macedonia270]

That is what you get when you take scientific advice from a disturbed Scandinavian teenage girl who have never set foot in a science class...or and class for that matter....Wind and solar power are two very cool ideas....they only have one drawback...It does not work....🤣😅😆

[@GibbonsTake]

@@Macedonia270 Imagine still thinking she was important and not a psyop. Hint nobody believed her. She was speaking on behalf of her handlers

[@GibbonsTake]

Dont most people in Europe use that?

[@laopang91362]

In the US, the strategy in drill, drill, baby drill.

[@supereasy22]

no respect for green peace. i wont be watching this

[@Gar99]

Aljazeera is becoming like a cartoons channel asking stupid questions fit for toddlers

[@surojeetchatterjee]

When it was mature ? 🤣

[@patbaptiste9510]

Think outside the current energy box. A nuclear power plant is simply a steam generator - nothing more, nothing less. Where can we harness ready-made steam while eliminating harmful by-products. *Think humans, THINK* Shift your focus

[@felixsatognon3383]

After, come to impose green economy to African countries.

[@assertivekarma1909]

Of course it will, technology improves for safety, we are in an electrical age, with climate/environmental concerns, and most gas/oil countries are dysfunctional, obnoxious, or adversarial. If such solutions don't occur, with Russian/Chinese style of brutal real politik imperialism increasing, such resource countries like the gulf nations, will likely be recolonized as gas stations instead.

[@normalizedinsanity4873]

The war in Ukraine is 100% US imperialism, the continuation of the one that has devastated the Middle East and Northern Africa for 20 years, slaughtering and displacing millions. Brzezinski's Grand chess board is the blueprint for the war launched in 2003 and cites Afghanistan and Ukraine as the two crucial nations that must be occupied, Funny how the media do not mention the 600,000 Ukrain troops stationed along the border just before the Russian attack. Putin is a despot, of a resource-rich country, while the US has committed genocide for resources for 20 years. The western media would never demonize Putin to cover for a war stated by the US in a million years.

[@assertivekarma1909]

@@normalizedinsanity4873 You are an addict of distorted propaganda

[@alexlazar4738]

For the last 200 years, we have been living in the Western Empire which is based on greed, cruelty and exploitation and which has brought us to near destruction of our planet. First it was the British Empire and now it is the US Empire. And you worry about Russian Chinese imperialism? Oh, the irony!

[@a22226565]

USA UK invade Iraq for WMD of OIL ?

[@a22226565]

Operation Iraqi Liberation = oil for short.

[@awolpeace1781]

Shin Ra is definitely French themed

[@mazzparker7198]

INI BONUS UNTUK AMERICA ACEH KALAU MENANG PERANG LAWAN RUSIA SATU LAWAN SATU OPEN WAR ACEH BONUS😎

[@iandaniel1748]

Best now we have Smr reactor and best them all is Triga reactor 😊

[@Avarrelgame]

scientists will be very proud, if their inventions are used for good

[@williewonka6694]

Nuclear power will make a comeback only if it is heavily subsidized by the taxpayers. After all, their competitors, except for coal, are. That's how big business in America works. High profitability depends on lobbying congress or the administration to line their pockets with free money from the taxpayers.

[@brendanralph8390]

The green peace guy is a muppet 🤣🤣🤣

[@vippanchal8]

The gas and oil prices and by effect the energy prices have not increased only for europeans! It has also happened for africans and asians! Why only cover Europe? As if rest of the world doesn’t matter when it cones to the living standards!

[@BoydGilbreath]

It takes forever to build one, some are never finished.

[@Kriss_L]

The cost and time to build a nuclear plant is largely a result of the greens suing them. Without all the obstuctionist lawsuits, the cost of nuclear would be even cheaper.

[@CHMichael]

Nuclear has the same problem as manufacturing. You don't just turn it on. There is lots of logistics involved and trained personnel hasn't been sitting around.

[@kareemkalisari]

_oh _*_NO_*_ !!!_ 🤔 _🌿🌎🌴 Each of us has a role to play in protecting our planet 🌏🌍_

[@eedobee]

☢️ our future

[@colettespooner225]

Tidal

[@Grace-bk4tq]

Freedom of speech Aljazeera, with is it?

[@ferdieortman6614]

Wood fire the best nuclear power is disastrous 💣

[@lorenzoceresa99]

Lmao😂

[@illuminate4622]

The reality is the exact opposite.

[@ashleywiedemann1005]

The General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine admitted that Ukrainian troops launched strikes in the Energodar area, where the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant is located - RIA Novosti

[@danjohnston9037]

It Was Until Ukraine Still ??

[@soewin9784]

Good solution. God willed it.

[@AljabbarWestJava]

💋 Music 🎶 Music 🎵 Is the language of PEACE ✌️😎. 🕺🏻💃️💃🏻

[@moonnightgodofegypt4998]

All EU member give me support now iam EU member

[@AljabbarWestJava]

Inspired by Madiba when he said, " _We are the heirs to a three-stream heritage: an inheritance that inspires us to fight and die for the loftiest ideals in life. The title ‘African hero’ embraces all these veterans._ " The *Nelson Mandela Foundation Invitational Golf Day* shirts are inspired by the eclectic 🇿🇦 South African heritage.

[@emmerentiagroenewald3694]

He was a fool.....

[@MaybeYoureRight-1234]

🌾🌏🌾🌍🌾🌎 _Our world is far too important_ _and the time to _*_ACT_*_ is _*_NOW_* ✍️ 😀😀😀

[@crystalharris7394]

💗💗💗

[@tka-tpa-prapatankalisari45192]

😱 *NUCLEAR* 🗯️ 😊 🎓🎓🎓 "Education is the most powerful weapon we can use to *change the world* ." ~ *Nelson Mandela* ✍️ _speaking during an Address at the Planetarium,_ 🌍 Johannesburg, 🇿🇦 South Africa 🌍 _16 July 2003_ 🎓 😊 . ...

[@tka-tpa-prapatankalisari45192]

yes 😊 Al Jazeera English! _maybe you're right_ ✓ 🤔 The 🇺🇸 *US* has called 🇮🇷 _Iran’s latest response_ in negotiations to revive the *2015* nuclear deal 'not constructive'. ─ _AL JAZEERA_ 🇶🇦 ☝️😂 🎓 😊

[@mikedc]

Trump2024

[@kareemkalisari]

🇶🇦 Al Jazeera English, _you so happy if my doughter 🌺 say ok_

[@Grace-bk4tq]

Jewlose ....

[@MaybeYoureRight-1234]

Maybe 😏

[@gerardosanchez8446]

No is not!

[@MaybeYoureRight-1234]

😀 👍 Yes👍 Oh Al Jazeera English 🤗 Yes👍 and yes-. MAYBE YOU'RE RIGHT 👍!. YES 👍 👍 # Cop 26 SAVE OUR PLANET 🌏🌍🌎! 👍 '' we are talked a lot about, but we are not listened to '' -why? 😀 Thank you. 😀😀