Is The Universe A Hologram?

According to Leonard Susskind ("Bad Boy of Physics"), our reality is much stranger than it appears to be and life, the universe, EVERYTHING, might just be a holographic projection! Is the universe a hologram? Is reality an illusion?? Will we ever comprehend the vastness of outer space?
Special Thanks to:
Books by Leonard Susskind
www.amazon.com/Leonard-Susskin...
Seeing Isn't Believing Videos:
James Randi vs The Supernatural - bit.ly/1I14Zax
What Are The Limits Of Your Perception? - bit.ly/1RN4QxV
Are We Alone In The Universe? - bit.ly/1OzdhHj
Is The Universe A Hologram? - bit.ly/1eQRRco
►Subscribe: / thegoodstuff
►Follow us on Twitter: / goodstuffshow
►Follow us on instagram: goodstuffshow
►Like us on facebook: / thegoodstuffshow
Digital street team: goodstuffshow.com/digitalstree...
Sign up for our mailing list: eepurl.com/bnSOcH
The Good Stuff is a proud member of the PBS Digital Studios family
__________________________________________________________________
Music by:
Jason Shaw
audionautix.com/
Driftless Pony Club
www.driftlessponyclub.com/
Rob Scallon
/ robscallon
Image Credits:
Leonard Lecturing, via UCSC, hipacc.ucsc.edu/IPC2013.html
Albert Einstein Headshot, By Photograph by Oren Jack Turner, Princeton, N.J. Modified with Photoshop by PM_Poon and later by Dantadd. [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons, upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...
Warped Spacetime with Gravity Probe, www.space.com/17661-theory-gen...
Quantum Mechanics Conference, Benjamin Couprie [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons, commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil...
Young Stephen Hawking, www.discoveryuk.com/web/stephe...
Stephen Hawking, www.flickr.com/photos/lwpkomm...
Juan M. Maldacena, www.flickr.com/photos/birdtra...
Hawking at University, www.flickr.com/photos/lwpkomm...
Gerard ‘t Hooft, By Wammes Waggel (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/b...) or GFDL (www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons, upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...
Stephen Hawking in Cambridge, By Doug Wheller [CC BY 2.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/b...)], via Wikimedia Commons, upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...
Atomic Laboratory Experiment on Atomic Materials, By NASA/Paul Riedel (Great Images in NASA Description) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons, commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
Large Telescope, By ESO/José Francisco Salgado (josefrancisco.org) (www.eso.org/public/images/potw...) [CC BY 4.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/b...) or CC BY 3.0 (creativecommons.org/licenses/b...)], via Wikimedia Commons, upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...
Pure Mathematics Formula, By Wallpoper [Public domain or Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons, upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...

[@mkwarlock]

Susskind is the most warm and down-to-earth physicist I have seen.. I really admire the man.

[@CosmicBarrilet]

+MK Warlock still interesting why do they call Him the Bad Boy of Physics.....

[@Maheonehooestse-HolyFireMan]

Thats really what it is about how they are perceived...

[@titansoftime]

I think Feynman is closer to what you described.

[@cinex-jw9ir]

must of been good LSD that got his mind set to that from being plumber to a scientist...

[@The22on]

@nils4545 I wouldn't want him as my plumber. He'll probably tell me that my toilet doesn't work because of the hologram projector at the edge of the universe.

[@Grillpander]

That was an amazing episode! Leonard Susskind seem like a super nice guy.

[@TheGoodStuff]

Grillpanzer Thanks! He is!

[@junepassingthrouthegate8810]

Grillpanzer Yeah, I wish he was my friend, or my Quantum Physics master T.T

[@friendlystonepeople]

His Stanford lectures are amazing and the closest thing you can get to the real Lenny. Google "The Theoretical Minimum".

[@robertl.fallin7062]

elnubnub ... did I tell you I was a carpenter's apprentice ? Signed , John Bell

[@J_Stockhausen]

His lectures about relativity are really nice and comprehensive

[@aliwahay]

I'm struggling to find words to describe how great these videos are. You guys delve into these subjects with such open minds and really try to show us the bigger picture. Can't believe I've only just starting watching them after being subbed to Craig for years haha. Thank You!

[@Rise9192Against]

Agreed.

[@spaceghosto]

I've seen hours and hours of Susskind lectures and I love them all. Although I have gone beyond this video content on this subject, it's very cool to see something so light and upbeat about it, and also very well encapsulated and simplified.

[@AgentWaltonSimons]

You guys are doing a really awesome job with these videos. Thanks for all your effort!

[@cellogirl0096]

This series is so good! You deserve more views and subscribers!

[@doubleirishdutchsandwich4740]

I subbed after this video

[@londonshutdownl.s.d6530]

I just subscribed. You guys deserve so many more. Thank you for educating us!

[@sonofblessed]

*Summary* *Hawkings:* Black holes empty the Universe's Recycle Bin. *Susskind:* No, black holes copy and paste all of the files and store one set in a back-up folder. *Hawkings:* Control+Z.

[@tggt00]

You guys should really get more views and subscribers, this video was awesome!

[@Addictivemeh]

That was a great video, I remember when you first announced the good stuff and I was skeptical but I really love this series now.

[@honkatatonka]

Very well done to get this interview with L. Susskind. Looks like you had fun! Thanks for sharing

[@Nnyerix]

These are some pretty good video's. Well produced, informative, enjoyable. I'm rather surprised you guys don't have more views. Keep it up!

[@valthormoor5426]

Past midnight. Nobody cares

[@valthormoor5426]

Not Heaven

[@tycho_m]

Wow, this is fantastic! Educational, entertaining and mind-blowing all in one. That's how learning should be!

[@TheGoodStuff]

Mel le That's awesome to hear! Glad you like it!

[@n1k32h]

@@TheGoodStuff no it’s flat get yourself facts right. Stop spreading bad news! Cops are coming to your house

[@cannonfodder4000]

How come these videos don't show up in my subscription feed? This channel's got good content.

[@lanak367]

+cannonfodder4000 your profile picture + your comment = utter confusion

[@LazyFaux5656]

I'm extremely glad there are people out there that are capable of understanding these theories, and furthering ideas such as this. My brain hurts, but I want to learn it.

[@luketremble9782]

LazyFaux5656 Earth is flat and this is all bull

[@hatfaesax]

Theres 2 sayings an idiot will say to a smart person you have to much time on your hands and my brain hurts .

[@saifahmad141]

Thats it brother atleast you want you to learn so keep it up .If you never try you will definitely never but if you try you may learn atleast some of it

[@samuelhawksworth1923]

I would really recommend beginning with the theoretical minimum books by Leonard Susskind

[@seditt5146]

@@samuelhawksworth1923 Why when many of his lectures have all been recorded and you could take most of his courses here on YT

[@TubeUil]

I'd be pretty excited to interview Leonard Susskind! Thanks for making this video and sharing it! Very nice outro music, good to ponder a little what has been said.

[@JakeJarvi]

The pacing of the "Don't do drugs, kids," exchange is about as perfect as visual and auditory entertainment gets.

[@TheGoodStuff]

pineappleboyfilms Ha! Thanks, Jake

[@LeoMRogers]

pineappleboyfilms 2:34 Matt can't remember where he parked his car, but I bet wherever it is parked is perfect.

[@TheGoodStuff]

LeoMRogers ParKing reference??? Nice

[@Seamo57]

smoke something better......

[@jojolafrite90]

Moron. Why would you watch this?

[@TheDruidKing]

John Malkovich could play Leonard Susskind.

[@stonerdemon]

I thought and commented the same.

[@gaminawulfsdottir3253]

I am now picturing a whole roomful of Leonard Susskinds.

[@marshallcurtis3251]

TheDruidKing Yes, I can see it now, John Malkovich verbally “bitch slapping” Stephen Hawking... JM...(voice starts low) I’m sorry, but I must vehemently, in no uncertain terms, disagree with your godawful “once anything goes inside a black hole it is eternally lost“ theory. (raises voice a little and gesters) No offense, but it is the worst crackpot unscientific POS I have ever heard since the day I first heard about “eternal hell for sinners”. (Raises voice more while gestering more emphatically) How could you, of all people, buy into anything even remotely resembling that fairytale nonsense?! (voice getting ever louder, with f-bomb at the top of his lungs, then starts to go lower) ONLY AN ABSOLUTE MEDIEVAL MORONIC MIND...FUCK!!!...WOULD ENTERTAIN THIS ULTIMATE RELIGIOUS HORSESHIT!(lowers voice) So how could you as a scientist and an atheist, and presumably the world’s formost modern day representative of the age of reason, believe and teach the atheist scientific equivalent of “eternal hell”? SH...(synthesized computer voice)... I never said or implied that there was an “eternal hell” inside a black hole, only that once anything enters it, it cannot return. We do not know what is on “the other side” of a black hole. For all we know, it could be a much better world, certainly better than a world where it is possible to be shriveled up with ALS, cooped up in a wheelchair, having to be fed and bathed, and having to speak through a computer for most of your life. To the average person, if there were an “eternal hell“, that would be it!

[@Leondegrance2]

Tony Amendola.

[@amoghskulkarni]

Or Ben Kingsley.

[@SuperDynamite666]

Great video with a Modern Master of Physics Susskind! Loved his vibe, and brilliance! The saddest part of life is getting old and dying and not be able to do more. Salute to the modern greats.

[@jjthom1879]

Great episode! You have one more subscriber! It's amazing to see how math has involved into nothing less than a beautiful language

[@salujathustra9905]

David Bohm pioneered this idea, though he was highly overlooked by the physics community for having a voice of his own.

[@dinofrangiamore]

You're absolutely right, and Bohm is still not getting the credit he deserves, not only as the foremost pioneer in the territory of holographic reality, but as one of the greatest thinkers of the 20th Century, not to mention his ballsy activism as a political exile for refusing to be a narc in the HUAC witch hunt.

[@chambermusicco]

Bohm is seemingly forgotten by science, a great shame. Susskind is great, of course, but credit where credit is due

[@mjlv3862]

Susskind is a beautiful human being.

[@bellsTheorem1138]

He started out as a plumber.

[@jmcsquared18]

I learned general relativity in high school by watching his free Stanford lectures. Ever since them, whenever I need to understand a physics concept, I've always gone to him. Somewhat ironically, or perhaps expectedly, he is the one leading the revolution in quantum gravity with conjectures like holography and ER=EPR. You said it best, mjlv.

[@SuperPhunThyme9]

@Star Trek Theory Damn what happened

[@flywheelshyster6549]

my god that guitar over the video was just amazing and is totally stuck in my head

[@TasZ06]

This was an amazing episode. Thanks for such an inspiring episode with one of the brightest minds of physics.

[@WARDISWARD]

So gratefull for these wonderfull people and their wonderfull minds . Thanks

[@RiDankulous]

This is better than most explanations. They don't go too deep and use good analogies.

[@sizulilight1118]

They did not explain anything they just told the conclusion. The explaining was that your too stupid to understand it.

[@kevinfairweather3661]

Thanks guys, great interview. The way i see it, we can learn a vast majority about physics and how the world works by learning about the concepts. But if one wants to be able to do any calculations and predictions in physics then that is where the maths comes in. I am terrible at maths but pretty good with the concepts.. Susskind obviously is excellent at both ! :)

[@nickhill9445]

Prof. Susskind has presented a wonderful series of lectures on quantum entanglement at Stanford, available on KZbin. He starts at high school British 'O' level standard and in a few hours walks you gently to the math of quantum physics. Prof Susskind if you are reading, thanks and please, if you are still presenting this material please re-record in high quality video.

[@spinning-around]

9:55 Words that all physics textbooks should start with

[@zero15388]

So, according to this theory, the universe is a super massive black hole from a previous universe?

[@thepathfinder5414]

I was awaiting trial when this was made. Now doing time. Good vid, I look forward to more videos thanks

[@Oakshield2]

I can't quite remember which Star Ocean game it was that I played when I was younger, but it had this idea that an universe can be basically a "The Sims" type game for some higher dimensional beings. I quite liked that idea at the time, even though it's quite deterministic. I doesn't kill free will totally though, since you can set your Sims to act on automatic according to their behavior and urges.

[@elizabethkropf2399]

This is brilliant! Professor Susskind is my favorite scientist.

[@HannahRenae]

THIS IS SO INTERESTING!!!

[@aprildutton7814]

this helped me alot let wrap my head around some more "Hard" theorys and stuff. and where you said that no one is right about the future. made me cry. thank you for that.

[@wyskass861]

Susskind's point about the difficulty in explaining complex ideas of quantum based physics was very enlightening. Lowers the frustration of not understanding certain concepts even though I'm good at learning most things. The retraining of thinking in terms of mathematics from natural intuition, makes complete sense.

[@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475]

Yes, he is right about that. Nobody is born with understanding 4D space-time or quantum mechanics. It's an abstraction that must be built-up by effort and experience. If you do like this sort of thing, i can recommend something: Susskind put lectures on yutub for continuing education. Everything from quantum mechanics, particle physics, Relativity, to Cosmology. They go in order from Classical Mechanics on up. Very comprehensive, and only use calculus. No esoteric math. It's an amazing resource, and it's free. Search his name, the lectures are on "Stanford" channel. Just like you said: you need to spend some time immersed in it to get a better understanding. You have to get in over your head if you want to learn to swim. He does a masterful job with these lecture series. There's also the "Theoretical Minimum" series, which hits the basics of what theoretical physics is. Susskind really did society a great service putting these lectures in the public domain for all to see. I am telling you of this because you are right in your assessment of what is needed to understand the topics. You're ready. Cheers.

[@wyskass861]

@@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475 Excellent

[@maltherossel9348]

When he got out TFIOS i almost started crying!

[@rohanpandey2037]

I think the problem is that this video states most of these ideas as fact, not unproven possibilities. This is probably because the entire video refers to only one scientists. But the general content is very interesting.

[@FirstRisingSouI]

+Rohan Pandey To be fair, the holographic principle is the only current resolution to the information paradox.

[@aurelienyonrac]

if what he says is true you would find it everywhere, as what you call metaphor. projector and a screen. allegoric of the cave. so you can prove it to yourself. yet it does not discredit anyone else, the universe is big enough to accommodate everyone. how does it feel?

[@mediamauro]

Susskind is doing an incredibly good job at breaking down the universe for all of us, and so do you guys. Keep it going.

[@sadabetas]

Was the living room scene filmed in two different times or in different places? At 14:37 Susskind's shoe seems to disappear/be cut in half. I couldn't tell initially because the editing/reactions were very well done as to convey that this is a natural convo.

[@mastrtonberry2]

Holograms, my friend. Holograms

[@ableone7855]

I’ve watched his college lectures online. He is an excellent lecturer and speaker. Has a great sense of humor. A great And humble man!

[@NiToNi2002]

Susskind looks like John Malkovich playing Grigor Andalov in Billions!

[@jigwan6009]

Susskind's explanation of why these ideas are so complex and why math is intrinsic to that complexity is beautiful. I will have to point someone to this playlist next time I'm asked why college students are so often required to take mathematics.

[@rohitchaoji]

I read Black Hole War few years ago. Leonard Susskind is exceptionally great at communicating such concepts.

[@TGC40401]

I love his lectures, I found some on KZbin... Can I meet him?

[@mastrtonberry2]

Sure if you pay to attend one of his lectures :) I'm sure he's a very busy man.

[@TGC40401]

mastrtonberry2 Aww... I happen to be quite impoverished. Oh well, video lectures it is!

[@TheActualVimple]

Wouldn't the hologram reality be slightly delayed from the non-hologram one? You know, speed of light and all that?

[@TheGoodStuff]

Vimple You'd have to ask Dr. Susskind to be sure but I believe the interaction between the hologram and the projection is instantaneous. Probably because they're not bound by "normal" space-time. We'll probably address this in the comment/response portion of the next video.

[@sergiogarza2519]

In short, yes. Your hologram is as far as your sphere of influence which would be at the speed of light. So your birthday with the amount of time you've been alive in seconds multiplied by the speed of light would theoretically be how far your hologram is. It's a pretty genius way of getting around the information paradox.

[@TheActualVimple]

***** Neat.

[@LeeviON]

Sergio Garza As The Good Stuff said, it's actually instantaneous. :P

[@sergiogarza2519]

LeeviON ***** I study general relativity, and one rule is that nothing happens instantaneously. If the sun magically disappeared, the earth would still keep circling around until the second it became dark, because information travels at the speed of light, and the earth would fly off like letting a ball with a string go. Along with everything in the universe, information cannot instantaneously move somewhere, it has to travel there as fast as possible which would be light. That's partly the reason why we had to create inflation for cosmology for something called the horizon problem. Because the universe is so uniform, there was a paradox in which it would have been impossible for information to travel across the entire universe from one side to another and communicate that everything, density and expansion and heat, should be almost the same. Your horizon is because how far you can look into the universe, also called the observable universe because the actual universe is something like 30x bigger but we can never see it. Because information can't travel instantaneously, you have the horizon problem so they got around it with cosmic inflation.

[@andjelatatarovic8309]

thank you for the interview!

[@tretolien1195]

I will say this is probably one of the best most straightforward descriptions of the holographic principle, I only wish you would have related more to quantom phenomenon and the maths behind it

[@ikaeksen]

14:35 greenroom setup. Look his foot?

[@ikaeksen]

let me push your eyes into your sockets

[@johnmatthews2227]

Wait. so. black holes are super dense. so why doesn't all the atoms from the stuff sucked in just stay at the black hole but just really hardly packed?

[@TheGoodStuff]

+John Matthews They do for a while, but what Stephen Hawking discovered was that black holes slowly evaporate until they eventually disappear. This is called Hawking radiation. Originally Hawking's theory implied that all the information is lost as the black hole evaporates. The holographic principle is sort of a work around solution to that problem.

[@johnmatthews2227]

Now that have your attention, can you tell me what is Greg DOING!? The last upload on weezy waiter was a week ago!

[@ojosepedrorocha]

+John Matthews Check WheezyNews

[@twitchraidsforthewin6017]

well his analogy is somewhat incorect. information is basically could you tell what fell into a black hole? on the event horizon photons continuously orbit at escape velocity. so you would continously see two dimensional cross sections of . there is no way of saying that an exact replica of you is created. you could tell which matter has entered by the energy of the photons etc.... it's like saying a life sized poster is a replica of you. black holes are so dense that they warp space time so much that it folds in on itself. because you can't pack that much matter down to a pin head. you yourself are even 95% empty space the space between the electrons and nucleus the nuclei are practically empty except for quarks and they are practically empty. even 95 % empty isn't enough to account for the density of a black hole but it folds space time into multiple layers, so you can fit more matter into a visibly smaller space.

[@Xo1ot1]

+The Good Stuff So, if the Black Hole slowly disappears, where (and "how") is the information from the event horizon then after the Black Hole is gone?

[@DaVeganZombie]

Can we all take a moment to appreciate how nervous Craig was during that interview? You can really tell how much he respects and admires Susskind(as many rightfully should)

[@yellowburger]

I think a good analogy for extra-dimensions would be color--or sound. We evolved to see only a small part of the electromagnetic spectrum. Yet electromagnetic waves we cannot see exist all around us. Likewise with sound. Perhaps extra-dimensions exist in a similar way.

[@LeeviON]

Damnit, I was just about to go to sleep..

[@LeeviON]

LeeviON Okay, now I can go.. maybe I'll just check the KZbin home page one more time..

[@Gonko100]

So if our three dimensional reality is a hologram projection at the event horizon of a singularity or black hole, filled with information from higher dimensions, it is interesting to think about the nature of our conciousness from that perspective. The incomprehensible subjective experience as a projected, granular artefact of a higher principle of conciousness.

[@johnallen2771]

As a person who believes that he is God I like the idea of contemplating myself from different dimensions. Since I am God and the whole universe and everything in it I know that there is no past and no future, only the now. A series of nows, a life, death, rebirth and then it starts all over again. Or maybe you get off the wheel and stay in the Godhead and learn, grow. The only constant is change.

[@sasstemir]

This video is just perfect, and every word and phrase are so accurate. Brilliantly done. Thank you for bringing knowlegde to people. I'm gonna so recommend your channel to my friends.

[@michaelbruns449]

The faith shattering truth... We still don't know what we are... We still don't know why we are... We still don't know where we are... Totally mind bending...

[@blankenator62]

Yeah to visualize how this really works you need to know the math..... or DMT

[@pagingdrbitchcraft]

blankenator62 The math is definitely my event horizon 😩😆

[@PURCELLular]

Down to earth information on QM - there was also much beard. Full marks.

[@MarcelKlein88]

Very interesting interview, thanks for making this video!

[@hamzawahbi5253]

this was areally great video i love they way Leonard Susskind describes our mind or our way of thinking as an evolutionnary consequance we just didnt need to think about all this stuff , during this last year i discovered all these youtubers talkiing about scienc and inspiring people ; veritassium physics girl and all the pbs channels and it really did change my life well thank you awsome people out there on youtube ^^

[@lastsilhouette85]

Pfft doing LSD helped me understand general relativity XD

[@iamanidiotbut5523]

;)

[@HubbaRock84]

This video needs to be updated. Hawking radiation shows how "information" is not lost in a black hole

[@ifhesamanandshesamanimhugh2252]

+David Molenberg Got a link?

[@Maheonehooestse-HolyFireMan]

And thus since 4 months ago that too has been updated.

[@illusionz9053]

+If He's a man and she's a man, I want to be a Hobo. Funny enough, around 2 months ago Hawkins admitted that "Hawking radiation" is likely wrong.

[@MrPDTaylor]

Quotation marks are being generous. I fail to see how this radiation can be considered information in any way whatsoever.

[@DeathBringer769]

They're more like "grey holes."

[@Bozhena904]

I have the feeling that not only what is happening now is stored somewhere but so does every experience that i've ever had in my life is stored somewhere. So it's not just in my memory but actually stored somewhere and actually "going on" right now.

[@StaffRecordPlayer]

well done guys. curious on the outcome of the Fermilab experiment. I hope you will cover it :)

[@livingahumanlife2651]

They say it's not a hologram..! news.sciencemag.org/physics/2015/12/controversial-experiment-sees-no-evidence-universe-hologram

[@informationyes]

Great scot a real life doc brown, where he hiding the delorian?

[@wheezywaiter]

So is this comment a hologram?

[@ME-ng7rb]

What about that question. Is it a hologram?

[@benjaminwilliamson2624]

Does Matt have access to the cloning machine?

[@SmellySquid]

Yes

[@cubenerf]

WheezyWaiter Great video!! The ending is hilarious!

[@ljmichaels1666]

No I don't think it is hollow.

[@BettiFulan]

Man I loved the video and you made it so interesting thank you so much

[@Jayson_Jennings]

I am one of these people who does not understand the rigirous math work but am fascinated by the answers. My response to the breakthroughs in physics is "That sounds great on paper, now what are we going to use this knowledge to build? Let's figure out a way to implement this hologram principle into a device everybody can use and benefit from much like the computer, smart phone, or automobile."

[@lirothen]

THERE IS NO SPOON 0.o

[@JackDaniels10101]

lirothen This video wasn't about Uri Geller... ;)

[@Kyle-ek4gr]

lirothen i took the blue pill and had a boner for 6 hours

[@jayshriver3933]

+Kyle McKenzie I took the red pill and got diarrhea.

[@gin3868]

This conversation has turned weird.

[@ofon2000]

You mean there is no space. I have plenty of spoons in my drawers.

[@christinehenkes9649]

i like it a lot

[@Othmarius]

Wow, this show is epic and this series super cool. Great work. KZbin at it's best!

[@lesempereur]

Amazing guys ...Beyond words...That was simply fantastic video ! Many many thanks to Mr. Susskind...Keep the good work up The Good Stuff.

[@ljmastertroll]

I'm so glad we finally did away with reality.

[@ZenMasterChip]

***** Yep, now all we have to contend with is existence.

[@bangyahead1]

It's pronounced kind, as in kindergarden, not kind, as in be kind to strangers. FFS.

[@thekidfromfresno]

bangyahead1 these guys in this video are noobs

[@bopyourhead9584]

tony kidd ; ha ha yeah, noobs with moobs! the video would have been better without them 😉

[@Ice_Karma]

How did they even interview him and not hear him say his own last name? =(

[@diegodsxx1]

Kindergarten*

[@XEinstein]

Well Susskind knows 't Hooft and has worked closely with him. Still Susskind cannot pronounce 't Hooft accurately. Or Gerard for that matter.

[@excogitatorishominum6819]

This IS the good stuff, staying true to the name! subbed

[@diego87802]

Just found this video and I already love the channel!!

[@FirstRisingSouI]

Susskind is the coolest.

[@axeltheredpanda5453]

reality is just an illusion, buy gold, BYE!!!!! -Bill Cipher (Gravity Falls)

[@mollycampbell1656]

I love Gravity Falls!!!!

[@marthajopeters8846]

great video with Susskind's explanation of hologram theory and of Maldecena's contribution which was a huge step forward

[@mastrtonberry2]

I feel incredibly bad that I've never heard of Maldecena until this point. Time to read up on him

[@davidwilkie9551]

The video recording of the images in front of it are stored in a linear raster in a memory chip. To replay, the driving oscillation of the computer clock takes the memory lines and projects that onto a screen. It's a process of components derived from how time takes the "relativity" of information and projects it by timing duration through the "quantum clock" oscillator. ("I'm forever blowing bubbles"..., was a song once and that's how the quantization principle measures out spacetime structures) This example is an "intuitive" mode of identifying the universal process. It's an elemental process analysis of the observable universe. Professor Maldecena has a comprehensive mathematical formalism of the same principle applied to a category of reasoning. It's a matter of identification by the logical shaping of information accordance with the measured out Renormalization base. Ie the mathematics is checked by experiment as far as possible. "The Holographic Principle" sums it up. Bubbles within bubbles of quantum foam are "Here There and Everywhere" at the zero point axis in time. Possibly "holography" is the observable modulation-quantization principle of QM-TIME that applies to the phase-states of physics we can measure , but doesn't apply "sensibly" to the "dark" zones. _____ "Physicists are usually studying very big things, or studying very small things", when it's really all a continuous example of the Holographic Principle combining very new things with very old things, ie "change-rates" difference.. Things = QM-TIMESPACE. I've waited for a video that reminds everyone that the information, the quantization of a hologram is distributed on the boundary of the general wave-package, the same hierarchical distribution of the structures built up at every level of quantization is the Fractal process of reciprocal exclusion distribution, and the "mathematization", point by inflated-condensed cause-effect timing point. A Black Hole is an orientation of constituent quantization that is a nodal frequency shifting modulation in space. Lensing, not losing information, but lots of "quantum-chromatic aberration". String Theory actually "says" the singularity-source is turned insideout by timing modulation ratios, and because of the Quantum Fields Modulation Mechanism, which proceeds 1, 2, 3, 4.., and so on to infinite e-Pi orbital, which is the brane or picture plane "string"-paths-> "rubber band-sheet" in perspective, and which is the singularity vanishing point dominated in our holographic experience by "two-ness", ..that makes up a fractal orbital shape of a String or rubber band, by vertex or vortex type nodal integration. Our neural networks are QM-TIMESPACE, ..how and why experience is accumulated directs attention to different aspects of partly congruent/correspondent in-form-ation, look-see-perceive in cause-effect e-Pi-i resonance, ..common sense and perceptions, ..holographic existence.

[@adapa11]

Allegory of the Cave.

[@aurelienyonrac]

nice

[@WillyKillya]

That's what I think of every time I hear about the hologram theory too It's also away we can at least try to comprehend that there are more than three dimensions so I call in because we are living (?) 3D shadows!

[@olivierl-a5364]

Lets make a trip into the platonic realm of forms. just follow me into the black hole and you will see MATHEMATICS, the first rational emanation from the absolute. With mathematics, the sacred geometry of our reality can be understood. Yes, Yes welcome into the dark side of physics.

[@KushbyAdoki]

7:00 exactly what happened when i took too much acid. EXACTLY

[@titansoftime]

People joke but there is an odd relationship with hallucinogenics and the nature of reality.

[@KushbyAdoki]

defo

[@vinayseth1114]

+Titansoftime In what sense though? The way that I see it, they only change our perceptions since they are acting upon the brain.

[@bjeah]

Vinay Seth - The brain is a part of the universe experiencing itself, and it's tuned to experience the parts of the universe that is useful to the survival of its owner's body. If you tune the mechanism a little differently it will perceive the universe in other ways.

[@bjeah]

Cosmonauteable Define "deeper". I don't know about your chemistry, but my chemistry, actually my whole body, is composed strictly of elements of the universe interacting in a pattern that allows it to experience the rest of itself from the viewpoint of an individual I call "me". There is no individual me distinct from the universe. I am the universe. And so are you. Is that too far out? To say "it's just chemistry and electrical impulses" is to downplay how amazing the concept and physics of the universe is. It can create every object, thought, feeling and experience we know in this human experience and all that is to come in the future. I find that to be mind bendingly awe inspiring. In fact it's so wild that to even function in everyday life, we all have to apply a shroud of mundanity to the whole thing. Some people are TOO good at this and they end up seeing biology and existence as something mundane. I'm afraid you've fallen into that trap. I'm not saying the the opposite, ultra hippy view is much better. There has to be a balance, and for me, that balance still gives room for awe.

[@demep.airless]

Being ''here'' or ''there'' watching it, is a miracle indeed. No trouble from outside can touch this magical moment.

[@cpymo]

What is the origin of the information on the boundary and how is it 'projected,' producing a holographic universe? Is quantum uncertainty in a holographic universe just a replica of the original information or can it have a 'life' of its own, thus creating deviations in the projections?

[@jaimie00]

I ♥ Leonard Susskind.

[@zenmasterjay1]

Lynyrd Skynyrd

[@drjojo5551]

Y??

[@hamsteraufkoks5949]

REALITY IS AN ILLUSION! THE UNIVERSE IS A HOLOGRAM! BUY GOLD! BYE

[@RiDankulous]

Gold is part of the hologram.

[@flatisland]

what about the time factor. Is the holographic projection a momentarily one of the current state of the things thrown into the black hole respectively all the things currently going on in the universe are projected from/ to the boundary of it or does the event horizon respectively that boundary accumulate all information that has ever been there and will ever be there? And does elementary information change or does it always stay the same and if the latter would that explain a "static" projection?

[@rusty1here]

Can I correctly assume that the Nash equilibrium based pathways of game theory are somehow the governing dynamics that animate our reality from the underlying quantum fields through a lexicographical computation akin to Conway's game of Life? Please advise. Thank you

[@francoisstrength]

"Maybe they should smoke something better" hehehe dmt

[@4inaftermath454]

hehehe agreed

[@okaythen250]

Who came here searching bill cipher saying, "REALITY KS AN ILLUSION THE UNIVERSE IS A HOLOGRAM BUY GOLD BYE!!!"

[@damiancrowther7036]

This is great. The question about am I here or am I really a projection from/on the limit of the universe is a great one. No simple answer.

[@thejtotti29]

I wish I would have subscribed sooner. These are great.

[@samramdebest]

Wait doesn't this theory of that the universe is a hologram require that the universe has an edge? Because NO EDGE. DFTBA

[@IamSamys]

samramdebest No, I think it's just the metaphor being insufficient to explain it that way.

[@FirstRisingSouI]

+samramdebest It's the particle horizon, a.k.a. the edge of the observable universe. It's the distance beyond which light would have had to travel for longer than the universe has existed in order to reach us.

[@bjeah]

A black hole is generally thought of as spherical. The surface of a sphere (like our planet) has only two dimensions.

[@julz_and_toby9265]

samramdebest Not so fast here's something which I think it's impossible, ready here we go if were living in the simulation how do we know? how do we know if the person outside of the multi-simulation is real? what if the Aliens or humans who are running the multi-simulation realize that they are part of someone else’s multi-simulation and then the next one and the next one and the next one and the next one? we don’t even know if this could be a possibly that we’re living in a simulation, because we will never know who is our true creator because it’s impossible to know if he or she or thing is real or not, because How do we know if the person outside the multi-simulation could be real? how do we know if they’re not part of someone else’s multi-simulation, so therefore it be impossible for us to be living in a simulation, either if humans or aliens are simulating us or where being simulated while we’re playing a game, how do we know if where in a multi-simulation, if the person outside of the multi-simulation is not part of someone else’s multi-simulation, How do we know if it’s true, how is it possible, we will never know? That's why I think it’s impossible for us to know if we’re living in a simulation, because our creator can't be created out of nothing, even if there's people from other dimensions then what are the odds that they don't know if they are part of simulation, now people said that someone or something who made the simulation is coding this so he would want us to think that way, but how do we know that the person who is coding this, how do we know if he's not being coded as well, for the people who are seeing glitches in real life. In my opinion it's either demons or aliens who can break the laws of physics in our world, the devil can sometimes trick your mind into thinking reality isn't real or aliens can do the same,

[@Epiidevvy]

While I can't comprehend this. I really can't. I have really come to understand just how meaningless everything is. I don't mean this in a bad way. I mean that nothing has any meaning.

[@Epiidevvy]

UberKrassMann enjoy my stay? Bitch, I live here.

[@Epiidevvy]

elocifer I have no problem accepting nothing means anything. In fact that's quite comforting. The only meaning we have is the meaning we arbitrarily assign to ourselves and the way we perceive our reality. Which for all intents and purposes, is intrinsic meaning.

[@MrWorm-mp6vw]

Devyn VanFossen so are you implying that things only have meaning because we put a meaning to it?

[@Epiidevvy]

Hector Graciano I'm not implying it. I'm saying it's more than likely true.

[@MrWorm-mp6vw]

Scott Johnstone are you talking about heaven and hell?

[@otaku1524]

I have watched a couple of other presentations with Susskind. He is most aeticulate and affable, and makes physics easy to understand for the rest of us non-physicist types.

[@jordyjordyjordyjordyjordy]

I just discovered this channel through your wheezynews mindbrain video and i absolutely love what you're doing here it's also quite a shocking difference from your normal wheezywaiter content LOL

[@goodtasteification]

Gravity is our mediocre attempt to explain how things work.

[@PVMNHaar]

Remember! The reality is a illusion, the universe is a hologram buy gold bye!

[@mollycampbell1656]

- Bill Chiper Gravity Falls

[@julz_and_toby9265]

nhaar Not so fast here's something which I think it's impossible, ready here we go if were living in the simulation how do we know? how do we know if the person outside of the multi-simulation is real? what if the Aliens or humans who are running the multi-simulation realize that they are part of someone else’s multi-simulation and then the next one and the next one and the next one and the next one? we don’t even know if this could be a possibly that we’re living in a simulation, because we will never know who is our true creator because it’s impossible to know if he or she or thing is real or not, because How do we know if the person outside the multi-simulation could be real? how do we know if they’re not part of someone else’s multi-simulation, so therefore it be impossible for us to be living in a simulation, either if humans or aliens are simulating us or where being simulated while we’re playing a game, how do we know if where in a multi-simulation, if the person outside of the multi-simulation is not part of someone else’s multi-simulation, How do we know if it’s true, how is it possible, we will never know? That's why I think it’s impossible for us to know if we’re living in a simulation, because our creator can't be created out of nothing, even if there's people from other dimensions then what are the odds that they don't know if they are part of simulation, now people said that someone or something who made the simulation is coding this so he would want us to think that way, but how do we know that the person who is coding this, how do we know if he's not being coded as well, for the people who are seeing glitches in real life. In my opinion it's either demons or aliens who can break the laws of physics in our world, the devil can sometimes trick your mind into thinking reality isn't real or aliens can do the same,

[@DeathBringer769]

Reality being a hologram projected onto a 2D surface, for us, wouldn't actually make anything less meaningful or less "real" to us in any significant sense worth worrying about, in my opinion. (Yea, I know, Gravity Falls reference.)

[@nicholascremato]

Easy.......... look at a video game. you are playing in the center of the screen. as you move your characters to the left all the other characters seem to go to the right until they are off of the screen. If you keep going to the left the characters will go so far right there will be very little or no computer resources dedicated to that character. It would be standing in limbo with no background. Now lets take you. You know people who know people. If you walk or drive somewhere where you are away from interacting with any person you might notice that your surroundings are breaking down and will eventually look like the Holosuite on star trek the next generation, just a grid pattern. I have had this happen to me twice and I have had a car drive right through me at an intersection at 3AM on a tuesday night. There wasn't even wind that morning. Many people have seen ghost trains and had real trains drive right through their cars without injury. The computer program is breaking down at it's outermost edges.

[@carlosantuckwell]

Many people say we are not necessarily limited to our '3D-neurological-wiring, and, that there is another way to apperceive the higher reality (the source of this hologram), other than mathematics (which is also valid). The first person I know of to get the idea of the holographic nature of this 'reality' out to the public, was Michael Talbot, in his book: "The Holographic Universe" - in which he quotes scientists from many different fields (not just quantum physicists), including neurologists. He also quotes many studies by leading universities on: out of body experiences, near death experiences, remote viewing and others who are able to see a higher level of reality - to directly tune in to the vibrations that are the basis of all mass. He first published that book in 1991.

[@jaig]

Feeling lighthearted today, after a long time. One question: so if our universe a hologram within a black hole with info on the horizon surrounding us and within this exist other black holes - does it not translate to a telescopic set of black holes? Nope, not smoking.