How Old Is the Earth? - Dr. Andrew Snelling (Conf Lecture)

Рет қаралды 68,174

Is Genesis History?

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 761

@billperez1141 4 жыл бұрын

Dr. Snelling I enjoy your lectures very much. Give honor and praise to HIM who lives forever.

@mitchellc4 4 жыл бұрын

The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Repent and believe the gospel! Follow Jesus’ teachings! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent. RSV Only-monos God-theos Monos theos Monotheism The Father Jesus is the one sent by the true God (the Father)! Jesus never claimed to be God, Jesus said he has ab God! Jesus has a God! Jesus died! God can’t die! God raised Jesus from the dead!

@beasthunt Жыл бұрын

This was a pure masterclass. Fantastic! As an Electrical Engineer I get how amazing God has laid out science for us all to see and marvel at. It's mesmerizing and I LOVE how he laid so much to bare for all to see. Then he gives us men like these to show us....."LOOK, here it is. Plain as day!"

@jbw3 4 жыл бұрын

"This lecture is from our 2017 'Is Genesis History?' conference." Let's have another, shall we? Please let me know where to sign up, especially if it is near Nashville!

@mitchellc4 4 жыл бұрын

@jeanniesuesmith5328 4 жыл бұрын

Praise God ! At last, you are making sense about God's wonderful works that the "scientic system" of man has proffered us in error. Refreshing Truth !!!

@vagrantbushcraft3741 4 жыл бұрын

@@mitchellc4 prove it.

@masada2828 3 жыл бұрын

@@vagrantbushcraft3741 - exactly what Dr Snelling is doing. Ask ‘Evolution’ theory to prove it!

@johnstown2451 4 жыл бұрын

I heard a debate where the skeptic asked “why don’t you creationists write scientific articles for peer review and submit to journals?” I know why, but it’s still a good question. We need to have documents published online for others to run with. So many souls are being lost to ‘higher’ education.

@Kingfish179 4 жыл бұрын

These people do publish in their fields- a quick google search of their names will tell you this. But as regards the lack of ID and YEC research in secular science journals, this is easy- it's called institutional bias. The modern scientific-naturalist worldview contains unexamined presuppositions that, ironically enough, function as dogma in the scientific disciplines. In other words, you won't get a job or grant money if you don't accept certain ideas. Anyone who thinks that institutional science functions as some sort of idealistic search for truth has no clue how the system actually works; in practice, it ultimately comes down to money and politics. The whole modern world rests on evolution, an old earth, and naturalistic explanations for the origin of the universe. If these dogmas turn out to be false, then modern regimes lose their justification. There are journals popping up to counter this ideological echo-chamber like Inference and Bio-Complexity, but most ID advocates and YECs publish academic books because they don't have any other choice. A good example of someone who publishes in their field would be Dr. James Tour

@Kingfish179 4 жыл бұрын

@Link Age no u

@lochiesmith5273 4 жыл бұрын

@@salmonkill7 Snelling is a GEOLOGIST PhD.

@Goodboy-ip7ue 4 жыл бұрын

@@salmonkill7 I applaud that you believe the earth is 4.5 billion years old....do you believe that Adam and Eve appeared 6000 years ago🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

@Goodboy-ip7ue 4 жыл бұрын

@@salmonkill7 And you don't have to be a Christian to give someone the shirt off your back👍

@Nelson373737 4 жыл бұрын

Always good to hear cience according to the Bible.

@danwarsaw1009 4 жыл бұрын

Good indeed

@richieevans8617 4 жыл бұрын

THE BIBLE IS ALWAYS RIGHT THANK GOD

@obiwanduglobi6359 4 жыл бұрын

Science is free from dogma. It's: Antiscience.

@Nelson373737 4 жыл бұрын

@@obiwanduglobi6359 ????? Dohhh !!! If science goes against the Bible principles it's NOT true science. Bible is ALWAYS RIGHT because it's author is Jesus.

@obiwanduglobi6359 4 жыл бұрын

@@Nelson373737 Yeah brother, that's what I meant when I was talking about dogma.

@13lillies18 4 жыл бұрын

The speaker is very intelligent and great with his explanations. Terrific upload.

@WhirledPublishing 4 жыл бұрын

He's a lying deceiving idiot.

@ats-3693 3 жыл бұрын

He well may be intelligent, but he is lying.

@NOTTHASAME 3 жыл бұрын

A good speaker does not tell you what is right , don't get caught up in the speaker , it is the point thar counts. This guy didn't take time to understand that what they are age processing is the petrified body's if creatures of Gigantuous size and we live on top of these dead creatures who's body's have turned into rock. Once they realize that human's today are not the first human's to walk this planet before the flood. We are as small as ants and grasshoppers compared to the first human's that were titans and over 2 miles tall. All formations above the oceanic water's are body parts of these creatures and you have been taught to call it land or contenants. The truth is what you ask for but when you get truth, you have no place to put it. Be careful of what you seek, you just might find it and scare you enough to dismiss it. Seek and yee shall find. Once you find , you shall be amazed. He that finds shall never taste death.

@truthisbeautiful7492 8 ай бұрын

Awesome evidence

@lynnmitzy1643 4 жыл бұрын

I just found your channel this week. Thank you for posting. I enjoyed this very much.

@freeroamer9146 3 жыл бұрын

Very compelling! This one warrants several repeats, as do so many other lectures in this series! 👍👍

@valerieprice1745 Жыл бұрын

Excellent presentation.

@claudette4113 Жыл бұрын

An excellent lecture. Thank you and bless you all

@IsGenesisHistory Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching! :-)

@cl5862 3 жыл бұрын

Thank you for the brilliant insights, Andrew!

@mentalcompassno1 4 жыл бұрын

We have no idea if the earth has a solid core

@mitchellc4 4 жыл бұрын

@freyaaldrnari6086 4 жыл бұрын

@@salmonkill7 Something is occurring beneath. It no longer seems important to me.

@freemind.. 4 жыл бұрын

Shelby Cobra - _"We have no idea if the earth has a solid core"_ *We do know that the inner core is solid. HOWEVER... the COMPOSITION of the core, and the TEMPERATURE at the core, are completely speculative, based on presupposition and inference... and the assumptions are wrong.*

@doowopkid0420 3 жыл бұрын

Bob Smith Calling someone a clown while saying not understand-Priceless

@ats-3693 3 жыл бұрын

Well we actually do, it is surprisingly easy to image the interior of the earth using seismic vibrations and waves.

@glennedgar5057 4 жыл бұрын

Good video. Really learned good stuff. I was educated as nuclear engineer.

@mitchellc4 4 жыл бұрын

@hisxmark 2 жыл бұрын

@@mitchellc4 Yes, indeed! Sell all you have and give it to the poor! Invite me to the yard sale. I'm not a Christian.

@CassetteMaster 2 жыл бұрын

@@hisxmark Jesus is Lord.

@hisxmark 2 жыл бұрын

@@CassetteMaster When are you selling your all your possessions?

@hisxmark 2 жыл бұрын

That's a good slave. Have a cookie!

@johnwall5624 2 жыл бұрын

Awesome. Thank you!!

@stevecowen5164 4 жыл бұрын

Great program. I'm not a Christian. I am a creationist because of the compelling arguments made by the likes of Dr. Snelling.

@joeboudreault2226 2 жыл бұрын

Then become a Christian. Dr Snelling explained how Jesus is also the Creator.

@fcarolsimmons6969 2 жыл бұрын

God bless you!!!!

@BigHonkinGoose 4 жыл бұрын

This is interesting!

@sabhishek9289 Жыл бұрын

Very interesting video.

@selmandr 4 жыл бұрын

Comets are not dirty snowballs. The Thunderbolts project has a number of KZbin videos reporting the latest information we have about comets and asteroids. Apparently they are material blown off of planets from electrical discharges between planets in the early days of our solar system.

@JonathanRedden-wh6un Жыл бұрын

Many thanks Dr Andrew for this clear lecture. The flood is referred to as the major catastrophe. After the fall, we are told that God cursed the ground. Maybe this was a further catastrophe.

@pepper_plus2874 4 жыл бұрын

I have a question, based on the theory that the Earth is about 6000 years old, astronomers discovered a space object (I don't remember if it was a galaxy or a nebula) emitting radio waves .(and they arrived for now) the distance of this object is about 2 or 3 billion light years (in other words, light takes this time to get here) ... But the question is whether the earth is 6000 years old How could the light have reached Earth in a shorter time?

@vagrantbushcraft3741 4 жыл бұрын

It didn’t. The earth is billions of years old.

@Lethoscorpia 4 жыл бұрын

This is the best explanation I have found for that dilemma www.jw.org/en/bible-teachings/questions/days-of-creation-universe/

@pepper_plus2874 4 жыл бұрын

@@Lethoscorpia wow thanks, .I never would have thought that the universe could have been created before the earth

@billwebb554 4 жыл бұрын

The universe is estimated to be about 13.8 billion years old and the Earth about 4.5 billion years old. Mankind was created in the recent past some thousands of years. Yes Starlight etc shows things to be very old in space kzbin.info/www/bejne/o5uXoZKEga6tnqs

@dan9521 Жыл бұрын

Actually look up we cannot measure the speed of light and also Dr. Jason Lisle's talks about the universe, very compelling

@juantapia8098 4 жыл бұрын

Thank You So Very Much !! You are Right and do give interesting Seminars. May God Continue to Bless You & in Christ Jesus Name,., Amen.

@DowsaTV 4 жыл бұрын

Great work!

@suzannehartmann946 4 жыл бұрын

Ok I do not understand why you would call it true age as of the time the basalt emerged at the surface as opposed to the age of the parent rock. To me the age of creation is the true age. The age it surfaced is the age it surfaces and began weathering. I have always complained some geologists fail to understand that lava is NOT "new rock" simply because it melted (magma) then flowed (lava) then hardened at the surface. Its radioactivity did not change that. Melting and freezing is a physical change, it did not just then get "created". It merely melted just like ice melting then getting frozen. Radioactivity changes over time as the rate of decay from the date of creation.

@mitchellc4 4 жыл бұрын

@easyenetwork2023 4 жыл бұрын

That is why most Christian scientists are hesitant to believe in radiometric dating.

@regdor8187 4 жыл бұрын

All matter, heaver than Hydrogen, is created in successive consolidations and explosions of Stars.....Hence the age of any particular matter is the time since the last cycle and each cycle produces ever more dense matter...The last cycle that we can detect is called a Black Hole but that is not the end for extreme energy has been detected being expelled from it's poles.....

@naplesbeachfan 3 жыл бұрын

Radioactive rates are affected by electrical interference, as well as contamination. So lightning strikes can change the ages of the ages or rocks and bones. Love this channel as it gives history without the blinders of Uniformity. Thank you to all.

@qcsorter4626 Жыл бұрын

Are there any clips on KZbin of Dr. Snelling debating with mainstream geologists?

@kevinrussell1144 10 ай бұрын

What would be the point? His mind is made up. There is nothing any geologist could say that would make him question his belief.

@PerryMarshallScott 10 ай бұрын

I haven't seen any. Outfits like Answers in Genesis, out of necessity, build their own museums / venues, and tend to self publish rather than try to foot it in mainstream literature or debate forums. Jehovah's witnesses and others do the same. As you can see from the comments here, they have a captive, but limited audience who are likely neither equiped or interested in contesting what they produce because it confirms their biases.

@beestoe993 9 ай бұрын

They are all convoluted, brainwashed and heavily biased. Why should he bother? Cast not your pearls to swine

@truthisbeautiful7492 8 ай бұрын

@@PerryMarshallScottalso I am surprised you weren't aware of the debate that Ken Ham did at the creation museum against Bill Nye, and the informal 'debate' they did at the Ark. So that's at least one formal debate that AIG has done. And if I recall, Dr. Jason Lisle and Ken Ham had a debate with Dr. Hugh Ross on young earth vs old earth.

@mariebcfhs9491 Жыл бұрын

Good day to you sir, Doctor Titalac

@njmattei0 3 жыл бұрын

Amen brother, this was excellent.

@EYESWIDEOPEN00 Жыл бұрын

I have to ask the question because when we are talking about experts on our side of the fence in regards to biblical text and what the age of the Earth is and what's above our heads, i really wish that i would see this topic discussed. And there are many topics in biblical text that i have never seen covered by any of these guys. I'll focus on the main one since this is more direct to their fields. But in is Genesis history the full movie (which I honestly did enjoy) God using a water ball to create the Earth was highlighted. Why aren't we ever looking into the fact that biblical text references a firmament. If you look at images/drawings that have been done using Hebrew text as a guideline, they all highlight waters above the firmament, a flat plane earth with the great deep underneath it and the earth resting on pillars. They also highlight a local Sun and Moon which actually does make more sense. I can even say it's been witnessed and captured on video. But back on topic directly, what is a Plane is geometry. It is a flat 2 dimensional surface that can only be measured in length and width, but can come in any shape, eg a square, a circle, a triangle and so on. Why is a Plane ✈️ called a Plane. The unbiased question asked online as the top answer is this word for word “In the French from which it was borrowed, the 'plane' is related to a geometrical plane (flat surface), which then became the name of the flat parts of flying machines that allow them to achieve lift,” So can someone please explain how the word Plane clearly meaning a flat surface, can end up being a round ball by simply adding the letter "T" onto the end of the word Plane. Biblical text makes no reference to a planet or planets, globes, space, and as also highlighted by yourselves, no mention of a Universe. So are we just ignoring the text or making up a reason why Universe wasn't a word in the Hebrew language. More transparency and discussion is needed, especially when it's right up these guys alley. Cheers

@masada2828 8 ай бұрын

U mean ‘he that sitteth on the circle of earth’ in Isaiah 40.

@EYESWIDEOPEN00 8 ай бұрын

@@masada2828or does it read he that sits above the round spinning ball above the earth? You also overlooked everything else i stated. No mention of planets. So if it's not written in the text, then these terms have come from somewhere else. Do you really think that if god had made all of these planets, that they wouldn't have been mentioned as such. Sun moon and stars. Our entire history is full of star and planet worship. All of these gods. The space shuttle Apollo. Greek God. The space rocket Artemis, Greek Goddess and the sister of Apollo. Satellites named ISIS. The Egyptian God originally. Our $ symbol is nothing more than the letters of ISIS overlaid over one another.

@aquillafleetwood8180 4 жыл бұрын

Genesis 1: 14...the stars shall be for signs... Google, the Northern Cross, by Aquilla Fleetwood, youtube! The earth is young....

@mitchellc4 4 жыл бұрын

@jthomas5226 4 жыл бұрын

@Ric Rovey GAP theory is pure garbage. 😒

@jthomas5226 4 жыл бұрын

@Ric Rovey Where is it written?

@jthomas5226 4 жыл бұрын

@Ric Rovey Without form and void doesn't mean it wasn't perfect. In fact after that day God uses the materials to form all other things related to earth. Atmosphere, plants, animals, then man. The Gap theory would have Satan's fall before man was created. Also before the Sun, Moon, and stars were created on day 4. That goes directly against Jobs account of there creation. Day and night when used together means 24 hours. Day and night when used with a number means 24 hours. I have listened to Andrew Murray and that doesn't mean I believe his opinion. I will link you to another interesting opinion. I don't know if I totally believe it also but it is plausible.

@jthomas5226 4 жыл бұрын

@Ric Rovey Why are you putting a time stamp on Satan's fall? Yes God did create the earth out of nothing. Like the Sun, Moon, and Stars. No He didn't create plants, animals or man out of nothing. Birds and sea creatures out of water. Except for the birds He created in front of Adam. Land animals and man from the ground. Including the ones He formed in front of Adam. All other statements about the gap theory are those read into scripture. Just like men do with Genesis 6. They twist the scriptures to fit a man made belief. There is only mention of 1 fall not 2 falls. Genesis 1:31 could not be written if sin and Satan had already fallen.

@leslieladyhawke 4 жыл бұрын

Cant wait!

@bluebluedogbooks 3 жыл бұрын

Interesting.

@OlegTirsina 4 жыл бұрын

Good teaching! Just funny how he says that he "ashumes", "ashuming" :)

@suzannehartmann946 4 жыл бұрын

I caught that too. Here in the US we have SOOO many accents. I know of at least 4 different southern accents. Many people from other parts of the Us think of only one. My parents were a "mixed" marriage. Atlanta GA and Tennessee. Two very different accents lol.

@dingorex 4 жыл бұрын

@@suzannehartmann946 We say assuming in Alabama. lol.

@mitchellc4 4 жыл бұрын

@iamwhoyousayiam6773 4 жыл бұрын

@@mitchellc4 Given the channel, you're preaching to the choir.

@mattmessuh 3 жыл бұрын

@@mitchellc4 what exactly do you believe Jesus is?

@VaxtorT 3 жыл бұрын

Where are all the human bones/fossils from all those who perished during the Flood? Honest question I have been asked and haven't a good answer with which to respond.

@notme3517 3 жыл бұрын

I was wondering that as well. Let me know if you find a solid answer.

@VaxtorT 3 жыл бұрын

@@notme3517 My only suitable answer is one that cannot be substantiated by physical evidence. Judging by the Fossil record the Flood first affected the lower order of marine life, tossing them up upon the land masses. Now, judging from the archeological evidence of footprints left in wet clay, it appears that the creatures on the land had opportunity to flee the floodwaters for a time before being completely immersed. Hence, the reason their remains are found in the higher sediments deposited by the flood. So, it may be plausibly assumed that men had some time with which to inadequately prepare by finding some form of flotation or fleeing to higher ground. This suggests that their bodies remained eithet buried in the top layers of sedimentation or else upon the re-emerging land when the flood waters abated. This in turn means that their bodies were consumed rather than being preserved in the fossil record. There are other legends and myths such as some being transformed into aquatic creatures; but, of course, these are legends of the supernatural and I am sticking to the more naturalistic explanation.

@ozowen 2 жыл бұрын

@@YouToobeism It's almost like they are talking BS isn't it?

@anthonypolonkay2681 2 жыл бұрын

Actually there are rare examples of human skeletons being found in layers to deep should have. The most famous of which is a pair of inarticulate remains that were partially fossilized and were uncovered deep in a mining query. They only explaination given about the skeletons is that they were somehow native American burials. Which makes not alot of sense at all given the circumstances.

@freemind.. Жыл бұрын

@@VaxtorT - Most human remains were utterly destroyed during the Global Flood, and understandably so. However, fossilized human bones HAVE been found in what is referred to as the lower Cretaceous layer, which would mean they must be around 140 million years old if we use the unscientific evolutionary stratigraphic dating method. That places them solidly in the middle of the time-period during which dinosaurs supposedly roamed the Earth. The find is called Malachite Man, and evolutionary anthropologists refuse to even look at it because it destroys their entire paradigm. 10 skeletons were found - 5 men, 4 women and 1 infant. Below is a video link. The portion about the Malachite Man begins at 2hrs 10 minutes into the video, and goes for 30 minutes, though I believe the entire video is worth watching. Can't post the link, so you'll have to find it. Title - *Don Patton - Co-existence of man and dinosaurs (all 4 videos)* It is around 4hrs 10min long, but again, start at 2hrs 10min for Malachite Man. Watch the rest later.

@GuitarmanJoel87 Жыл бұрын

THANK YOU for this material! Praise God! 🤲

@IsGenesisHistory Жыл бұрын

Thank you for watching!

@regdor8187 4 жыл бұрын

A question of where you start counting....All matter, heaver than Hydrogen, is created in successive consolidations and explosions of Stars.....Hence the age of any particular matter is the time since the last cycle and each cycle produces ever more dense matter... The last cycle that we can detect is called a Black Hole but that is not the end for extreme energy has been detected being expelled from it's poles.....

@rotorfib8719 4 жыл бұрын

That was an amazing ending, thank you and God bless.

@sasquatchhadarock968 11 ай бұрын

Comets are not "dirty snowballs". Two different space agencies sent probes to two different comets. Both made physical contact. Neither found loose dust and ice. Both observed hard, rocky bodies.

@nickydaviesnsdpharms3084 Жыл бұрын

that's a bizarre thing to say ''we don't know because we weren't there'' iv'e been hearing this lately and couldn't get my head around it at first because one doesn't need to have been there to see a thing happen with their own eyes in order to know it took place. A good example of this from your own worldview is any one of the things God supposedly said in Genesis creation narrative.

@injcksn1994 4 жыл бұрын

What about the reset of Argon 40 when the rock is in a liquid state? Scientists say that Argon 40 leaves the rock as a gas before the lava solidifies. That explains the assumption that there was no Argon 40 when the lava was solidified.

@anthonypolonkay2681 2 жыл бұрын

If you research any papers regarding k/ar dating in known age rocks, you'll see that the idea that all argon boils out of magma/lava before cooling, inst just sometimes wrong, it's wrong in every recorded instance.

@sds_80 Жыл бұрын

Thank you, great lecture. Wish there was K-8 curriculum based on this type of perspective. School kids need to be presented with the truth about competing secular vs Biblical scientific worldviews.

@user-vn8so9rf3d Жыл бұрын

Yes, but the curriculum authority in your country must also incorporate explanations of more than just the Flood. YEC people would need to also explain the science of many asteroid impact craters left on Earth by God, and also explain why no ancient texts mention these, despite most being far larger than the Flood. Ditto for vulcanism. Ditto for ancient evidence, again directly attributed to God for massive stellar explosions that we are just seeing, but for stellar events that actually happened millions of years ago. YEC advocates explain these events by saying God created the light in transit, or God changed the laws of physics at some time. It's going to be hard to put this in a science curriculum that science teachers will not ridicule. As a Christian teacher, I would have a problem teaching that God has not told the truth here. In my country I taught alongside many science teachers - Many were atheist, and only some were Christians, plus an increasing number were devout Sikhs, Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus. My students also came from similarly diverse backgrounds.

@PerryMarshallScott 10 ай бұрын

Key word. Competing. Some world views survive scrutiny with credibility, others don't. The Biblical view is not scientific and has its place among those that don't stack up.

@brobdingnagianone900 4 жыл бұрын

So he mentions how the magnetic field changes according to how the motion of molten core changes direction. Makes since. The motion probably changes due to the precession of the earths axis. The time it takes for the precession to occur is a known ro be approximately 25000 years. That would account for the numerous changes in the poles. That's a fact. We have ice cores that prove the duration of ice ages. There's indisputable evidence that civilizations existed during the ice age when the sea levels were lower are now covered. I believe the last ice age, we are still coming out of , but the sea levels rose about 12000 years ago. Salvation isn't based on the age of the earth. Stop arguing inconsequential things.

@lochiesmith5273 4 жыл бұрын

Incorrect. The ice core dates are based on assumptions too, try finding out what they are, and think how the flood affected them. There was one post-flood ice age where sea levels were a lot lower. It is not inconsequential - every book of the New Testament treats Gen 1- 11 as history. It stands together.

@brobdingnagianone900 4 жыл бұрын

@@lochiesmith5273 the bible is not a history book. It is a collection of books that teaches us how to have a relationship with God and arguing the age of the earth is trivial in comparison to john 3:16.

@lochiesmith5273 4 жыл бұрын

@@brobdingnagianone900 Most of it is straight history. Nowadays telling people the real age of the Earth is pivotal to them getting a relationship with God.

@treyfred3247 4 жыл бұрын

ATHEIST ASKED ME: How old is the Universe (Earth)? (And I will add what about 6 days of creation?) LET ME ANSWER YOUR QUESTION USING EINSTEIN and TIME DILATION. Please watch the very short Carl Sagan video clip below for context From Carl Sagan’s show the cosmos: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bmSpdalmYrqGp5o In this video, Carl Sagan talks about two different types of time. Ship Time at the speed of light, and Earth time. The most important comparison in the video, is when Carl Sagan talks about the Ship Time to circumnavigate the entire Known universe (56 years for the Space Ship Traveler) and the amount of “Earth time” that would have passed for those left behind (Carl Sagan says, “they would [BE] 10s of Billions of Years in the Far Far Future” Earth Time). In fact, Earth would have been destroyed by our sun going Super Nova before we return, BUT for the sake of argument, we imagine again, that the Earth is still here. Now what is the conversation we would have, with those people on the Earth? We would exclaim-it is I, the space traveler, one of your ancestors, and only 56 years have passed since I left Earth. Of course, the people on the Earth would claim I was insane. According to our history, that space flight took place Billions and Billions of years ago, and there is no way you are the astronaut that left Earth so long ago. Question: Which group is telling the truth about the passage of time? Answer-Both of them Now the best part, what in the world does this have to do with the Bible, time dilation, and sheep herders in the Land of Israel 2400 years ago during the time of King David, and 2000 years ago with the Apostle Peter? Lets start with: 2 Peter 3:8 8 But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. It is very important to find out what Peter means by this statement, but first I want to concentrate on how Peter could possibly have come up with this statement. As Christians, we of course believe in divine revelation though the holy spirit is one possible way-but my Atheist friends are already groaning. The other possible way, is the Old Testament. In fact, Psalm 90:4 adds a critical component to what Peter wrote. Here is the verse: A thousand years in your sight are like a day that has just gone by, or like a watch in the night. So the first part of the Psalm, basically mirrors what Peter wrote, but the last part of the verse is key: “or like a watch in the night.” So what is a watch in the night-3 hours of time. There were 4 watches each night, for a total of 12 hours. WHAT DOES THIS ALL MEAN? For God, time is relative. If God chooses-he can spend 1000 of his years, in a space of only 3 hours of Earth Time. Or, if God chooses-he can spend a 1000 of his years in one day of Earth Time. Or (since this is a principle and not a dogmatic rule) if God chooses-he can spend a 1000 of his years in only 3 seconds of Earth time. Conversely, two thousand years can pass here on Earth, but for God, only 48 hours could have past, or 6 hours, or 6 seconds. The truly amazing thing is, until Albert Einstein elucidated his Theory of Special Relativity, ideas like these were relegated to science fiction. Today, this is scientifically possible in this universe. Now, think about the 6 days of creation, spoken about in the Book of Genesis. From who’s perspective, are these days given? Since man is not created until the 6th day-and the Bible says we are still in the 7th day, they must be from God’s perspective. Therefore, if time is relative for God, he can “live” 1,000, or 10,000 or 100,000 or 1 Billion years in one 24 hour Earth day. And, again, conversely, a 24 hour period of time could pass for God, yet a billion years could pass on Earth. Since this IS A SCIENTIFIC possibility, and not simply speculation, this can go a long way to reconcile the young Earth, old Earth Debate

@alephtav4254 4 жыл бұрын

Now I umderstand the Importance of CROSS sectioning Proving and get Right Conclusion about what findings of a certain material.. finding the cause of Everything Thank GOD for Great Wisdom givem to MAN.. And I LOVE doing the cross sections Thank GOD for revelations from MATH, Science, Archeology, History and Geneology of First Man to Jesus in Bible..

@mitchellc4 4 жыл бұрын

@donniev8181 2 жыл бұрын

Remember though, God created earth and everything else for that matter with an apparent age. If people would've been asked to figure out how Adam was on his first day, they could've never figured out his real age. "A man who thinks halfheartedly will not believe in God, but a man who truly thinks has to believe in God" Isaac Newton

@francisxavierpassanha5063 4 жыл бұрын

Dr. Snelling, may the Lord bless you. I praise God . Jesus is my Lord..

@francisxavierpassanha5063 4 жыл бұрын

@@BobSmith-ew5oi ,the questions raised by you may appeal to the person who is lost eternally like you. However have some patience to get answer to your questions. If you have patience, search in the scriptures as regards the Holiness of God, justice of God, and judgement of God. Bcoz of Gods Holiness , his judgement and wrath comes. If you have not understood the scriptures, then you are a self righteous person. Question : who is a self righteous person ? Ans: a person who thinks he is wiser than the God o f the Bible. A person who thinks he is holier than The God of the Bible. A person who compares himself with another person and considers himself far better than that sinful person . A self deceived religionist like roman catholic pope, priest and nuns , who think that they can plz God by good works alone , and hence go to heaven. An arrogant, proud , haughty person. These are some of the examples I have given to you. Mr Bobsmith, (Ephesians 2:8, t o 10) Salvation is by faith and by grace alone lest anyone should boast.salvation is the gift of God and not of works. Mr. Bobsmith , you are deceived by lies of Satan. You are deceived by your own wisdom. You are deceived by your reasoning and logic. YOU ARE DECEIVED BY YOUR OWN HEART BECAUSE OF THE SIN. If you don't repent before it is too late , you will appear naked before the white throne judgement seat of the Just and righteous God. ( Revelation 20:11to 15). You will get answers to your questions on that day, but you have missed the bus (SALVATION).

@davidgardner863 2 жыл бұрын

Snelling is being misleading in misquoting Carl Sagan’s book “Comet” in referring to the Oort Cloud. It actually reads ‘ Yet there is not yet a shred of direct OBSERVATIONAL evidence for its existence”, meaning those comets have not been observed by telescope.

@billypilgrim4816 2 жыл бұрын

Selective quote mines being misleading? As if creationists would resort to that :)

@phillipdavis4507 Жыл бұрын

Love your British accent 😁

@bugnfront 4 жыл бұрын

Assuming all data is linear is a fault to start. Location is dynamic, weather is dynamic and all other factors! Assumptions are the beginning pattern of being off course! As the wind is Dynamic so is life itself. The environment is in constant flux...this is a dynamic fact!

@iamwhoyousayiam6773 4 жыл бұрын

If HAARP can exist, that means this can happen to the earth even quicker.

@KevinKilgorepage 4 жыл бұрын

there are no "reversals", it is weak and strong, and if you know what a graph is, and understand "mean" and "median" you can SEE they moved the graph to reflect the median, and what was below was called a REVERSAL ! There is no place on earth where your compass points SOUTH. I wish they would stop repeating this. You might as well repeat all the lies.

@mikedeitz2924 4 жыл бұрын

The magnetism of the earth has flopped in the past and it is what will happen again.

@KevinKilgorepage 4 жыл бұрын

@@mikedeitz2924 did you read the side scanning radar data ? i did .

@dooglitas 4 жыл бұрын

@@KevinKilgorepage What scanning radar data are you talking about? Reversals occurred at a time before radar existed, so I have no idea what you are talking about.

@KevinKilgorepage 4 жыл бұрын

@@dooglitas you have GOOGLE look it up yourself ! I aint your boy

@dooglitas 4 жыл бұрын

@@KevinKilgorepage Like I said, radar didn't exist when the reversals happened, so I have no idea what you're talking about. Since i have no idea what you're talking about, I have no idea what in the world you think I should "Google." I'm not asking you to be "my boy" (what an asinine comment). I'm just asking you to say something that makes sense. If you can't do that, then I guess we're done here.

@mountainviewsoapcompany5712 4 жыл бұрын

Very very good!

@disiamtheillusion 4 жыл бұрын

I love the amount of time energy and resource spent on this type of stuff vs ending poverty and hunger and the stuff jesus said to do

@calvinismisheresy9941 4 жыл бұрын

Speaking of which, Jesus said the poor is always with you (Matthew 26:11 KJV). But this verse isn’t saying we shouldn’t help those who are poor and it’s sad I have to say that nowadays. Christians should still help those suffering from poverty and hunger in need with compassion as Jesus did (Mark 8:2 KJV) and when we help the needy we honor our Creator (Proverbs 14:31 KJV). But your lack of respect for “this type of stuff” (which is called apologetics) is not following God’s word. Apologetics is written in God’s word which is a command to be ready always to give an answer to those who ask for the reason of the hope that is in you with meekness and fear (1 Peter 3:15 KJV). The absence of following God’s word to utilize apologetics is the main reason why young people are leaving the church. This is why we do what we do so next time you should find out why creation science ministries spend a great amount of time, energy and resources in this activity before you criticize it.

@disiamtheillusion 4 жыл бұрын

@@calvinismisheresy9941 nota zionist or so called hebrew so their inaccurate claim of race and title is meaningless.what language did abram speak and write? Wasnt hebrew.

@gwkdad 4 жыл бұрын

What I love is the amount of time and energy someone like you spends commenting about videos they find fault with. Couldn't you do something better with your life than trolling on youtube???

@disiamtheillusion 4 жыл бұрын

@@gwkdad not really.im a slave in a system designed to destroy human life and peace of mind.name calling is a tool of the weak mind,no matter how many people in your echo chamber engage in it to feel good.maybe go vote and youll feel important or whatever you hoped for

@Bildad1976 4 жыл бұрын

My family and our church is actually doing both. I've discovered that the people who arrogantly criticize others like this are not involved with helping the poor. So, which ministries to the poor are you supporting?

@elpolo5500 4 жыл бұрын

Most ignorance is vincible ignorance. We don't know because we don't want to know. Aldous Huxley

@MarkOBrienmarkspage1 3 жыл бұрын

This is why I say that believing in evolution and atheism is like having a learning disability. When a person struggles with a learning disability they have trouble learning the core competencies of a particular ideology and struggle with reading comprehension and other critical thinking skills. Atheists definitely present as people struggling with core competencies and learning problems since they cannot logically work through any potential evidence of creationism. Evolution is more of a learning disability than a belief system

@pw8721 4 жыл бұрын

Sorry I’m asking this here....but.... Rev 12: 1-2...... I’ve heard this sign occurred in Sept 2017 exactly as the verse says. Can anyone here confirm that or recommend at site to show that constellation alignment happened. Thank you.

@kiowagrant8503 4 жыл бұрын

This is not an actual celestial event of sun, moon and stars. This is a quick overview of Israel and the Messiah. Cross reference this with Joseph's dream Genesis 37:9 (sun, moon and stars represent his father, Jacob and his brothers i.e Israel). Read all of Chpt. 12 for full context. The woman spoken of is Israel. Verses 3 and 4 speak of Satan and his fallen angels. Verse 4 depicts Satan waiting for "her" (Israel) to deliver the Messiah and kill Him. Remember the decree to kill all male children? Verse 5" And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron (Jesus): and her child was caught up unto God, and to His throne (Ascension of Christ after resurrection).

@markmooney5662 4 жыл бұрын

The sign represents Israel ...12 stars...12 tribes...it happened in may 1948 and we are now living in the last days. can i recommend a video on 'Searchlight with Jon Courson'...in the playlist it gives Revelation chapter by chapter and explains each one...people think this is a hard book to understand...it really isn't....but it is very very interesting. Grace and peace to you Gilly wife of Mark

@brobdingnagianone900 4 жыл бұрын

When was the Sphinx built? It shows indisputable evidence of water erosion. When did it rain enough to erode the sphinx? About 12000 years ago.

@malcolmdavid722 4 жыл бұрын

We can all agree Oil, gas and coal deposits came from huge deposits of decaying vegetation when dinosaurs roamed and all that required huge amounts of water. Enough water then in the atmosphere for a later flood and further proof the earth is not young

@brobdingnagianone900 4 жыл бұрын

I don't doubt there was a global flood. There are too many worldwide accounts of it including the bible. But I don't think that the earth is as young as some creationists believe. I think a lot of so called pre recorded history has been lost due to numerous cataclysmic events including the flood. Another point I'd like to make is that I am not an evolutionist. Monkeys have always been monkeys and humans have always been humans. But I do believe animals may adapt and change with the environment over time. That does not mean it results in new species though. God created the heavens and the earth, man, woman, and every animal. I just think the time line used by creationists is wrong and they think that if you don't believe that way you don't believe the word of God. That's bullcrap and it divides people. What really matter is John 3:16.

@davidh5101 3 жыл бұрын

I like how he can keep a straight face through the whole thing.

@gaz1tinsley 2 жыл бұрын

He is a professional and he means what he is saying with vigour !

@johnbrinsmead3316 2 жыл бұрын

Why should we assume that the observed short period comets have to be the same age as the solar system or at least have occupied their current orbits.

@anthonypolonkay2681 2 жыл бұрын

Because the proposed naturalistic origin of comets has them form at the same time as the begining of our solar system. If this were the case operating on a deep time paradigm all the comets would have formed, and disintegrated by now.

@ramigilneas9274 2 жыл бұрын

@@anthonypolonkay2681 Nah… the religious explanation is that comets were created within the same week as everything else. The scientific explanation is that comets are still getting created today.

@anthonypolonkay2681 2 жыл бұрын

@@ramigilneas9274 no.. actually it isn't, that's kinda the issue.

@TheJimtanker 3 жыл бұрын

The Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old, the Solar System is approximately 4.6 billion years old and the universe is approximately 13.8 billion years old. Anyone who doesn't believe that doesn't believe in science.

@jameswilkinson259 2 жыл бұрын

Spoiler: it isn't 6000 years old.

@devinfraser9795 4 жыл бұрын

Ahh this will be good ..

@mitchellc4 4 жыл бұрын

@rturner5676 4 жыл бұрын

@@mitchellc4 You do realize that quoting a book that atheists and people from non-Christian religions don't believe is anything other than a work of fiction doesn't change many minds, right? For my part, I'll be swilling down beer in Valhalla and slurping up noodles rained from on high by the Flying Spaghetti Monster, so I'm good.

@doowopkid0420 3 жыл бұрын

R Turner Are you black? Because Valhalla doesn’t have any black people

@jim-qz7up 4 жыл бұрын

well the year is 2020.... so its definitely gotta be 6,666 old

@jim-qz7up 4 жыл бұрын

@Northstar Borealis we'll see.... we'll all see

@drezilla1310 4 жыл бұрын

Northstar Borealis Nice fairytales. Did everything come from nothing also?

@sungyrlusa8580 4 жыл бұрын

The current 2019/2020 in Hebrew colander 5780.🇮🇱

@ManlyServant 4 жыл бұрын

@Northstar Borealis 300k year? did ever human in history record this thing?,its all carbon-dating,try to watch their video about carbon dating,all over bones were starts interesting after the scientists miss-using the carbon-dating

@drezilla1310 4 жыл бұрын

@Northstar Borealis School is the only place to learn? No wonder you believe in fairytales. Go to school in Russia, see what you’ll learn. Every country has many biases. You should watch the video and actually learn something...

@TheLeediger 4 жыл бұрын

A geologist making comments about astronomical events, like comets, is way out of his wheel house. His quote, "We are making assumptions." There are quite far fewer assumptions with an Old Earth view point. The reason we still have mountains is because tectonic plates are still moving. And his erosion of continents doesn't even take into account volcanoes, skipping over a whole lot of information. He is leaving an amazing amount of science off the table in his discussion.

@lochiesmith5273 4 жыл бұрын

The continental movements are not fast enough to cause landforms to replace the erosion. Also the majority of landforms observed are flat sedimentary. Volcanoes do not produce that.

@olgaburgos7780 2 жыл бұрын

Evolution theory is95 per cent made out of assumptions,Robs lies, maybies

@DeeegerD 4 жыл бұрын

I believe both ages as Genesis states "The earth became void" (if you take it to the Strong's concordance you'll see that was the true meaning, and not "the earth was void.")

@GordoFabulous 4 жыл бұрын

This is topic I find most fascinating, particularly in light of the electric universe's theory of the 12,000 year disaster cycle, which would effectively wipe out the Earth and require everything to be restarted. (See Suspicious0bservers and Thunderbolts Project YT channels if you aren't familiar with the theory.) I'm still not sold either way.

@lynnmitzy1643 4 жыл бұрын

Oh, I always understood that to mean , ...the earth was as yet , void of form. Thanx for this.

@Iluvantir Жыл бұрын

Gen 1:2a "The earth was without form, and void;" "Was" - hāyâ = to be, become, come to pass, exist, happen, fall out i a) to happen, fall out, occur, take place, come about, come to pass b) to come about, come to pass ii - to come into being, become a) to arise, appear, come b) to become i) to become ii) to become like iii) to be instituted, be established iii - to be a) to exist, be in existence b) to abide, remain, continue (with word of place or time) c) to stand, lie, be in, be at, be situated (with word of locality) d) to accompany, be with -- The word hāyâ has many meanings, so it depends on the context. The context is "In the Beginning", and there is no sign of a gap of time between the first and second sentence other than the verse number which wasn't part of the original - chapter and verse numbers have been added recently, and are not inspired. "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void;" It is all part of the same thought. Simply doing "a word study" when looking at ancient, more complicated languages, is foolish. You need to know the language in question, not just look up a word and then pick another of it's "meanings". When we do that, we are able to twist it so that it says whatever we want it to say. To try and pick another meaning for hāyâ in this instance is flying in the face of the correct grammatical reading in Hebrew, and is ignoring the context of the rest of Genesis, as well as ignoring and calling a lie the rest of the Scriptures. If there was "an earth" before us, and therefore life before Adam, life which was killed off due to sin and Lucifer's fall... then the blame for sin and death being squarely on Adam is a lie. Also, God's statement regarding Lucifer "being in Eden" until iniquity was found in him is a lie. Also, God's statement in Genesis that all things were "very good" at the end of the 6th day is a lie. How could it be very good if a fallen Lucifer and other angels were knocking around? How could it be "very good" if there were condemned souls of "pre-Adamic peoples" existing? How could God say that sin and death were Adam's fault when sin and death entered the universe before Adam came to be? Context, context, context. The Bible isn't a pick-and-mix. Either accept it all, or reject it all. Picking and choosing does nothing but confuse you and others.

@johnstark8116 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much

@deepwaters2334 Жыл бұрын

I fail to see how any form of radioactive dating of volcanic rocks is valuable because wouldn't the rocks we find have radioactive components that decay at the same rate no matter whether they are molten in the mantle or cooled on the surface? If that is true, the half life would have to match whatever is found in the mantle today forever since they had the same source! Since we do see differences, this means that the magma that formed the rocks could not have possibly have had consistent levels of radioactive components to start with! The idea that location in either the mantle or on the surface is irrelevant of course assumes perfect mixing of components in the mantle at all times, but you cannot possibly identify parent atom to daughter atom quantities without this. And if you don't assume perfect mixing to start with, the premise of radioactive dating isn't remotely possible to start with either. The whole notion of dating volcanic rocks appears to be totally flawed!

@geraldjohnson8871 4 жыл бұрын

*the age of the earth is Not that much of a concern*man was Created after the earth existed no matter how* *Long that might be*

@geraldjohnson8871 4 жыл бұрын

@@BobSmith-ew5oiB.S *Is this how you evolved*Personally l never evolved from *anything but the Man God Almighty Created* *🙈🙉🙊Maybe you think you did*but man is Not to be monkeying with God*

@DeeegerD 4 жыл бұрын

@@BobSmith-ew5oi My bicycle is made up of similar components as my car (metal, rubber, etc...). Did cars evolve from bicycles? Evolution takes more faith than creation. Apparently you didn't listen - most science is based on assumption (I was trained in science) and unless it's a "law" it's just a "theory" like the "THEORY" of evolution.

@mutantthegreat7963 Жыл бұрын

How is it that not *all* of the helium leaks into space?

@threeshocks5769 4 жыл бұрын

God said it I believe it That sedels it

@coloradostrong 3 жыл бұрын

What is "sedles"? Are you trying to convey the word "settle"? As in "That _settles_ it"?

@jameswilkinson259 2 жыл бұрын

😂😂

@JesusChrists396 3 жыл бұрын

The letter அ provide all informations what you want to know... So take tamil language It give all your life

@waynebaker542 6 ай бұрын

Cain was a farmer, the first child of Adam and Eve so from beginning of man, we had agriculture. In fact Adam and Eve wasto manage the Garden of Eden.

@enk983 4 жыл бұрын

Need subtitles in the other languages!!! It's important for send the message to those who don't know English!!! Please!!

@cicik57 4 жыл бұрын

and you upload this video in order for it appear a new presentation, but all arguments are very old

@dingorex 4 жыл бұрын

Still stand the test of time. Every year these arguments should be uploaded as even in my neighborhood in the South I can see a lack of knowledge or even an interest in God, science, reading etc is making a generation after generation of hoodlums and thugs.

@cicik57 4 жыл бұрын

@@dingorex do not worry, the arguments, debunking it all will be also uploaded every year :D

@eggman077 4 жыл бұрын

I can verify 74.5 YO.

@ralphstasilli4273 2 жыл бұрын

why haven't all of earths rivers created 'Grand Canyons' if earth is billions of years old? The earths face fractured and the Colorado River ran through it?!!!

@albanan1 4 жыл бұрын

Possibly the most intellectually dishonest talks ever. Ignores plate tectonics in discussion of erosion, because this doesn't fit with his theory. Pulls a number out of thin air to say that short period comets disintegrate in less than 10,000 years. Utterly untrustworthy.

@albanan1 4 жыл бұрын

@Timothy Somerville did you actually watch the video? Snelling argued that erosion would mean that all land would disappear within a few million years. He ignored the effects of plate tectonics in this process.

@lynnmitzy1643 3 жыл бұрын

Can you please explain the Black Knight Satellite ?Thank you 🕊

@ats-3693 3 жыл бұрын

Maybe not a question for a geologist, even one like this guy who lies and distorts reality to try push his fictitious narrative.

@Yowie722 4 жыл бұрын

13:38 kapow

@easyenetwork2023 4 жыл бұрын

I believe since rotten speech is only going back about 4400-4500 year ago, that the Earth can only be a couple thousand years older than that, at most.

@dred1046 4 жыл бұрын

This was very hard to watch. The lack of real science was astounding to say the least

@Enigma-2050 3 жыл бұрын

Our education system has failed miserably. Either that or most of these viewers went to Christian schools and received a less than adequate education based on facts and reality.

@robbysguitars8223 Жыл бұрын

Poor deluded God haters. The preponderance of scientific evidence is on the side of a young earth, but you can't accept that, so you're left with your fanciful tale of everything being created by nothing. May your Creator give you eyes to see and ears to hear.

@dred1046 Жыл бұрын

@@robbysguitars8223 Really...lol. Keep believing in jebus...nothing wrong with that , but stating their is a plethera of evidence for a young earth is beyond laughable

@robbysguitars8223 Жыл бұрын

@@dred1046 you've never listened to the evidence in all scientific disciplines, because you've been taught all your life that the supernatural doesn't exist and yet, I'm willing to bet that you believe in aliens and ascended masters. Who's got the more schizophrenic world view?

@ryanlengacher 3 жыл бұрын

The sun loses 5 billions tons of fuel Every Second so if you Reverse time and go back 4 billion years The suns gravity would’ve been much much stronger ! It would’ve ate the earth up. No way the earth can be billions of years old.

@leapingtortoise 4 жыл бұрын

I'm curious as to whether Dr Snelling has actually read the bible. I haven't. I've read a translation of the bible in English. I think anyone interested in a Christians perspective on the old earth (ie consistent with the contemporary scientific view) take a look at John Lennox and his book/lectures "7 Days That Divide The Earth" and an interesting point he (Lennox) makes is "What does the bible ACTUALLY say" in regards to Genesis 1 which I think directly conflicts with Snelling's claim that the bible gives us "Clear advise on how the world began." He notes that we get a lot of information in view few words which means we need to be EXTREMELY careful in the interpretation of such sophisticated writing. According to Lennox' research the first part of Genesis (Before "And God said "Let There Be Light") is written in a tense that says it's an indeterminate time past. It then switches to God's creation days. He notes that there's an order however the wording and process is interesting. eg it says "Day one, Day two... Day five, THE sixth day, THE seventh day." Why is this different? He also notes that there are two days where God speaks twice - Day three and Day six. The creation of life and the creation of humans. It's interesting. I think he raises some interesting points however I think his conclusions are ultimately weak. There are definitely gaps in the knowledge and very little in science gets challenged down the road because so much is built on previous work. It does need to get challenged occasionally, if for no other reason than to verify it against newer understandings. To check that it still holds up. I'm curious about the comets (I'm a space person), but I think that to say "It doesn't quite fit" ignores 1) That we understand so little about the universe and 2) assumes that the assumed origin is the only other explanation. Both flawed assumptions. I'll defer to his authority as a geologist, because I've never paid attention, but I think it's important to remember that reading an English translation of the bible doesn't give the scientific recipe of the past and CERTAINLY doesn't give the full narrative of creation when some nuance is lost to translation. It'd be interesting - ignoring the bible (something Christians so do every so often :P ) - to have him sit down with another geologist who holds opposing views and let them discuss their theories.

@brendanl2580 3 жыл бұрын

"I'm a geologist who who works at answers in Genesis" is kinda like saying "I'm narcotics officer who work for the drug cartel".

@obsoletevalues6209 3 жыл бұрын

Except the geologists all have doctorates and are speaking within their respective fields of training. If you don't have objections to the facts they present, then I guess all you have left is ad hominem arguments like yours.

@brendanl2580 3 жыл бұрын

@@obsoletevalues6209 if they were focused on the facts they wouldn't be working for answers in Genesis.

@dropdtune9199 2 жыл бұрын

Wow what a wack lecture. Misinterpretation of isotopes, comets and everything. Look forget all that stuff, its very simple. Watch over the course of a spring runoff or river or ditch even, the amount of sediment that accumulates at the bottom over say, a week or month. Maybe millimeters or so maximum in a year. Now look at the thousands of meters of strata that occur in some canyons, and calculate how many years it takes to deposit, using YOUR OWN observations from that stream. You are very quickly over 200,000 years. This doesn't account for erosion that happens between deposition, which makes the timescale much longer. Sir James Hutton did this centuries ago, long before radioactivity was discovered.

@malcolmdavid722 4 жыл бұрын

The first point to grasp = 2 Peter 3:8 "A day to the Lord is a thousand years ....." God was not standing on planet Earth when he was creating it [or the solar system] so He was not bound by our time, and therefore did not create it in 6 literal Earth days [or 6x24 hr periods or revolutions]. So, as we are told by Peter, it took 6000 years.

@iamwhoyousayiam6773 4 жыл бұрын

That was talking about prophecy though, not the age of the earth.

@mike6583 4 жыл бұрын

That is wrong. The literal (Hebrew) writing indicates it was 6 day/night periods.

@easyenetwork2023 4 жыл бұрын

This is where you have to look at Christian Apologetics on that passage. No where is it indicated that Genesis chapter 1 means more than literal 24 hr days. Back then they may not have gone off of 24 hr days, but their day would be morning and then the evening, meaning less than several years between days because it was a true/literal morning and the evening.

@easyenetwork2023 4 жыл бұрын

It also says right after that passage that a thousand years is like a day to God.

@iamwhoyousayiam6773 4 жыл бұрын

@@easyenetwork2023 I guess 🤷‍♀️ God exists outside of time so it's hardly relevant. Unless you're trying to disprove God using science to which is say that's a fruitless endeavor and rarely anyone on either side ends up pursuaded.

@BCFalls1 4 жыл бұрын

wow, short period comets are a result of God removing the waters from earth after the flood!

@BCFalls1 4 жыл бұрын

I could never understand dirty snowballs without a solid core until now.

@BCFalls1 4 жыл бұрын

if we have a 24,000 yr full cycle then they may return to source. With them being less than 10,000 yrs old a 12,000 yr mark would they congregate (|by space terms over a decade in a general area) on an opposite side? and the point in between what goes out must come back are the farthest away points on either side, therefor right now is the time to determine the 6,000 yr age if they are the farthest point away from source and a computer model AI should be able to calculate it.

@freemind.. 4 жыл бұрын

Corey Falls - _"short period comets are a result of God removing the waters from earth after the flood!"_ *That's not correct. The waters went back inside the Earth where they came from.. and they're still there now.*

@suzannehartmann946 4 жыл бұрын

@@freemind.. UNLESS those are the "hailstones" God has reserved for the tribulation or end of days?

@freemind.. 4 жыл бұрын

@@suzannehartmann946 - I hope not! But who can say? I can tell you this.. comets were made in the same way as planets and moons; in and of WATER. Modern science would have us believe that the minerals form from cooling magma. Very few will form that way. The vast majority are crystalline in nature, and they grow in super-saturated water like all natural crystals. That is why they contain water inside like giant geodes. By the way, the Earth is not full of magma.. it is full of water and rock. So, when someone asks where the water came from to flood the entire Earth-- that is the answer. Where did it go afterward? Back inside where it came from.

@paulr6400 4 жыл бұрын

Oh dear.........

@ats-3693 3 жыл бұрын

Yes, it's actually difficult to understand how a PhD geologist could stand in front of an audience and give a talk like this, what happened?

@joshuastoltzfus4910 4 жыл бұрын

I don't think Christians have to believe in a new earth, right?

@mjespinosa4452 4 жыл бұрын

Nope, not at all.

@dingorex 4 жыл бұрын

A sin free one? It is necessary. I suppose I'm a whacked out Christian. So be it. Praise the LORD!

@joshuastoltzfus4910 4 жыл бұрын

@@dingorex I certainly don't see being a new Earth Christian as a whack Christian, but what do you mean by sin free?

@markmooney5662 4 жыл бұрын

Joshua...you either believe the word or you don't but if you choose not to do that...just make sure you believe Romans 10 v13...as for me ...I believe it all ...as it was written...i may not understand it all...but the bits I don't understand are not going to be explained by the bigoted atheists making foolish comments in this site. These are the last days Joshua...time is running out...time to decide . Praying for you anyway Grace and Peace to you. Gilly wife of Mark

@daniellebcooper7160 4 жыл бұрын

Where does the 'Creator' come from?. Can any of these creation believers explain this?. As everything has to start somewhere, in some form or another.

@daniellebcooper7160 4 жыл бұрын

@Ric Rovey Do I what?.

@Masonman928 4 жыл бұрын

God is the Creator and He is eternal; He is eternally existing. He always was; and He is; and He will always be. God is “from everlasting to everlasting” (Ps. 41:13; 90:2; 93:2; 103:17; and many more verses).

@daniellebcooper7160 4 жыл бұрын

@Ric Rovey You posted to me: Nope do you?. So I'm asking: Do I what?.

@daniellebcooper7160 4 жыл бұрын

@Ric Rovey I asked the believers in creation where god came from, that was my question. I don't believe in a creator being.

@daniellebcooper7160 4 жыл бұрын

@Ric Rovey Life as we know it evolved from the Earth, and most likely in a hot puddle of water on a volcanic land mass; this is the most recent and plausible explanation. This scenario has come from a number of scientists, who have spent years researching the subject, David Deamer being just one. It makes sense to many people, as with so many other solar systems in the milky way galaxy, and so many galaxies in the known universe, it shows that under the right circumstances, life can start anywhere. Which makes more sense than believing in someone who doesent exist.

@cristianpopescu78 2 жыл бұрын

I dont believe coal deposits occured over milions of years,too..There is no such process running right now nowhere, never was,as they said ,peat acumulation in such huge amount is in the natural enviroment impossible to take place. Amazon rainforest is over ,supposely, 50 milions years old,the peat thickness there is about just 3- 4 Meter. Same in Congo rainforest. There are even 200 Meter coal thickness ,wich means before that peat become coal,there was 10 times thicker ,the ratio peat - coal is 10 to one...which is impossible..2000 Meter peat thickness never ever could be formed. In the oldest rainforest 180 milions years old ,lays less than 20 Meter peat thickness.

@DanChampionJr 4 жыл бұрын

32 different layers of sedimentary rock that the Grand Canyon displays totally debunks this speech. Quite just making assumptions that fit your narrative. How many years per layer? Different species found in different layers, laid down during different times.

@WhirledPublishing 4 жыл бұрын

You don't know where the stratified layers came from, you don't know how the stratified layers got there and you don't know when the layers got there - you have theories which are wrong - so assuming you have the answers, when you don't, is exposing yourself as a delusional imbecile.

@DanChampionJr 4 жыл бұрын

@@WhirledPublishing So, outlining the problem with him just making assumptions without proof bothers you? You say my assumptions are wrong, and I am a delusional imbecile. The problem is I offered NO assumptions. I showed the problem with his assumptions. It was easy for me to see you had nothing when your very first move in the conversation has to involve name calling. That is a tell. It shows you have nothing, but desperately going to cling to your narrative. Well done.

@WhirledPublishing 4 жыл бұрын

@@DanChampionJr I did the research to get the true timeline for the stratified layers, the tectonic plates, the ocean trenches and archipelago islands, the ocean waters, the continents, the mountains, the cataclysms... You don't have the true timeline and you don't know when or how the stratified layers appeared because the truth has never been a priority for you - if you cared about the truth, you would have done the research - like I did - this is why I refer to you as a delusional imbecile because you cling to idiotic theories while patting yourself on the back for being the smart one - when you're actually insane. The truth about our Earth is right there for anyone who wants it but you'd rather copy off others and expose yourself as a lunatic.

@DanChampionJr 4 жыл бұрын

@@WhirledPublishing Doubling down on your inability to engage is par for the course. If in fact you did any research other than watch nuts like this guy, you would know that you can't carve out the Grand Canyon at the same time you are laying 32 different layers of sedimentary rock, many with footprints, and fossils. It just isn't possible. So either this guy has it wrong, or God is deceiving us. Since He isn't the author of lies, then this is pure crap. I am glad however that you think calling me names has some way of bolstering your claims. It doesn't, it shows how weak your argument is. It truly is laughable. Keep up the great work.

@WhirledPublishing 4 жыл бұрын

@@DanChampionJr You assume the Grand Canyon was "carved out"? Do the decades of research instead of exposing yourself as a delusional lunatic. My research didn't include watching videos from "geologists", listening to videos from "geologists" or reading books from "geologists", my research was decades of studying the evidence. Now that I know the true timeline for our Earth's continents, oceans, mountains, cataclysms, etc., I want to know what the idiots of the world believe and how they arrived at their conclusions so I can expose them for being lunatics. As for your ignorant, arrogant stupidity, I tell the truth about you because I'm a person who tells the truth - unlike you - who apparently knows mostly lies. Continue to laugh yourself silly - it's what you've done your entire life while regurgitating idiotic theories from the insane instead of actually doing research - like an intelligent adult would do.

@quantumrobin4627 4 жыл бұрын

The entire oil industry depends on how accurate they can carbon date the rock layers. Let me say that again, a 10 trillion dollar a year business, relies ENTIRELY on the accuracy of carbon dating to find oil deposits. Andrew Snelling can’t get a job at a real university with these presentations, he would be laughed out of town. Sorry folks, reality rules over our ancestors superstitions every time!

@truthinchristapologetics3542 4 жыл бұрын

Actually check your info. Carbon dating is really only accurate to about 30-40,000 years. Some say up to 60-70, they have to use other isotopes to go further.

@easyenetwork2023 4 жыл бұрын

Oil companies rarely find oil by science alone, right?

@freemind.. Жыл бұрын

@QuantumRobin🐦- _"The entire oil industry depends on how accurate they can carbon date the rock layers. Let me say that again, a 10 trillion dollar a year business, relies ENTIRELY on the accuracy of carbon dating to find oil deposits."_ *Wow! We rarely see someone make such a display of arrogant ignorance... and then double-down on it!! Hahaha! You obviously know next to nothing about carbon dating OR oil locating..*

@billwoehl3051 4 жыл бұрын

Can still visit Noah's vineyard today, it's the oldest vineyard in the world, right at the foot of the mountain Noah's ark landed on

@mitchellc4 4 жыл бұрын

@doowopkid0420 3 жыл бұрын

Bob Smith So you believe in evil then? Says who? You?

@papi3d Жыл бұрын

How old is the Earth!?...pfff... that's nothing...I can't wait for his reaction when he finds out the Earth is not a spinning ball!

@valerieprice1745 Жыл бұрын

Spoken like someone who has never read the Bible, or anything else worth reading. The Bible doesn't imply a flat earth, but it takes functional literacy to read the whole thing. There are remedial reading courses for adults. You should check into that, so you can actually read the literature you are criticizing, to find out what it says.

@Aurora666_yt 11 ай бұрын

Even the mother of all creationist grifters, Kent Hovind, acknowledges that the earth is in fact a globe.

@KA-pq3yz 4 жыл бұрын

After science discovered and proof those facts that you are using, goat harder book is right ? Wtf!

@WhirledPublishing 4 жыл бұрын

"Science" is all about "theories" from unintelligent C average lunatics that graduated from low level institutions with minimal entrance requirements.

@KA-pq3yz 4 жыл бұрын

@@WhirledPublishing yah. Those **theories ** that you are using now to communicate, fly,drive, vaccinate, etc doesn’t come from your goat harder book

@WhirledPublishing 4 жыл бұрын

@@KA-pq3yz I have no theories - I have hundreds of historic documents, written in over a dozen languages from all across our Earth, going back over 600 years - with reports going back to Earth's early beginnings - which tell us the timeline for our Earth's continents, oceans, mountains, cataclysms, etc. Since this timeline - from our ancestors who witnessed the Earth Changes - is corroborated by thousands of other independent sources - theories, guesses, speculation, etc., are unnecessary. Your reply suggests you confuse theories with technology - theories are not the same as technology. The goat HERDER book which you attempt to refer to is not the basis of my research.

@VinnyOrzechowski 4 жыл бұрын

Ashhhhume

@cepheus7391 2 жыл бұрын

😂🤣 54 minutes of Gibberish.

@cfdfirefighter 10 ай бұрын

He presents both arguments and when set side by side it’s clear that the assumed standard worldview is the one with more assumptions and less likely. That’s why a creationist will happily teach both arguments, but an evolutionist will only teach their one because when presented with a better idea, it’s obvious.

@BCFalls1 4 жыл бұрын

population would have been greater with less wars, hunger, disease, etc.