The author clearly has a skill of providing clear explanations! Well done, sir!
@WrathofMath10 ай бұрын
Many thanks!
@KermitTheHermit. Жыл бұрын
Understood perfectly! Thank you for a different perspective. Was stuck with the textbook definition for long. Thanks again🙏🏻😊
@WrathofMath Жыл бұрын
Glad to help, thanks for watching!
@VijitChandna Жыл бұрын
First! Tommorow is my exam and I had commented on his channel about this topic and he sent me an unlisted link! Thank you so much :)
@wenzhang3654 ай бұрын
Please keep up the good work, thank you!
@JTan-fq6vy4 ай бұрын
Thanks for the great video! Is there any theory that deals with the generalization of this isomorphism? For example, if I want to verify an equivalent relation between two mathematical objects with arbitrary properties (not specifically the ones of binary operator for groups), is there a modification of the definition in time 1:50 that can give a generalized notion of isomorphism?
@gabriels.i.780 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! Very clear and rich explanation. I would like to ask...Isomorphism seems pretty restrictive as a way to study identity/similarity between groups. Is there any concept in abstract algebra that can account for "weaker" forms of similarity? Thanks!
@WrathofMath Жыл бұрын
Great question and the answer is a big yes! kzbin.info/www/bejne/qHvTpmVon7KYf7s&pp=ygUSaG9tb21vcnBoaWMgZ3JvdXBz
@claytonbenignus46889 ай бұрын
I Get It!!! You could say that if you take a Zane Grey Novel and transform a few words (Rancher's Daughter = Martian Princess; Rifle = Disintegrator; Stage Coach = Rocket Shoip; The Cavalry = Star Fleet; etc.), you get a Star Trek Episode . . .
@EatYourVegsАй бұрын
Really well done video. Thanks this will help me in my upcoming test
@lamyamalcolm-uu8zp7 ай бұрын
Very skillful and talented, thank you so much. You videos help me a lot with my studies here.
@WrathofMath7 ай бұрын
Glad to hear it, thanks for watching!
@alexdrougkas208 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for the lecture. Keep up the great quality of work!
@WrathofMath Жыл бұрын
Thank you Alex!
@2kreskimatmy11 ай бұрын
do you get into Cayley's theorem in some video?
@MrCoreyTexas4 ай бұрын
For anyone interested, you should look up the Wikipedia on the Klein Group with 4 elements
@kabirbhattacharyya90144 ай бұрын
One thing I was wondering.... How does isomorphism "transforms" a group to another? Like how I thought.... It's like a bridge to Each storeys of two almost identical buildings. One is red, one is blue.. etc. what exactly I'm calling the "Isomorphism"? Also could you help me with the "transforms" a group to another?
@JPL454Ай бұрын
It means it sends each element of G to a single element (injective) of H, with all elements of H being the image of some element of G (surjective). This for an isomorphism from G onto H. It's basically just the same idea of a bijective function that has the property f(a)f(b)=f(ab) for every a,b from the group G
@kabirbhattacharyya9014Ай бұрын
@JPL454 thanks. My exams ended over 1.5 months ago, but thanks anyways🙌
@JPL454Ай бұрын
@@kabirbhattacharyya9014 Oh your welcome😅, hope that they went well
@madomalene589811 ай бұрын
For the first example,how did you obtain the second table. What rules were you using to perform the multiplication
@lemonandgaming60139 ай бұрын
he just renamed all elements and the operation of g1. that is how he got g2. then he proved that these groups are isomorphic (the same), which is trivial since one is a renaming of the other
@ahasdasetodu6304 Жыл бұрын
The second theorem mentions a set of all groups but from my understanding of set theory such a thing would lead to contradictions the same way a set of all sets does. Wouldn't it be better to say a class of all groups?
@WIRELESStransport2 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for this
@WrathofMath2 ай бұрын
Glad to help - thanks for watching!
@gp211110 ай бұрын
For the portion where you discuss ways to find groups that are NOT isomorphic, you give 4 criteria but I'm curious what the difference between #2 and #3 are? If a G1 has an element of order n, does that not make it cyclic, which would be the same as #2?
@WrathofMath10 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching and for the question! Perhaps you're confused because you think I mean 'n' to be the order of the group? I simply mean n to be a finite number, and a group having an element of finite order does not force it to be cyclic. Does that answer your question?
@gp211110 ай бұрын
@@WrathofMath Gotcha! It does answer my question. Thanks.
@jaaaaaaaaaaaac69869 ай бұрын
very nice video!you should put this into your list, can't find this one in the list.
@WrathofMath9 ай бұрын
In the playlist? Weird, I see it. It is right after Permutation groups and before Order of Elements in a Group! I have spreadsheets on spreadsheets to keep all my playlists organized haha!
@SphereofTime8 ай бұрын
1:42
@algierithm44438 ай бұрын
Hello what notepad are you using? Thanks
@WrathofMath8 ай бұрын
Notability!
@algierithm44438 ай бұрын
@@WrathofMath thanks much. btw, I love your videos.
@VijitChandna Жыл бұрын
The chapters seem to say homomorphism for some reason
@WrathofMath Жыл бұрын
Looks like they're correct in the description, will probably just take some time to update hopefully!
@scito1541 Жыл бұрын
so isomorphism is a homomorphism that is a bijection right?
@scito1541 Жыл бұрын
if anyone wants to know i asked Bing AI and it basically said yes