Israel-Hezbollah War: Gallant Says, 'Steps to Continue Until Israeli Residents Can Return Home'

[@tonychea6435]

Pre emptive strikes is not self Defense. The right to defend oneself, often referred to as "self-defense," is a legal doctrine that allows individuals to use reasonable force to protect themselves from harm. This principle varies in scope and application depending on jurisdiction, but some common aspects include: 1. Reasonable Force: The force used in self-defense must be proportional to the threat faced. For example, using lethal force is generally only justified if there is an imminent threat of serious bodily harm or death. 2. Imminence: The threat must be immediate. Self-defense cannot be claimed for preemptive or retaliatory actions. 3. Duty to Retreat: Some jurisdictions have a "duty to retreat" requirement, meaning that individuals must attempt to avoid conflict and retreat from the situation if it is safe to do so before using force. Other jurisdictions have "stand your ground" laws, which allow individuals to use force without retreating. 4. Castle Doctrine: Many places have laws that allow individuals to use force, including deadly force, to protect themselves in their homes without a duty to retreat. This is often referred to as the "castle doctrine." 5. Legal Consequences: The use of self-defense can lead to criminal charges if the force is deemed excessive or unreasonable. Individuals claiming self-defense may still face legal scrutiny and must often prove that their actions were justified. 6. Burden of Proof: In many legal systems, once a defendant claims self-defense, the burden may shift to the prosecution to prove that the use of force was not justified. 7. Civil Liability: Even if a self-defense claim is upheld in criminal court, the individual may still face civil lawsuits from the injured party. Because laws can vary widely by state or country, it's essential to consult local laws and legal expertise regarding self-defense rights and principles.

[@Cooldutch]

Now there goal is changed , same for Gaza people and syria , Lebanon people

[@johnskylez]

God bless Israel!

[@tonychea6435]

The right to self-defense is recognized in international law, primarily through the United Nations Charter and customary international law. Here are key points regarding self-defense in the context of international law: ### 1. UN Charter Article 51 - Article 51 of the United Nations Charter explicitly recognizes the right of nations to self-defense. It states: > "Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to maintain international peace and security." - This means that a state has the right to defend itself against armed aggression. ### 2. Use of Force - International law generally prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state (Article 2(4) of the UN Charter). However, self-defense is an exception to this prohibition. - The use of force in self-defense must be proportionate and necessary to repel an attack. ### 3. Customary International Law - Beyond the UN Charter, the right to self-defense is also part of customary international law, which evolves through the consistent practice of states and their acceptance of that practice as law. - The principles of necessity and proportionality are also integral to customary international law regarding self-defense. ### 4. Collective Self-Defense - States may also exercise the right to collective self-defense, which allows countries to come to the aid of an ally that has been attacked. This was invoked in the context of NATO and other military alliances. ### 5. Limitations - Self-defense must be a response to an actual armed attack. Preemptive strikes (attacking before an attack occurs) are controversial and not universally accepted under international law. - The necessity of self-defense must be clear, and states are generally expected to exhaust all peaceful means of resolution before resorting to force. ### 6. Human Rights Considerations - Actions taken in self-defense must also comply with international human rights law. For instance, the use of force must respect the principles of humanity and the protection of civilians during armed conflicts. ### 7. International Criminal Law - In the context of international criminal law, individuals may claim self-defense in cases of alleged war crimes or crimes against humanity, but such claims are scrutinized carefully under international law standards. ### Conclusion While international law does recognize the right to self-defense, the application of this right is complex and closely regulated. States must navigate the legal framework of the UN Charter, customary international law, and human rights considerations when asserting the right to self-defense.

[@armageddon2520]

The road to self-destruction

[@yusufmuhammed412]

And you will never achieve your aim.

[@abdurajiabdula3023]

Your nucliar weapons is your brag weapons..but Allah is hundreds times stronger.Allah is the creator of everythings mighiest of all even all human beings will allied altogether

[@Truth...]

Israel has God Nothing can conquer God, not even your Allah

[@mornangel1599]

​Kibir,.

[@cherylmason5788]

😂

[@superbael]

End o f Lebanon nigh

[@mornangel1599]

Gazzeyi yok edemediniz,Lübnan nasıl yeneceksiniz.?Sadece Bibinin iktidarı önemli.İsrail halkını düşünmüyor.Arı yuvasına sopa soktu.Bu iş ww3.Biraz mantıklı düşün..