At 1:17 the upgraded version of raptor is able to produce 2300kN of thrust as opposed to the older version with a thrust number of 1815 kN. Source: kzbin.info/www/bejne/d33Mf6CwpNRklac
@IndoSB Жыл бұрын
ISRO PSU banke bazaar se $¥€ kyo nhi uthata ? Iss field pe Space-X ko ek unfair advantage mil jaata h 😡
@cosmicfactz Жыл бұрын
How to witness launch of isro Rockets anyone please help me with this
@tirthachakrabarti5912 Жыл бұрын
@@cosmicfactz Near launch site or in video?
@dibakarsaha6807 Жыл бұрын
@@IndoSB it's a govt organisation.....not a company
@IndoSB Жыл бұрын
@@dibakarsaha6807 Galat, ISRO manufacturing v krta hai.
@bharathch5282 Жыл бұрын
RD-810 is a Ukrainian derivative of Russian engine RD-120. Russian RD-120 is developed in 1990 and China got this technology in 1990s from Russia. In 1995 USA got this engine and updated for there requirements. In 2006 government of India got blueprints of RD-810 engine from Ukraine. For people wondering yes it is 30 year old engine technology and it depends on ISRO to innovate it just like China and USA did. China got this technology in 1990s and created Yf engines in 2007 which power all LONG MARCH family rockets.
@yangshujian Жыл бұрын
Not quite correct for the Chinese YF part. All Chinese liquid engines are named YF-XXX, including those hypergolic ones developed during 1970s, like YF-20, which is still powering the Long March 2/3/4 families today. The Chinese engine derived from RD-120 is called YF-100, which is being used on Long March 5/6/7/8, namely the "new generation Long March rockets" only. Today the majority of the Chinese launches are still completed by rockets powered by hypergolic engines, just like Vikas. Only about 15% of China's annual launches use the clean YF-100 engines. Yet they are all used to launch the heaviest payloads, like space station modules, cargo spacecrafts, or advanced communication satellites, all of which require high energy that the traditional engines can't handle.
@JohnSmith-vn8dm Жыл бұрын
The YF-115 is also closely derived from the RD-120. I didn't know the US had any updated RD-120 though, are you sure about that? I know they bought some RD-120s for the Atlas 3.
@uniquea4643 Жыл бұрын
From where you all getting this knowledge 😮😮 i feel jealous
@hera-nf8mz Жыл бұрын
you get excited by the headline and think , wah, and then you read a comment like yours and realise, this tech come to india quarter century late, then mood changes to desperation. still, hope comes form india making consistent progress.
@jarjarbinks3193 Жыл бұрын
@@JohnSmith-vn8dm China's YF-100 is based on the Ukrainian RD-801 design, which is a derivative of the Soviet RD-120. India's SCE-200 is based on the Ukrainian RD-810 design, which is also a derivative of the Soviet RD-120.
@ashutoshkumar7452 Жыл бұрын
My brain starts to overflow with dopamine whenever I get a notification of your new vedio 🚀🚀🚀🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@abhishekP67676 Жыл бұрын
Same here brother
@ancientscientisttheuniverse Жыл бұрын
You guys future of India 👍🏻👌
@hiren_bhatt Жыл бұрын
Correct spelling is "video". 😊
@rajoynunisa244 Жыл бұрын
Congratulations to the entire team for their efforts. And thanks for giving us brief and vivid explanation of SCE 200.
@gunasekaran7290 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for adding subtitles...it means a lot .
@GareebScientist Жыл бұрын
Need to correct them will around lunch time
@hiren_bhatt Жыл бұрын
@@GareebScientist Yes. I noticed quite a few errors such as "leaks" instead of "leagues", and wrong spelling of "Mahendragiri". 😅
@dibakarsaha6807 Жыл бұрын
@@hiren_bhatt kryojinik😂
@audiotonic Жыл бұрын
are you proactively working in the space industry .If not then man just flabbergasted by the level of knowledge you have about each and every topic Respect.
@appdev4861 Жыл бұрын
As an engineer, cannt agree more that many times from-scratch projects are easier to productise than derived ones..
@mratanusarkar Жыл бұрын
What a time to be alive! 😍
@aps_in Жыл бұрын
Especially being GenZ in India ❤❤ Very lucky
@supremeleader55163 ай бұрын
Worst time man, 50 saal late ana chaiye tha, tab tak yeh shithole shi ho jata
@supremeleader55163 ай бұрын
@aps_indian lmao genz not getting job! What lucky
@rakheekamble60 Жыл бұрын
Love this guy! Never lets us down.
@sairampv1 Жыл бұрын
last time i checked news about cryogenic engine development in India I was saddened due to the slow progress but after trying to do my engineering final year project i now understand building new things is so difficult even with a clear blueprint
@supremeleader55163 ай бұрын
Bro you are college students and ISRO is full fledged govt company with crores of funding and top tier engineers, it should not be difficult for them
@Kanishhkaa Жыл бұрын
01:53 respect increased for ISRO as well as China
@-Blue-_ Жыл бұрын
Lol China
@tirthachakrabarti5912 Жыл бұрын
@@-Blue-_ China is highly advanced. Currently only second to the USA.
@-Blue-_ Жыл бұрын
@@tirthachakrabarti5912 nope some European countries are advanced than China
@sidharthcs2110 Жыл бұрын
@@-Blue-_ Ignorant, am i right?
@devbro2310 Жыл бұрын
@@-Blue-_ learn to respect, I am gona copy several thing to start manufacturing in IND
@sandeepmore681 Жыл бұрын
Are bhai kab iska kab se wait kar raha hun me 😍😍🤩😍😍
@woman178 Жыл бұрын
It's good news isro and for Indians home made asml machine talents of Indian s shining everywhere
@sjjerome8706 Жыл бұрын
Man, that tubing is insane.....
@yellowNred Жыл бұрын
Waiting for the day when ISRO starts competing and overtaking SpaceX. Dream big. Work hard and smart. 🇮🇳🙏👍
@sundarjoshi65689 ай бұрын
ISRO can't overtake SpaceX bro never in a lifetime. They are way ahead.
@omdevs Жыл бұрын
Damn! Cool! Thanks
@vivekmanjeshwar2039 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for the Beutiful explanation admin, you have covered all the aspects, Congratulations to our team Isro, Jai Hind 🙏
@SpaceTechExplorationprogram123 Жыл бұрын
SCE200 Something you promised 3 years ago BTW Great video 🎉
@priyansutank Жыл бұрын
Nambi sir has entered the chat!
@gamingwithkiran9610 Жыл бұрын
Please make a video on shukrayaan Maine suna delay kar diya gaya hai 2031 tak
@gtvishal2521 Жыл бұрын
Bade dino baat video ka notification aya tumhara
@bundusingla1045 Жыл бұрын
This is a big achievement. But ISRO has to speed up its complete development and integration trails with the rocket so that it may not left behind the race.
@r.a.wscientists Жыл бұрын
this year going to be fun 😁
@vadapallichaitu8799 Жыл бұрын
It will take 2 years for this engine to be ready . 2025 is the year you should look out for
@r.a.wscientists Жыл бұрын
@@vadapallichaitu8799 chandrayan 3 hai Aditya L1 ha uske liye excited
@indranilchoudhury4723 Жыл бұрын
Jai Ho Ma Bharati ISRO World’s Envy Bharat’s Pride
@vigneshb53478 ай бұрын
Thanks for an Excellent info Bro 🙏
@vigneshb53478 ай бұрын
About these engines, if I remember it right, the engines made for Saturn series in US can no longer be replicated as the engineers/ scientists who designed and made them are long gone and the Art they mastered too is gone.
@newworld2086 Жыл бұрын
Great video and explanation. You mentioned about metallurgy. I know this engine and Kaveri are totally different but can metallurgy knowledge be transferred to Kaveri team or it is completely different? 😬
@arunramachandran5012 Жыл бұрын
The correct term is material science and metallurgy is one part of it. Yes, one of the biggest challenges in engineering today IS material science but nobody is giving it the due focus and value. Even Elon Musk routinely says that for SpaceX and Tesla, the biggest challenge is material science and his advice to young engineers is to focus on that field. Yes, some of the material science expertise can absolutely be transferred from the work done on Kaveri. But obviously, some of the specs and engineering requirements are also going to be brand new.
@newworld2086 Жыл бұрын
@@arunramachandran5012 Thank you for detailed information.
@himanshusingh5214 Жыл бұрын
Material science is a well funded (by market and governemnts) multi trillion dollar Industry. It has been in existence since at least 1 lakh years. It has been a separate field of study since the first half of 20th century. It touches every aspect of your life and it is everywhere, even inside your pussy. Every year thousands of new materials get developed for millions of applications. People are always in the search of the new miracle material with desirable properties. Some examples of big breakthroughs in material science are plant fiber based fabric, processed leather, refined copper and silver, Ceramics, Steel, Aluminium (in 20th century), Kevelar, Plastic, Graphene, rubber, bitumen, refined silicon, body friendly materials, high melting point alloys, ultralight alloys, ultralight tiles, silicon nitride, high temperature superconductors.
@Dennis56781000 Жыл бұрын
@@newworld2086 Someone once commented that Jet engines are far more sophisticated than Rocket engines. This is due to the fact that Jet engines have moving parts and require a very high degree of engineering and manufacturing expertise. That's why you'll see Rocket engine tech proliferating while Jet engine tech is a closely guarded secret that no one shares. Kaveri would require 5-10 billion dollars and a decade to function tbh. You will be amazed to know we spent only 2000 crore over a span of 30 years on Kaveri which is peanuts and it's a miracle that folks at GTRE still churned out a working engine.
@laveena7358 Жыл бұрын
Sir it's a request, please make a complete series of videos explaining everything related to Rocket technology from scratch. It would be helpful for us to understand the technical terms in a better way.
@mahir__2589 Жыл бұрын
You can view channels like everyday astronaut or bps space or scott manley for those kinda stuffs
@tirthachakrabarti5912 Жыл бұрын
Happy to see you have used that Moon mission scheme in a video. I have a HD picture of SC120 stage. Tell me if you need that.
@GareebScientist Жыл бұрын
Thanks Tirtha bhai for hunting it down. Arre mila. Mein ye rush mein kiya since later week would be difficult to make time. Rush shows in the broken flow
@tirthachakrabarti5912 Жыл бұрын
@@GareebScientist oh..okay.
@JBande9 ай бұрын
Please make a video on how spacex got so fast and so much ahead of the rest of the pack, did they develop the engines from scratch and so on...
@ManmohanSingh-ep1sc8 ай бұрын
I think they got full technology from NASA when SpaceX started.
@ashwadhwani Жыл бұрын
Pls set up ISRO challenge scholarship for engineering/science students where they get a chance to help from minor problems to roadblocks
@saurabhsingh-ew5re Жыл бұрын
02:20 ok bro maan lia aesa ni hota hai.... 🤣🤣🤣 ❤
@dhoomketu731 Жыл бұрын
DRDO and ISRO should seriously start working together for developing Scramjets and Ramjets. We cannot afford to miss on these technologies.
@aniruddhamulay2932 Жыл бұрын
I guess you should read about DRDO's SFDR and HSTDV and ISRO's RLV-TD.
@dhoomketu731 Жыл бұрын
@@aniruddhamulay2932 I have read about it. The thing is that we should fund such projects generously. Our scientists accomplish wonders on a shoe string budget. Give them international level funding and watch them soar above everyone else. Jai Hind!
@shivamwarwadkar4107 Жыл бұрын
Dhanyawad bhau
@indiboy7 Жыл бұрын
Wow! We will soon have our own cryo engine!
@GareebScientist Жыл бұрын
We have once since decades, Ce 7. 5, ce20 Semi cryo? Yes 1st time kind off. They have tested smaller scale ones. Nambi narayan book ha mention I guess
@indiboy7 Жыл бұрын
@@GareebScientist ok. I am learning about rockets from your videos sir.
@tirthachakrabarti5912 Жыл бұрын
@@indiboy7 You can say we are going to have lower/core stage (semi)cryogenic engine for the first time.
@FermionAP Жыл бұрын
Dear GS subtitles need to be updated..i think
@User86559 Жыл бұрын
People thinks reverse engineering is same as ctrl c and ctrl v lol😅
@harshaprasad8666 Жыл бұрын
I don't even know what will I do with the information i get from this channel
@tayenderkumar3366 Жыл бұрын
IMO goal thoda jyada bada rkh liya jaise Kaveri turbojet engine ka rkh liya. SpaceX ko bahot mushkil hui raptor ka temperature maintain krne me, Wish Isro all the very best.
@GareebScientist Жыл бұрын
Spacex issue is more because of the complex full flow stage combustion cycle. Sce 200 os staged combustion similar to gslv mk2s ce7. 5
@gravy4708 Жыл бұрын
Bhai ISRO ke future missions pe ek ek dedicated video bana do. Jaise Gaganyan, Chandryaan 3, Sun probe aur agar kuch aur honge to
@GareebScientist Жыл бұрын
No waise videos mein point nahi lagta. Google karo
@r.a.wscientists Жыл бұрын
@@GareebScientist u believe in quality>quantity 🔥
@harimohanbajpai8418 Жыл бұрын
Sir please make a video on nuclear fusion reactor 🙏
@CuriousEngineer Жыл бұрын
ISRO methelox engine pe bhi Kam kar raha hai right? And awesome video as always keep up the the good work bro. 👍
@GareebScientist Жыл бұрын
Yes 1000kn thrust. Already tries 100 tonnes wala
@CuriousEngineer Жыл бұрын
@@GareebScientist i hope that SCE200 OUTPERFORM THE THRUST ASPECT JUST LIKE HOW VIKAS ENGINE DID BACK THEN ,PHIR NAYA NAMKARAN HOGA😂
@harshitrai5306 Жыл бұрын
@@CuriousEngineer sc200 reusable engine hai kya ?? Ye vertical landing kar sakta hai ??
@HarshSingh-eg2nb Жыл бұрын
Pls make a difference between semi cryogenic and cryogenic engine
@0xbinarylol Жыл бұрын
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 gazab cryogenic engine 😊
@AyushKumar-km7ly Жыл бұрын
most important development
@manishsramon Жыл бұрын
Whoever is questioning ISRO's decision to derive their preliminary design out of RD series. Most semi cryo sea-level engines in the world are of Soviet Origin. SpaceX's Raptor is also a Soviet Derivative in its preliminary design (RD180), which Elon himself admitted in an old video-look for it. It's just not considered wise to start everythig from scratch. Co-axial Swirl Injector technology is what made Soviets pioneers of Liquid Propellant engines while on the other hand in NASA was busy trying perfecting not so practical impinging injector design (In which they eventually did succeed). After the collapse USSR, NASA somehow managed to got that Soviet technology patented in their own names (Probably by buying some people at the Energomash I guess). Now there are literally enjoying loyalities on Soviets achievements. Well, their (NASA) story is that they invested ~$3 Billion to perfect that technology used in RD-180 cluster that later got incorporated in ULA's Atlas-V rocket.
@sidharthcs21109 ай бұрын
Ther Merlin is definitely not related to RD 180. RD 180 is a closed cycle design
@Phantom369-h3i3 ай бұрын
False, Elon just praised the rd-180 for its high chamber pressure and thrust to weight ratio and for making the metallurgy work out for LOX rich engines. He never said that raptor is a derivative of rd-180.
@kapilsapre Жыл бұрын
Sir, ur narration is too simple to understand. Keep it up .
@HarshSingh-eg2nb Жыл бұрын
Is vikas engine is a cryogenic engine.
@gopallohar5534 Жыл бұрын
Development of *Raptor* engine started in 2013....
@StanStanoi Жыл бұрын
A 7-year-old journey that started in 2016) called OSIRIS-REx to grab an asteroid sample ( a sample grabbed from asteroid BENNU in 2018) delivered to Earth tomorrow for us in asia ( when it is still sunday 24th sept ) there at the Utah desert ( USA ) within an expected 30-mile range. It will be eagerly awaited, and telecast as well - an easy deal to telecast, it is Earth where the drop-off happens and doesn't have to be animated. OSIRIS-REx after dropping it off, will go on to do other missions.
@venkateshbc3912 Жыл бұрын
You are Ameer scientist 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@Sorry2701 Жыл бұрын
4:25, If we get SC-120 then ADMIRE Test is very near, Because Merlin-1D is same engine as Vikas but with different fuel, Grasshopper was tested with Merlin-1D which is similar to SC-120.
@azadahamed96777 ай бұрын
Marlin 1D and vikas are completely different engines. They use different fuels, marlin is regeneratively cooled where vikas is water cooled, the expansion ratio , chamber pressure, specific impulse all are better in marlin. And using hypergolic fuel instead of cryogenic or semi cryogenic fuel is way easier. So both are not the same.
@prakhargupta3104 Жыл бұрын
I think another reason for chill down is to prevent cavitation during engine start when cold liquid touches hot surface and perhaps the primary reason.
@KumarK-xn5go7 ай бұрын
Wonder why ISRO can't use the Vikas engine in cluster mode like the 9 Raptor engines used by Falcon Heavy?
@capt.proton50418 ай бұрын
Isro human moon mission and joining the Artemis mission what is the difference between these two?
@CanItMakeMoreSense Жыл бұрын
At 3:44 what is that smoke slab thing coming out below the tower to the engine flame. Is that a coolant of some kind or just the smoke
@sheetalagarwalla1241 Жыл бұрын
Bro if this sce 200 engine replaces vikas engine then then we may have gslv mk3 rocket capability equivalent to atlas v 🎉
@viralboy007 Жыл бұрын
Ya engine complete kabtak hoga?
@FermionAP Жыл бұрын
You just can't copy...GS❤
@dipti_dress_designing_tutorial Жыл бұрын
Super informative videos
@nssdatta Жыл бұрын
Attendence 🚀
@newworld2086 Жыл бұрын
Will this help in reducing our dependence on ESA for heavy launches?
@shrodingerscat8940 Жыл бұрын
That problem is due to low production line and only one launchpad for gslv
@pandharisapate9942 Жыл бұрын
Super method in information
@akihokokurosaki Жыл бұрын
NGLV kb tk operational hoga??
@GareebScientist Жыл бұрын
No date linked to it
@shrodingerscat8940 Жыл бұрын
they also mentioned its capable of 2600kn in the article. does that mean it will a upgraed version like high thrust vikas ?
@GareebScientist Жыл бұрын
2600kn limit is for the test stand Test stands have to have a higher tolerance than the actual
@shrodingerscat8940 Жыл бұрын
@@GareebScientist if that's the limit then how will they test cluster engine for nglv?
@GareebScientist Жыл бұрын
Same doubt
@Bablu69_420 Жыл бұрын
@@shrodingerscat8940 Maybe they will upgrade it with time, i guess they are still focusing on single SCE200 engine and clustered variant wont be available anytime soon.
@harshitrai5306 Жыл бұрын
@@Bablu69_420phir bhul jao next 5-10 year nglv rockets aayega or Heavy vehicle , rocket aayega Isro ke pass jo powerful ho
@alokkumarsahu9318 Жыл бұрын
Is sce-200 reusable?
@jaygagare4333 Жыл бұрын
What will be the weight carrying capacity of this engine?
@commieTerminator Жыл бұрын
~200 tones (It's in the name SCE-200). It sounds a lot for lifting satellites but majority of a rocket's weight is fuel itself
@anshulsingh8326 Жыл бұрын
What is their expected power?
@mantrachhaya6835 Жыл бұрын
I gues about 2MN, it will be proper competition for raptor, but raptor is a methalox, while untill i know, sce200 is kerolox...
@thesentientneuron6550 Жыл бұрын
Is there any published article on Isrosene? Any idea what makes it differ from RP-1/RG-1?
@GareebScientist Жыл бұрын
Unfortunately couldn't find. From talking to people from isro, what i understood is it's sulphur content is higher than rp1 and coming temperature too higher. No specifics
@thesentientneuron6550 Жыл бұрын
@@GareebScientist Thanks! Maybe the higher combustion temp counteracts the higher sulphur content potentially causing a buildup + free ISP boost? Side Note: I wonder if there's any book published on prop chem research conducted in India, like was done in "Ignition!", that would be a cool piece of space history.
@GareebScientist Жыл бұрын
Sorry I meant coking temperature. Yes would be cool to have one
@thesentientneuron6550 Жыл бұрын
@@GareebScientist Oh, thanks for the clarification! From some 5-min quick research I'm able to hypothesize that Isrocene may have a higher molecular wt. and thus higher coking temp. but maybe also higher density? What are your thoughts? Ig it makes sense from a strategic perspective? Please keep us updated of any news is shared about this!
@Bablu69_420 Жыл бұрын
I searched the term Isrosene in google i got an article from pib.
@surajnag3650 Жыл бұрын
Hey bro can you make an informative video on Rocket fuel? Like types of fuel, pros & cons of each types of fuel. I know it would requires a lengthy video & you need to do extra work for that. But brother i think most nerdy folks would be interested in learning about rocket fuels.
@lovepeacehatewar9818 Жыл бұрын
Bhai 🙏🏻 Please SCE ka Test Kaisa raha Jaldi Suna digiye. Kaan Taras raha hai, Bahoot Becheni ho raha hai🤞🤞🤞, All The Best ISRO,💐💐💐💪💪💪🙌🙌🙌👏👏👏
@tirthachakrabarti5912 Жыл бұрын
Successful
@lovepeacehatewar9818 Жыл бұрын
@@tirthachakrabarti5912 please give link or Source 🙏🏻
@orion8364 Жыл бұрын
Which is better? Lox + RP 1 or Lox + methane?
@sandipselar6043 Жыл бұрын
Great
@TigerCraft79 Жыл бұрын
GS bro why has ISRO or Indian space companies have not joined/been invited to artemis program, i saw article claiming India is not involved to not anger china because china hates artemis program. What is the case?
@dibakarsaha6807 Жыл бұрын
Will hamper our own program
@commieTerminator Жыл бұрын
What's the expected weight of SCE200?
@dibakarsaha6807 Жыл бұрын
2.5 tons
@Kingshukpalchoudhury Жыл бұрын
What is expected thrust to weight ratio of SCE 200?
@mayurcharniya8785 Жыл бұрын
nice
@icfak27704 Жыл бұрын
Bro make video of gslv future update
@icfak27704 Жыл бұрын
Ulv and HIV kab tak aayega
@sandeepshekhar451 Жыл бұрын
Is this close cycle engine and fuel rich or oxygen rich ?
@GareebScientist Жыл бұрын
yes close cycle and fuel rich afaik, but you verify once
@Shaayrana_andaaz_015 ай бұрын
Bro iska current update doo yr
@Puran.5 ай бұрын
The second hot fire test is now tentatively set for December
@HemanthKumarJadhav Жыл бұрын
It would be nice to see a resusable rocket, so that we can resuse these engines again after proper refurbishment. That would save lot of cost and time.
@oadka Жыл бұрын
Only if the engine has been designed to be able to be refurbished. It might happen that making it reusable (thus sacrificing performance and payload) will cost more than the money saved by reuse. For reusability to work I feel everything has to be designed from the ground up to be reusable.
@commieTerminator Жыл бұрын
I'd be happy if I can witness a heavy duty reusable ISRO rocket before I die. The speed at which ISRO works is the major concern
@HemanthKumarJadhav Жыл бұрын
@@oadka well, SpaceX does resuse its rockets with Merlin and Raptor engines after refurbishment. Only difference is they use MethLOX as fuel & oxidizer and we use IsrosceneLOX.
@HemanthKumarJadhav Жыл бұрын
@@commieTerminator we don't have the luxury of the funds and have a lot of bureaucratic red tapes for funds to get sanctioned.
@kunjukunjunil1481 Жыл бұрын
@@HemanthKumarJadhav Merlin still uses RP1 and oxygen. Only raptor is MethLox
@cosmicfactz Жыл бұрын
How to witness launch of isro Rockets anyone please help me with this
@2603insantosh Жыл бұрын
At present the maximum that we can lift is 8 ton i guess. With the new rock technology, how much more can we lift.. is it more than 20 ton. How many tons would a human moon mission require
@KaustubhBadgujarK2 Жыл бұрын
Sir apko Kay lagta hai ISRO our DRDO mil ke hypersonic missile bana sakte hai kya
@alokkumarsahu931811 ай бұрын
Koi update😢😢
@ra8620 Жыл бұрын
USA bought Russian engine to learn combined cycle rocket motor plumbing at 1990 .
@riscnx Жыл бұрын
I think population systems for ISRO missions is manufactured by MTAR (A Hyderabadi company), not ISRO.
@abhinavayush967 Жыл бұрын
Chines j15 tiger shark was developed from su33 bought from Ukraine, , they letter develope their own clone .
@KumarK-xn5go Жыл бұрын
It will be a great achievement for ISRO once they perfect the tech. As far as copying goes haven't various technologies been copied by the west too?
@Modiji_deshi Жыл бұрын
🎉🎉
@mantrachhaya6835 Жыл бұрын
The be-4 engine was in development for so long, and stil lis in development, while the raptor is already ahead of it, it's like blue origin does not even care about it anymore, and when nasa favour spacex for being a chesper and trustworthy bet these companies complain about competition and political support to spacex...
@harshaprasad8666 Жыл бұрын
1:52 haa he toh kya😂
@DetCoAnimeFan Жыл бұрын
New video!
@Hardikdwivedi17 Жыл бұрын
🎉
@mauryasamrat935 Жыл бұрын
भारत के देश भक्तो की देश भक्ति के कुछ तथ्य ISRO official यूट्यूब चैनल पर 3 मिलियन सब्सक्राइबर है जबकि आज के लैंडिंग के व्यूज 64 मिलियन है।Nasa के यूट्यूब चैनल के 11 मिलियन सब्सक्राइबर हैSpacex के 6M
@sidharthcs2110 Жыл бұрын
Why don't you make a video on what makes something a copy of something else.
@GamerLife777 Жыл бұрын
✌
@GoodBoyAnatoly Жыл бұрын
Private space companies ka kya scope hai?
@r.a.wscientists Жыл бұрын
it depends on which company ur talking about
@rishabhshuklaa1 Жыл бұрын
Parts bnane wali companies kafi fayde me rahengi...
@sariputtaambade5689 Жыл бұрын
😍😍😍
@jaymahakailchannel9109 Жыл бұрын
?But sir methan is good option than hydrogen i thing so and less costly
@a.harshvardhan9611 Жыл бұрын
kash, NASA ka jitna budget ISRO ko mil jaye !
@gravy4708 Жыл бұрын
Government ulta ghata rahi hai budget ISRO ka consistently per year
@tirthachakrabarti5912 Жыл бұрын
@@gravy4708 Nope
@gravy4708 Жыл бұрын
@@tirthachakrabarti5912 Yes. Kaun si duniya me jee raha hai be tu