ISTP - Craftsman - SLI - Explained Correctly

[@cm8011]

30:33 - As an ISTp, understanding the demonstrative function of Ti is incredibly helpful. I love the way you’ve explained it as I know I engage in Ti frequently, but never feel comfortable just living there. I have a constant urge to take what I’ve analyzed and make something useful of it.

[@eagledove9]

I'm glad to see this video. 3:56 "...don't like being suddenly interrupted." My dad would say to my mom, "Can this wait? Do I have to drop what I'm doing and come over there right this instant?" Role function, Ni: they may not want to sit down and try to see how things are going to go in the future, but they may have to, if they think there might be something unpleasant in the future, or some disruption - this accurately describes something that's been going on a lot in my life lately. I'm disturbed about some changes going on with the new owners at the place where I'm renting at this RV park, and I can't see the future of how it's going to turn out. I think you described this function really well - it feels like the way that I experience it. About seeking Ne: I often do think of what seems like a million different possibilities, but I don't know which one to choose. I don't know which one will work, and which one will fail. I don't want to waste a bunch of time and energy trying something that's just going to fail, and then I run out of time. 'Running out of time' seems to be my stronger Ni function. I know that I have to hurry, and can't invest in some time-consuming new and unfamiliar possibility that I have never tried before, only for it to be a disaster. I would need someone who has the vision to imagine that this possibility could be able to work, all the way through, especially if you avoid these particular problems or pitfalls. Mobilizing function, Fi: whenever I'm going to try some new and unfamiliar possibility, I also want it to be in line with my inner feelings, whether I like or dislike something. Is this new possibility going to turn out to be something that I'm going to hate doing? If someone knows me well enough, they know what I like and dislike, and they'll know that such-and-such would be the kind of thing that I would like. About expecting the best of people, good faith judgments: when I was young, I used to believe that there was no such thing as evil. Anyone who seemed evil was really just simply 'hurting' or 'sad,' or something, and I was sure it could be fixed. I got into a really bad relationship as a teenager when I believed that I could 'fix' somebody who I could not fix. It took a long time to learn that not everything is as simple as, 'this is just a sad person who needs some help,' or whatever. With Ti: I find that I sometimes go 'cherry-picking' if I read something. I might read a medical text, and it might be really complicated and it's a lot of jargon, but I skim it looking for a few things that I understand and that I'm interested in, and yet, I can piece together well enough what it's saying and decide whether it makes sense to me, even if I don't memorize every single detail, every single numerical measurement or mathematical formula. I can decide whether it seems believable or not. This isn't always thorough enough, and I can make mistakes when I do this, but if somebody explained the mistake, I would try to understand it. And I do this, looking for something that I can apply that will be useful. Yay, now this particular series of videos is a 'complete set!'

[@AdoptionLawSourceTrinity]

It's so good to see you back, Jack.

[@jeanninecramer1161]

Jack, You did a brilliant job with this series!

[@kevinvictor911]

the best for last.

[@maximelamadeleine1824]

FINALLYYY WOOOOOO

[@PharelleJackson]

Hey Jack, I just wanted to say thank you for helping figure out my socionics. This is definitely a great description of me and how i.m as a hole. In terms of my Charterstics I mean.

[@EyeHeartSUSHI]

love this. and very very accurate for me.

[@jaredvaughan1665]

Amazing video Jack

[@ekinozcan3399]

This was such a helfpul video, thank you Jack! 😊

[@yyzx_6668]

I know my type now. Thanks!

[@ravenousrausch878]

Thank god finally here was about to change my type!

[@thegreenyguineapiggy5127]

this video helped me type myself, thanks

[@christineschreiber5073]

finally all are available and I can send a video to whatever friend mow 😻🙏 very well done the ISTP can really be funny indeed. Also very friendly with people. Fe polr is imo not „cold“ if you value Fi. Its just quiet warm. A reason why they get mistyped. Yes they are gentle (if possible) an quietly loyal and very dutyful and reliable. The warmth is indirect, shown by actions not words. Look for a capable quiet person that minds their business and once you are interested in their hobby can show up with so many stunning info and details, a quiet expert, willing to help and happy to then go on minding their business. and always will hate to be interrupted, thats very characteristic. But for ISTJ TiSe too I observed, yet for another reason with a different flavor. the ISTP Si Te is the more flexible one actually once you did interrupt them successfully. yes! open minded! Another point where they do not get recognized. Look for gentle and eventually open minded quiet people. The Si Fi makes them also very loyal and reliable. For the the pet narrative I have seen that in reality. Her Majesty Queen Elisabeth and her love for dogs and horses is a wonderful example. The last type that wants such a position ,she fullfilled it so well.

[@Jamz-]

You know I had to be here.

[@klp3309]

As an SEI, I also relate to being boxed in by my Ni role and unable to see something from a different angle. I guess that’s why we’re supposed to be with an Ne lead.

[@rupiik]

Finally.

[@Amaend8]

Hey jack. I watched some videos of yours after realizing i doubted my last typing. Out of all of em istp seems to really resonate with me. But there are stuff i heard from here and there that dont match. Please enlighten me on it. 1st. Being into astrology/symbolism is only an intuitive thing 2nd. I heard from you and others that Si trickster will not pay attention to their body. I luv chilling. getting comfortable. Taking my sweet time and so on. But i also have memories of me neglecting my body and mind for the sake of achieving a goal to the point id bleed during a match but id ignore it so i can keep enjoying the game. I also happen to not have a great schedule for food and sleep. But i do genuinely enjoy em and im known for my very detailed taste and sense of smell. (All my sense except hearing are very hightend. My hearing is actually very precise too but i damaged my ears slightly in the past by not using the right volumes while mixing songs.) I belive the 2nd option looks like a contradiction but my knowledge wouldnt be enough to judge that. I hope yours is. Oh 1 other clue that might help or at least it makes me feel honest: when realizing i mistyped my Te use with Ti i got high haert rate and almost an anxiety attack. It took me some time to overcome it. I belive its a natural reaction although it sounds harsh but i dont think other people can calm themselves down this easily after having an ego death. Im calm now. Wasnt in some hours ago. It also mightve been the excess licorice i used beforehand that amplified the effect. Very chatty of me. But i tried to get enough info for you to have a fair judgement. I kept it honest and precise. Thank you in advance jack.

[@jaredvaughan1665]

I like how Craftsman and Inspector deliberately share the same names as Keirsey's Craftsman and Inspector which identifies who they are. Which is why I only use Keirsey nicknames for all 16 Socionics types. Including IEI Counselor.

[@khiroe]

Thanks, now I can confirm that my husband is SLI

[@Fellhat]

are you iee?

[@JasmineWu-v4l]

quite confused... isn't Ti is the dominant function of istp?

[@WorldSocionics]

ISTP is Perceiving rather than Judging. Should its dominant function, therefore be Perceiving or Judging?

[@higeroman5800]

I understand and agree with how you switch P for J but brother, it makes watching your videos kind of confusing in contrast with all the rest of the content on youtube, this is probably your Ti at play lol, thanks for all the info though

[@mateuszmazurek7991]

Please my friend one thing.... It's ISTp, it's too easy to confuse with ISTP which is a LSI

[@WorldSocionics]

There is no need for ISTp. There can just be ISTP. Don't sell the ISTP short.

[@Conviction454]

So i don't know a thing about socionics. Is it safe to say that each of the different functions means something entirely different from MBTI or even the original jungisn theory? Based on what I've read(Which may or may not be entirely accurate). Si in socionocs kinda sounds like Se in mbti to me. I've even heard some people flat out say that Mbti is "wrong" or "inaccurate" despite being two completely separate theories.

[@WorldSocionics]

I wouldn't say that they are entirety different, but they are different. Socionics is simply built with greater rigour than MBTI.

[@geniduchesne4613]

Si+Te is ISTJ, not ISTP. Is that a typo?

[@WorldSocionics]

When explained correctly, Si+Te is ISTP. After all, shouldn't a P type have Perception as their Dominant function?

[@geniduchesne4613]

@@WorldSocionics okay, I had a look at your other similar videos series and I get that you are approaching MBTI type with another perspective or method than the one we are used to. I was just scanning ISTP-related videos but now that I know that, I'm going to listen to the one of my own type so I'll understand better your explanation and logic. I am new to Socionics. Thanks

[@WorldSocionics]

Good idea, take a look at the ISTJ video alongside this one, see which one sounds more like you. It may be that the other one sounds better, it may be that a different type sounds best. When updating to the Socionics model, MBTI people can find themselves relating to surprisingly different types to what they had initially expected. @@geniduchesne4613

[@geniduchesne4613]

@@WorldSocionics Thanks, I am beginning to discover a new approach of typology based on functions. I am Ni dominant (INTJ in MBTI). This is quite interesting as I studied many typology model but never heard about this one who is more popular around east Europe, from what I have read. I found your video by chance but it could bring answer I haven't found so far. I will start from the beginning and look at your first videos that explains the socionics.

[@WorldSocionics]

If you find yourself hooked on my videos and want to learn more, I have a course. Just email [e-mail] to purchase.@@geniduchesne4613

[@spicyholly]

i cant decide between SLI or LSE 😭😭 im very rational and SLI is irrational bc of Si base right? Although i seem to fit the layout of the functions of SLI pretty well and i use a lot of Si but my Te is very good too, i just don't know if it's my main function can u help?

[@WorldSocionics]

Would you like a diagnostic interview?

[@spicyholly]

@@WorldSocionics no thank you I did look and it seems great but I'm saving my money lol, I enjoy figuring it out myself

[@Defaulted123]

​@@spicyhollySounds like SLI😅

[@spicyholly]

@@Defaulted123 I thought that when commenting it haha, I def dont use Ti nearly as much as Te though

[@Defaulted123]

@@spicyholly Im not very sure yet what Type I am. But I tend to INTP (Mbti) or LII. But the thing is Ti and Te can be confused sometimes. All I relly know is, Ne, Ni Ti, and Te and Si are my fav functions. So actually it really depends where you feel drawn to and can identify with.

[@BenVaserlan]

Oh, the irony. If you have to ask what I mean then you admit that thinking isn't totally external.

[@WorldSocionics]

There is a difference between what you say and what you intend or mean to say. The latter isn't simply Thinking.

[@BenVaserlan]

@@WorldSocionics So when you talk about thought being "external", you are excluding linguistic thought? NB: you said it doesn't need to be "reinterpreted"?

[@WorldSocionics]

The colour of your kitchen floor is undeniably external, yet I do not have any knowledge of it, because the opportunity has not occurred by which you might show it to me. It is obscured by geographical distances, garden hedges and brick walls. In addition, a bacterium on a leaf is undeniably external, yet I cannot see it unless through a microsope. In the same way, if you do not show the components of your thoughts, I will not know them. If your mental processes are unmuddled, and follow some semblance of a rationale, then all you need to is express that rationale, and I will understand what you are Thinking. The act of expressing one's thoughts is EXACTLY how we can determine if someone really is Thinking at all, or doing something else. Quite often, when people say they are 'thinking', they are merely iNtuiting, which is internal. When someone tries to articulate iNtuition, without Thinking, they just spout nonsense. It's only Thinking that is expressed as sense. Additionally, sometimes Thinking may be expressed, but in terms unfamiliar to the receiver, because they lack the extra knowledge necessary to access it. That again does not stop the Thinking from being external, they just need some other Thinking first to access the new contribution of Thinking, much like you need a microscope to see that bacterium. Either of these possibilities, 1) a genuine lack of Thinking on the part of someone, or 2) the reliance on other Thinking not yet provided to access their Thinking, may explain why people don't always understand what other people mean.@@BenVaserlan

[@demogorgon4244]

​@@WorldSocionics the biggest problem with your reasoning above is this: only things that makes sense can be external, lol. how could you believe ti is external while it is all about analysis, deconstrunction, logical integrity seeking and deeper verification? all these things require time and absolutely inner processes. just because you later, way later, able to express them makes it external? no. and then, how can you believe ne is internal, while the way they jump from this to that is very external. i know the answer of this question of course. you think you are entp while you are not so you rationalize you are an ne dom this way... entps are are not ni users. they don't try to intuit accurately. their intuition is very much based on trial and error a fancier term i always use is heuristic. try this, try that, oh what about this!! bollocks! it didn't work! hahahah. ni doms basically simulate ne inside their heads so they don't fail in real life. ne doms don't care and claim this and claim that and see if it works. if it doesn't, then they try something else. this is very external and objective too btw. ne dom = reality vs their intuitions. ni dom = simulation of reality vs their intuitions = subjective.

[@BenVaserlan]

@@WorldSocionics Re the subjective side of sensing: 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder, body dysmorphia where a skinny person sees a fat person in the mirror, or myself when after breaking my nose, my mind straightened it in the reflection. But when I saw a photograph, I saw how bent it was. I later had a nose-job to straighten it. The subjective response is bound up with the stimulus e.g. musical taste. I will reply to your other points soon.

[@jaredvaughan1665]

Sensory + Rational = mbti-SJ Sensory + Irrational = mbti-SP Intuition + Static + Judicious = mbti-NP Intuition + Dynamic + Decisive = mbti-NJ

[@Defaulted123]

Sensory+ irrational= Sp... ISTP irrational?

[@jaredvaughan1665]

In their jobs they use SiTi while riding their TeNe 🐎