ISTQB v4.0 Boundary Value Analysis (BVA) explanation with examples

[@testing1O1]

Register for the course with 1000+ questions and 5 Sample Exams via the link below www.udemy.com/course/istqb-foundation-level-ctfl-certification/?referralCode=D4A4926A6A08C8228DB8 Coupon: 27848E6A3938577FF0E9 Register for a FREE course via the link below www.udemy.com/course/istqb-foundation-level-v4-new/?referralCode=31368F2B5CBF49F3ED48

[@alperaslan.]

I saw the 3-point BVA question on another KZbin channel before and i didn't understand. Now i understand crystal clear :) Amazing video . Congrats and thank you :)))

[@BlackShadow3591]

Regarding the theoretical impossible numbers like for the question at 23:13 with -1 and 101, the question is asking for a BVA Coverage Percentage, if you were to include -1 and 101 in total BVA values, they would only cover 6/14 and expressed as a percentage is 42.86% which is not an option to choose. So we can safely say that -1 and 101 are not included in the answer. Dropping those 2 values they cover 6/12 BVA Values which is 50% exact which is an option to choose from being option A. I think it just takes logical thinking and some logical tweaking to the calculation when looking at the possible answers. This is 100% the most informative video on BVA, I had no idea 3 point BVA was this complex as I am only self studying

[@testing1O1]

Hi, in this particular exam sample, answer options can't confuse you, but in the real exam, unfortunately, it is not the case. You may have two answer options, both of which can be correct, depending on whether you include -1 or 0 or not. It is quite a tricky issue with no solution for now

[@mikhailkhalil3390]

Thanks so much for this amazing explanation

[@testing1O1]

You're welcome, I did my best in these videos)

[@maiosama4615]

I guess -1 is ignored in the question because it will be considered as 2 characters, as in the question he specified numbers of characters not specific number