IT HAPPENED!! First Deep Field Image From NASA's James Webb Space Telescope.

On Monday (July 11), President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and NASA Administrator Bill Nelson released the first scientific-quality image taken by the $10 billion James Webb Space Telescope at the White House. According to NASA, the image is the deepest infrared vision of the cosmos to date, and it was obtained using only 12.5 hours of observation time on one of the telescope's four sensors.
Today, we can officially announce that NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope has produced the deepest and sharpest infrared image of the distant Universe to date. Known as Webb’s First Deep Field, this image of galaxy cluster SMACS 0723 is overflowing with detail.
This deep field, taken by Webb’s Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam), is a composite made from images at different wavelengths, totalling 12.5 hours-achieving depths at infrared wavelengths beyond the Hubble Space Telescope’s deepest fields, which took weeks.
The image shows the galaxy cluster SMACS 0723 as it appeared 4.6 billion years ago. The combined mass of this galaxy cluster acts as a gravitational lens, magnifying much more distant galaxies behind it. Webb’s NIRCam has brought those distant galaxies into sharp focus; they have tiny, faint structures that have never been seen before, including star clusters and diffuse features. Researchers will soon begin to learn more about the galaxies’ masses, ages, histories, and compositions, as Webb seeks the earliest galaxies in the Universe.
SMACS 0723 is a particularly good target for this sort of observation because there are massive clusters of galaxies in the foreground. These act like giant cosmic magnifying glasses. Because of their immense mass, their gravity causes a pronounced curvature of the space-time around them, with the effect of magnifying light from more distant objects.
NASA has already announced some of the celestial objects that space enthusiasts might expect to see in these photos. The agency revealed on Friday (July 8) that tomorrow's event will include views of the Carina and Southern Ring nebulas, as well as Stephan's Quintet of densely packed galaxies. WASP-96 b observations are also on the program, albeit JWST will not provide a picture of the distant world. Instead, scientists will present a spectrum of the planet, which divides light into wavelengths and provides information on the planet's chemical composition.
If you want to learn more about the James Webb Space Telescope and stay up to date, subscribe to the channel to receive our daily updates.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @nasaspacenewsagency
Tags:
#nasa #jwst #J0624-6948 #supernova #jwst1stimage #jwstasteroidhit #webbtelescopeupdates #rockyworld #exoplanets #55Cancrie #jwstnews #jwstupdate #mars #saturn #cassini #saturnrings #saturnmoon #jameswebbspacetelescope #webbtelescope #jwst #universe #mysterioussignal #galaxy #webbtelescopeupdates #jwstimages #photons #firstgalaxy #webbtelescopeupdates #interstellar #webbselfie #webbtelescopeimage #alienlife #jwstasteroid #asteroidtracking #jameswebbspacetelescope #nasa #galaxy #star #spacenews #nasanews #webbtelscopenewimages #HD84406 #webbtelescopeupdates

[@paulpence8895]

The amount of gravitational lensing is unbelievable.... cant wait for tomorrow...

[@untouchable360x]

There is a gravitational lensing plugin for Photoshop.

[@humansrants1694]

@@untouchable360x Go back to your metal cant melt videos.

[@paulpence8895]

@@untouchable360x I have the plugin for notepad, so I'm good...thx...

[@shacirsss]

I told em

[@Fabian3331234333]

When I first saw this image I was like "what the hell is that. Looks like some gravitational lensing effect... No that can't be. Maybe some odd looking gas coulds?" Well yeah. That's seriously impressive. The more I look at this image the more moving it gets

[@MultiMiasma]

What a time to be alive.

[@guitarstella1]

yeah killing our planet while we stair into space at dust and desd planets

[@maxheimer9605]

Yeah satanic times. Satanic lies and beliefs.

[@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306]

@@guitarstella1 So... you feel cutting the miniscule percentage of our budget for this purpose to learn more about the universe and everything which is really the core of our humanity is somehow going to solve the problems we have on our planet? In the meantime there are voters that don't even know how to determine the shape of our planet. Would you feel better if any of our budget was put into their hands instead?

[@iconocolor643]

@@guitarstella1 Pretty sure most astronomers are disgusted with corporations killing our fields with roundup and Wal-Mart popping everywhere. Why trowing the stone at them? Because they look at the Cosmos you think they're disconnected and don't have a view on pollution? Cheap ass mindset, really retarded.

[@thepowerman8952]

@@guitarstella1 Insane, isn't it?

[@eam2564]

Every pixel of this image is bigger than 10.000 light years

[@benohb]

The universe seems older than we think Scientists were expecting the appearance of plasma filaments and a thermal background

[@garyoldham4449]

@@benohb James Webb will probably prove that the Big bang is not correct. Probably the universe isn't really expanding either. The red shift attributed to acceleration of recessional speed is probably due to diffractional effects. With greater distances there are greater diffractional effects. I'm not so sure that redshift means the furthest objects are receding faster. The sun shining through gas and dust of the atmosphere certainly becomes red shifted at sunset and sunrise. And there's gas in dust in space. But are there pebbles in the atmosphere, small rocks, large rocks, small asteroids? Maybe there's just a lot more Pebble fields in space between us and the furthest objects then they have taken into account and they have simply not subtracted enough diffractional redshift from the total redshift to arrive at an accurate recessional speed. They subtract a certain amount to account for diffractional effects. But isn't that a guesstimate? If they have a hard time detecting dwarf planets in the kuiper belt how are they going to detect pebbles halfway across the known universe? The fact is they don't know how much gas dust and larger particles. All of which cause diffractional redshift. And if our atmosphere _was_ full of pebbles the sun would appear red even when it was straight overhead. Also we have no idea if light doesn't shift toward the red inherently over extreme distances.

[@benohb]

@@garyoldham4449 What you say is reasonable...we are still learning

[@klissiabellane4678]

O contraste entre espectros horripilantes, farsescas, deprimentes, oportunistas e usurpadoras e sem-préstimos e imagens úteis à Terra é patente, é nítido. Esperamos que nenhuma Civilização extraterrestre tenha tido o desconforto de ver os espectros que perambulam inepta e vergonhosamente na face deste Planeta. Que possamos corrigir esta "distorção" medonha.

[@gravitonthongs1363]

@@benohb plasma filament? We are not looking at a stars corona, do you mean intergalactic filament (aka cosmic web / gravitational filaments)

[@ginomania]

I hope to live long to see more great things like this historic photo And I hope for this channel that more people finally realize that this channel is a gem of astronomy

[@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306]

I subbed. Can't get enough astronomy. And when we are getting to see the fruits of our 10 billion dollar investment it makes me appreciate how much it was worth it. Humanity can only get better as we get closer to the truth to why we should love, respect and appreciate life rather then superstitious death cults only out to bilk the ignorant and gullible because they fear a hard days work or honest living.

[@cv507]

like pyramids rebuilt ? vvtc ? x D

[@bitangayves2125]

Wait there is more already !!!! I can't wait for the other pics coming this week 😍 😍

I remember the time they announced the scope, i have been waiting for it since.

[@bloodyorphan]

Amazing images

[@mistermindahenziandalasnus3754]

Imagine, there are civilisations watching back at us there somewhere, wondering if we are here.

[@Tackleqb]

Well not likely. Remember these are the galaxies as they were 13 billion years ago (only a few hundred million years after the Big Bang). So likely no intelligent life in these photos as they were back then and as they look in these photos. Most if not all of these galaxies are long gone, have collided, etc etc. But still interesting to think about.

[@mistermindahenziandalasnus3754]

@@Tackleqb not in those positions anymore, of course. Wherever they are now.

[@Tackleqb]

@@mistermindahenziandalasnus3754 yea yea I figured you meant that haha. But who knows maybe I’m wrong and there really WAS intelligent life 13 billion years ago on a planet in one of those millions of galaxies looking back in our directions.

[@treashurehunter800]

With a much better telascope no doubt.

[@mistermindahenziandalasnus3754]

@@Tackleqb I actually mean now, or whatever now means in the vastness of the space time continuum. Right now at the other end of the universe, there are civilisations wondering if they are alone as they gaze at their skies. Makes you wonder yah?

[@jamestiburon443]

Pascal, the French philosopher from the 1600's said" The silence on these infinite spaces frightens me", in his book PENSEES. I look at these new pics and those of Hubble and get truly spiritually inspired that " there is more dreamt of in my philosophy" than I may imagine, to paraphrase Shakespeare.. Congrats to all the science ph.d's who love wondering that earned this great accomplishment.

[@craigmayall7513]

Unbelievable images. WOW! so cool The music is a bit distracting guys!

[@adonistopofmen2571]

Great images ...

[@lazarusblackwell6988]

We are alive in the most interesting times of the human race. Also in the most terrible times as well. Life is strange.

[@UKnowtheThing]

Every generation has said the same.

[@fraggranade3598]

Laughs in ww2

[@lazarusblackwell6988]

@@fraggranade3598 WW2 was chamomile tea compared to the suffering of a lot of people today. I rather have bombs flying over my head than this hell today.

[@hrhhrhrh]

Yep, Wish we were exploring these places in person.

[@matgeezer2094]

Great image - what's the object that's caused the diffraction spikes? The JWST really is an impressive instrument

[@LukeMancell]

The camera mountings

[@freeman10000]

Am I seeing globular clusters on some of the background (lensed) galaxies?

[@Hussam.tubeyou]

what is the name of music which using by this video ?

[@47crazed]

we're definitely not alone

[@rambow70]

I really want to see these new images. I'm sure they're going to only get better from the first image. Are they going to release more to the public? Not really sure how it works.

[@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306]

Yes they are going to release it to the public because it belongs to us and we paid for it. But they have to be careful not to release something that is going to cause a panic or civil war due to a bunch of nutters with their tin hats on too tight mistaking a blurry image as aliens invading or sky demons or whatever asstarded shit they can come up with because they don't understand... therefore [insert nonsense of choice here].

[@goannaj3243]

looks like a background to an old sci-fi show like Blakes 7, but is real and will need weeks if not months to analyze.

[@leewightman8619]

Space is so amazing

[@drhmufti]

The size of the universe is unfathomable.

[@sgtcrash4775]

Hello.. I think this is amazing 👏.. Couple questions, 1, as far as distance goes , is this the maximum distance we can see with the JWTS ? 2, and is there a reason the president and VP were there ?

[@PatRourke137]

1. Probably not 2. To show the funding paid off, more "official" of an announcement My guess

[@jdel7525]

@@PatRourke137 funding never stops....it was a good gesture by NASA to include them because they'll ask for more funding....

[@treashurehunter800]

so they said it took 12 hours to appear into this depth that we see now. at some point they're going to hold the position for days and really look off the deep end finally. 🥺🤪😵

[@garyoldham4449]

Well that's the most detailed shot we've ever gotten for only 12 hours exposure time. What if they detect aliens heading this way? Wouldn't it be worth 10 billion to know and start preparing for the invasion? Then would you think it was worth it? Just kidding there aren't any aliens out there! But I predict that over the next 10 years you aren't going to be saying it was a waste of time.

[@Sp1Deep]

@@garyoldham4449 we can't be the only ones out there look at all those galaxy's it's too big for us to be the only freak accident to happen

[@Mrs.pinkalicious]

@@garyoldham4449 well if they did seen aliens billion light years away they probably dead

[@Boardwoards]

@@garyoldham4449 if an alien was coming at you it'd probably be close to lightspeed so you'd never see it until it got here

[@quasaaaar]

@@Boardwoards or even faster than light. And when you see them coming in the telescope they are already laughing behind you.

[@luisvega666]

How telescope works?

[@htoohtoohtetaung359]

i'm curious to get the original highest resolution of JWST's deep fields!! could someone help?

[@mvikas1995]

Nasa's instagram page has a pic uploaded and I thnk its the clearest image we have as of now

[@mohitmandole9058]

Is this the same space area what hubble observed in it's deep field view or some other region of space ? Due to Gravity lensing effect we see it as distorted and bent then how can we find it's (galaxies,stars) actual location to study them in detail ? (As Supernova SN Refsdal exploding images was seen 4 times over the course of few weeks )

[@devanshchauhan8283]

Its exactly the same place brother.

[@bitangayves2125]

Yes it is the same spot. With way better resolution, taken in 12.5 hours, instead of weeks . Imagine the potential 🙆🏾‍♂️🙆🏾‍♂️🙆🏾‍♂️🙆🏾‍♂️🙆🏾‍♂️

[@mohitmandole9058]

@@bitangayves2125 Hell Yeah 🤘 but still confused about the 2nd query ?

[@bitangayves2125]

@@mohitmandole9058 lol i sure as hell can't, the people at nasa can, using complex math 🤣 and computers to do the calculations for them ....

[@mohitmandole9058]

@@bitangayves2125 😅 u got me wrong . I mean i am just curious that can nasa guys know the exact location if they see the same light of exploding supernova in four different locations as the light coming to them is gravity lensed . Anyways 🤘👍

[@08wolfeyes]

To think that all that detail covers an area of sky no larger than you holding out a grain of sand at arms length. It just blows my mind looking at this image and can't wait to see more!

[@wib6044]

Yea that’s what is mind blowing. Imagine how long it would take you to cover just the sky you could see if you did that for a second at each point. Then to realize each point you covered contained that many galaxies, and each of those swirly objects contained trillions of planets. It doesn’t even make sense. 🤪🤯

[@johnber1470]

This mission is like counting the grains of sands manually.

[@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306]

And yet, they are pulling it off. That just makes me that much more impressed and thankful a smidgeon of my tax dollars went into this. If it were up to me 50% of my tax dollars would go into this and the other 50% to help those less fortunate. I am a firm believer that when the less fortunate do well, it benefits us all. As well I feel learning more about the universe and everything is one of the main purposes I can think of for humanity to even exist. The universe may not give a rats ass about us, but we certainly do about it.

[@keynotes7399]

Where’s

[@sexmaster]

???: hey, professor! the brain in the jar made map hack upgrade!

[@antn8387]

thanks skynet

[@filipwyberg]

why didnt Hubble deepfield show up any gravitat ional lenses?

[@spatrk6634]

gravitational lensing is best seen in galaxy clusters. hubble did take some images of galaxy cluster with noticeable gravitational lensing. but wasnt really focused on it until late 2010

[@whowho1693]

was it aiming to take a photo of a gravitational lens? but it seems that only certain colors are affected by the gravitational lensing effect...Is it related to the distance....? Come to think of it, I'm curious lol

[@blas_de_lezo7375]

Light probably is all red (redshift) and changed for us with computers. Not related to grav lensing.

[@oytgrubbs9172]

They should retake the Hubble Deep Field and juxtapose the two, so we can compare what Hubble sees vs JWST!

[@devanshchauhan8283]

They already had taken the Hubble deep field of the exact same place as we are seeing today. I have a comparison photo of both the telescope pictures..but cant send you here

[@bitangayves2125]

Check on KZbin jwst vs hubble. Same spot

[@klissiabellane4678]

O contraste entre espectros horripilantes, farsescas, deprimentes, oportunistas e usurpadoras e sem-préstimos e imagens úteis à Terra é patente, é nítido. Esperamos que nenhuma Civilização extraterrestre tenha tido o desconforto de ver os espectros que perambulam inepta e vergonhosamente na face deste Planeta. Que possamos corrigir esta "distorção" medonha.

[@toecutter8002]

Wow look at all those galaxies and that photo is aiming in one direction! It's impossible for us to be all alone there's life somewhere out there in the cosmos. We are that proof of life if we're here then they're there.

[@dadillonful]

It’s not impossible, we can literally be the only life in the universe

[@rgdomztv3794]

@@dadillonful Gokou, Saitama,all Onepiece character are leave in those galaxies , believe me.

[@garyoldham4449]

That's not how proof works. You are talking about a belief.

[@leejerrett8268]

@@DavidMorrill Look up how minuscule the area our radio transmissions have traveled so far is compared to the size of our galaxy, and then realise that even at such a relatively short distance from earth our signals are already so attenuated thanks to the inverse square law that they are irretrievable from background noise. Imagine you lived alone with your nearest neighbour living over the horizon and you concluded that you must be the only person on the planet because you couldn’t hear the sound of anybody else’s TV from ten km away.

[@Phyde4ux]

What I find most interesting about this comparison is, JWST is seeing the same objects that appear in the HDF, but in much better resolution. Beyond that though, there doesn't seem to be much more. Some tiny blips, but no real deeply red-shifted structures like I was expecting. Perhaps we really are looking at the very first generation of galaxies here!

[@williamwesley5078]

That's what I was thinking too

[@read6301]

Hubble took weeks James web took 12.5 hours so imagine if James web took weeks

[@taimo.]

I was here

[@BlazingLove316]

Can’t believe this.

[@000fisherman]

I would love to see this agai8nst 100 hrs same spot.

[@tylerdurden4006]

Which mirror took the major strike from debris? It shouldn't work right?

[@SuperFrankto]

A micrometeoroid hitting a 6.5 meter mirror is not a 'major' strike.

[@thejack666]

It works, of course. They built this telescope knowing it'll take hits

[@garyoldham4449]

James Webb has 18 mirrors. Only one of them has a nick. It's like if you wear glasses and there is a tiny scratch one of your lenses. You're still going to be able to see stuff. James Webb has a flaw on that one mirror but you still will get great images because all of those 18 mirrors are blended together into one. The point of having 18 mirrors layering up the same exact image is because one of the segments could show a certain brightness. But when they're all combined it's 18 times as bright. Even if there's a bad spot on that mirror the other mirrors fill in the missing information. So it really is just a small spec on one mirror. So there is a small dimple in one mirror from that impact. And then they were for other impacts which were much smaller particles. In other words it's normal. It's expected that James Webb will very slowly suffer damages from specs smaller than a grain of sand. But there's a chance it could get hit by something larger like a pebble or even something larger. Hopefully it only gets hit by tiny particles but it could get hit 100 times and still take great pictures.

[@garyoldham4449]

So it's been hit five times so far. Only one was larger than a grain of sand and did a tiny bit of damage. The others didn't do much of anything. But they didn't help. But it's normal. It will always get hit a little bit now and then. After 10 years the image won't be quite as good. But they'll still be better than anything else we have.

[@rogchat5156]

That's cool ,but don't we have big question on closer planets right now !!

[@rocoe9019]

There's big questions on this planet, our neighbour the moon and pretty much everything ! Your point ?

[@grimdicer152]

Imagine what we could achieve, if we all worked together as one...

[@maxheimer9605]

We won't achieve Jack shit. Crisis always brings the best in man. Look lat the world today, if it was peaceful why look at the stars, just stay all day on ig models and scratch balls like a macaque.

[@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306]

If only. The thing is what has been getting in the way the past couple of thousand years is superstitious nonsense. But being this death cult superstitious nonsense rakes in billions tax free and is politically connected we are lucky to be where we are. If they had their way we would be communicating by banging on logs and burning witches for entertainment. Sorry to come off as negative but it is the truth and we will never be fixed until we not only come to terms with it, but find a way to convince others or somehow eliminate them.

"THANKS: SKYNET CYBERDYNE" lol :D

[@barnabasstewart4104]

"Thanks Skynet Cyberdine"....... 😳

[@iyaboy888]

One day we will discover another planet earth and migrate on it

[@franciscop1192]

Skynet Cyberdine? 😍😍😍

[@Garthinyus]

Why does it seem like one of the galaxies has a mirror image?

[@torstenmaier5624]

Ich hab den Eindruck, das Internet wird demnächst noch mehr unipolar, ist das die Nachricht von James Webb?

[@baraskparas9559]

The lensing of distant galaxies IMHO is caused by pure refraction of light through ejecta from galaxies and black holes and has nothing to do with fictitious gravitational lensing from fictitious warping of space time.

[@cquintanilla71]

So it travel 1 million miles impressive , I would also like to see our planet or galaxy from that distance.

[@leejerrett8268]

1 million miles is about 4 and a half times the distance of the moon, so it is still much closer to our planet than any other body in the solar system; our galaxy will look exactly how it looks from earth.

[@cquintanilla71]

@@leejerrett8268 thanks!

[@fawziaabdurrahman2251]

Our planet if anything will be the tiniest dot

[@bitangayves2125]

It's sitting behind the moon at that distance, so I don't think it can see the earth. Remember it has be in the shadow of the moon at all times.

[@GT-ry1cv]

@@bitangayves2125 It can't be pointed at the earth due to the sun shield that protects it from the Sun.

[@collier6794]

Show us images of the moon foot prints with this telescope

[@martinc.720]

You have no idea how these things work, do you? And you believe in all that nonsense?

[@teryn3723]

Just a food for thought, 1 galaxy consists of Millions to billions of stars and planets alone...now imagine billions of galaxies, how many stars and planets would that be.... answer, it will be too hard for our puny mind to know........

[@seemev2.0phuckbootube78]

I think its way out there. I also wonder now when are they going to direct towards planets like earth. Imagine the details we can get on closer objects if it can view that far.

[@alexventrov6826]

Yup, at that point its really hard for the human brain to comprehend. Even if the number was layed out to give some perspective it would just look like a bunch of numbers.

[@mh22xv]

Its fuzzy!! I demand that an image of light travelling for 13 billion years to be sharp! …… not. 😉 can’t wait for the images from exoplanets though.

[@soisaidtogod4248]

Wow, looks like it always has, stuff in the distance and stuff close. Seems it is a rather huge area, like we always wondered.

[@bitangayves2125]

Lol u couldn't be more underwhelmed if u tried 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@dagriz]

Honestly it looks just like Hubble's deep field picture.

[@hikmet6293]

Benim için hayalkırıklığı oldu bu fotoğraf için mi 12 Temmuz u bekledik

[@clinte9160]

What's behind those galaxies? I knew they needed a larger telescope.

[@nmarks]

A restaurant.

[@kazj1728]

They should survey a similar section of the sky using the Event Horizon Telescope radio collaboration. It would take months/years to develop an image as this field is probably thousands of times bigger than Sagittarius A*, but using that technique imagine how sharp those faint blobs in this image would appear.

[@iyaboy888]

There will discover planet that have civilization and having a war using sword and stones

[@bitangayves2125]

Patience brother, this was just a 12 hour exposure. It's a way better resolution oic than the hubble ultra deep field pic that took several weeks long exposure. Can u imagine the potential of this machine.... I can't imagine what it would find with several weeks of exposure. I mean this thing can see a fly flying across the moon ..... let's wait and see ... there are more pictures coming tomorrow and hopefully the whole week

[@drhmufti]

Skynet Cyberdine?

[@sylviadugdale1035]

Could be from early star trek episode who knows

[@deRockmoto]

But still won’t show us surfaces of possible life on exoplanets

[@eladioalonso8906]

En español 😀😀, porfavor

[@000fisherman]

There are that many ARCs in this shot , you could come down to 50mtre wavelenght and get the same shot only 20 b.lyears

[@whichgodofthousandsmeansno5306]

I love astronomy. I love that I live in a time we were are making such advancements. A shame we have to share this time with a segment of morons who think it was better back when we didn't even know where the sun went at night and taking a shit was life threatening.

[@sakaisims6191]

Our world leaders think too small we still are so primal and petty on this beautiful planet.

[@navneetsharma6223]

The picture is not so sharp

[@pitphase7410]

Why are we first look billions of years into the past? To see the surrounding area so clear I would find better.

[@1just_carl]

Wheres the exoplanets

[@humansrants1694]

its not going to show the min detail.

[@garyoldham4449]

Those are galaxies. The exoplanet is a little to the right just out of frame. Just wait till they turn the rig a little to the right! I was just looking at photos of exoplanets. And a video of HR 8799 showing the interpolated motion of the planets orbiting the star. James Webb will show them much more clearly.

[@42the_answer]

Don’t know why you had to include those clowns in the beginning of the video.

[@rickdeckardbladerunner2049]

They say it is such a great telescope it can see footsteps on the moon.

[@anajayasmr7126]

I was thinking the same thing 🤔

[@Vanilla_Icecream1231]

Sorry but no it can’t lol

[@rickdeckardbladerunner2049]

@@Vanilla_Icecream1231 kzbin.info/www/bejne/lXOafq14os-UgJo Bruce Willis in Armageddon would not agree with your statement.

[@MrMysterious31]

Yes, it's real that it can see footsteps on moon but it is not made for those purposes :)

[@rickdeckardbladerunner2049]

@@MrMysterious31 Well, it would be good PR for NASA to prove all those wrong that we did in fact go to the moon!

[@samuelboye4483]

Humans are way too inquisitive. What do we benefit from trying to know all this?

[@michaelt1357]

@Smee Self Some would say Grug was right to be cautious.

[@BustaCap]

Ruined all this when the intro said the president and Vice President released this. I swear they take all the credit even when they’re the ones that wanted to defund NASA originally.

[@emblake7750]

Just watched president Biden conference revealing first photo,that was painful man

[@Thedirtylittlesecret]

Amazing we are nothing.

[@shacirsss]

7

[@leew8812]

Music? Guys come on! At least have it at a level that doesn't drown out the speech

[@joegeorge3889]

I works

[@ready1fire1aim1]

Theory of Everything solution (short version): Swap from Newton "real/necessary" universe over to Leibniz "contingent/not-necessary" universe as our fundamental blueprint of the universe. This includes Leibniz calculus vs Newton calculus. Anywhere Leibniz and Newton thought different. All of it. Gottfried Leibniz "contingent/not-necessary" universe just lacked 2022 quantum physics verbiage (just match up definitions) and Hamilton's 4D quaternion algebra (created 200 years after Leibniz died). Lastly, the first number is NOT 1. It's 0. First four numbers are 0, 1, 2, 3 ✅. First four dimensions are 0D, 1D, 2D, 3D ✅. Finishing what Leibniz started (with the intention of destroying what Newton started): (Have to include a lot of definitions, sorry. Note 0D point, quark and Monad same definitions) [Math; Geometry 0D point] A point is a 0-dimensional mathematical object which can be specified in -dimensional space using an n-tuple ( , , ..., ) consisting of. coordinates. In dimensions greater than or equal to two, points are sometimes considered synonymous with vectors and so points in n-dimensional space are sometimes called n-vectors. 1D = line, straight; two points; composite substance; matter 《0D (point) is exact location only; zero size; not a 'thing', not a 'part'; Monad》 Monad (from Greek μονάς monas, "singularity" in turn from μόνος monos, "alone") refers, in cosmogony, to the Supreme Being, divinity or the totality of all things. The concept was reportedly conceived by the Pythagoreans and may refer variously to a single source acting alone, or to an indivisible origin, or to both. The concept was later adopted by other philosophers, such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who referred to the monad as an elementary particle. [Quantum] Quark is a type of elementary particle and a fundamental 'constituent' of matter. Quarks combine to form composite particles called hadrons, the most stable of which are protons and neutrons, the components of atomic nuclei. What is another word for quark? fundamental particle, elementary particle. Do quarks take up space? Its defining feature is that it lacks spatial extension; being dimensionless, it does not take up space. How fast do quarks move? the speed of light [In mathematics, a tuple is a finite ordered list (sequence) of elements. An n-tuple is a sequence (or ordered list) of n elements, where n is a non-negative integer. There is only one 0-tuple, referred to as the empty tuple. An n-tuple is defined inductively using the construction of an ordered pair] 1st four dimensions are 0D, 1D, 2D, 3D ✅. 1st four dimensions are not 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D 🚫. Human consciousness, mathematically, is identical to 4D quaternion algebra with w, x, y, z being "real/necessary" (0D, 1D, 2D, 3D) and i, j, k being "imaginary/contingent" (1D xi, 2D yj, 3D zk). 1D-9D 'contingent' universe has "conscious lifeforms" (1D xi, 2D yj, 3D zk)..."turning" 'time'. [In mathematics, a versor is a quaternion of norm one (a unit quaternion). The word is derived from Latin versare = "to turn" with the suffix -or forming a noun from the verb (i.e. versor = "the turner"). It was introduced by William Rowan Hamilton in the context of his quaternion theory.] [Math; 4D quaternion algebra] A quaternion is a 4-tuple, which is a more concise representation than a rotation matrix. Its geo- metric meaning is also more obvious as the rotation axis and angle can be trivially recovered. How do you make a quaternion? You can create an N-by-1 quaternion array by specifying an N-by-3 array of Euler angles in radians or degrees. Use the euler syntax to create a scalar quaternion using a 1-by-3 vector of Euler angles in radians. "Turn" to what, you might ask. 5D is the center of 1D-9D. The breadth (space-time). All 'things' and 'parts' are drawn to the center, the whole. (The Dawn -Book of Cain on the creation of the contingent universe) [Contingent Universe]: 3 sets of 3 dimensions: (1D-3D/4D-6D/7D-9D) The illusory middle set (4D, 5D, 6D) is temporal. Id imagine we create this middle temporal set similar to a dimensional Venn Diagram with polarized lenses that we "turn" by being conscious. Which requires energy. 3D height symmetry/entanglement with 9D absorption is why we are "consumers", we must consume/absorb calories, and sleep, to continue "to turn" 'time' (be alive). 1D-3D spatial set/7D-9D spectral set overlap creating the temporal illusion of 4D-6D set. According to theoretical physicist Carlo Rovelli, time is an illusion: our naive perception of its flow doesn't correspond to physical reality. Indeed, as Rovelli argues in The Order of Time, much more is illusory, including Isaac Newton's picture of a universally ticking clock. Does time exist without space? Time 'is' as space 'is' - part of a reference frame in which in ordered sequence you can touch, throw and eat apples. Time cannot exist without space and the existence of time does require energy. Time, then, has three levels, according to Leibniz: (i) the atemporality or eternality of God; (ii) the continuous immanent becoming-itself of the monad as entelechy; (iii) time as the external framework of a chronology of “nows” The difference between (ii) and (iii) is made clear by the account of the internal principle of change. The real difference between the necessary being of God and the contingent, created finitude of a human being is the difference between (i) and (ii).] 1D, 2D, 3D = spatial composite (line, width, height) 4D, 5D, 6D = temporal illusory (length, breadth, depth) 7D, 8D, 9D = spectra energies (continuous, emission, absorption) Symmetry/entanglement: 1D, 4D, 7D line, length, continuous 2D, 5D, 8D width, breadth, emission 3D, 6D, 9D height, depth, absorption Conclusion: Humanity needs to immediately swap from "Newton" to "Leibniz". Our calculus is incorrect (Leibniz > Newton): What is the difference between Newton and Leibniz calculus? Newton's calculus is about functions. Leibniz's calculus is about relations defined by constraints. In Newton's calculus, there is (what would now be called) a limit built into every operation. In Leibniz's calculus, the limit is a separate operation. Our Universal Constants have convoluted answers. Leibniz's Law of Sufficient Reason fixes this in a day. (FUNDAMENTALS > specifics)

[@itheuserfirst3186]

K, champ.

[@TheKamillosdanny]

Do you have a girlfriend?

[@itheuserfirst3186]

@Smee Self It's the only place they won't be ignored.

[@pitbulls2849]

Still can't see nothing, we already know its a lot of galaxies n stars. We want close up pics not far away

[@mirjanahreljin6639]

explained...? by Biden...?? by Kamala...??? hahahahaha...that is a god one... the best...🤣😂🤣😂😂😂😂

[@jieli3313]

What is time? Time is the speed of the earth's orbit around the sun and the speed of the earth's rotation! However, the rotation speed of each planet in the universe is different! Because the speed is different! So the time is different! Einstein's relativity space-time bending! just the rotation speed of the planet is different!

[@spatrk6634]

lol no. if we have same watch that counts earths time. watch would still show different time if one person travels fast compared to other person with same watch. or in very strong gravitational field. it doesnt have to do with planets rotation. most basically... faster you travel through space, slower you travel through time. but only compared to other person who is not moving through space. you would still experience one second as one second. its just that when you compare the time with the person who didnt move, you would notice that your time ticked at slower rate compared to him. it also applies to strong gravitational field but thats more complicated to explain.

[@vinugvalentine230]

Are we seeing Genesis...

[@pron777]

I noticed that if you enhance Hubble pictures with say higher contrast and brightness while maintaining the blackness of space, you get the same as Webb pictures. This Webb is a very expensive scientific entertainment. Lets focus more on finding alternative to fossil fuel and climate change than looking into the past. Webb picture will not matter if climate change drastically affects Earth.

[@000fisherman]

Amounts to if you put a 20mtr telascope up there. The picture would look the same but the galaxies are another X-?m lyears.

[@ready1fire1aim1]

"Before the beginning there was void. Nothing. No flesh. No rock. No air. No heat. No light. No dark. Nothing, save a single, perfect pearl. Within that pearl dreamed a mighty, unfathomable spirit-the One- Anu. Made of shining diamond. Anu was the sum of all things: good and evil, light and dark, physical and mystical, joy and sadness-all reflected across the crystalline facets of its form. And, within its eternal dream-state, Anu considered itself-all of its myriad facets. Seeking a state of total purity and perfection, Anu cast all evil from itself. All dissonance was gone. But what of the cast-off aspect of its being? The dark parts, the sharp, searing aspects of hate and pridefulness? Those could not remain in a state of separation, for all things are drawn to all things. All parts are drawn to the whole. Those discordant parts assembled into the Beast-the Dragon. Tathamet was his name-and he breathed unending death and darkness from his seven devouring heads. The Dragon was solely composed of Anu's cast-off aspects. The end sum of the whole became a singular Evil- the Prime Evil, from which all the vileness would eventually spread throughout existence. Though separate beings, Anu and the Dragon were bound together within the Pearl's shadowed womb. There they warred against each other in an unending clash of light and shadow for ages uncounted. The diamond warrior and the seven-headed dragon proved to be the equal of the other, neither ever gaining the upper hand in their fierce and unending combat-till at last, their energies nearly spent after countless millennia of battle, the two combatants delivered their final blows. The energies unleashed by their impossible fury ignited an explosion of light and matter so vast and terrible that it birthed the very universe all around us. All of the stars above and the darkness that binds them. All that we touch. All that we feel. All that we know. All that is unknown. All of it continues through the night and the day in the ebbing and flowing of the ocean tides and in the destruction of fire and the creation of the seed. Everything of which we are aware, and that of which we are utterly unaware, was created with the deaths of Anu and the Dragon, Tathamet. In the epicenter of reality lies Pandemonium, the scar of the universe's violent birth. At its chaotic center lay the Heart of Creation, a massive jewel unlike any other: the Eye of Anu- the Worldstone. It is the foundation stone of all places and times, a nexus of realities and vast, untold possibility. Anu and Tathamet are no more, yet their distinct essences permeated the nascent universe-and eventually became the bedrock of what we know to be the High Heavens and the Burning Hells. Anu's shining spine spun out into the primordial darkness, where it slowed and cooled. Over countless ages it formed into the Crystal Arch, around which the High Heavens took shape and form. Though Anu was gone, some resonance of it remained in the holy Arch. Spirits bled forth from it-shining angels of light and sound who embodied the virtuous aspects of what the One had been. Yet, despite the grace and beauty of this shining realm, it lacked the perfection of Anu's spirit. Anu had passed into a benevolent place beyond this broken universe- a paradise of which nothing is known and yet represents perhaps the greatest-kept secret of Creation. Longed for, but unimaginable." -THE DAWN, BOOK OF CAIN.

[@AD-kv9kj]

"Before the beginning there was void. Nothing. No flesh. No rock. No air. No heat. No light. No dark. Nothing, save [for] a single..." No, no, no... "NOTHING"...Nothing... There was absolutely pure nothing. There was no one special thing in pure nothingness to create something else, all things came from pure nothingness. Because real pure NOTHINGness is the most fertile state in existence. God is nothing, that's why nobody can really find God and the world seems often to be godless...because it is. God is a state of pure void and therefore creates all things but never interferes with the processes of matter, nor interferes with human being or any other creatures, because that would be dictatorship, not freedom, and God is nothingness, so God has no judgements, desires, plans etc etc. All that exists is of God, but the way all that is plays out is of itself, and all beings are free to help themselves and each other as equally free as we are to torture ourselves and each other. Because ultimately, we're all of the same one spirit/soul - which is the universe itself, which comes out of pure nothing. Where do we go when we die? Back to where we were before we were born, pure nothing. But that pure nothing manifests and plays as all things.

[@ready1fire1aim1]

@@AD-kv9kj I kinda feel like you mean Monad 😀. The totality of the contingent universe has a Monad. And an opposite, Yaldabaoth. Personifications of 0D and...10D? Hmm

[@PhoenixProdLLC]

👏👏👏🇺🇲✨💃🏼

[@cv507]

1:03 vvätt is in smäckce 723 ? äin nöne öff yör biznäss sö stäy out v v

[@nidnev3857]

After this initial excitement goes down, it's time to look for alien megastructures or alternative earths. Time is running out. A group of human pioneers must colonize another planet soon.

[@alioshapopovicius3352]

We are going to colonize Mars soon. Better than that we can't do with our current technology. If people would stop believing in conspiracy theories and obstructing science we could advance much faster. Hope westart colonizing Mars very soon though

[@suspicioustumbleweed4760]

If you could travel those insane distances you could also save the earth instead.

[@liveandletlive8264]

😲😲😲😲👍❤🇭🇷

[@randallarmstrong1840]

This is like finding dirt behind dirt.

[@28_Bones]

These images are just paintings done by nasa artists

[@MrMysterious31]

I can't understand humans, they want to explore future while stopping themselves by egoistic primitive hunting skills🤔

[@nightmisterio]

Gravity lensing is wrong.

[@user-dk4xq6xl6u]

SubhanAllah

[@alfredalexanderkirk..13cir37]

Anunnakl 13 circle ⭕️ left power..red dragon women power

[@gabox01]

This picture isn't any better than the Hubble one. I think they f-d something up that is unrepairable. It still amazes me all the sheep who look at this picture and wow I've never seen anything like this.

[@cooldude8651]

Its again just 1 percent we know about universe🥴

[@thomasmorin749]

Please find evidence of extra terrestial life.

[@elizabethmillar1829]

As if they would really show us what they truly saw 🤔

[@Ktranphoto]

Thanos is coming for us

[@huijgenr]

You should have kept politics out of this

[@OwenPrescott]

Impossible. Everything must be politics. Can't let an oppurtunity go to waste brainwashing the NPC's

[@dreamlover7681]

I really liked the cgi used in this video.

[@xmj6830]

I really like the AI behind this comment.

[@garyoldham4449]

What's your problem with science? Is it because you're no good at it? You really should go study science. After a while it will all make sense to you. Of course if you think science is fake then you probably wouldn't want to study it. Is that it? You're lazy and don't want to study science so the easy way to play hooky is to pretend that it's all fake so you won't have to study it?

[@michaelbariso3192]

Time and distance cannot be relative to other objects in space-time as that would violate the law of conservation of energy. To travel distance requires potential energy, an observer can have no effect on a moving objects kinetic energy-Relativity debunked. If there is no universal time in time dilation then there are no universal coordinates so time couldn't exist. Explain how moving clocks can run slow without having a universal time :-). Traveling at a different speed from the stationary clock having no universal time, all the stars, planets and galaxies would be in a different place in the universe so distance for the observer could never be calculated. When certain frequencies of light are shined onto metal electrons are ejected instantaneously without delay according to the photoelectric effect yet Einstein's disciples tell us the speed of light is limited to 186,000 miles per second. Doublethink is the act of accepting two conflicting beliefs as truth. Time and distance cannot be relative to other objects in space-time as that would violate the law of conservation of energy. Light travels in both directions, anyone having a conversation with their friends understands this simple phenomenon yet Einstein's disciples believe people on earth are time traveling backwards and forwards in space-time relative to one another. Testing the speed light on Earth is like riding a bicycle up hill, gravity will show you down. The biggest threat to humanity is human stupidity. Explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time. Explain how moving clocks can run slow without having a universal time :-). Doublethink is the act of accepting two conflicting beliefs as truth. The communications delay between Earth and Mars is approximately 20 minutes. We're either viewing the light from Mars in the future, Einstein's past dimensions of space-time or in real time, which do you think is more logical? Einstein's relativity is wrong light has no limitation of speed; it cannot be slowed down because it isn't moving. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions. Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. According to Einstein's relativity-time dilation's, photos taken of the Earth from the Discovery Space station traveled from the past to the future violating the laws of physics, conservation of energy and common sense. According to Einstein's projectile light particle proton light has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime, but if light has a (constant speed) then moving clocks cannot run slow through spacetime! :-) The speed of light according to Einstein's relativity is 186,000 miles per second, but according to physics if two mechanical watches were synchronized on earth and one traveled across the universe and back, there would be no difference in time between the mechanical watches proving the speed of light is instantaneous as the only way a mechanical watch will run slow is if you tighten the main spring. Big Bang, Einstein's relativity-time dilation and nearly all of science debunked. Using optical clocks, lasers and GPS to prove Einstein's time dilation-space-time curvature is like using a metal detector to find gold at Fort Knox. The closer you are to the electromagnetic fields, mass and gravity of the earth the more light bends aka gravitational lensing. If the speed of light is constant then past and future dimensions of spacetime and an expanding universe would not be possible, obviously destroying the twins paradox as each twin cannot move faster or slower than the other. A mirror is a wave reflector that flips images from left to right, but according to Einstein the images you see are the result of projectile light particle photons being transported into past and future dimensions of space-time. Explain how particle light photons can re-converge their molecular structures in mirrors and how this is done without violating the law of conservation of energy. From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in all directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel all directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second. Einstein would have made a great used car salesman :-). Light waves can stretch, bend-curve and occupy a state of superposition, whereas the hypothetical Einstein projectile light particle (photon), a particle that has never been observed cannot. Unlike a TV or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of frames that create the appearance of a moving image. There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just video recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. Neither time, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. Time and space are independent of each other, not material bodies or fantasy unions that magically stretch Time, energy, and matter like a rubber band into space-time dimensions. Einstein's projectile light particle proton has a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second moving through spacetime and because so wavelengths of light cannot stretch through spacetime! Red-shifts are simply the result of decelerating electrons, as moving electrons of charged electromagnetic waves-light travel through the plasma of the universe each lump (or "quanta") of energy in the electromagnetic waves are charged then discharged to the next lump, eventually the energy dissipates causing the delay in radio communications giving the appearance of time dilation - longer wavelengths in red shift. Will the James Webb Telescope view the birth of the first galaxies? Nope, the universe goes on to infinity. Neither time, the atom, energy nor mass can create itself into nothing, reside in nothing or expand into nothing simply because nothing has no properties. The James Webb Space Telescope is not a time machine, you can’t travel back in time to view the beginning of the universe with telescopes that were made in the future :-). Light and electromagnetic waves are independent of each other. If science uses Einstein's wrongly theorized speed of light like an odometer to calculate past dimensions of distance and time, then using that same method to calculate forward dimensions of distance and time would mean the Big Bang was created and expanded in the future before time existed. Unlike a television or computer monitor the images we are viewing in the universe are in real time, not a series of still image frames that hypothetical Einstein projectile light particles photons create to give us the appearance of a moving image :-). The speed of electromagnetic wave is 186,282 miles per second vs Einstein's projectile light particle proton at 186,000 miles per second. Is this a coincidence or did Einstein plagiarize yet another phenomenon to fit the math of relativity? Electromagnetic waves in space can neither slow down or speed up, this is consistent with the law of conservation of energy. If light slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy so the speed of light is instantaneous and cannot travel slower than it does. If Einstein's projectile light (particle photon) had mass it's light could not travel across the universe, high speed particles traveling at 186,000 miles per second would break the Hubble and James Webb telescope mirrors, debunking the speed of light, Big Bang, Einstein's relativity and any science that uses relativity in their theories. Similar to a mirror light is a real-time wave reflector where light and images travel in straight lines-in all directions in space as they do on earth. The faintest stars and galaxies are neither in a past or future dimension of Einstein's space-time, they're in real-time. Everyone knows cell phone electromagnetic radio waves travel both ways, yet Einstein's disciples believe time energy, mass and light can only travel one way back in time. If you simply run the Big Bang theory in reverse you reveal the insanity of Einstein's relativity and Big Bang theory. If the expansion of the Big Bang were true, time, energy, mass and light would be in the future from the vantage point of an expanding singularity-Big Bang and planet Earth would now reside in a past dimension of Einstein's time dilation (moving clocks run slow) space-time 13.8 billion years ago :-). From every vantage point in the universe light is omnidirectional-instantaneously traveling in both directions (forwards and backwards through Einstein's space-time) while violating the law of conservation of energy. Explain how Einstein's projectile light particle proton can travel in both directions having a (constant speed) of 186,000 miles per second :-)

[@michaelbariso3192]

There are no DCU digital convergence circuits in space, yet Einstein's disciples believe the light and moving images they see in the universe aren't really there, they're just recorded images of the past 13.8 billion years. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in Relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories. You could lead a cult to water, but you can't make them think. If the light from the universe travels to past dimensions of time then it's light is also traveling into future dimensions of time (instantaneously). “And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.” a state of superposition where time and gravity run inwardly, outwardly, in all directions in the same time frame, similar to the electromagnetic field having no beginning and no end. The Doppler effect is wrongly conflated with cosmological Redshift. As one approaches a blowing horn the perceived pitch is higher until the horn is reached, then becomes lower as the horn is passed. This phenomenon is caused by the physical movement of a mechanical soundwave traveling through the medium of air, similar to throwing a rock in a pond, the rock creates physical movement in the medium of water. Cosmological Redshifts are merely the GoPro fisheye effect where wavelengths appear to lengthen-stretch from the phenomenon of gravitational lensing. "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End" Traveling at a different speed from the stationary clock having no universal time, all the stars, planets and galaxies would be in a different place in the universe so distance for the observer could never be calculated. Twins paradox debunked. If there is no universal time in time dilation then there are no universal coordinates so time couldn't exist. Explain how moving clocks can run slow without having a universal time :-). Doublethink is the act of accepting two conflicting beliefs as truth. Explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time. When certain frequencies of light are shined onto metal electrons are ejected instantaneously without delay according to the photoelectric effect yet Einstein's disciples tell us the speed of light is limited to 186,000 miles per second. Testing the speed light on Earth is like riding a bicycle up hill, gravity will show you down. If light has a limitation of speed how do Einstein's disciples explain time dilation and the increasingly faster rate of expansion of the theorized Big Bang? Maxwell's equations state light has a constant speed of 299792458 m/s but if light slowed down its kinetic energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy. To govern, limit or decelerate kinetic energy takes more kinetic energy duh Applying the same equations of Einstein's time dilation on earth a Democrats gravity, speech, hearing and eyesight would be in a past dimension of space-time :-). Einstein Special Relativity Debunked for Beginners kzbin.info/www/bejne/gnzbkJ2VaL-gbJo via @KZbin Testing the speed light on Earth is like riding a bicycle up hill, gravity will show you down. If light has a limitation of speed how do Einstein's disciples explain time dilation and the increasingly faster rate of expansion of the theorized Big Bang? Maxwell's equations state light has a constant speed of 299792458 m/s but if light slowed down its kinetic energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy. To govern, limit or decelerate kinetic energy takes more kinetic energy duh Revelation 22:13. Disciples, remember thy 1st commandment, thou shalt not question thy lawgiver of relativity for blasphemers are the devil's pawn. Let thee not dwell in dissension of our Lord Albert, shun them, drive them back to their jungle lair amen. Albert Einstein, an autistic violinist patent clerk that had access to more papers than Suzanne Somers litter box yet creates theories with more bugs than Terminix- Magnetron

[@rocoe9019]

I'd be very surprised if any one reads more than a couple of line of this!

[@michaelbariso3192]

@@rocoe9019 Light and images travel both ways in space the same way they do on Earth, but Einstein's disciples believe light and images can only travel one way back in time. Unbeknownst to Einstein's disciples aliens in distant galaxies using similar James Webb telescopes would also see the light and images from our Milky Way galaxy. Without a universal time clock, if the Sun is 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a the past dimension of space-time, than the Earth is 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time as well. The speed of light and gravity are both 186,000 miles per second, if the speed of light slows with the stretching of space-time, gravity must also slow as well. Explain how the planets in our solar system can maintain orbits without gravity if the Sun and planets are both in the past dimension of space-time. Ignorance is not knowing and doing, stupidity is knowing and doing anyway. When you have no evidence for your beliefs, refute, devalue and slander your opponent's character with smear campaigns aka tactical stupidity. When Einstein's disciples are unable defend relativity they deflect from answering questions in debates by using ad hominem attacks aka deflection-misdirection. Once members of the cult have been conditioned to believe an ideology all evidence to the contrary is rejected. Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information only in a way that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs. Pretending not to notice the gross contradictions-pseudoscience in relativity is typical of Einstein's disciples, devaluing the source of any information that's in contradiction with their beliefs-theories while having no evidence for their beliefs aka an argument from ignorance. The scientific method refutes arguments with logic facts and reason not childish ridicule. Again, explain how you can see and feel the infrared warmth of the Sun coming up on Earths horizon when light-speed (Einstein's space-time) tells us the Sun is supposedly 8 minutes and 20 seconds in a past dimension of space-time. What do you think a psychiatrist would say if a patient told them when the Sun comes up on the horizon it's not really there :-). The speed of light and gravity are both 186,000 miles per second, if the speed of light slows with time dilation gravity must also slow as well. Explain how the planets in our solar system can maintain orbits if the gravity from the Sun slows down! If the speed of light and gravity from the Sun were slowed down, its energy would decrease, thereby violating the law of conservation of energy. It's scientifically impossible for light, gravity and images to stretch with the fabric of space time as that would require a re-convergence of geometry, there are no TV-monitor DCU digital conversion circuits in space duh. The light and images from the James Webb telescope are in real time. If the Suns light, gravity and images are in a past dimension of space-time using the same frame of reference, all the stars, planets and galaxies in the universe have different coordinates than Earth. I've given you the gift of viewing God's incredible universe in real time but you'd rather believe in a fantasy ??. Ignorance is not knowing and doing, stupidity is knowing and doing anyway. Einstein Relativity 1=2 Fantasy Physics, Wave-Particle Duality, Photon, ... kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZpTNc5eKrKtprJo via KZbin

[@rocoe9019]

@@michaelbariso3192 I don't mean because of the subject matter, I mean because people don't come to the comment section to read an essay

[@michaelbariso3192]

@@rocoe9019 If the stars and galaxies were in a past dimension of space-time you wouldn't be able to see them unless you traveled back in time. Without a potential energy source light, images and gravity immediately stops. Explain where the energy is coming from to produce light, images and gravity in the past dimension of space-time for 14 billion years. Ignorance is not knowing and doing, stupidity is knowing and doing anyway