What if the USSR Never Existed

[@andreascarabelli826]

Rare images of italian mapper not making a video about ww2:

[@Ajochi]

Yeah there's a wW2

[@shorenadarcmelidze7199]

Ahh wild nature

[@gabrielbernardes9290]

Too soon

[@andreascarabelli826]

Bruh, he made 3/4 of the video about ww2 💀💀💀 he tricked us

[@Galacticuser]

He also not talking about cold war and modern world ☠️

[@bogdancirovic1217]

Just so you know, the only reason the Soviets lost against Finland is beacuse Stalin purged his good generals, while the Tsar wouldn't do that. Just some food for thought...

[@Italian_Mapper]

Russia didn't industrilize with the monarchy so the army had a serious disadvantage, and the tsar would possibly get not as professional generals

[@FuntimeVictimerFNAFBR]

​@@Italian_MapperThe industry of the Russian Empire in the First World War Despite the ordeals during the First World War, the industry of the Russian Empire continued to grow. Compared to 1913, industrial production grew by 21.5%. For example, in the same time period, industrial production in the UK decreased by 11%, and in Germany it decreased as much as 36%.[17] At the same time, the volume of engineering production in Russia increased 4.76 times over these three years, metal processing 3.01 times, the chemical industry 2.52 times[18] Also, in 1915-1917, a large-scale modernization of industry was carried out, and, unlike the pre-war period, most part of the equipment was produced by domestic enterprises. On the eve of the revolution, the country's national income was 16.4 billion rubles (7.4% of the world total). According to this indicator, the Russian Empire ranked fourth after the United States, Germany and the British Empire.[20] According to Orlov, Georgieva, Georgiev the development of industry reached the peak both in quantitative and in qualitative terms towards the end of the existence of the Russian Empire, on the eve of the February Revolution.[citation needed] Subsequent industrialization was carried out in the USSR in the late 1920s using administrative-command methods based on five-year plans under totalitarianism.[21] By Wikipedia. If the RI survived,It would be far stronger than the soviet Union in 1939.

[@FuntimeVictimerFNAFBR]

​@@Italian_MapperThe February and October Revolutions in 1917 ignited hope in the Grand Duchy of Finland. After the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II on 2 March (15 March N.S.) 1917, the personal union between Russia and Finland lost its legal base - at least according to the view in Helsinki - as he was the Grand Duke of Finland. Negotiations began between the Russian Provisional Government and Finnish authorities. -wikipedia. So yeah,there would not be an winter War on the First place without the abdication of Nich II.

[@FuntimeVictimerFNAFBR]

​​@@Italian_Mapperwrong, Stalin purged even people like tukhachevsky (So skilled that he was known as the Red Napoleon),so even If the Tsar didnt have many skilled generals,It would be better to have them than to have people with no experience. Aside from the fact that there would be no winter War,ofc. Edit: actually, the RI wouldnt have purged people like tukhachevsky,so yeah,still more powerful than the soviets.

[@bogdancirovic1217]

​@@Italian_MapperBtw Russia was industrializing under the monarchy with Tsar Nicholas II. Yes, the process would be slower, but it would be better in the long term as the Tsar wouldn't get rid of the kulaks like the Soviets did. Again, just some food for thought...

[@TheT-90thatstaresintoyoursoul]

I’ll just have to assume February was cut out, given it was already the Russian Republic by the time of Lenins revolution

[@Bolitadewien]

Iba a comentar eso

[@matthiuskoenig3378]

6:03 unrealistic, Tsarist russia was industrialising faster than USSR. this is because the USSR killed and imprissoned Russia's most experianced and effective industrialists, and exiled foreign aide. A Tsarist Russia would not only continue to rapidly expand their industry due to both their own internal industrialists and investment from the british, french and americans, like IRL. but it would be even higher than pre-ww1 levels as the Tsarists recignised during the first world war that their industry was not sufficient and one of their goals was to further increase their rate of industrialisation. But ALSO a Tsarist russia in the timeline provided would have war reparations, almost certainly in the form of industrial investment, due to staying in the war and being on the winning side. AND it wouldn't have the damage to repair from civil war that the USSR had. furthermore, it has been calculated that the disarerous soviet policies like collectivisation pushed back their ecconomic development by atleast 24%. even the most conservative estimates for the size of Tsarist industry in the 1940s is still slightly larger than the USSR in the OTL. and that's assuming a reduction of ecconomic development. a maintaining of Tsarist growth leads to about 33-50% more industry in 1940 than the USSR. and using extrapolations based off of similar ecconomies to the Tsarist russia that maintained a market ecconomy we see one potentially double the indsutrialisation of the USSR (depending on how far they go) one of the reasons the germans were eager for war with russia in ww1 was because they wanted to beat them before they overtook the germans ecconomically and industrially. (main source: Ricón, José Luis, “The Soviet Union: From farm to factory. Stalin's Industrial Revolution”, Nintil (2017-02-04)) the other major unrealistic elements: 1) the success of the germans against the ussr at the begining was largely a result of the USSR's forward deployment of their divisions allowing easy large encirclements at the start of the war and the dismanteling of the 'stalin line' as the ussr shifted to a more agressive stance to the germans. If the Tsarists are less industrial then there is noway they would do this shift, ie in your scenario they would still do better. 2) without loss of land to the soviets poland would not gain territory from germany. the allies gave german territory to poland after ww2 as compensation for land lost to the ussr. furthermore the western allies were against forced migration. 2.1) speaking of poland, if they were in a commonwealth treaty with Russia they would not have gotten the polish corridor or atleast Danzig would remain part of germany that was set up to give poland access to the sea via a friendly/free port. since Russia is the friendly port in this timeline that doesn't happen. there is also no way that poland gains eastern Galicia, as russia already annexed that during the war (proclaiming liberation of the Ruthenians of Galicia), there is no way a Russia on the side of the victorious powers would seceed that without a fight, speaking of... 2.2) there is no way the polish win against the russians so quickly or at all. historically the polsih BARELY defeated a soviet invasion. the russian army would be stronger, and the poles would have less time to prepare, and the russians wouldn't be invading but already deployed in their country. You also have the intervension of the league of nations who will be interested in actually keeping the peace since they are not overtly anti-russian (OTL they were anti-soviet) 3) Assuming Russia even breaks up into Ukraine/etc (already unlikely, those only broke away from ussr after the soviet coup in the 90s, they originally voted to stay united with Russia) Crimea would be part of Russia. it was only transfered to Ukraine by the USSR. no USSR means no Ukrainian Crimea. Without USSR it is either independant or part of russia. 4) Russia would have been brought back as a monarchy just like other occupied monarchies. if it changes to a republic later on thats another story. 5) the ww1 peacedeal is just in general unrealistic for a 1919 surrender. 1919 surrender means massive american involvement, meaning more american say in how the peacedeals go down. meaning the 14 points are actually followed. so no sudentenland in Czechsolovakia, Italy doesn't get all of South Tirol, only the italian population bit. no Carpatho Ruthenia in Slovakia (but part of russia), a less harsh treaty for hungary. no prevention of austria and germany uniting. this more conistant peace, and no ussr takes alot of wind out of nazi sails. its likely that germany becomes monarchist or austrio-fascist rather than nazis. they are also unlikely to start ww2 at all. 5.1) ww2 is much more likely to be the result of a french civil war being escalted by italy. the french almost had a civil war in the 1940s and only the threat of germany united them. without an agressive germany, the french fall into civil war, probably while the spainish one is still on going. and the italians intervene. 6) then there is the question of if the tsarist government can even survive staying in ww1.

[@jamessparkes4215]

Bro I agree with u 100% but no way anyone reading that

[@TerraSlimeS]

This might be THE Historian.

[@Jisk1zz]

Man, if you really think that RE would industrialize faster, than USSR, I have very sad news. Up to the Bolsheviks, Russia was a backward agrarian country, since the tsars did not benefit from any industrialization. That is why the First World War was so devastatingly lost by the Russian side.but I completely agree with your statement that this video has flaws. The Russian Empire after the Second World War would not only have been unable to maintain power, it would have collapsed in a similar way to 1917. because there were no purges of the staff, which removed traitors and ineffective persons from their posts

[@nazalostizsrbije]

Truth is it is likely Russian economic development would slow down

[@MortalHumanDefinetlyNotARobot]

Woah!

[@rittyrizzani5705]

Small Error: The Treaty of London which made Italy join the war was known only by Italy, Russia, France and the UK, with no Russian Revolution, the Treaty of London would have remained a secret and so, the USA would not have opposed the Italian claim to all of Dalmatia.

[@Subedeiy]

Автор даже не старался. Просто сделал историю ПМВ и ВМВ, только зачеркнул СССР и написал Российскую империю.

[@НикитаЛебедев-з8л]

А смысл? Мобилизовать треть населения может каждый, не только вождь народов божий сын Сталин. Так что РИ не как не отличится от СССР

[@Jisk1zz]

​@@НикитаЛебедев-з8лникак не отличается, говоришь? Ну-ну, 95% всего что построено в снг, было построено большевиками, а не самодержавным царьком всея Руси.

[@ShukshinGamer]

Он ещё забыл Российскую Республику 💀💀💀

[@comrade1991-u8k]

​@@НикитаЛебедев-з8лДа вы что?) Николай Второй, Во-первых, у власти уже не был к моменту революции, но допустим что это альтернатива, но вот если он подавил восстание то это не значит, что страна бы изменилась)) Не было бы ни индустриализации, ни строительства школ, ни бесплатной общедоступной медицины, да и образования. А армия вообще позор, первую мировую не отстояла, вторую подавно не отстояла бы. Сама же ВМВ вообще смех, якобы союзники победили бы Германию сами, когда СССР задержал на себе 80% армии и убил всю промышленность Германии. В общем и целом битву за Британию Германия выиграла бы и война союзниками была бы проиграна. Автор видео идиот, ни истории не знает, ни альтернативы нормальной сделать не сможет.

[@НикитаЛебедев-з8л]

@@comrade1991-u8k Ладно бро, ты коммунист мы тебя поняли. перестань смотреть вестника бури

[@ВладЛеньо]

The provisional government left the chat.

[@TEDAC771]

Yea and anti war revolts plus supply problems food shortages morale problems even before the soviets the army wasn't in fighting condition they were killing officers and deserting plus even tho nick was deposed in March this doesn't show that

[@DakuHonoo]

6:03 "Russia is not fully industrialized because of the Monarchy, their army is wiped out" I thought similar back at the botched winter war with Finland but if Russia was under-industrialized then how the did the reich manage to do as well as in reality without the secret military cooperation with the USSR?

[@NickAndriadze]

That is a good point, but don't forget about Stalin's 5 year plan. The nation industrialized so lightning-fast, that it became the fastest growing economy in the world. USSR overall had much better and more effective conscriptions than Tsarist Russia ever had or could ever have. Their horrible initial performance in WWII could be attributed to a combination of many severe factors, from unpreparedness and initial confusion of the Soviets contrasted with the extreme professionalism and speed of Barbarossa and the Soviet military purges, placing its army in a disadvantageous position and giving Stalin very little time to reform the army, in the one year downtime between the Winter War & Nazi Invasion

[@A-Flano]

If anything the Russians would likely be stronger by the time WW2 came around than the Soviet Union was, especially given the show trial purges. This would've seen them likely do better against blitzkrieg, potentially stopping the German advance roughly aroudn about Minsk and along the river in Latvia, and stopping them at the Dnipro, also they'd do much better against Finland without the purges

[@Hamstorian]

Without the soviets, the Russians wouldn't have Industrialized Fast enough to stop the germans.

[@BAHLANsarrola222]

Russian empire would mobilize even more given that many died in the civil war​@bwmasterr

[@under6075]

what about industrialization? stopping the German advance around minsk the latvia river and dnipro might require the russians to be industrialized enough

[@randomdude5187]

With the monarchy in Russia they would be much more corrupt than the USSR and will not dare thinking about industrialization which would lead to Russia losing the war.

[@Naranjita-my8zh]

A big army is useless if for example, you have 1 million man but your industry can only supoply 1 thousand even with better generals

[@DutchyOfAston]

Damn, these videos are the best for my friends and i to watch! Keep making these videos mn ❤

[@samuelenriquealvarezhernan8088]

The history would be another if that had happened. Not only in Europe, but in the entire world.

[@Mrjestin]

7:31 RIP Nicolas II, cause of death were *killed by german soldier* 🫡

[@Italian_Mapper]

possible

[@huxi-YO]

Ohhhhh he died in 1917

[@Hamstorian]

@@Italian_Mapper It could me More Likely he Died of old Age in the city of Perm.

[@under6075]

@@Hamstorian how old would he have been by the time of the 1940's because old age seems far more likely

[@Hamstorian]

@@under6075 Exactly.

[@vexillologymaster]

1:45 We shall never forget the dreadful asd event.

[@Fog799]

7:23 it happened twice too such a devastating tragedy

[@greatlakesfederation2033]

Petition for Italian Mapper to do WW1 Fuhrerreich 👇

[@virus99i75]

Unrealistic af but still good

[@Hamstorian]

What's so Unrealistic About the scenario?

[@LHIF29]

​@@Hamstorianthe german defeats in ww2

[@AntonBoymer]

​​@@HamstorianRussia's loss in the war with Poland and the Baltic States and in the winter war. If there had not been a civil war in Russia, then these countries would have had no chance of victory. And also, if the monarchy had been preserved, Russia would have received Constantinople and the lands of Germany and Austria-Hungary under the terms of the Versailles Peace. And the Allied victory over the Third Reich after the defeat of Russia was impossible

[@TEDAC771]

Also the fact he started in November yet nicholas is still emperor​@@Hamstorian

[@fun_production228xd]

6:53 Волгоград при монархии назывался Царицын, а Санкт-Петербург с начала первой мировой Петроград так-как Санкт-Петербург звучал слишком по немецкий

[@Italian_Mapper]

The excuse of this being an alternate timeline could justify why they were named that way but you are right

[@fun_production228xd]

@@Italian_Mapper мне кажется, что в подобных видео события до момента старта, видео должны идти так же, как и в реальности

[@AwwsomeHistoryYT]

3:34 this wouldn’t be a Italian Mapper vid without WW2

[@kluszeq]

What if Italy didn't join Russia, France and Great Britain and stayed in the Central Powers

[@小咪咪-w2n]

France allying with Germany makes no sense

[@Italian_Mapper]

they still lose italy is weak

[@skyguyxninja5650]

how do you know @@Italian_Mapper

[@GuiM2]

​@@Italian_MapperI think this would help the Central Powers positionally, since Austria-Hungary wouldn't need to send thousands of soldiers to the Italian front, and could help more on the western front, adding 100k soldiers to a front changes a lot

[@skyguyxninja5650]

Yes, probably France was not able to hold the line@@GuiM2

[@Mrjestin]

This would happened if nicolas II actually learn how to control the country

[@ChhonyeeGoh-gy4ib]

Also he had no idea how to run he was 18!

[@Lqg7379]

He was doing stuff you would do at 10 years old

[@JellyBrick.7745]

​@19Southpaw-_-33 Nicholas was an extremely soft and indecisive ruler, he lacked the determination of Nicholas I. He also had absolutely no desire to listen to the State Duma, Although ideas for the development of the country were promoted there, he did not address the people and blindly believed that he was still loyal to the monarchy.

[@AscendShadow]

rare non ww2 scenario

[@Mainecks]

Sorry for my english Video is cool but very unrealistic Bolshevik revolution is impossible without February revolution, because their popularity began to grown only after mistakes of the provisional government. If February revolution didn't happen, then Russian army discipline isn't falling. Russian Empire planned major offensive in 1917. I think in that scenario, Great war would have ended in autumn 1917 - summer 1918. Also polish and romanian army couldnt resist russian army Loser of World War II Russia is really fuuny, because Russian economy and army potential without Civil War is mooooore beter than Soviet

[@FuntimeVictimerFNAFBR]

And another unrealistic part is independent Finland, since they were in a personal union with Russia.

[@RraaiRoznieks]

Probably best timeline. No 30,000,000 dead at the hands of the communists. Great quality and work! Amazing!

[@knn310]

And no cold war (I think) no Chechen war no catastrophic 1990s and no Ukrainian war no Korean war no communist china.Russia is probably more liberal no Stalin purge no deportation no holodomor

[@spartacus936]

Do you realize that Hitler won the Second World War in this timeline, right?

[@RraaiRoznieks]

@@spartacus936 and? They were never remotely bad as the communist genocidal regime. The Germans were liberators, and you are clearly not educated when you say that "Hitler" and not A nation won. When that happens I know you're brainwashed

[@spartacus936]

​​@@RraaiRoznieksLol, you said that the Germans were liberators, and I'm the brainwashed one? Sure bro, as you say I guess.

[@joekaputt4415]

​@@RraaiRoznieks Germans wanted to genocide slavs and jews but soviets also accidentally genocided slavs and jews

[@RraaiRoznieks]

I think Russia being non-communist would probably influence all of europe. A lot of national socialist ideology in Germany was focused around The struggle against the slavic hordes and especially communism. A lot of the ideology came from White émigrés from the russian civil war, especially Baltic Germans, spreading their ideas of the communists. Now they wouldnt flee, since the communists didnt win. It would probably be a significant change. Since now Germany wouldnt have a politcaly polar oppoisite enemy (the USSR) its ideology would change. A lot of Hitler's cabinet, especially before coming to power, were monarchists and nationalists.

[@FunnySpaceMan.]

I don't like this, you basically just replaced the USSR with the Russian Empire and the only difference being you made their army a little weaker.

[@AlgerianGuy-xf9lp]

Cry about it

[@FunnySpaceMan.]

@AlgerianGuy-xf9lp Really? You're just going to ignore my entire complaint with a "Cry about it?" At least respond with "I Disagree."

[@AlgerianGuy-xf9lp]

@@FunnySpaceMan. 🤓🤓🤓🤓

[@FunnySpaceMan.]

@AlgerianGuy-xf9lp Okay so you just cannot be communicated with.

[@GabrielRuiz-pl2cj]

Okay he can do whatever he wants but stop acting like a kid bro

[@TheRomanMapper]

That was pretty good 👍

[@DeviousPlaceholder]

5:45 Since Russian Empire is NOT Communist, Germany would probably be okay with it. Another way for this to happen if Russia joined the War with their old Ally United Kingdom. Molotov Pact wouldn’t exist either

[@Гречка-и7е]

1st-bolsheviks lost to poles because they fighted a CIVIL WAR at that time. without the civil war there will be no other fronts to fight, meaning that ALL of russian army will fight the poles, romanians etc. assuming that russian army demobilized onto pre-war level, poles will have to fight 1m-1.5m soldiers. THEY ARE NOT SURVIVING. Also, Finland was in a personal union with Russia, so I dont see any point in resisting till Nickolas dies. 2nd-Russia would still get industrialized, because after the recovery of the economy, the GIANT potential of the most populous european nation with little industry will come in hand, and foreign companies will invest in RE. 3rd-Winter war was a humiliation of the soviets because soviets purged the army. HALF OF THE OFFICERS AND GENERALS WERE PURGED. Without purges happening, I can't see Finland survive 4th-Due to RE being a part of a global economical system, I can say that Russia would be interested in containing nazi germany cuz the war will hurt russian economy by destroying a european market pretty much. 5th-if Russia falls, then germany has ALL resources they need. Allies would not emerge victorious, they would need to sign a peace treaty with them cuz 3 MILLION german soldiers will be guarding the coasts of atlantic, leaving no chance for d-day.

[@SamSam-df4ow]

what if free territory won and russia fell into anarchy

[@DreerKarler]

how could the free territory win?

[@DreerKarler]

maype just suddenly uprising

[@SirArny]

"wanna break from the ww2 videos?" Get your Italian membership now!

[@hackerverde9999]

Where is kerensky 💀

[@imgreen311]

Finally, Mapper Have a WW1 Video

[@ВладиславВалерьевич-в7о]

Да да,Россия выстояла на 2 фронта в первой мировой, но проиграла каким-то бомжам с палками под руководством Пилсудского.

[@lolitzdefaltboy5063]

No offense, but the Baltics would remain Russian and Poland is given semi-autonomy, Russia will gain Galicia from Austria-Hungary and incorporate it into the Semi-Autonomous Poland, and Germany loses all of East Prussia to Russia basically destroying any hopes of German revenge

[@Tennesseeball]

Technically, even if the Russian Empire had never turned communist, it would have suffered domestic violence and turmoil for years to come. Without the Five-Year Plans to industrialize their economy, Germany would have had a much easier time conquering Russia, assuming a similar path in an alternate history. However, the purges made by the Soviets in the real timeline wouldn't happen either in this scenario.

[@lechopuT]

February revolution: ...

[@DavidHoaglandOfficial]

Why is The Führer's Portrait blurred?

[@Italian_Mapper]

to avoid further complications with youtube policies

[@DavidHoaglandOfficial]

@@Italian_Mapper I wonder why youtube has these policies...

[@Speed249]

​@@DavidHoaglandOfficial Because they are trying to censor and erase history, you know so that the little ones never know about this.

[@francisesquilon4712]

Remember history shall not be censored its a sign of direspect of the historical leaders

[@Posidon09]

​@Italian_Mapper, it's stupid by KZbin to censor history. I get it if it's gory, but just a picture of a man being blurred is unnecessary, not like it's your fault, but it's KZbin

[@sinfoxtre2501]

Бро, в октябре 1917 Николай 2 не был у власти. Монархия пала уже в феврале. Ну и странно вообще, что Россия проиграла Польше, Румынии и не смогла подавить восстание в Прибалтике, хотя до этого одолела Германию, несравненно более сильную. Еще в стране при отсутствии гражданской войны не было бы таких человеческих потерь, а также не был бы разорен экономический потенциал. В 1930 не было бы такой жесткой коллективизации и индустриализации, а наоборот: все прошло бы довольно гладко. Соответственно, не следовало бы ожидать и репрессий против офицерства, то есть к войне Россия была бы куда лучше подготовлена как в плане экономики, так и в плане армии. И поражение в Великой Отечественной в таком случае представляется очень нереалистичным. Да, командная экономика и советский тоталитарный режим, без сомнения, поспособствовали победе в войне, но делать эту роль решающей странно, при учете уже перечисленных плюсов.

[@НикитаЛебедев-з8л]

Пусть и так, за то будем жить нормально, без "величия"

[@Litwinoo]

Fun fact: in the time of World War I the Tsar Nicolas II promised Poland to be independent state if the war will end

[@epiceratos2051]

How about cold war scenario?

[@Italian_Mapper]

Maybe

[@Hamstorian]

@@Italian_Mapper Man! do it! that be great!!

[@agent6599]

Great video bro. Could you do a modern day scenario USA vs the world with US victory? I feel like that’d be fun to watch. Appreciate your work

[@zeng552]

Т.к это был уже не срветский союз , то он не мог так же колопсироваться , во 1 у россий федариции бы не было такой системы как республик , что государство состояло бы союз нескольких других , по этому белорусь и украина вообще не как не могли бы отсоедениться без вооруженного востания , что мало вероятно, тк тут бы не развивалась эдэнтичнойсть отдельных народов как в ссср , где напримую они назывались белорось и ураина. И так же причиной колапса экономики СССР был сильный военный бюджет , что при демократичной России было бы мало вероятно, т.к не было бы холодно войны и правешему верху это было сложне.А тут даже холодной войны не может быть и речь , т.к России не контролирует даже близко таких теритой варшавского договора , что не говорить о поддержке режимов коммунистов по всему миру.Так же маловероятен был бы приход Путина и Ельцина к власти без колапса

[@Poland_Ball_Fan]

"Germany speedruns the battle of france"

[@tinytubby]

4:29 germany Speedruns the Battle of France 🤣

[@RobertAnderson-o6l]

So in other words, almost nothing changes

[@BelarusianPolkovnik]

Where you did animation?

[@Italian_Mapper]

paint .net

[@barbara1126]

Do a video of WW1:Red Flood (Every days)

[@Italian_Mapper]

Red Flood is too chaotic and i just quit making those scenarios 😿

[@SamHorseherd2209]

I'll admit, of all the things I saw happening, Tsar Nicolas the II working with Hitler was not one of the things I thought I'd see here.

[@PatricktheWatermelonCat]

What is the speech in 7:12-7:32

[@Pojospom]

''Do you want a total war?'' - Joseph Goebels

[@sus6943]

If Nicholas was taught by his father or at least installed a constitutional monarchy and other things to avoid a revolution:

[@NickAndriadze]

*2:15* I know the stereotype of Romania just yoinking random territories all over the place, but they really, really, REALLY would have never attacked the Russian Empire. Not only is it Russia's huge success over Austria-Hungary that they even managed to obtain Transylvania and practically double their territory, but also it's because of the Russian Empire that they _even managed to exist as an independent state TO BEGIN WITH._ It would never happen, or at the very least, it would be a prick move from the Romanian side... And I'd doubt such a large scale war immediately after WWI would sit well with the Entente, whom which Russia is still an ally!

[@iOSHelper.]

Damn bro ur so good ❤

[@Italian_Mapper]

Thanks

[@fictionalinanutshell]

Basically in this scenario, Carpia is independent, we have BIG BIG poland and prussia is srill there

[@rickgg6554]

Why is there two permire vids

[@Italian_Mapper]

yes

[@Sergentrap]

Кто нибудь может сказать людям, что гражданская война была после Октябрьской революции, а Российская империя перестала существовать, став республикой после Февральской революции. И в смерти империи Ленин не имеет никакого окончания

[@miguelhs6045]

What? How realistic they countered the revolution this easily? Just asking Of course I read the name of the video, but... how?

[@Italian_Mapper]

Well I cam't say in details but as the Tsar its still in charge it means the february revolution didnt happen meaning that hw was able to satisfy the people allowing the mass to not rebel

[@miguelhs6045]

@@Italian_Mapper well... this is plausible, so nice imagination ;)

[@Qued_]

You should expand this 👍

[@spartathemapper]

Good video!

[@Iter_fire_guy]

You have NO RIZZ, you pull ZERO maidens, your Jordan are FAKE, and the cool guy sticker isn't even that COOL. (edit) Btw this is pure irony I do NOT watch skibidi toilet or something

[@thegermanicunionmapping]

😭

[@randommappr.]

💀

[@VinoProduction192]

What💀

[@RAIBISHU]

💀

[@BritishEditor1922]

I’m worried for the next generation

[@SrTicMC]

I don’t think that Vladimir Putin would be born in this reality.

[@hellheaven-dy2bz]

I have a complaint How in the world will allies win the war without russia i mean if russia collapsed at ww2 it means the world will collapse aswell

[@AniruddhSingh-fc1xz]

It would take much time and casualties than in real life but allies would win with the help of usa and british empire

[@hellheaven-dy2bz]

@AniruddhSingh-fc1xz british is a joke they wonot even be able to mobilise their much inexperienced troops being recruited in the homeland and american troops compared to those german soldier who are the most experienced of all soldiers of that age ofcourse they will be cooked this overestimating american power needs to be stopped america won cause germany was fighting on 2 sides each front they were fighting on had more soldiers than their army

[@kdtorres-ce1vy]

Alternative Title:"If Tsar Nicholas was competent in WW1"💀

[@Pie-fk9rp]

Bro thinks that Russian Empire is the Soviet Union ☠️

[@Italian_Mapper]

a

[@Person-who-likes-history]

​@Italian_Mapper Wise words

[@David201-o]

ASD 1:50 But by the way why Nicolas II of Russia is not dead

[@Fog799]

I like how we still end up with putin lmfao

[@irl4767]

İ have a interesting question can you explain what happen to western armenia aka eastern anatolia is turks managed conquer it or russia still kept territories after poland romania vs russia war

[@Italian_Mapper]

russia lost it

[@PurpleBroadcast]

Me thinking Greater Romania will survive only for it to end in the same fate as reality

[@History-and-stuff]

What if the world was extremely based:

[@caiusoof]

I would feel that by 1940, Nicholas would be dead as he would be over 70 years old. Alexei would have taken his place by then as tsar

[@iraklikachakhidze6191]

Can you do a video: What if Austria-Hungary participated in WW2?

[@viciousgaming52]

7:21 asd?

[@BurcasLurton]

The Russian Empire becomes the Russian Republic in 15 March 1917

[@fattnnDgrit]

Can you make about WW3 between Germany and puppets on europe and africa vs Japan and its allies (maybe Pacific Country) if Axis Won WW2?

[@Italian_Mapper]

Maybe

[@ledieudesdieux4353]

@@Italian_Mapper With two scenarios ?

[@RK_BDR_TIMP]

Provisional Government of All Russia: Am I a joke for you?

[@skyguyxninja5650]

L ending

[@Italian_Mapper]

Bro why 😿

[@Dwight.DEisenHower]

Wehraboo

[@skyguyxninja5650]

because its weird@@Italian_Mapper

[@skyguyxninja5650]

And when Germany conquered all of the Caucasus and the land before the Volga river, Russia should really have surrended at this point. And we all should know Russia would have not been so strong as the UdSSR

[@courtneyrivera-mw2ot]

@@skyguyxninja5650 ok then 🤓🤓🤓

[@FilippoNazarenoPANTALLA]

not the German add that sponsors War Thunder Showing a Panzer 2A5 Main Battle Tank😭😭😭💀💀💀

[@Moskovskiy_YouTuber]

ммм, речь Сталина на 6:33 У нас же нету тут СССР

[@Italian_Mapper]

Its cool

[@animationwarbygear8422]

So, which country will be enemy’s usa in cold war

[@Italian_Mapper]

Maybe russia would still be hostile or some other organziation but hard to say

[@SPSR2005KZ]

румыния врядли бы напал на РИ

[@FireThePirate]

where did comrade Nicholas go after 1942?

[@Italian_Mapper]

deposed

[@elitedima9672]

So... just like real world then?

[@C.A._Old]

*There is no russian empire after feb 1917 Revolution. Where is Russian Republic? :'D*

[@Italian_Mapper]

*if i started the video in february everyone would quit so have it that way*

[@IAmJustAChillGuyBro]

I want to watch this video already pls release it

[@lyudmilaismayilova8937]

I dont think so moldova exist in this timeline they are would incorporate to romania

[@Onio_700]

@Italian_Mapper Romania was promissed after ww1 bessarabia and Bukowina

[@Italian_Mapper]

not bessarabia only transylvania and bukovina

[@batty4103]

Romania was not going to lose North Bucovina and Bessarabia if Russia constantly failed on a counter attack

[@NavalTroll]

Nice video! Can you make the pt3 of ww2 struggle on Europe? I've been waiting for months for the next pt.

[@Italian_Mapper]

Thanks but struggle of europe is not a series that i still persue since the idea became too chaotic and the views range isn't much high

[@gottalivehappy]

Would nato even exist in this timeline

[@tolstoy4328]

1 germany not can win russian empire 2 if germany win allies too not can win.

[@Damjandrawmations1723]

Ah, yes Asd the best description...

[@You302]

𝓘𝓽’𝓼 𝓞𝓷𝓵𝔂 𝓪𝓷 𝓜𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓸𝓯 𝓣𝓲𝓶𝓮 Before Germany Collapses 0:23

[@ДмитрийАлексеевич-л7р]

Мне кажется, у СССР и РИ свои особенности. СССР как будто лучше справлялся с крупными войнами, или с войнами с крупными державами: (Японская Империя. Третий Рейх. Италия. США в небольших анти-колониальных второстепенных войнах без посредственного участия) однако плохо воевал против Финляндии, и Афганистана. РИ как будто хорошо справлялась с покорением Средне Азиатских стран, подавлением восстаний в Варшавском Герцогстве

[@LindaGodfrey-or5jo]

Why did the tsar not change

[@TEDAC771]

I dont think theyd still fight just bc theres no commuism doesn't mean theres no anti war sentiment

[@TEDAC771]

Plus you forgot that the russian general deposed nicholas in March seeing you started in November that's a big inaccuracy

[@TEDAC771]

Also the Russians don't suddenly stop having a supply food and army problem In general bc of no ussr there would be slight advances forcing a peace on Russia

[@HypergamingYT512]

Bro the only reason why Poland won against the USSR is because the entente helped Poland against the USSR since the USSR was communist but since the Russian empire was monarchist they would win the war against Poland

[@HypergamingYT512]

The same is with the baltics

[@HypergamingYT512]

Also no purges

[@HypergamingYT512]

And since the allies in this timeline where allies with the Russian empire, Russia would start to mobilize and win the war against Germany

[@Hamptercheese1]

Fps?

[@SndndnxnCnfnfnd]

Why is Hitler's face blurred

[@Italian_Mapper]

to avoid hate speech strike

[@sevimcelik861]

Nice video

[@theu.k.traveler6401]

Why capital was moved back to Moscow

[@Dusceonia5165]

I have an interesting question: How the hell did the allies manage to win in this scenario!? If the Germans prevailed in the western front they could have wiped out the rest of the allies in Europe in just a few months! Or alternatively, The allies would have signed an armistice with the Germans after the defeat of Russia! That part of the video will always be a mystery to me.

[@Italian_Mapper]

idk maybe i exagerated