I look forward to your weekly Q/A much is learned in a short period of time . Thank you both for what you do for us
@ericgriffith35796 күн бұрын
Two interpretations of “not under the law”: - Not under obligation to keep it - Not under condemnation for breaking it Romans 8 verses 1-8. “No condemnation” for those - “who are in Christ Jesus” AND - “who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit” Jesus came “so that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled” WHERE? “IN US”! We’re supposed to keep God’s law but we need the help of His Spirit to do that. Thank you for doing these Q&A, I learn a lot from them!
@YoYoSullivan9 күн бұрын
Love Q&A’s they are a very effective way for me to learn and recap what I already know, especially helpful with my ADD to keep things varied, suits my brain very well lol😅
@Amajwi10 күн бұрын
Thank you
@WellinChrist9 күн бұрын
God bless the IIW team!!!❤❤🙏🙏
@ElenaChristinne9 күн бұрын
These are so much fun! ❤ Happy Sabbath
@JerryVegoika-mu6hk7 күн бұрын
Amen 🙏🏽
@juliegreen79116 күн бұрын
Our names are written in the Lambs book of life and I think he recreates us from the dust, just like the prophecy of the dry bones... Resurrection
@Richard4Torah8 күн бұрын
No law no covenant,
@sandypratt89519 күн бұрын
🙏✝️🙏👍
@A-childOfGod-pp4ge10 күн бұрын
Daniel and Jeremiah’s prophecy in Daniel 9 was also spoken about in 2 Chronicles : 2 Chronicles 36: 20 “And they that were left by the sworde, caryed he away to Babel, and they were seruants to him and to his sonnes, vntill the kingdome of the Persians had rule, 21To fulfill the worde of the Lord by the mouth of Ieremiah, vntill the lande had her fill of her Sabbaths: for all the dayes that she lay desolate, she kept Sabbath, to fulfill seuentie yeeres.” Pre 1599 Geneva Bible
@tonimurphy852110 күн бұрын
Why are you speeding up the video can’t understand what you’re saying
@poppycorn95799 күн бұрын
Check your playback speed, you probably sped it up by accident
@Carlos_Dee_M6 күн бұрын
22:02 So, what you're technically saying is that in heaven, God will give you a "certificate of divorce?" C'mon, stop your nonsense. Look at the wording: "marriage or given in marriage". Context is "in heaven". Your spouse will always be your spouse. What the text is saying is that in eternity, there will be no new marriages. The only 2 institutions established before sin were marriage and the Sabbath. So, in eternity, we will keep only 1 of those 2 institutions? You can't pick and choose what's written in God's word.
@binnapazio994410 күн бұрын
Question. Is the bible we are using at the moment the original one? Muslims claim that the true bible was changed by the romans to fit their view. How do we go about this claims?
@my1vice7 күн бұрын
Can God not protect His Word? If your answer is no, you have larger issues to deal with.
@binnapazio99447 күн бұрын
Expound on this pls@@my1vice
@binnapazio99447 күн бұрын
Pst Brandshaw to help me with this quiz
@ericgriffith35796 күн бұрын
Just to clarify, there are modern translations that omit to gloss over important things, so comparing versions and using a concordance is good when studying to understand.
@ejsimms49609 күн бұрын
Surprise and greatly disappointed by your take on tithing
@markhauserbible71689 күн бұрын
The problem with your EXACT date of 457 BC cannot be proven. The next problem is you cannot prove Jesus died in 31 AD. Then you compound the problem by saying the 70th week ended in 34 AD, without any biblical proof. This is called ADDING TO Gods word. So, here is the TRUE interpretation of Dan 9:27. First of all there are TWO covenants. Heb 8:6-10. So, WHO is this that CONFIRMS? 1Cor 1:6,8/ Gal 3:17. ITS JESUS. So, ask yourself, has Jesus stopped confirming believers into the Kingdom? Of course, not. So, the 70th week of Daniel REPRESENTS the Church age. (Just like Rev20 the 1000 years) It's been 2000 years.