Waza is a Better choice. Having the buffer ensures No Tone Suck "aka" Loss of High-end Sparkle over longer cable lengths.
@revelationsoundstudio8 жыл бұрын
The Waza version has better electronics including a better buffer, bypass option, and I personally like the light on the Waza and color over the original.
@michael_caz_nyc7 жыл бұрын
Me too
@TheTinMan1236 жыл бұрын
There’s a huge difference in price, cosmetically the Waza looks better, but I stick with the tu3 cause it’s a cracking tuner,
@poseidon50033 жыл бұрын
It has a better bypass circuit. And brighter leds for easier viewing on stage. But you're right. I like my TU-3 as well. And the little rolling red led graphic that lets you know that this string IS in tune.
@mouthmw Жыл бұрын
@@poseidon5003 you can turn that function on the Waza version as well (Accu-Pitch). I'm using it on mine, it's a neat little extra confirmation.
So I can buy a TU-3 for £55, or I can buy a TU-3w for £128. From what I see you are buying cosmetic looks and a class A buffer for more than double the price...how can the Waza be that much more expensive. I do not understand.....?
@Mcsteveberry4 жыл бұрын
dude just get the tu-3
@edparker35494 жыл бұрын
@@Mcsteveberry I did...dont regret it either
@wumark61877 жыл бұрын
Which is good?
@MrTergazzi7 жыл бұрын
At least you'll find the standard one on a dark stage.
that's it... you pay the double for a nicer look...
@spicecrop5 жыл бұрын
No it's not double moron, and the Waza has a higher quality buffer and a switch to have buffer or true bypass, it's also faster and has a better display.